To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
In this world, where everything and everyone is for sale, we must sustain independent media we can trust. If you believe independent journalism is critical to protecting democracy and the common good, please support Common Dreams this Giving Tuesday! We wouldn't exist without you.
U.S. President Donald Trump and Mohammed bin Salman, Deputy Crown Prince and Minister of Defense of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, prepare to have lunch in the State Dining Room, at the White House, March 14, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
As new evidence emerges that Washington Post correspondent Jamal Khashoggi was tortured and killed inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul last week, lawmakers and ethics watchdogs said Thursday that President Donald Trump's reluctance to hold the Saudis responsible for Khashoggi's possible murder is exactly what they've warned about when calling attention to Trump's refusal to divest from his businesses--which, according to the president himself, Saudis have invested tens of millions of dollars over the years.
Saudi officials, along with other international political figures, have stayed in Trump's hotels since he took office in 2017, with lobbyists from Saudi Arabia spending $270,000 in the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. last year alone.
"Saudi Arabia, I get along with all of them," Trump said in 2015. "They buy apartments from me. They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much."
The Saudis also have a long history of business dealings with Trump, including a Saudi prince's purchase of a yacht and a hotel from him in the 1990s when the real estate developer was in need of money. But Democrats in Congress and the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) have especially expressed concern with his financial entanglements with the kingdom after he took office, saying they blatantly violate the U.S. Constitution's emoluments clause.
On Twitter, CREW suggested that Saudi Arabia's status as a loyal customer to the Trump Organization--from which the president refused to divest after taking office--has likely been on Trump's mind this week as he's told the press that he won't consider sanctioning or condemning the Saudis over Khashoggi's disappearance.
\u201c#tbt to Trump\u2019s hotel in DC receiving $270,000 in payments linked to Saudi Arabia in late 2016 through early 2017. Is Trump going to think about all that money when he makes foreign policy decisions? \nhttps://t.co/RatdpFxNGR\u201d— Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics) 1539291623
\u201cWe shouldn\u2019t have to ask if the president\u2019s foreign policy is being dictated by his business interests.\nWe have to ask if the president\u2019s foreign policy is being dictated by his business interests. https://t.co/UaPNOk6wFD\u201d— Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics) 1539347417
Trump's ongoing business relationship with the Saudis--including Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MbS, whose visit to the president's hotel in New York helped raise its revenues by 13 percent earlier this year--violates the Constitutional clause that forbids the president from receiving gifts or payments from foreign officials.
\u201cThe Saudi government is funneling $ directly into Trump\u2019s pockets while he refuses to hold them accountable for atrocities.\n\nThis is exactly what emoluments clause of Constitution was intended to prevent, & is why presidents should divest from biz interests before taking office.\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1539306505
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) drew attention to Trump's emoluments violations and put it bluntly on Twitter:
\u201cThe subtext and context for this MBS situation is the emoluments clause of the constitution.\u201d— Brian Schatz (@Brian Schatz) 1539311702
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit filed along with 200 other Democratic lawmakers, demanding information on foreign patrons of Trump's businesses, also suggested that the president is too entangled with the Saudis to condemn them for the journalists disappearance--or any other violations.
\u201cIs the Saudi gov't purposely filling Trump's pockets? If so, what do they expect in return? We don\u2019t know, because Trump refuses to comply with the Constitution\u2014requiring disclosure & Congressional approval for foreign gov't benefits. I\u2019m fighting in court to hold him accountable\u201d— Richard Blumenthal (@Richard Blumenthal) 1539193913
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
As new evidence emerges that Washington Post correspondent Jamal Khashoggi was tortured and killed inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul last week, lawmakers and ethics watchdogs said Thursday that President Donald Trump's reluctance to hold the Saudis responsible for Khashoggi's possible murder is exactly what they've warned about when calling attention to Trump's refusal to divest from his businesses--which, according to the president himself, Saudis have invested tens of millions of dollars over the years.
Saudi officials, along with other international political figures, have stayed in Trump's hotels since he took office in 2017, with lobbyists from Saudi Arabia spending $270,000 in the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. last year alone.
"Saudi Arabia, I get along with all of them," Trump said in 2015. "They buy apartments from me. They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much."
The Saudis also have a long history of business dealings with Trump, including a Saudi prince's purchase of a yacht and a hotel from him in the 1990s when the real estate developer was in need of money. But Democrats in Congress and the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) have especially expressed concern with his financial entanglements with the kingdom after he took office, saying they blatantly violate the U.S. Constitution's emoluments clause.
On Twitter, CREW suggested that Saudi Arabia's status as a loyal customer to the Trump Organization--from which the president refused to divest after taking office--has likely been on Trump's mind this week as he's told the press that he won't consider sanctioning or condemning the Saudis over Khashoggi's disappearance.
