Mourners carry the coffin of a child at the funeral procession for those killed in an airstrike on a bus carried out by a warplane of the Saudi Arabia-led coalition on August 13, 2018 in Saada, Yemen. (Photo: Mohammed Hamoud/Getty Images)
Nov 13, 2018
Anti-war groups have been cautiously hopefully in recent weeks that the U.S. would withdraw support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen following widespread outcry over Saudi Arabia's murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi--but those hopes were dashed late Tuesday when House Republicans moved to stop a long-planned-for vote from going to the floor.
In their final weeks in control of the House Rules Committee, Republicans adopted a rule to de-prioritize Rep. Ro Khanna's (D-Calif.) bill invoking the War Powers Resolution (H.R. 138), which argues that U.S. participation in the assault on Yemen is illegal because Congress never voted to approve it. The move ensured that Republicans can avoid voting on the bill--a vote in which they would have to choose between standing up against a war that has killed more than 15,000 civilians or angering President Donald Trump.
\u201cThis is happening today. Reminder that 14 million are at risk of famine because the US has continued to fund Saudis to continue their war. We're going to destroy this country for generations if we don't stop this war.\u201d— Saikat Chakrabarti (@Saikat Chakrabarti) 1542197513
The Republican maneuver was denounced as "disgraceful" by the anti-war group Peace Action.
"Apparently, neither Saudi Arabia's brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi nor its mid-summer bombing of a school bus packed full of children were enough to break the ice surrounding House Majority Leader Paul Ryan's heart," said Kevin Martin, president of the group, in a statement.
"Millions of people in Yemen are on the verge of starvation, a crisis brought on by Saudi tactics in the war, yet in the face of a maelstrom of condemnation of Saudi Arabia from the national and international community, House leadership would still rather prevent Congress from voting on whether or not to end U.S. support for Saudi Arabia's starvation campaign in Yemen than risk interfering with arms industry profits," he added.
Peace Action and other groups have been joined since the war began in 2015 by Democratic lawmakers including Khanna and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) as well as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in demanding that the U.S. end its support for the Saudi-led assault. The calls for the passage of H.R. 138 and the Senate's version of the bill have gained traction since October, after the Saudis admitted to the murder of Khashoggi.
Last week, the Trump administration announced it would stop refueling the Saudis' planes, following Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's call for a ceasefire in Yemen. Both announcements were met with cautious optimism from progressives and humanitarian groups along with criticism of their late arrival.
The GOP's decision on Tuesday made it clear that the party has no plans to use its final weeks in power to help stop the assault on Yemen, in which recent targets have included a school bus, a marketplace, and a wedding party--all using American intelligence and bombs.
Democratic lawmakers and other critics rebuked the Republicans for what House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) called an abdication of their congressional responsibility.
\u201cThe Republicans tomorrow are trying to bury my Yemen War Powers Resolution in a rule that would prevent an up or down vote. This is unprecedented and would undermine the very purpose of the War Powers Act. Anyone who cares about Article I of the Constitution should be outraged.\u201d— Ro Khanna (@Ro Khanna) 1542155781
\u201cRo Khanna tried to end the US involvement in the Yemen massacre\n\nPro-life Republicans blocked it\u201d— jordan (@jordan) 1542167429
\u201cThis, like everything about America's involvement in the war in Yemen, is a disgrace. https://t.co/t6lc1Mgcl4\u201d— Pat_Garofalo (@Pat_Garofalo) 1542207111
\u201cThis Congress should have a full and transparent debate on the United States\u2019s role in #Yemen\u2019s civil conflict; by blocking that from happening, House Republicans are shirking their Congressional responsibility. https://t.co/ECbYmYAGU3\u201d— Steny Hoyer (@Steny Hoyer) 1542164524
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
jamal khashoggimike pompeopeace actionrepublican partysaudi arabiasteny hoyerus houseus militaryyemen
Anti-war groups have been cautiously hopefully in recent weeks that the U.S. would withdraw support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen following widespread outcry over Saudi Arabia's murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi--but those hopes were dashed late Tuesday when House Republicans moved to stop a long-planned-for vote from going to the floor.
In their final weeks in control of the House Rules Committee, Republicans adopted a rule to de-prioritize Rep. Ro Khanna's (D-Calif.) bill invoking the War Powers Resolution (H.R. 138), which argues that U.S. participation in the assault on Yemen is illegal because Congress never voted to approve it. The move ensured that Republicans can avoid voting on the bill--a vote in which they would have to choose between standing up against a war that has killed more than 15,000 civilians or angering President Donald Trump.
\u201cThis is happening today. Reminder that 14 million are at risk of famine because the US has continued to fund Saudis to continue their war. We're going to destroy this country for generations if we don't stop this war.\u201d— Saikat Chakrabarti (@Saikat Chakrabarti) 1542197513
The Republican maneuver was denounced as "disgraceful" by the anti-war group Peace Action.
"Apparently, neither Saudi Arabia's brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi nor its mid-summer bombing of a school bus packed full of children were enough to break the ice surrounding House Majority Leader Paul Ryan's heart," said Kevin Martin, president of the group, in a statement.
"Millions of people in Yemen are on the verge of starvation, a crisis brought on by Saudi tactics in the war, yet in the face of a maelstrom of condemnation of Saudi Arabia from the national and international community, House leadership would still rather prevent Congress from voting on whether or not to end U.S. support for Saudi Arabia's starvation campaign in Yemen than risk interfering with arms industry profits," he added.
