SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) appeared satisfied with Judge Brett Kavanaugh's statement last month that Roe vs. Wade is "settled law"--but revelations in his confirmation hearings have shown that he believes the law could be overruled by the Supreme Court. (Photo: @Slate/Twitter)
Fund to Unseat Susan Collins in 2020 Climbs to $500,000 as Leaked Doc Offers New Evidence Kavanaugh Clear Threat to Roe v. Wade
"Kavanaugh not only believes Supreme Court precedent can 'always' be overturned, he said Roe v. Wade is not settled law. This directly contradicts what he's said in his hearing—but confirms what we already knew. What else is he hiding?"
Sep 06, 2018
Demanding that Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) face consequences should she vote to confirm anti-choice extremist Judge Brett Kavanaugh for a lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, healthcare activist Ady Barkan has successfully raised more than $500,000 for whomever challenges the four-term senator in 2020, should she vote for approval.
About $250,000 of those funds have poured in since Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing began on Tuesday, as Americans have watched President Donald Trump's nominee dodge straightforward questions about women's right to abortion care, and Senate Republicans dismiss Democrats' objections to the hearing just hours after 42,000 pages of documents about Kavanaugh's career were released.
"This nomination is about more than just a position on the Supreme Court," Barkan said in a statement. "It is about the future of this country. I believe in a future in which we can all be free. That's why I am calling on each Senator to Be a Hero and #CancelKavanaugh."
Barkan began his "Be A Hero" campaign fundraiser after Kavanaugh's nomination was announced in July, asking Americans to pledge $20.20 to go to Collins's challenger, should she vote for the judge. Should she vote no, the funds would be returned to the millions of Americans who have donated.
After Monday's document dump, containing records of Kavanaugh's time working the George W. Bush administration, Barkan asked supporters for a total of $42,000--a request that was easily reached within 24 hours.
"We overwhelmingly tripled that request. The funds keep pouring in mostly from the residents of Maine," Barkan said.
Mainers have aggressively targeted Collins since the nomination was announced, as they did last summer when her vote was desperately needed by Americans who count on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for health insurance coverage, with the Republicans threatening to repeal the law.
Collins identifies herself as a "moderate" Republican, claiming to be pro-choice despite the fact that she voted for Trump's first Supreme Court nominee, anti-choice Justice Neil Gorsuch, last year as well as a number of other anti-choice judges.
\u201cA thing that keeps happening that gets no attention: pro-choice GOP Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski are voting to confirm lifetime federal judges who are incredibly anti-choice. https://t.co/nrhxnyafTO\u201d— Jennifer Bendery (@Jennifer Bendery) 1524746648
Collins has not stated definitively how she will vote on Kavanaugh, but said after meeting with him in August that he saw Roe vs. Wade as "settled law"--a statement he has echoed numerous times in his hearings as he's attempted to deflect concerns that he could be the deciding vote in overturning the landmark case, should one of 13 abortion rights cases currently stalled in federal appeals courts make it to the high court.
Kavanaugh's anti-choice views have been clear since before he was nominated. Last year, he praised former Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe.
He also voted in 2017 to delay the abortion a young immigrant in U.S. custody was seeking. On Thursday, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) pointed out that despite Kavanaugh's suggestions that he would observe "settled law" and "judicial precedent" if confirmed, he blatantly flouted precedent when delaying the woman's care after she had obtained permission from a judge to have an abortion.
\u201cKavanaugh told us over and over that he thought Jane Doe needed help making her decision. SHE. MADE. HER. DECISION. \nDoe fulfilled the requirements of Texas law. She BEGGED the court to let her go through with HER choice. Kavanaugh ignored precedent & denied her. #StopKavanaugh\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1536231772
Barkan's campaign continued to gather steam as the confirmation hearing shed more and more light on his extreme anti-choice views. Also on Thursday, the New York Times published a leaked 2003 email from Kavanaugh in which he wrote:
I am not sure that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme Court level since Court can always overrule its precedent, and three current Justices on the Court would do so.
Kavanaugh again dodged a question from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) about the email, saying he had simply been stating a fact about then-Justices Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas's opinions. But critics on Twitter were outraged at the crystal-clear message of the email: that with a fourth anti-choice justice, the court could indeed "overrule the precedent."
