SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Wednesday announced the Trump administration will terminate a decades-old bilateral treaty with Iran rather than comply with an International Court of Justice order to lift sanctions due to humanitarian concerns. (Photo: The State Department/screenshot)
'The Drums of War Are Beating': ICJ Ruled US Sanctions Violate Treaty With Iran, So Pompeo Just Ditched It
NIAC leader Trita Parsi says the Secretary of State "walking out of it signals that he wants to make sure that disputes with Iran are NOT resolved peacefully."
Oct 03, 2018
This is a breaking story and may be updated...
After the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Wednesday ruled the Trump administration's sanctions against Iran violate the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo "impetuously" declared at a morning press conference that the United States will terminate the decades-old bilateral agreement rather than comply with the United Nations court's order to ease sanctions.
\u201c.@SecPompeo: In light of how #Iran has abused the @cij_icj as a form for attacking the United States, I am therefore announcing today that the United States is terminating the Treaty of Amity with Iran.\u201d— Department of State (@Department of State) 1538580162
Critics of the move immediately spoke out and warned of potentially dire consequences.
"The 1955 US-Iran treaty provided a tool for resolving disputes when diplomacy failed," noted Trita Parsi, founder and president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). "Pompeo walking out of it signals that he wants to make sure that disputes with Iran are NOT resolved peacefully."
\u201cAs Lacie points out, the 1955 US-Iran treaty provided a tool for resolving disputes when diplomacy failed.\n\nPompeo walking out of it signals that he wants to make sure that disputes with Iran are NOT resolved peacefully.\n\nPeople, wake up...\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1538583325
The ruling earlier in the day by the Hague-based court had stated U.S. assurances that the sanctions would not negatively impact humanitarian aid and aviation safety "were not adequate." The decision was welcomed by Iran's Foreign Ministry, which condemned the measures as "illegal and cruel."
Pompeo's announcement that the U.S. is canceling the 1955 agreement--similar to the President Donald Trump's decision to ditch the Iran nuclear deal earlier this year and coupled with reports that Pompeo and Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton are actively working to "foment unrest" in Iran--elicited immediate concerns about future engagement with the country.
"The drums of war are beating," journalist Aaron Rupar warned on Twitter.
"As you can see, Article 1 on the Treaty--'There shall be firm and enduring peace and sincere friendship between the United States of America and Iran'--hasn't aged very well over the years," remarkedForeign Policy reporter Robbie Gramer.
\u201cHelpful backgrounder on the treaty of amity that Sec. Pompeo impetuously withdrew from, rather than acknowledge and address serious humanitarian concerns with U.S. sanctions: https://t.co/Y1aq0Pr14o\u201d— Ryan Costello (@Ryan Costello) 1538581226
During his announcement at the State Department on Wednesday, Pompeo said with a chuckle, "This is a decision, frankly, that is 39 years overdue," an apparent reference to the 1979 Iranian revolution in which the U.S.-backed Shah was overthrown.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
This is a breaking story and may be updated...
After the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Wednesday ruled the Trump administration's sanctions against Iran violate the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo "impetuously" declared at a morning press conference that the United States will terminate the decades-old bilateral agreement rather than comply with the United Nations court's order to ease sanctions.
\u201c.@SecPompeo: In light of how #Iran has abused the @cij_icj as a form for attacking the United States, I am therefore announcing today that the United States is terminating the Treaty of Amity with Iran.\u201d— Department of State (@Department of State) 1538580162
Critics of the move immediately spoke out and warned of potentially dire consequences.
"The 1955 US-Iran treaty provided a tool for resolving disputes when diplomacy failed," noted Trita Parsi, founder and president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). "Pompeo walking out of it signals that he wants to make sure that disputes with Iran are NOT resolved peacefully."
