A depiction of President Donald Trump in Havana, Cuba. (Photo courtesy Michal Eskayo)
Nov 02, 2018
The United Staes once again displayed its near its near total outlier status on Thursday after the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly voted in favor of a symbolic resolution denouncing the 58-year U.S. embargo against Cuba.
Following the trend of how the 193-member body voted over the previous 27 years on the resolution, 189 nations voted (pdf) in favor of the "Necessity of ending the economic, commercial, and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba" resolution, while just two--the United States and uber ally Israel--voted against it. There were no abstentions, though two members states, Ukraine and Moldova, did not vote.
The U.S. had offered up 8 amendments to the resolution. They overwhelmingly failed.
U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley dismissed the resolution as "a waste of everyone's time." Haley went on to call the vote "one more time that countries feel they can poke the United States in the eye," then added: "But you're not hurting the United States when you do this. You are literally hurting the Cuban people by telling the regime that their treatment of their people is acceptable."
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez, for his part, said, "The government of the United States doesn't have the least moral authority to criticize Cuba or anyone when it comes to human rights." In addition, as the Associated Pressreports:
Rodriguez accused the U.S. government of committing "crimes against humanity," pointing to its dropping of the atom bomb in Japan in World War II, waging wars that "caused the death of millions, many of them innocent," and carrying out what he claimed were "extrajudicial executions, kidnapping, and torture." He also accused the U.S. of violating the human rights of its citizens, singling out Afro-Americans, Hispanics, minorities, refugees, and migrants.
Iran's envoy to the United Nations Gholam-Ali Khoshroo, meanwhile, said the U.S. embargo on Cuba not only "violates the United Nations' Charter as well as the international law" but "constitutes an obstacle for international cooperation."
In 2016, under the Obama administration, the United States for the first time abstained in the vote amid thawing relations between Washington and Havana.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The United Staes once again displayed its near its near total outlier status on Thursday after the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly voted in favor of a symbolic resolution denouncing the 58-year U.S. embargo against Cuba.
Following the trend of how the 193-member body voted over the previous 27 years on the resolution, 189 nations voted (pdf) in favor of the "Necessity of ending the economic, commercial, and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba" resolution, while just two--the United States and uber ally Israel--voted against it. There were no abstentions, though two members states, Ukraine and Moldova, did not vote.
The U.S. had offered up 8 amendments to the resolution. They overwhelmingly failed.
U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley dismissed the resolution as "a waste of everyone's time." Haley went on to call the vote "one more time that countries feel they can poke the United States in the eye," then added: "But you're not hurting the United States when you do this. You are literally hurting the Cuban people by telling the regime that their treatment of their people is acceptable."
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez, for his part, said, "The government of the United States doesn't have the least moral authority to criticize Cuba or anyone when it comes to human rights." In addition, as the Associated Pressreports:
Rodriguez accused the U.S. government of committing "crimes against humanity," pointing to its dropping of the atom bomb in Japan in World War II, waging wars that "caused the death of millions, many of them innocent," and carrying out what he claimed were "extrajudicial executions, kidnapping, and torture." He also accused the U.S. of violating the human rights of its citizens, singling out Afro-Americans, Hispanics, minorities, refugees, and migrants.
Iran's envoy to the United Nations Gholam-Ali Khoshroo, meanwhile, said the U.S. embargo on Cuba not only "violates the United Nations' Charter as well as the international law" but "constitutes an obstacle for international cooperation."
In 2016, under the Obama administration, the United States for the first time abstained in the vote amid thawing relations between Washington and Havana.
The United Staes once again displayed its near its near total outlier status on Thursday after the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly voted in favor of a symbolic resolution denouncing the 58-year U.S. embargo against Cuba.
Following the trend of how the 193-member body voted over the previous 27 years on the resolution, 189 nations voted (pdf) in favor of the "Necessity of ending the economic, commercial, and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba" resolution, while just two--the United States and uber ally Israel--voted against it. There were no abstentions, though two members states, Ukraine and Moldova, did not vote.
The U.S. had offered up 8 amendments to the resolution. They overwhelmingly failed.
U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley dismissed the resolution as "a waste of everyone's time." Haley went on to call the vote "one more time that countries feel they can poke the United States in the eye," then added: "But you're not hurting the United States when you do this. You are literally hurting the Cuban people by telling the regime that their treatment of their people is acceptable."
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez, for his part, said, "The government of the United States doesn't have the least moral authority to criticize Cuba or anyone when it comes to human rights." In addition, as the Associated Pressreports:
Rodriguez accused the U.S. government of committing "crimes against humanity," pointing to its dropping of the atom bomb in Japan in World War II, waging wars that "caused the death of millions, many of them innocent," and carrying out what he claimed were "extrajudicial executions, kidnapping, and torture." He also accused the U.S. of violating the human rights of its citizens, singling out Afro-Americans, Hispanics, minorities, refugees, and migrants.
Iran's envoy to the United Nations Gholam-Ali Khoshroo, meanwhile, said the U.S. embargo on Cuba not only "violates the United Nations' Charter as well as the international law" but "constitutes an obstacle for international cooperation."
In 2016, under the Obama administration, the United States for the first time abstained in the vote amid thawing relations between Washington and Havana.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.