The email should provide more than enough evidence for Collins, they argued, that Kavanaugh would not commit to upholding Roe vs. Wade simply because it is "settled law."
\u201cBREAKING: Leaked emails show Kavanaugh not only believes Supreme Court precedent can "always" be overturned, he said Roe v. Wade is not settled law. This directly contradicts what he's said in his hearing \u2014 but confirms what we already knew. What else is he hiding? #StopKavanaugh\u201d— National Women's Law Center (@National Women's Law Center) 1536243640
\u201cKavanaugh\u2019s emails show he knows very well that calling Roe v. Wade \u201csettled law\u201d is meaningless \u2014 because it can be overruled by any Supreme Court justice. #StopKavanaugh\u201d— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1536242045
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Demanding that Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) face consequences should she vote to confirm anti-choice extremist Judge Brett Kavanaugh for a lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, healthcare activist Ady Barkan has successfully raised more than $500,000 for whomever challenges the four-term senator in 2020, should she vote for approval.
About $250,000 of those funds have poured in since Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing began on Tuesday, as Americans have watched President Donald Trump's nominee dodge straightforward questions about women's right to abortion care, and Senate Republicans dismiss Democrats' objections to the hearing just hours after 42,000 pages of documents about Kavanaugh's career were released.
"This nomination is about more than just a position on the Supreme Court," Barkan said in a statement. "It is about the future of this country. I believe in a future in which we can all be free. That's why I am calling on each Senator to Be a Hero and #CancelKavanaugh."
Barkan began his "Be A Hero" campaign fundraiser after Kavanaugh's nomination was announced in July, asking Americans to pledge $20.20 to go to Collins's challenger, should she vote for the judge. Should she vote no, the funds would be returned to the millions of Americans who have donated.
After Monday's document dump, containing records of Kavanaugh's time working the George W. Bush administration, Barkan asked supporters for a total of $42,000--a request that was easily reached within 24 hours.
"We overwhelmingly tripled that request. The funds keep pouring in mostly from the residents of Maine," Barkan said.
Mainers have aggressively targeted Collins since the nomination was announced, as they did last summer when her vote was desperately needed by Americans who count on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for health insurance coverage, with the Republicans threatening to repeal the law.
Collins identifies herself as a "moderate" Republican, claiming to be pro-choice despite the fact that she voted for Trump's first Supreme Court nominee, anti-choice Justice Neil Gorsuch, last year as well as a number of other anti-choice judges.
\u201cA thing that keeps happening that gets no attention: pro-choice GOP Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski are voting to confirm lifetime federal judges who are incredibly anti-choice. https://t.co/nrhxnyafTO\u201d— Jennifer Bendery (@Jennifer Bendery) 1524746648
Collins has not stated definitively how she will vote on Kavanaugh, but said after meeting with him in August that he saw Roe vs. Wade as "settled law"--a statement he has echoed numerous times in his hearings as he's attempted to deflect concerns that he could be the deciding vote in overturning the landmark case, should one of 13 abortion rights cases currently stalled in federal appeals courts make it to the high court.
Kavanaugh's anti-choice views have been clear since before he was nominated. Last year, he praised former Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe.
He also voted in 2017 to delay the abortion a young immigrant in U.S. custody was seeking. On Thursday, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) pointed out that despite Kavanaugh's suggestions that he would observe "settled law" and "judicial precedent" if confirmed, he blatantly flouted precedent when delaying the woman's care after she had obtained permission from a judge to have an abortion.
\u201cKavanaugh told us over and over that he thought Jane Doe needed help making her decision. SHE. MADE. HER. DECISION. \nDoe fulfilled the requirements of Texas law. She BEGGED the court to let her go through with HER choice. Kavanaugh ignored precedent & denied her. #StopKavanaugh\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1536231772
Barkan's campaign continued to gather steam as the confirmation hearing shed more and more light on his extreme anti-choice views. Also on Thursday, the New York Times published a leaked 2003 email from Kavanaugh in which he wrote:
I am not sure that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme Court level since Court can always overrule its precedent, and three current Justices on the Court would do so.
Kavanaugh again dodged a question from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) about the email, saying he had simply been stating a fact about then-Justices Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas's opinions. But critics on Twitter were outraged at the crystal-clear message of the email: that with a fourth anti-choice justice, the court could indeed "overrule the precedent."