Peace Action and other groups have been joined since the war began in 2015 by Democratic lawmakers including Khanna and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) as well as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in demanding that the U.S. end its support for the Saudi-led assault. The calls for the passage of H.R. 138 and the Senate's version of the bill have gained traction since October, after the Saudis admitted to the murder of Khashoggi.
Last week, the Trump administration announced it would stop refueling the Saudis' planes, following Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's call for a ceasefire in Yemen. Both announcements were met with cautious optimism from progressives and humanitarian groups along with criticism of their late arrival.
The GOP's decision on Tuesday made it clear that the party has no plans to use its final weeks in power to help stop the assault on Yemen, in which recent targets have included a school bus, a marketplace, and a wedding party--all using American intelligence and bombs.
Democratic lawmakers and other critics rebuked the Republicans for what House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) called an abdication of their congressional responsibility.
\u201cThe Republicans tomorrow are trying to bury my Yemen War Powers Resolution in a rule that would prevent an up or down vote. This is unprecedented and would undermine the very purpose of the War Powers Act. Anyone who cares about Article I of the Constitution should be outraged.\u201d— Ro Khanna (@Ro Khanna) 1542155781
\u201cRo Khanna tried to end the US involvement in the Yemen massacre\n\nPro-life Republicans blocked it\u201d— jordan (@jordan) 1542167429
\u201cThis, like everything about America's involvement in the war in Yemen, is a disgrace. https://t.co/t6lc1Mgcl4\u201d— Pat_Garofalo (@Pat_Garofalo) 1542207111
\u201cThis Congress should have a full and transparent debate on the United States\u2019s role in #Yemen\u2019s civil conflict; by blocking that from happening, House Republicans are shirking their Congressional responsibility. https://t.co/ECbYmYAGU3\u201d— Steny Hoyer (@Steny Hoyer) 1542164524
Anti-war groups have been cautiously hopefully in recent weeks that the U.S. would withdraw support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen following widespread outcry over Saudi Arabia's murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi--but those hopes were dashed late Tuesday when House Republicans moved to stop a long-planned-for vote from going to the floor.
In their final weeks in control of the House Rules Committee, Republicans adopted a rule to de-prioritize Rep. Ro Khanna's (D-Calif.) bill invoking the War Powers Resolution (H.R. 138), which argues that U.S. participation in the assault on Yemen is illegal because Congress never voted to approve it. The move ensured that Republicans can avoid voting on the bill--a vote in which they would have to choose between standing up against a war that has killed more than 15,000 civilians or angering President Donald Trump.
\u201cThis is happening today. Reminder that 14 million are at risk of famine because the US has continued to fund Saudis to continue their war. We're going to destroy this country for generations if we don't stop this war.\u201d— Saikat Chakrabarti (@Saikat Chakrabarti) 1542197513
The Republican maneuver was denounced as "disgraceful" by the anti-war group Peace Action.
"Apparently, neither Saudi Arabia's brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi nor its mid-summer bombing of a school bus packed full of children were enough to break the ice surrounding House Majority Leader Paul Ryan's heart," said Kevin Martin, president of the group, in a statement.
"Millions of people in Yemen are on the verge of starvation, a crisis brought on by Saudi tactics in the war, yet in the face of a maelstrom of condemnation of Saudi Arabia from the national and international community, House leadership would still rather prevent Congress from voting on whether or not to end U.S. support for Saudi Arabia's starvation campaign in Yemen than risk interfering with arms industry profits," he added.
Peace Action and other groups have been joined since the war began in 2015 by Democratic lawmakers including Khanna and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) as well as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in demanding that the U.S. end its support for the Saudi-led assault. The calls for the passage of H.R. 138 and the Senate's version of the bill have gained traction since October, after the Saudis admitted to the murder of Khashoggi.
Last week, the Trump administration announced it would stop refueling the Saudis' planes, following Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's call for a ceasefire in Yemen. Both announcements were met with cautious optimism from progressives and humanitarian groups along with criticism of their late arrival.
The GOP's decision on Tuesday made it clear that the party has no plans to use its final weeks in power to help stop the assault on Yemen, in which recent targets have included a school bus, a marketplace, and a wedding party--all using American intelligence and bombs.
Democratic lawmakers and other critics rebuked the Republicans for what House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) called an abdication of their congressional responsibility.
\u201cThe Republicans tomorrow are trying to bury my Yemen War Powers Resolution in a rule that would prevent an up or down vote. This is unprecedented and would undermine the very purpose of the War Powers Act. Anyone who cares about Article I of the Constitution should be outraged.\u201d— Ro Khanna (@Ro Khanna) 1542155781
\u201cRo Khanna tried to end the US involvement in the Yemen massacre\n\nPro-life Republicans blocked it\u201d— jordan (@jordan) 1542167429
\u201cThis, like everything about America's involvement in the war in Yemen, is a disgrace. https://t.co/t6lc1Mgcl4\u201d— Pat_Garofalo (@Pat_Garofalo) 1542207111
\u201cThis Congress should have a full and transparent debate on the United States\u2019s role in #Yemen\u2019s civil conflict; by blocking that from happening, House Republicans are shirking their Congressional responsibility. https://t.co/ECbYmYAGU3\u201d— Steny Hoyer (@Steny Hoyer) 1542164524
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.