SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Critics of President Donald Trump shredded his first public comments of California's most recent wildfires on Saturday, denouncing both the cruelty of a victim-blaming tweet he posted and the president's active curtailing of efforts to curb the climate crisis, which has exacerbated extreme events like the fires.
Trump threatened early Saturday morning to end federal support for California's efforts to fight wildfires like the ones raging in the northern part of the state as well as near Los Angeles, scolding the state for what he deemed poor forest management.
\u201cThere is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor. Billions of dollars are given each year, with so many lives lost, all because of gross mismanagement of the forests. Remedy now, or no more Fed payments!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1541837332
The president's tweet came hours after he declared a state of emergency in California, opening up federal funds to help local and state officials battle the Camp Fire in the northern town of Paradise as well as the Woolsey and Hill Fires in the south.
It also followed reports that at least nine people have been killed by the Camp Fire, now the most destructive blaze in the state's history. More than 50,000 people have been forced to evacuate due to the fire and more than 6,700 buildings have been destroyed--including more than 80 percent of the homes in one town.
In Southern California, more than 200,000 residents have had to evacuate due to the fires raging near Los Angeles.
\u201cTrump\u2019s evil knows no bounds. He is blaming CA forest management (a topic about which he knows zero) for the fires that are raging right now, rather than offering condolences and support. He\u2019s doing it only Bc CA rejects him. If it were a red state he\u2019d be nothing but sympathy\u201d— Tim Wise (@Tim Wise) 1541859916
\u201cHe offered no condolences to those killed in the blazes and did not explain how he believed the forests were being mismanaged by state authorities. https://t.co/TLmsRiOawT\u201d— HuffPost Green (@HuffPost Green) 1541865404
\u201c9/11: Brag (wrongly) about now having the tallest building in the area \n\nHurricane Maria: 3,000 die while Trump tweets insults at Puerto Ricans for having bank debt and being lazy\n\nPipe bombs to CNN: Blame CNN\n\nCalifornia wildfire: threaten to cut funding\n\nThis is who Trump is.\u201d— Brian Klaas (@Brian Klaas) 1541840872
Several critics condemned the president for ignoring the reality of the climate crisis, as he has during other extreme weather events--while taking direct action to stop national and global efforts to curb the carbon emissions that have contributed to the planet's rising temperature and the resulting hurricanes, droughts, and wildfires.
"While California's climate has always been fire-prone, the link between climate change and bigger fires is inextricable," wrote Kendra Pierre-Louis at the New York Times.
\u201c@realDonaldTrump This is such an ugly thing for anyone to say let alone the top person whose duty it is to protect & defend Americans. Blaming this on forest management but not climate change is like blaming hand soap for the flu instead of the virus.\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1541837332
\u201cCalifornia fires are getting more extreme because of climate change. The lives of billions of people, Californians included, are at risk because of the denial of the Trump Administration.\u201d— Zo\u00eb Keating (@Zo\u00eb Keating) 1541865097
"Behind the scenes of all of this, you've got temperatures that are about two to three degrees Fahrenheit warmer now than they would've been without global warming," Dr. Park Williams, a bioclimatologist at Columbia University, told the Times. "In pretty much every single way, a perfect recipe for fire is just kind of written in California. Nature creates the perfect conditions for fire, as long as people are there to start the fires. But then climate change, in a few different ways, seems to also load the dice toward more fire in the future."
As he did last summer as fires raged in the state and elsewhere in the West, Trump alluded to forest management reforms in California as the solution to wildfires--comments which critics have said are the president's way of lobbying for forests to be opened up to the logging industry.
\u201cre: trump's tweet about california's "bad forest management" (as in if you let the timber industry cut it all down you would not have these problems)\u201d— doreen anderson (@doreen anderson) 1541864443
As Common Dreams reported in August after Trump's earlier comments on wildfires, wildfire expert Michael Kodas has said cutting down more trees would do little to help California avoid blazes like ones that have swept through the state this week.
