An oil refinery is seen before the arrival of Hurricane Harvey on August 25, 2017 in Corpus Christi, Texas. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Aug 17, 2018
Chemical manufacturers must immediately comply with the Chemical Disaster Rule, a set of requirements aimed at keeping communities safe from toxic disasters, following a federal court ruling on Friday which called the Trump administration's delay of the rule "arbitrary" and illegal.
"This is a victory first and foremost for the neighborhoods most susceptible to dangerous and toxic chemical releases. Families who live under the shadows of chemical facilities deserve safer practices to prevent future disasters," said Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
\u201cJUST IN: In another big court loss for EPA, D.C. Circuit throws out rule delaying Obama-era safety standards for chemical facilities\u201d— Amanda Reilly (@Amanda Reilly) 1534514639
\u201cReading through the opinion, and D.C. Circuit does not mince words: EPA "makes a mockery of the statute."\u201d— Amanda Reilly (@Amanda Reilly) 1534514639
President Donald Trump delayed implementation of the rule, which had been developed by the Obama administration, when he entered office. The regulations required the chemical industry to coordinate with emergency responders ahead of a likely emergency, to maintain transparency with their surrounding communities regarding possible chemical threats, to fully investigate disasters, and to assess whether the use of different technologies by their facilities could prevent chemical emergencies.
The Union of Concerned Scientists noted earlier this year that the delay of the rule likely exacerbated disasters including the Arkema plant explosion outside Houston last August after Hurricane Harvey hit.
"The rule would have begun to prevent and reduce chemical disasters in communities near over 12,500 facilities nationwide if the Trump administration had not abruptly suspended it one year ago, in March 2017," wrote Gretchen Goldman.
The court's decision came "not a moment to soon," for the 177 million Americans who live in places where their safety could be put at grave risk in the event of a chemical emergency, said the climate action group Earthjustice.
"The government cannot withdraw critical safety rules based on political whim--people's lives should come first," said Gordon Sommers, an attorney with Earthjustice. "The court's order means industry will have to start implementing these critical safety measures immediately--with the new hurricane season underway, there is no time to wait."
Others also applauded the ruling, including some who noted that it was just the latest recent blow to the Trump administration's pro-industry agenda--one that has consistently put the bottom line of the chemical and fossil fuel industries over the safety of Americans.
\u201cTwice in two days federal judges have used the word \u201cillusory\u201d to describe as unlawful Trump EPA delays of Obama-era rules\n\nLeft: WOTUS\nRight: Chemical safety rule\u201d— Alex Guill\u00e9n (@Alex Guill\u00e9n) 1534519486
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Chemical manufacturers must immediately comply with the Chemical Disaster Rule, a set of requirements aimed at keeping communities safe from toxic disasters, following a federal court ruling on Friday which called the Trump administration's delay of the rule "arbitrary" and illegal.
"This is a victory first and foremost for the neighborhoods most susceptible to dangerous and toxic chemical releases. Families who live under the shadows of chemical facilities deserve safer practices to prevent future disasters," said Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
\u201cJUST IN: In another big court loss for EPA, D.C. Circuit throws out rule delaying Obama-era safety standards for chemical facilities\u201d— Amanda Reilly (@Amanda Reilly) 1534514639
\u201cReading through the opinion, and D.C. Circuit does not mince words: EPA "makes a mockery of the statute."\u201d— Amanda Reilly (@Amanda Reilly) 1534514639
President Donald Trump delayed implementation of the rule, which had been developed by the Obama administration, when he entered office. The regulations required the chemical industry to coordinate with emergency responders ahead of a likely emergency, to maintain transparency with their surrounding communities regarding possible chemical threats, to fully investigate disasters, and to assess whether the use of different technologies by their facilities could prevent chemical emergencies.
The Union of Concerned Scientists noted earlier this year that the delay of the rule likely exacerbated disasters including the Arkema plant explosion outside Houston last August after Hurricane Harvey hit.
"The rule would have begun to prevent and reduce chemical disasters in communities near over 12,500 facilities nationwide if the Trump administration had not abruptly suspended it one year ago, in March 2017," wrote Gretchen Goldman.
The court's decision came "not a moment to soon," for the 177 million Americans who live in places where their safety could be put at grave risk in the event of a chemical emergency, said the climate action group Earthjustice.
"The government cannot withdraw critical safety rules based on political whim--people's lives should come first," said Gordon Sommers, an attorney with Earthjustice. "The court's order means industry will have to start implementing these critical safety measures immediately--with the new hurricane season underway, there is no time to wait."
Others also applauded the ruling, including some who noted that it was just the latest recent blow to the Trump administration's pro-industry agenda--one that has consistently put the bottom line of the chemical and fossil fuel industries over the safety of Americans.
\u201cTwice in two days federal judges have used the word \u201cillusory\u201d to describe as unlawful Trump EPA delays of Obama-era rules\n\nLeft: WOTUS\nRight: Chemical safety rule\u201d— Alex Guill\u00e9n (@Alex Guill\u00e9n) 1534519486
Chemical manufacturers must immediately comply with the Chemical Disaster Rule, a set of requirements aimed at keeping communities safe from toxic disasters, following a federal court ruling on Friday which called the Trump administration's delay of the rule "arbitrary" and illegal.
"This is a victory first and foremost for the neighborhoods most susceptible to dangerous and toxic chemical releases. Families who live under the shadows of chemical facilities deserve safer practices to prevent future disasters," said Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
\u201cJUST IN: In another big court loss for EPA, D.C. Circuit throws out rule delaying Obama-era safety standards for chemical facilities\u201d— Amanda Reilly (@Amanda Reilly) 1534514639
\u201cReading through the opinion, and D.C. Circuit does not mince words: EPA "makes a mockery of the statute."\u201d— Amanda Reilly (@Amanda Reilly) 1534514639
President Donald Trump delayed implementation of the rule, which had been developed by the Obama administration, when he entered office. The regulations required the chemical industry to coordinate with emergency responders ahead of a likely emergency, to maintain transparency with their surrounding communities regarding possible chemical threats, to fully investigate disasters, and to assess whether the use of different technologies by their facilities could prevent chemical emergencies.
The Union of Concerned Scientists noted earlier this year that the delay of the rule likely exacerbated disasters including the Arkema plant explosion outside Houston last August after Hurricane Harvey hit.
"The rule would have begun to prevent and reduce chemical disasters in communities near over 12,500 facilities nationwide if the Trump administration had not abruptly suspended it one year ago, in March 2017," wrote Gretchen Goldman.
The court's decision came "not a moment to soon," for the 177 million Americans who live in places where their safety could be put at grave risk in the event of a chemical emergency, said the climate action group Earthjustice.
"The government cannot withdraw critical safety rules based on political whim--people's lives should come first," said Gordon Sommers, an attorney with Earthjustice. "The court's order means industry will have to start implementing these critical safety measures immediately--with the new hurricane season underway, there is no time to wait."
Others also applauded the ruling, including some who noted that it was just the latest recent blow to the Trump administration's pro-industry agenda--one that has consistently put the bottom line of the chemical and fossil fuel industries over the safety of Americans.
\u201cTwice in two days federal judges have used the word \u201cillusory\u201d to describe as unlawful Trump EPA delays of Obama-era rules\n\nLeft: WOTUS\nRight: Chemical safety rule\u201d— Alex Guill\u00e9n (@Alex Guill\u00e9n) 1534519486
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.