The email should provide more than enough evidence for Collins, they argued, that Kavanaugh would not commit to upholding Roe vs. Wade simply because it is "settled law."
\u201cBREAKING: Leaked emails show Kavanaugh not only believes Supreme Court precedent can "always" be overturned, he said Roe v. Wade is not settled law. This directly contradicts what he's said in his hearing \u2014 but confirms what we already knew. What else is he hiding? #StopKavanaugh\u201d— National Women's Law Center (@National Women's Law Center) 1536243640
\u201cKavanaugh\u2019s emails show he knows very well that calling Roe v. Wade \u201csettled law\u201d is meaningless \u2014 because it can be overruled by any Supreme Court justice. #StopKavanaugh\u201d— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1536242045
Demanding that Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) face consequences should she vote to confirm anti-choice extremist Judge Brett Kavanaugh for a lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, healthcare activist Ady Barkan has successfully raised more than $500,000 for whomever challenges the four-term senator in 2020, should she vote for approval.
About $250,000 of those funds have poured in since Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing began on Tuesday, as Americans have watched President Donald Trump's nominee dodge straightforward questions about women's right to abortion care, and Senate Republicans dismiss Democrats' objections to the hearing just hours after 42,000 pages of documents about Kavanaugh's career were released.
"This nomination is about more than just a position on the Supreme Court," Barkan said in a statement. "It is about the future of this country. I believe in a future in which we can all be free. That's why I am calling on each Senator to Be a Hero and #CancelKavanaugh."
Barkan began his "Be A Hero" campaign fundraiser after Kavanaugh's nomination was announced in July, asking Americans to pledge $20.20 to go to Collins's challenger, should she vote for the judge. Should she vote no, the funds would be returned to the millions of Americans who have donated.
After Monday's document dump, containing records of Kavanaugh's time working the George W. Bush administration, Barkan asked supporters for a total of $42,000--a request that was easily reached within 24 hours.
"We overwhelmingly tripled that request. The funds keep pouring in mostly from the residents of Maine," Barkan said.
Mainers have aggressively targeted Collins since the nomination was announced, as they did last summer when her vote was desperately needed by Americans who count on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for health insurance coverage, with the Republicans threatening to repeal the law.
Collins identifies herself as a "moderate" Republican, claiming to be pro-choice despite the fact that she voted for Trump's first Supreme Court nominee, anti-choice Justice Neil Gorsuch, last year as well as a number of other anti-choice judges.
\u201cA thing that keeps happening that gets no attention: pro-choice GOP Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski are voting to confirm lifetime federal judges who are incredibly anti-choice. https://t.co/nrhxnyafTO\u201d— Jennifer Bendery (@Jennifer Bendery) 1524746648
Collins has not stated definitively how she will vote on Kavanaugh, but said after meeting with him in August that he saw Roe vs. Wade as "settled law"--a statement he has echoed numerous times in his hearings as he's attempted to deflect concerns that he could be the deciding vote in overturning the landmark case, should one of 13 abortion rights cases currently stalled in federal appeals courts make it to the high court.
Kavanaugh's anti-choice views have been clear since before he was nominated. Last year, he praised former Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe.
He also voted in 2017 to delay the abortion a young immigrant in U.S. custody was seeking. On Thursday, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) pointed out that despite Kavanaugh's suggestions that he would observe "settled law" and "judicial precedent" if confirmed, he blatantly flouted precedent when delaying the woman's care after she had obtained permission from a judge to have an abortion.
\u201cKavanaugh told us over and over that he thought Jane Doe needed help making her decision. SHE. MADE. HER. DECISION. \nDoe fulfilled the requirements of Texas law. She BEGGED the court to let her go through with HER choice. Kavanaugh ignored precedent & denied her. #StopKavanaugh\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1536231772
Barkan's campaign continued to gather steam as the confirmation hearing shed more and more light on his extreme anti-choice views. Also on Thursday, the New York Times published a leaked 2003 email from Kavanaugh in which he wrote:
I am not sure that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme Court level since Court can always overrule its precedent, and three current Justices on the Court would do so.
