SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Already offered the cover of the "whitewashed" supplemental background investigation by the FBI, the last remaining Senate holdouts on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination--namely Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republicans Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Jeff Flake of Arizona--were all given the additional opportunity to feel badly for the nominee on Thursday night when the Wall Street Journal was kind enough to offer him space on their editorial page for an op-ed in which he apologized for being "emotional" during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week and "said a few things I should not have said."
"When people show you who they are, believe them--even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise."
--Eddie S. Glaude Jr.
But while it remains to be seen if any of those senators--some of whom specifically expressed concern about the tone and content of Kavanaugh's prepared remarks and subsequent exchanges with committee members--will be moved by his quite obviously self-serving mea culpa on the eve of a procedural Senate vote scheduled for Friday morning, it was very clear indeed that critics across the internet were beyond unimpressed with the effort.
"Anyone who has to write [an op-ed titled "I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge"] on his own behalf is clearly not," remarked Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, right after the piece was published.
As further evidence, here are an additional ten tweets as a small but representative sample:
\u201cWhen people show you who they are, believe them\u2014even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise. https://t.co/ySDOOnio53\u201d— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@Eddie S. Glaude Jr.) 1538697456
\u201c1) Kavanaugh penning a half-hearted OpEd for the \u2066@WSJ\u2069 should be disqualifying \n\n2)The coming home and crying routine is lame, played and pathetic https://t.co/d3H83b794l\u201d— Karine Jean-Pierre (@Karine Jean-Pierre) 1538706563
\u201cyou don't write this unless you don't have the votes and/or realize your credibility has been shot https://t.co/RXPUCaQxbO via @WSJOpinion\u201d— Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin (@Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin) 1538699009
\u201cYour shameful and deliberately polarizing performance in that hearing room was in total contradiction to the sweet reason expressed in this op-ed. That's why 2400+ law professors https://t.co/V5wfv1NOqc said you do not belong on the court. https://t.co/iQLbDU6IyC\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1538698924
\u201cBrett Kavanaugh's op-ed is written in the language of every abuser: lash out in anger, apologize for that anger, blame outside influences for that anger, promise that's not "who you are" and you'll be better about your anger.\n\nRepeat.\u201d— Danielle Campoamor (@Danielle Campoamor) 1538699190
And finally:
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Already offered the cover of the "whitewashed" supplemental background investigation by the FBI, the last remaining Senate holdouts on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination--namely Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republicans Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Jeff Flake of Arizona--were all given the additional opportunity to feel badly for the nominee on Thursday night when the Wall Street Journal was kind enough to offer him space on their editorial page for an op-ed in which he apologized for being "emotional" during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week and "said a few things I should not have said."
"When people show you who they are, believe them--even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise."
--Eddie S. Glaude Jr.
But while it remains to be seen if any of those senators--some of whom specifically expressed concern about the tone and content of Kavanaugh's prepared remarks and subsequent exchanges with committee members--will be moved by his quite obviously self-serving mea culpa on the eve of a procedural Senate vote scheduled for Friday morning, it was very clear indeed that critics across the internet were beyond unimpressed with the effort.
"Anyone who has to write [an op-ed titled "I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge"] on his own behalf is clearly not," remarked Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, right after the piece was published.
As further evidence, here are an additional ten tweets as a small but representative sample:
\u201cWhen people show you who they are, believe them\u2014even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise. https://t.co/ySDOOnio53\u201d— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@Eddie S. Glaude Jr.) 1538697456
\u201c1) Kavanaugh penning a half-hearted OpEd for the \u2066@WSJ\u2069 should be disqualifying \n\n2)The coming home and crying routine is lame, played and pathetic https://t.co/d3H83b794l\u201d— Karine Jean-Pierre (@Karine Jean-Pierre) 1538706563
\u201cyou don't write this unless you don't have the votes and/or realize your credibility has been shot https://t.co/RXPUCaQxbO via @WSJOpinion\u201d— Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin (@Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin) 1538699009
\u201cYour shameful and deliberately polarizing performance in that hearing room was in total contradiction to the sweet reason expressed in this op-ed. That's why 2400+ law professors https://t.co/V5wfv1NOqc said you do not belong on the court. https://t.co/iQLbDU6IyC\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1538698924
\u201cBrett Kavanaugh's op-ed is written in the language of every abuser: lash out in anger, apologize for that anger, blame outside influences for that anger, promise that's not "who you are" and you'll be better about your anger.\n\nRepeat.\u201d— Danielle Campoamor (@Danielle Campoamor) 1538699190
And finally:
Already offered the cover of the "whitewashed" supplemental background investigation by the FBI, the last remaining Senate holdouts on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination--namely Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republicans Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Jeff Flake of Arizona--were all given the additional opportunity to feel badly for the nominee on Thursday night when the Wall Street Journal was kind enough to offer him space on their editorial page for an op-ed in which he apologized for being "emotional" during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week and "said a few things I should not have said."
"When people show you who they are, believe them--even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise."
--Eddie S. Glaude Jr.
But while it remains to be seen if any of those senators--some of whom specifically expressed concern about the tone and content of Kavanaugh's prepared remarks and subsequent exchanges with committee members--will be moved by his quite obviously self-serving mea culpa on the eve of a procedural Senate vote scheduled for Friday morning, it was very clear indeed that critics across the internet were beyond unimpressed with the effort.
"Anyone who has to write [an op-ed titled "I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge"] on his own behalf is clearly not," remarked Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, right after the piece was published.
As further evidence, here are an additional ten tweets as a small but representative sample:
\u201cWhen people show you who they are, believe them\u2014even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise. https://t.co/ySDOOnio53\u201d— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@Eddie S. Glaude Jr.) 1538697456
\u201c1) Kavanaugh penning a half-hearted OpEd for the \u2066@WSJ\u2069 should be disqualifying \n\n2)The coming home and crying routine is lame, played and pathetic https://t.co/d3H83b794l\u201d— Karine Jean-Pierre (@Karine Jean-Pierre) 1538706563
\u201cyou don't write this unless you don't have the votes and/or realize your credibility has been shot https://t.co/RXPUCaQxbO via @WSJOpinion\u201d— Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin (@Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin) 1538699009
\u201cYour shameful and deliberately polarizing performance in that hearing room was in total contradiction to the sweet reason expressed in this op-ed. That's why 2400+ law professors https://t.co/V5wfv1NOqc said you do not belong on the court. https://t.co/iQLbDU6IyC\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1538698924
\u201cBrett Kavanaugh's op-ed is written in the language of every abuser: lash out in anger, apologize for that anger, blame outside influences for that anger, promise that's not "who you are" and you'll be better about your anger.\n\nRepeat.\u201d— Danielle Campoamor (@Danielle Campoamor) 1538699190
And finally: