Climate activists hold a sign outside COP21 in Paris on Dec. 12, 2015. (Photo: Carlos Felipe Pardo/flickr/cc)
Nov 27, 2018
Climate campaigners welcomed what they saw as a "step forward" and "glimmer of hope" following the European Commission's announcement Wednesday that it had set a goal of 2050 to get to net zero climate emissions. But, they warned, the plan still doesn't go far enough to avert planetary crisis.
"Going climate neutral is necessary, possible, and in Europe's interest," stated Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy, Miguel Arias Canete. He added that it "is in Europe's interest to stop spending on fossil fuel imports and invest in meaningful improvements to the daily lives of all Europeans."
The latest IPCC report, Arias Canete told reporters, was "a real wake-up call," and "today we are responding to this call."
The proposal, put forth days before the United Nations climate summit known as COP24 kicks off in Katowice, Poland, declares that the "status quo is not an option." It also says the "vision presented today does not propose to change the 2030 climate and energy targets but will enable the EU to build on them and develop in due time policies towards 2050." Greenpeace adds in a press statement: "The IPCC report also clearly states that emission cuts between now and 2030 are what will make or break the world's response to climate change."
Herein lies a problem, says Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe.
"By opting for net zero emissions by 2050, the EU will be better equipped to prevent the climate catastrophe," said Wendel Trio, director of the group. "But this commitment alone would not be enough to pull us back from the brink of the climate breakdown. As a matter of urgency, the EU needs to massively increase the 2030 target. It is the short term emission cuts that will make or break our response to climate change."
Moreover, "With communities already feeling the effects of climate breakdown, today's suggestion by the EU to go 'net zero' in 2050 is simply too late for Europe to stop burning carbon," said Clemence Hutin, climate justice campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe.
\u201cThanks for your work to achieve this step @MAC_europa.\n\nBut with communities already feeling the effects of #climatebreakdown, today\u2019s 2050 \u2018net zero\u2019 announcement is simply too late for Europe to stop burning carbon.\n\nLet's go #fossilfree by 2030!\u201d— Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d (@Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d) 1543407540
"Europe is largely responsible for the carbon pollution in Earth's atmosphere and must do its fair share of action--meaning we must massively and speedily transform our society to phase out fossil fuels in the next decade, not thirty years' time," she continued.
Another problem in the proposal is the reliance on carbon capture and storage to address emissions. Corporate Europe Observatory says that shows the thumbprint of the natural gas industry lobby on the vision statement.
"As long as gas industry lobbyists continue to have a strong grip over policy-making, we will not be able to break free from fossil fuels," said the group's climate policy researcher Pascoe Sabido. "We need a firewall that protects EU and national level decision-makers from gas industry lobbyists if we are serious about tackling the climate crisis."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Climate campaigners welcomed what they saw as a "step forward" and "glimmer of hope" following the European Commission's announcement Wednesday that it had set a goal of 2050 to get to net zero climate emissions. But, they warned, the plan still doesn't go far enough to avert planetary crisis.
"Going climate neutral is necessary, possible, and in Europe's interest," stated Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy, Miguel Arias Canete. He added that it "is in Europe's interest to stop spending on fossil fuel imports and invest in meaningful improvements to the daily lives of all Europeans."
The latest IPCC report, Arias Canete told reporters, was "a real wake-up call," and "today we are responding to this call."
The proposal, put forth days before the United Nations climate summit known as COP24 kicks off in Katowice, Poland, declares that the "status quo is not an option." It also says the "vision presented today does not propose to change the 2030 climate and energy targets but will enable the EU to build on them and develop in due time policies towards 2050." Greenpeace adds in a press statement: "The IPCC report also clearly states that emission cuts between now and 2030 are what will make or break the world's response to climate change."
Herein lies a problem, says Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe.
"By opting for net zero emissions by 2050, the EU will be better equipped to prevent the climate catastrophe," said Wendel Trio, director of the group. "But this commitment alone would not be enough to pull us back from the brink of the climate breakdown. As a matter of urgency, the EU needs to massively increase the 2030 target. It is the short term emission cuts that will make or break our response to climate change."
Moreover, "With communities already feeling the effects of climate breakdown, today's suggestion by the EU to go 'net zero' in 2050 is simply too late for Europe to stop burning carbon," said Clemence Hutin, climate justice campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe.
\u201cThanks for your work to achieve this step @MAC_europa.\n\nBut with communities already feeling the effects of #climatebreakdown, today\u2019s 2050 \u2018net zero\u2019 announcement is simply too late for Europe to stop burning carbon.\n\nLet's go #fossilfree by 2030!\u201d— Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d (@Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d) 1543407540
"Europe is largely responsible for the carbon pollution in Earth's atmosphere and must do its fair share of action--meaning we must massively and speedily transform our society to phase out fossil fuels in the next decade, not thirty years' time," she continued.
Another problem in the proposal is the reliance on carbon capture and storage to address emissions. Corporate Europe Observatory says that shows the thumbprint of the natural gas industry lobby on the vision statement.
"As long as gas industry lobbyists continue to have a strong grip over policy-making, we will not be able to break free from fossil fuels," said the group's climate policy researcher Pascoe Sabido. "We need a firewall that protects EU and national level decision-makers from gas industry lobbyists if we are serious about tackling the climate crisis."
Climate campaigners welcomed what they saw as a "step forward" and "glimmer of hope" following the European Commission's announcement Wednesday that it had set a goal of 2050 to get to net zero climate emissions. But, they warned, the plan still doesn't go far enough to avert planetary crisis.
"Going climate neutral is necessary, possible, and in Europe's interest," stated Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy, Miguel Arias Canete. He added that it "is in Europe's interest to stop spending on fossil fuel imports and invest in meaningful improvements to the daily lives of all Europeans."
The latest IPCC report, Arias Canete told reporters, was "a real wake-up call," and "today we are responding to this call."
The proposal, put forth days before the United Nations climate summit known as COP24 kicks off in Katowice, Poland, declares that the "status quo is not an option." It also says the "vision presented today does not propose to change the 2030 climate and energy targets but will enable the EU to build on them and develop in due time policies towards 2050." Greenpeace adds in a press statement: "The IPCC report also clearly states that emission cuts between now and 2030 are what will make or break the world's response to climate change."
Herein lies a problem, says Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe.
"By opting for net zero emissions by 2050, the EU will be better equipped to prevent the climate catastrophe," said Wendel Trio, director of the group. "But this commitment alone would not be enough to pull us back from the brink of the climate breakdown. As a matter of urgency, the EU needs to massively increase the 2030 target. It is the short term emission cuts that will make or break our response to climate change."
Moreover, "With communities already feeling the effects of climate breakdown, today's suggestion by the EU to go 'net zero' in 2050 is simply too late for Europe to stop burning carbon," said Clemence Hutin, climate justice campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe.
\u201cThanks for your work to achieve this step @MAC_europa.\n\nBut with communities already feeling the effects of #climatebreakdown, today\u2019s 2050 \u2018net zero\u2019 announcement is simply too late for Europe to stop burning carbon.\n\nLet's go #fossilfree by 2030!\u201d— Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d (@Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d) 1543407540
"Europe is largely responsible for the carbon pollution in Earth's atmosphere and must do its fair share of action--meaning we must massively and speedily transform our society to phase out fossil fuels in the next decade, not thirty years' time," she continued.
Another problem in the proposal is the reliance on carbon capture and storage to address emissions. Corporate Europe Observatory says that shows the thumbprint of the natural gas industry lobby on the vision statement.
"As long as gas industry lobbyists continue to have a strong grip over policy-making, we will not be able to break free from fossil fuels," said the group's climate policy researcher Pascoe Sabido. "We need a firewall that protects EU and national level decision-makers from gas industry lobbyists if we are serious about tackling the climate crisis."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.