"A logging company would like to come in and remove the big, granddaddy trees that are really valuable as timber," Kodas told Wyoming Public Media at the time. "Most of what needs to be removed from these forests are brush, scrub, small, spindly trees that have been sick that have almost no economic value."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Critics of President Donald Trump shredded his first public comments of California's most recent wildfires on Saturday, denouncing both the cruelty of a victim-blaming tweet he posted and the president's active curtailing of efforts to curb the climate crisis, which has exacerbated extreme events like the fires.
Trump threatened early Saturday morning to end federal support for California's efforts to fight wildfires like the ones raging in the northern part of the state as well as near Los Angeles, scolding the state for what he deemed poor forest management.
\u201cThere is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor. Billions of dollars are given each year, with so many lives lost, all because of gross mismanagement of the forests. Remedy now, or no more Fed payments!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1541837332
The president's tweet came hours after he declared a state of emergency in California, opening up federal funds to help local and state officials battle the Camp Fire in the northern town of Paradise as well as the Woolsey and Hill Fires in the south.
It also followed reports that at least nine people have been killed by the Camp Fire, now the most destructive blaze in the state's history. More than 50,000 people have been forced to evacuate due to the fire and more than 6,700 buildings have been destroyed--including more than 80 percent of the homes in one town.
In Southern California, more than 200,000 residents have had to evacuate due to the fires raging near Los Angeles.
\u201cTrump\u2019s evil knows no bounds. He is blaming CA forest management (a topic about which he knows zero) for the fires that are raging right now, rather than offering condolences and support. He\u2019s doing it only Bc CA rejects him. If it were a red state he\u2019d be nothing but sympathy\u201d— Tim Wise (@Tim Wise) 1541859916
\u201cHe offered no condolences to those killed in the blazes and did not explain how he believed the forests were being mismanaged by state authorities. https://t.co/TLmsRiOawT\u201d— HuffPost Green (@HuffPost Green) 1541865404
\u201c9/11: Brag (wrongly) about now having the tallest building in the area \n\nHurricane Maria: 3,000 die while Trump tweets insults at Puerto Ricans for having bank debt and being lazy\n\nPipe bombs to CNN: Blame CNN\n\nCalifornia wildfire: threaten to cut funding\n\nThis is who Trump is.\u201d— Brian Klaas (@Brian Klaas) 1541840872
Several critics condemned the president for ignoring the reality of the climate crisis, as he has during other extreme weather events--while taking direct action to stop national and global efforts to curb the carbon emissions that have contributed to the planet's rising temperature and the resulting hurricanes, droughts, and wildfires.
"While California's climate has always been fire-prone, the link between climate change and bigger fires is inextricable," wrote Kendra Pierre-Louis at the New York Times.
\u201c@realDonaldTrump This is such an ugly thing for anyone to say let alone the top person whose duty it is to protect & defend Americans. Blaming this on forest management but not climate change is like blaming hand soap for the flu instead of the virus.\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1541837332
\u201cCalifornia fires are getting more extreme because of climate change. The lives of billions of people, Californians included, are at risk because of the denial of the Trump Administration.\u201d— Zo\u00eb Keating (@Zo\u00eb Keating) 1541865097
"Behind the scenes of all of this, you've got temperatures that are about two to three degrees Fahrenheit warmer now than they would've been without global warming," Dr. Park Williams, a bioclimatologist at Columbia University, told the Times. "In pretty much every single way, a perfect recipe for fire is just kind of written in California. Nature creates the perfect conditions for fire, as long as people are there to start the fires. But then climate change, in a few different ways, seems to also load the dice toward more fire in the future."
As he did last summer as fires raged in the state and elsewhere in the West, Trump alluded to forest management reforms in California as the solution to wildfires--comments which critics have said are the president's way of lobbying for forests to be opened up to the logging industry.
\u201cre: trump's tweet about california's "bad forest management" (as in if you let the timber industry cut it all down you would not have these problems)\u201d— doreen anderson (@doreen anderson) 1541864443
As Common Dreams reported in August after Trump's earlier comments on wildfires, wildfire expert Michael Kodas has said cutting down more trees would do little to help California avoid blazes like ones that have swept through the state this week.
"A logging company would like to come in and remove the big, granddaddy trees that are really valuable as timber," Kodas told Wyoming Public Media at the time. "Most of what needs to be removed from these forests are brush, scrub, small, spindly trees that have been sick that have almost no economic value."