\u201cAs Lacie points out, the 1955 US-Iran treaty provided a tool for resolving disputes when diplomacy failed.\n\nPompeo walking out of it signals that he wants to make sure that disputes with Iran are NOT resolved peacefully.\n\nPeople, wake up...\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1538583325
The ruling earlier in the day by the Hague-based court had stated U.S. assurances that the sanctions would not negatively impact humanitarian aid and aviation safety "were not adequate." The decision was welcomed by Iran's Foreign Ministry, which condemned the measures as "illegal and cruel."
Pompeo's announcement that the U.S. is canceling the 1955 agreement--similar to the President Donald Trump's decision to ditch the Iran nuclear deal earlier this year and coupled with reports that Pompeo and Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton are actively working to "foment unrest" in Iran--elicited immediate concerns about future engagement with the country.
"The drums of war are beating," journalist Aaron Rupar warned on Twitter.
"As you can see, Article 1 on the Treaty--'There shall be firm and enduring peace and sincere friendship between the United States of America and Iran'--hasn't aged very well over the years," remarkedForeign Policy reporter Robbie Gramer.
\u201cHelpful backgrounder on the treaty of amity that Sec. Pompeo impetuously withdrew from, rather than acknowledge and address serious humanitarian concerns with U.S. sanctions: https://t.co/Y1aq0Pr14o\u201d— Ryan Costello (@Ryan Costello) 1538581226
During his announcement at the State Department on Wednesday, Pompeo said with a chuckle, "This is a decision, frankly, that is 39 years overdue," an apparent reference to the 1979 Iranian revolution in which the U.S.-backed Shah was overthrown.
This is a breaking story and may be updated...
After the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Wednesday ruled the Trump administration's sanctions against Iran violate the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo "impetuously" declared at a morning press conference that the United States will terminate the decades-old bilateral agreement rather than comply with the United Nations court's order to ease sanctions.
\u201c.@SecPompeo: In light of how #Iran has abused the @cij_icj as a form for attacking the United States, I am therefore announcing today that the United States is terminating the Treaty of Amity with Iran.\u201d— Department of State (@Department of State) 1538580162
Critics of the move immediately spoke out and warned of potentially dire consequences.
"The 1955 US-Iran treaty provided a tool for resolving disputes when diplomacy failed," noted Trita Parsi, founder and president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). "Pompeo walking out of it signals that he wants to make sure that disputes with Iran are NOT resolved peacefully."
\u201cAs Lacie points out, the 1955 US-Iran treaty provided a tool for resolving disputes when diplomacy failed.\n\nPompeo walking out of it signals that he wants to make sure that disputes with Iran are NOT resolved peacefully.\n\nPeople, wake up...\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1538583325
The ruling earlier in the day by the Hague-based court had stated U.S. assurances that the sanctions would not negatively impact humanitarian aid and aviation safety "were not adequate." The decision was welcomed by Iran's Foreign Ministry, which condemned the measures as "illegal and cruel."
Pompeo's announcement that the U.S. is canceling the 1955 agreement--similar to the President Donald Trump's decision to ditch the Iran nuclear deal earlier this year and coupled with reports that Pompeo and Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton are actively working to "foment unrest" in Iran--elicited immediate concerns about future engagement with the country.
"The drums of war are beating," journalist Aaron Rupar warned on Twitter.
"As you can see, Article 1 on the Treaty--'There shall be firm and enduring peace and sincere friendship between the United States of America and Iran'--hasn't aged very well over the years," remarkedForeign Policy reporter Robbie Gramer.
\u201cHelpful backgrounder on the treaty of amity that Sec. Pompeo impetuously withdrew from, rather than acknowledge and address serious humanitarian concerns with U.S. sanctions: https://t.co/Y1aq0Pr14o\u201d— Ryan Costello (@Ryan Costello) 1538581226
During his announcement at the State Department on Wednesday, Pompeo said with a chuckle, "This is a decision, frankly, that is 39 years overdue," an apparent reference to the 1979 Iranian revolution in which the U.S.-backed Shah was overthrown.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.