"Despite the progress we have made, stereotypes and biases clearly still influence corporate hiring strategies," Sara Steffens, secretary-treasurer of the CWA, concluded in a statement on Tuesday. (Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
Sep 18, 2018
"Facebook is violating federal civil rights law. Period."
So declared the ACLU on Tuesday after announcing it has filed charges against the social media giant and ten other employers for illegally "excluding all women and non-binary" Facebook users from job advertisements.
"Shame on these employers for targeting ads based on gender, and shame on Facebook for facilitating this practice."
--Sara Steffens, Communications Workers of America
Submitted on behalf of three female workers, the Communications Workers of America (CWA), and the hundreds of thousands of female workers CWA represents, the ACLU's charges "allege that Facebook delivers job ads selectively based on age and sex categories that employers expressly choose, and that Facebook earns revenue from placing job ads that exclude women and older workers from receiving the ads."
"Targeting job ads by sex is unlawful under federal, state, and local civil rights laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964," the ACLU continued.
Galen Sherwin, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, pointed out in a statement that advertising discrimination on the basis of gender "has historically been used to shut women out of well-paying jobs and economic opportunities."
"We can't let gender-based ad targeting online give new life to a form of discrimination that should have been eradicated long ago," Sherwin said.
\u201cBREAKING: We've filed charges against @Facebook and 10 employers for using the platform to target their job ads \u2014 for positions in male-dominated fields \u2014 only to younger men.\n\nFacebook is violating federal civil rights law. Period.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1537277293
While Facebook proclaimed in response to the ACLU's charges that discrimination is "strictly prohibited in our policies," the social media giant has long been accused of letting advertisers exclude specific racial, religious, and ethnic groups from their ads.
"Imagine if, during the Jim Crow era, a newspaper offered advertisers the option of placing ads only in copies that went to white readers," ProPublicanoted in a 2016 investigation of Facebook's practices. "That's basically what Facebook is doing nowadays."
Though Facebook has made a number of policy changes ostensibly geared toward putting a stop to such rampant and harmful discrimination, critics have argued that the changes didn't go nearly far enough.
According to the ACLU's charges, Facebook's discriminatory practices are alive and well.
"Despite the progress we have made, stereotypes and biases clearly still influence corporate hiring strategies," Sara Steffens, secretary-treasurer of the CWA, concluded in a statement on Tuesday. "Shame on these employers for targeting ads based on gender, and shame on Facebook for facilitating this practice."
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"Facebook is violating federal civil rights law. Period."
So declared the ACLU on Tuesday after announcing it has filed charges against the social media giant and ten other employers for illegally "excluding all women and non-binary" Facebook users from job advertisements.
"Shame on these employers for targeting ads based on gender, and shame on Facebook for facilitating this practice."
--Sara Steffens, Communications Workers of America
Submitted on behalf of three female workers, the Communications Workers of America (CWA), and the hundreds of thousands of female workers CWA represents, the ACLU's charges "allege that Facebook delivers job ads selectively based on age and sex categories that employers expressly choose, and that Facebook earns revenue from placing job ads that exclude women and older workers from receiving the ads."
"Targeting job ads by sex is unlawful under federal, state, and local civil rights laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964," the ACLU continued.
Galen Sherwin, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, pointed out in a statement that advertising discrimination on the basis of gender "has historically been used to shut women out of well-paying jobs and economic opportunities."
"We can't let gender-based ad targeting online give new life to a form of discrimination that should have been eradicated long ago," Sherwin said.
\u201cBREAKING: We've filed charges against @Facebook and 10 employers for using the platform to target their job ads \u2014 for positions in male-dominated fields \u2014 only to younger men.\n\nFacebook is violating federal civil rights law. Period.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1537277293
While Facebook proclaimed in response to the ACLU's charges that discrimination is "strictly prohibited in our policies," the social media giant has long been accused of letting advertisers exclude specific racial, religious, and ethnic groups from their ads.
"Imagine if, during the Jim Crow era, a newspaper offered advertisers the option of placing ads only in copies that went to white readers," ProPublicanoted in a 2016 investigation of Facebook's practices. "That's basically what Facebook is doing nowadays."
Though Facebook has made a number of policy changes ostensibly geared toward putting a stop to such rampant and harmful discrimination, critics have argued that the changes didn't go nearly far enough.
According to the ACLU's charges, Facebook's discriminatory practices are alive and well.
"Despite the progress we have made, stereotypes and biases clearly still influence corporate hiring strategies," Sara Steffens, secretary-treasurer of the CWA, concluded in a statement on Tuesday. "Shame on these employers for targeting ads based on gender, and shame on Facebook for facilitating this practice."
"Facebook is violating federal civil rights law. Period."
So declared the ACLU on Tuesday after announcing it has filed charges against the social media giant and ten other employers for illegally "excluding all women and non-binary" Facebook users from job advertisements.
"Shame on these employers for targeting ads based on gender, and shame on Facebook for facilitating this practice."
--Sara Steffens, Communications Workers of America
Submitted on behalf of three female workers, the Communications Workers of America (CWA), and the hundreds of thousands of female workers CWA represents, the ACLU's charges "allege that Facebook delivers job ads selectively based on age and sex categories that employers expressly choose, and that Facebook earns revenue from placing job ads that exclude women and older workers from receiving the ads."
"Targeting job ads by sex is unlawful under federal, state, and local civil rights laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964," the ACLU continued.
Galen Sherwin, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, pointed out in a statement that advertising discrimination on the basis of gender "has historically been used to shut women out of well-paying jobs and economic opportunities."
"We can't let gender-based ad targeting online give new life to a form of discrimination that should have been eradicated long ago," Sherwin said.
\u201cBREAKING: We've filed charges against @Facebook and 10 employers for using the platform to target their job ads \u2014 for positions in male-dominated fields \u2014 only to younger men.\n\nFacebook is violating federal civil rights law. Period.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1537277293
While Facebook proclaimed in response to the ACLU's charges that discrimination is "strictly prohibited in our policies," the social media giant has long been accused of letting advertisers exclude specific racial, religious, and ethnic groups from their ads.
"Imagine if, during the Jim Crow era, a newspaper offered advertisers the option of placing ads only in copies that went to white readers," ProPublicanoted in a 2016 investigation of Facebook's practices. "That's basically what Facebook is doing nowadays."
Though Facebook has made a number of policy changes ostensibly geared toward putting a stop to such rampant and harmful discrimination, critics have argued that the changes didn't go nearly far enough.
According to the ACLU's charges, Facebook's discriminatory practices are alive and well.
"Despite the progress we have made, stereotypes and biases clearly still influence corporate hiring strategies," Sara Steffens, secretary-treasurer of the CWA, concluded in a statement on Tuesday. "Shame on these employers for targeting ads based on gender, and shame on Facebook for facilitating this practice."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.