SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A depiction of President Donald Trump in Havana, Cuba. (Photo courtesy Michal Eskayo)
With Landslide 189-2 UN Vote, International Community Once Again Rebukes US for Cuba Embargo
In vote on resolution condemning nearly six-decade embargo, 189 member states vote in favor
Nov 02, 2018
The United Staes once again displayed its near its near total outlier status on Thursday after the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly voted in favor of a symbolic resolution denouncing the 58-year U.S. embargo against Cuba.
Following the trend of how the 193-member body voted over the previous 27 years on the resolution, 189 nations voted (pdf) in favor of the "Necessity of ending the economic, commercial, and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba" resolution, while just two--the United States and uber ally Israel--voted against it. There were no abstentions, though two members states, Ukraine and Moldova, did not vote.
The U.S. had offered up 8 amendments to the resolution. They overwhelmingly failed.
U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley dismissed the resolution as "a waste of everyone's time." Haley went on to call the vote "one more time that countries feel they can poke the United States in the eye," then added: "But you're not hurting the United States when you do this. You are literally hurting the Cuban people by telling the regime that their treatment of their people is acceptable."
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez, for his part, said, "The government of the United States doesn't have the least moral authority to criticize Cuba or anyone when it comes to human rights." In addition, as the Associated Pressreports:
Rodriguez accused the U.S. government of committing "crimes against humanity," pointing to its dropping of the atom bomb in Japan in World War II, waging wars that "caused the death of millions, many of them innocent," and carrying out what he claimed were "extrajudicial executions, kidnapping, and torture." He also accused the U.S. of violating the human rights of its citizens, singling out Afro-Americans, Hispanics, minorities, refugees, and migrants.
Iran's envoy to the United Nations Gholam-Ali Khoshroo, meanwhile, said the U.S. embargo on Cuba not only "violates the United Nations' Charter as well as the international law" but "constitutes an obstacle for international cooperation."
In 2016, under the Obama administration, the United States for the first time abstained in the vote amid thawing relations between Washington and Havana.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The United Staes once again displayed its near its near total outlier status on Thursday after the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly voted in favor of a symbolic resolution denouncing the 58-year U.S. embargo against Cuba.
Following the trend of how the 193-member body voted over the previous 27 years on the resolution, 189 nations voted (pdf) in favor of the "Necessity of ending the economic, commercial, and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba" resolution, while just two--the United States and uber ally Israel--voted against it. There were no abstentions, though two members states, Ukraine and Moldova, did not vote.
The U.S. had offered up 8 amendments to the resolution. They overwhelmingly failed.
U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley dismissed the resolution as "a waste of everyone's time." Haley went on to call the vote "one more time that countries feel they can poke the United States in the eye," then added: "But you're not hurting the United States when you do this. You are literally hurting the Cuban people by telling the regime that their treatment of their people is acceptable."
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez, for his part, said, "The government of the United States doesn't have the least moral authority to criticize Cuba or anyone when it comes to human rights." In addition, as the Associated Pressreports:
Rodriguez accused the U.S. government of committing "crimes against humanity," pointing to its dropping of the atom bomb in Japan in World War II, waging wars that "caused the death of millions, many of them innocent," and carrying out what he claimed were "extrajudicial executions, kidnapping, and torture." He also accused the U.S. of violating the human rights of its citizens, singling out Afro-Americans, Hispanics, minorities, refugees, and migrants.
Iran's envoy to the United Nations Gholam-Ali Khoshroo, meanwhile, said the U.S. embargo on Cuba not only "violates the United Nations' Charter as well as the international law" but "constitutes an obstacle for international cooperation."
In 2016, under the Obama administration, the United States for the first time abstained in the vote amid thawing relations between Washington and Havana.
The United Staes once again displayed its near its near total outlier status on Thursday after the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly voted in favor of a symbolic resolution denouncing the 58-year U.S. embargo against Cuba.
Following the trend of how the 193-member body voted over the previous 27 years on the resolution, 189 nations voted (pdf) in favor of the "Necessity of ending the economic, commercial, and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba" resolution, while just two--the United States and uber ally Israel--voted against it. There were no abstentions, though two members states, Ukraine and Moldova, did not vote.
The U.S. had offered up 8 amendments to the resolution. They overwhelmingly failed.
U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley dismissed the resolution as "a waste of everyone's time." Haley went on to call the vote "one more time that countries feel they can poke the United States in the eye," then added: "But you're not hurting the United States when you do this. You are literally hurting the Cuban people by telling the regime that their treatment of their people is acceptable."
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez, for his part, said, "The government of the United States doesn't have the least moral authority to criticize Cuba or anyone when it comes to human rights." In addition, as the Associated Pressreports:
Rodriguez accused the U.S. government of committing "crimes against humanity," pointing to its dropping of the atom bomb in Japan in World War II, waging wars that "caused the death of millions, many of them innocent," and carrying out what he claimed were "extrajudicial executions, kidnapping, and torture." He also accused the U.S. of violating the human rights of its citizens, singling out Afro-Americans, Hispanics, minorities, refugees, and migrants.
Iran's envoy to the United Nations Gholam-Ali Khoshroo, meanwhile, said the U.S. embargo on Cuba not only "violates the United Nations' Charter as well as the international law" but "constitutes an obstacle for international cooperation."
In 2016, under the Obama administration, the United States for the first time abstained in the vote amid thawing relations between Washington and Havana.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.