Critics of President Donald Trump shredded his first public comments of California's most recent wildfires on Saturday, denouncing both the cruelty of a victim-blaming tweet he posted and the president's active curtailing of efforts to curb the climate crisis, which has exacerbated extreme events like the fires.
Trump threatened early Saturday morning to end federal support for California's efforts to fight wildfires like the ones raging in the northern part of the state as well as near Los Angeles, scolding the state for what he deemed poor forest management.
\u201cThere is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor. Billions of dollars are given each year, with so many lives lost, all because of gross mismanagement of the forests. Remedy now, or no more Fed payments!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1541837332
The president's tweet came hours after he declared a state of emergency in California, opening up federal funds to help local and state officials battle the Camp Fire in the northern town of Paradise as well as the Woolsey and Hill Fires in the south.
It also followed reports that at least nine people have been killed by the Camp Fire, now the most destructive blaze in the state's history. More than 50,000 people have been forced to evacuate due to the fire and more than 6,700 buildings have been destroyed--including more than 80 percent of the homes in one town.
In Southern California, more than 200,000 residents have had to evacuate due to the fires raging near Los Angeles.
\u201cTrump\u2019s evil knows no bounds. He is blaming CA forest management (a topic about which he knows zero) for the fires that are raging right now, rather than offering condolences and support. He\u2019s doing it only Bc CA rejects him. If it were a red state he\u2019d be nothing but sympathy\u201d— Tim Wise (@Tim Wise) 1541859916
\u201cHe offered no condolences to those killed in the blazes and did not explain how he believed the forests were being mismanaged by state authorities. https://t.co/TLmsRiOawT\u201d— HuffPost Green (@HuffPost Green) 1541865404
\u201c9/11: Brag (wrongly) about now having the tallest building in the area \n\nHurricane Maria: 3,000 die while Trump tweets insults at Puerto Ricans for having bank debt and being lazy\n\nPipe bombs to CNN: Blame CNN\n\nCalifornia wildfire: threaten to cut funding\n\nThis is who Trump is.\u201d— Brian Klaas (@Brian Klaas) 1541840872
Several critics condemned the president for ignoring the reality of the climate crisis, as he has during other extreme weather events--while taking direct action to stop national and global efforts to curb the carbon emissions that have contributed to the planet's rising temperature and the resulting hurricanes, droughts, and wildfires.
"While California's climate has always been fire-prone, the link between climate change and bigger fires is inextricable," wrote Kendra Pierre-Louis at the New York Times.
\u201c@realDonaldTrump This is such an ugly thing for anyone to say let alone the top person whose duty it is to protect & defend Americans. Blaming this on forest management but not climate change is like blaming hand soap for the flu instead of the virus.\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1541837332
\u201cCalifornia fires are getting more extreme because of climate change. The lives of billions of people, Californians included, are at risk because of the denial of the Trump Administration.\u201d— Zo\u00eb Keating (@Zo\u00eb Keating) 1541865097
"Behind the scenes of all of this, you've got temperatures that are about two to three degrees Fahrenheit warmer now than they would've been without global warming," Dr. Park Williams, a bioclimatologist at Columbia University, told the Times. "In pretty much every single way, a perfect recipe for fire is just kind of written in California. Nature creates the perfect conditions for fire, as long as people are there to start the fires. But then climate change, in a few different ways, seems to also load the dice toward more fire in the future."
As he did last summer as fires raged in the state and elsewhere in the West, Trump alluded to forest management reforms in California as the solution to wildfires--comments which critics have said are the president's way of lobbying for forests to be opened up to the logging industry.
\u201cre: trump's tweet about california's "bad forest management" (as in if you let the timber industry cut it all down you would not have these problems)\u201d— doreen anderson (@doreen anderson) 1541864443
As Common Dreams reported in August after Trump's earlier comments on wildfires, wildfire expert Michael Kodas has said cutting down more trees would do little to help California avoid blazes like ones that have swept through the state this week.
"A logging company would like to come in and remove the big, granddaddy trees that are really valuable as timber," Kodas told Wyoming Public Media at the time. "Most of what needs to be removed from these forests are brush, scrub, small, spindly trees that have been sick that have almost no economic value."