\u201c#tbt to Trump\u2019s hotel in DC receiving $270,000 in payments linked to Saudi Arabia in late 2016 through early 2017. Is Trump going to think about all that money when he makes foreign policy decisions? \nhttps://t.co/RatdpFxNGR\u201d— Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics) 1539291623
\u201cWe shouldn\u2019t have to ask if the president\u2019s foreign policy is being dictated by his business interests.\nWe have to ask if the president\u2019s foreign policy is being dictated by his business interests. https://t.co/UaPNOk6wFD\u201d— Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics) 1539347417
Trump's ongoing business relationship with the Saudis--including Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MbS, whose visit to the president's hotel in New York helped raise its revenues by 13 percent earlier this year--violates the Constitutional clause that forbids the president from receiving gifts or payments from foreign officials.
\u201cThe Saudi government is funneling $ directly into Trump\u2019s pockets while he refuses to hold them accountable for atrocities.\n\nThis is exactly what emoluments clause of Constitution was intended to prevent, & is why presidents should divest from biz interests before taking office.\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1539306505
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) drew attention to Trump's emoluments violations and put it bluntly on Twitter:
\u201cThe subtext and context for this MBS situation is the emoluments clause of the constitution.\u201d— Brian Schatz (@Brian Schatz) 1539311702
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit filed along with 200 other Democratic lawmakers, demanding information on foreign patrons of Trump's businesses, also suggested that the president is too entangled with the Saudis to condemn them for the journalists disappearance--or any other violations.
\u201cIs the Saudi gov't purposely filling Trump's pockets? If so, what do they expect in return? We don\u2019t know, because Trump refuses to comply with the Constitution\u2014requiring disclosure & Congressional approval for foreign gov't benefits. I\u2019m fighting in court to hold him accountable\u201d— Richard Blumenthal (@Richard Blumenthal) 1539193913
As new evidence emerges that Washington Post correspondent Jamal Khashoggi was tortured and killed inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul last week, lawmakers and ethics watchdogs said Thursday that President Donald Trump's reluctance to hold the Saudis responsible for Khashoggi's possible murder is exactly what they've warned about when calling attention to Trump's refusal to divest from his businesses--which, according to the president himself, Saudis have invested tens of millions of dollars over the years.
Saudi officials, along with other international political figures, have stayed in Trump's hotels since he took office in 2017, with lobbyists from Saudi Arabia spending $270,000 in the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. last year alone.
"Saudi Arabia, I get along with all of them," Trump said in 2015. "They buy apartments from me. They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much."
The Saudis also have a long history of business dealings with Trump, including a Saudi prince's purchase of a yacht and a hotel from him in the 1990s when the real estate developer was in need of money. But Democrats in Congress and the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) have especially expressed concern with his financial entanglements with the kingdom after he took office, saying they blatantly violate the U.S. Constitution's emoluments clause.
On Twitter, CREW suggested that Saudi Arabia's status as a loyal customer to the Trump Organization--from which the president refused to divest after taking office--has likely been on Trump's mind this week as he's told the press that he won't consider sanctioning or condemning the Saudis over Khashoggi's disappearance.
\u201c#tbt to Trump\u2019s hotel in DC receiving $270,000 in payments linked to Saudi Arabia in late 2016 through early 2017. Is Trump going to think about all that money when he makes foreign policy decisions? \nhttps://t.co/RatdpFxNGR\u201d— Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics) 1539291623
\u201cWe shouldn\u2019t have to ask if the president\u2019s foreign policy is being dictated by his business interests.\nWe have to ask if the president\u2019s foreign policy is being dictated by his business interests. https://t.co/UaPNOk6wFD\u201d— Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics) 1539347417
Trump's ongoing business relationship with the Saudis--including Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MbS, whose visit to the president's hotel in New York helped raise its revenues by 13 percent earlier this year--violates the Constitutional clause that forbids the president from receiving gifts or payments from foreign officials.
\u201cThe Saudi government is funneling $ directly into Trump\u2019s pockets while he refuses to hold them accountable for atrocities.\n\nThis is exactly what emoluments clause of Constitution was intended to prevent, & is why presidents should divest from biz interests before taking office.\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1539306505
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) drew attention to Trump's emoluments violations and put it bluntly on Twitter:
\u201cThe subtext and context for this MBS situation is the emoluments clause of the constitution.\u201d— Brian Schatz (@Brian Schatz) 1539311702
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit filed along with 200 other Democratic lawmakers, demanding information on foreign patrons of Trump's businesses, also suggested that the president is too entangled with the Saudis to condemn them for the journalists disappearance--or any other violations.
\u201cIs the Saudi gov't purposely filling Trump's pockets? If so, what do they expect in return? We don\u2019t know, because Trump refuses to comply with the Constitution\u2014requiring disclosure & Congressional approval for foreign gov't benefits. I\u2019m fighting in court to hold him accountable\u201d— Richard Blumenthal (@Richard Blumenthal) 1539193913