Kavanaugh again dodged a question from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) about the email, saying he had simply been stating a fact about then-Justices Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas's opinions. But critics on Twitter were outraged at the crystal-clear message of the email: that with a fourth anti-choice justice, the court could indeed "overrule the precedent."
The email should provide more than enough evidence for Collins, they argued, that Kavanaugh would not commit to upholding Roe vs. Wade simply because it is "settled law."
\u201cBREAKING: Leaked emails show Kavanaugh not only believes Supreme Court precedent can "always" be overturned, he said Roe v. Wade is not settled law. This directly contradicts what he's said in his hearing \u2014 but confirms what we already knew. What else is he hiding? #StopKavanaugh\u201d— National Women's Law Center (@National Women's Law Center) 1536243640
\u201cKavanaugh\u2019s emails show he knows very well that calling Roe v. Wade \u201csettled law\u201d is meaningless \u2014 because it can be overruled by any Supreme Court justice. #StopKavanaugh\u201d— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1536242045
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
LATEST NEWS
Poll Has AOC Leading Schumer by Nearly 20 Points in 2028 New York Primary
"What AOC is doing is leadership—and people see that," said one observer.
Apr 04, 2025
A poll released Friday from the progressive think tank Data for Progress has Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez besting Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, also a Democrat, by 19 points in a hypothetical matchup in the 2028 New York primary for a U.S. Senate seat.
According to the poll, which was was first shared exclusively with Politico, 55% of voters said they would cast a ballot for Ocasio-Cortez or leaned toward supporting her, and 36% said they would support Schumer or leaned toward supporting him, with 9% undecided.
The only subgroup that supported Schumer over Ocasio-Cortez were moderates, who favored Schumer 50%-35%, with 15% undecided. Ocasio-Cortez carried all other subgroups with an outright majority, except for voters over the age of 45, 49% of whom said they would support her or leaned toward supporting her.
The poll—while several years out from the actual race—comes in the wake of Schumer's decision to throw his support behind a Republican-backed spending bill in early March, a move that roiled his own party and prompted calls for him to step aside from his leadership position in the Senate.
The episode also sparked murmurs among some Democrats that Ocasio-Cortez should consider a primary bid against Schumer in 2028.
The poll was conducted March 26-31 and surveyed 767 likely Democratic primary voters in New York state. According to Data for Progress, the polling indicated that the hypothetical matchup between Ocasio-Cortez and Schumer is "relatively static" and does not shift when voters are offered more information about the respective candidates.
Ocasio-Cortez recently declined to speak about a potential run for Senate in 2028, according to Politico.
"Replacing Chuck Schumer with AOC would be an incredible upgrade. I guess we'll have to wait four more years…," wrote Bhaskar Sunkara, president of The Nation.
Zephyr Teachout, a professor at the Fordham University School of Law, shared Politico's reporting on the poll and wrote: "Good morning to leadership and fighting oligarchy!"
"What I mean is that what AOC is doing is leadership—and people see that," added Teachout, who also highlighted that the poll found that an overwhelming majority of respondents, 84%, want their leaders to do more to resist the actions of U.S. President Donald Trump.
Another observer, market researcher Adam Carlson, highlighted that despite Schumer's loss in the hypothetical race, most respondent subgroups still view him favorably, according to the poll. Besides "very liberal" voters and those between ages 18-44, Schumer stands at over 50% "favorable" among all other subgroups surveyed.
"People just want a changing of the guard," said Carlson.
China Retaliates Against Trump 'Bullying' With 34% Tariffs on All US Goods
"Trade and tariff wars have no winners," said China's foreign ministry. "We urge the U.S. to stop doing the wrong thing."
Apr 04, 2025
The Chinese government on Friday responded to U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs with 34% import duties on all American goods beginning next week, intensifying global blowback against the White House and accelerating a worldwide financial market tailspin.
China's tariffs on U.S. imports, which match the tariffs the Trump administration moved this week to impose on Chinese goods, are set to take effect on April 10. Trump's 34% tariffs on Chinese imports come on top of the 20% tariffs the U.S. president imposed earlier this year.
"The U.S. approach does not conform to international trade rules, seriously damages China's legitimate rights and interests, and is a typical unilateral bullying practice," China's Ministry of Finance said in a Friday statement.
Additionally, China's Commerce Ministry announced immediate export restrictions on rare earth materials and "added 16 entities from the U.S., including High Point Aerotechnologies and Universal Logistics Holdings Inc., to its export control list," according to the state-run China Daily.
"Under the new rule," the outlet reported, "Chinese companies are prohibited from exporting dual-use items to these 16 U.S. entities. Any ongoing related export activities should be immediately halted, said the Ministry of Commerce."
Retaliatory tariffs from the world's second-largest economy mark the latest step in a global trade war launched by the Trump White House, which—despite warnings of disastrous impacts for working-class U.S. households and the broader economy—plowed ahead this week with a 10% universal tariff on imports and larger tariffs on a number of trading partners, including China.
Following Trump's official tariff announcement, Beijing condemned the duties as "unacceptable" and vowed to "take measures as necessary to firmly defend [China's] legitimate interests."
"Trade and tariff wars have no winners. Protectionism leads nowhere," said the spokesperson for China's foreign ministry on Thursday. "We urge the U.S. to stop doing the wrong thing, and resolve trade differences with China and other countries through consultation with equality, respect, and mutual benefit."
Other nations hit by Trump's tariffs are expected to respond in the coming days.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told reporters Thursday that the E.U. was "already finalizing the first package of countermeasures in response to tariffs on steel, and we are now preparing for further countermeasures to protect our interests and our businesses if negotiations fail."
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed that "we are going to fight these tariffs with countermeasures."
"In a crisis, it's important to come together and it's essential to act with purpose and with force," Carney added. "And that's what we will do."
New Projected Cost of Trump-GOP Tax Cuts for the Rich: 'Staggering' $7 Trillion
"What Republicans are trying to jam through Congress right now is a level of economic recklessness we’ve never seen before," said a group of Democratic lawmakers.
Apr 04, 2025
A new analysis indicates Republicans' plan to extend soon-to-expire provisions of their party's 2017 tax law, as well as their push to tack on additional tax breaks largely benefiting the rich and big corporations, would cost $7 trillion over the next decade, a figure that a group of congressional Democrats called "staggering."
The analysis from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), published on Thursday, updates previous estimates that suggested the GOP effort to extend expiring provisions of the 2017 law would cost $4.6 trillion over a 10-year period. The new assessment shows that extending the law's temporary provisions—which disproportionately favored the wealthy—would cost $5.5 trillion over the next decade.
The projected cost of the GOP agenda balloons to $7 trillion after adding Senate Republicans' call for $1.5 trillion in additional tax cuts in the budget resolution they advanced in a party-line vote on Thursday. The GOP has come under fire for using an accounting trick to claim their proposed tax cuts would have no budgetary impact.
"The Republican handouts to billionaires and corporations will come at a staggering cost, and it's unconscionable that their plan to pay for those handouts includes kicking millions of Americans off their health insurance, hiking the cost of living with tariffs, and driving up child hunger," Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), and Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) said in a joint statement issued in response to the JCT figures.
"Even after making painful cuts that will inflict hardship on typical American families, Republicans will still risk sending us into a catastrophic debt spiral that does permanent harm to our economy," the Democrats added. "What Republicans are trying to jam through Congress right now is a level of economic recklessness we've never seen before."
The JCT's updated cost analysis came as President Donald Trump plowed ahead with what's been characterized as the biggest tax hike in U.S. history, one that will hit working-class Americans in the form of price increases on household staples and other goods.
Trump administration officials, not known for providing reliable numbers, have claimed the president's sweeping new tariffs could produce roughly $6 trillion in federal revenue over the next decade. The Trump tariffs have sent financial markets into a tailspin, heightened recession fears, and prompted swift retaliation from targeted nations, including China.
In an appearance on MSNBC on Thursday, Boyle—the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee—said Trump's tariffs represent "the single largest tax increase in American history."
"It's a tax that everyone will pay in this country, based on the goods that they buy," said Boyle. "However, it's also a tax that is highly regressive—the poorest amongst us will end up paying a higher percentage of their income."
A previous version of this story incorrectly stated the analysis was conducted by the Congressional Budget Office. It was conducted by the Joint Committee on Taxation.
Most Popular
We cover the issues the corporate media never will.
Please support our journalism.