SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Richard B. Russell (D-Ga.) filibustered anti-lynching bills in the 1960s. On Wednesday, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) led the charge to finally pass legislation making lynching a federal crime. (Photo: LBJ Library/Steve Rhodes/Flickr/cc)
After 200 Attempts Over a Century, Senate Makes What 'Should Be an Obvious Choice,' Recognizing Lynching as a Federal Crime
"Lynching is part of the dark and despicable aspect of our country's history that followed slavery and many other outrages in our country...They were needless and horrendous acts of violence and they were motivated by racism. And we must acknowledge that fact lest we repeat it."
Dec 18, 2018
More than a century after legislation to recognize lynching as a crime was first introduced in Congress, a bill was unanimously passed in the Senate on Wednesday making the brutal method of public execution--which was common throughout the late 19th century and persisted through the civil rights era--as a "federal civil-rights crime."
Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Tim Scott (R-S.C.) introduced the latest bill to make lynching punishable as a hate crime. The legislation passed unanimously.
"This is an historic piece of legislation that would criminalize lynching, attempts to lynch, and conspiracy to lynch for the first time in American history," said Harris on the Senate floor ahead of the vote. "Lynching is part of the dark and despicable aspect of our country's history that followed slavery and many other outrages in our country...They were needless and horrendous acts of violence and they were motivated by racism. And we must acknowledge that fact lest we repeat it."
\u201cCongress has been attempting to pass a federal anti-lynching law since 1882. From 1882 to 1968, 200 bills were introduced in the House, and seven presidents asked for a federal law against lynching.\n\nFederal anti-lynching legislation never got past the Senate, until today.\u201d— Jane Coaston (@Jane Coaston) 1545254935
Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), who came under fire last month when she joked about attending a "public hanging" while facing black Democratic candidate Mike Espy in a run-off election--in the state with the most recorded lynchings in U.S. history--was presiding over the Senate during the debate.
According to the NAACP, 4,743 people were lynched between 1882 and 1968, and nearly three-quarters of the victims were black. White victims were generally targeted for their anti-racist and anti-lynching beliefs.
Over the past two decades, two murders of black men by white supremacists--those of James Byrd and Brandon McClelland--were classified as lynchings by some.
Despite the persistence of these public extrajudicial killings, lawmakers failed to pass legislation codifying the practice as a crime--although proposals were brought up in Congress about 200 times since the first attempt at the turn of the 20th century, according to Harris.
As Waleed Shahid of Justice Democrats wrote on Twitter, refusal to stand firmly against lynching by the Democratic Party for several decades, in the interest of uniting with conservatives, was to blame for much of the inaction.
\u201cThe anti-lynching legislation @KamalaHarris and @CoryBooker successfully pushed forward today has so much historical significance.\n\nFor years, Northern white liberals and Democrats ignored the issue of lynching because it was 'divisive.'\n\nThis is a major step toward justice.\u201d— Waleed Shahid (@Waleed Shahid) 1545247063
\u201cPresident Franklin Roosevelt told Walter White of the NAACP:\n\n"If I come out for the anti-lynching bill, they [Southern Democrats] will block every bill I ask Congress to pass to keep America from collapsing. I just can't take that risk."\u201d— Waleed Shahid (@Waleed Shahid) 1545247063
In the 1960s, Sen. Richard Russell (D-Ga.)--after whom one of the Senate office buildings on Capitol Hill is named--successfully blocked numerous pieces of legislation making lynching a crime.
"For over a century members of Congress have attempted to pass some version of a bill that would recognize lynching for what it is, a bias, motivated act of terror. ... We do know the passage of this bill, even though it cannot reverse irrevocable harm that lynching was used as a terror of suppression, the passage of this bill is a recognition of that dark past," Booker said.
Rep.-elect Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) was among the progressive lawmakers who applauded the vote--and expressed dismay that the subject of lynching's illegality still needed to be brought up in the Senate in 2018.
"Making lynching a hate crime should be an obvious choice," she wrote. "There is no more clear symbol of the terror of racism and hate."
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
More than a century after legislation to recognize lynching as a crime was first introduced in Congress, a bill was unanimously passed in the Senate on Wednesday making the brutal method of public execution--which was common throughout the late 19th century and persisted through the civil rights era--as a "federal civil-rights crime."
Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Tim Scott (R-S.C.) introduced the latest bill to make lynching punishable as a hate crime. The legislation passed unanimously.
"This is an historic piece of legislation that would criminalize lynching, attempts to lynch, and conspiracy to lynch for the first time in American history," said Harris on the Senate floor ahead of the vote. "Lynching is part of the dark and despicable aspect of our country's history that followed slavery and many other outrages in our country...They were needless and horrendous acts of violence and they were motivated by racism. And we must acknowledge that fact lest we repeat it."
\u201cCongress has been attempting to pass a federal anti-lynching law since 1882. From 1882 to 1968, 200 bills were introduced in the House, and seven presidents asked for a federal law against lynching.\n\nFederal anti-lynching legislation never got past the Senate, until today.\u201d— Jane Coaston (@Jane Coaston) 1545254935
Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), who came under fire last month when she joked about attending a "public hanging" while facing black Democratic candidate Mike Espy in a run-off election--in the state with the most recorded lynchings in U.S. history--was presiding over the Senate during the debate.
According to the NAACP, 4,743 people were lynched between 1882 and 1968, and nearly three-quarters of the victims were black. White victims were generally targeted for their anti-racist and anti-lynching beliefs.
Over the past two decades, two murders of black men by white supremacists--those of James Byrd and Brandon McClelland--were classified as lynchings by some.
Despite the persistence of these public extrajudicial killings, lawmakers failed to pass legislation codifying the practice as a crime--although proposals were brought up in Congress about 200 times since the first attempt at the turn of the 20th century, according to Harris.
As Waleed Shahid of Justice Democrats wrote on Twitter, refusal to stand firmly against lynching by the Democratic Party for several decades, in the interest of uniting with conservatives, was to blame for much of the inaction.
\u201cThe anti-lynching legislation @KamalaHarris and @CoryBooker successfully pushed forward today has so much historical significance.\n\nFor years, Northern white liberals and Democrats ignored the issue of lynching because it was 'divisive.'\n\nThis is a major step toward justice.\u201d— Waleed Shahid (@Waleed Shahid) 1545247063
\u201cPresident Franklin Roosevelt told Walter White of the NAACP:\n\n"If I come out for the anti-lynching bill, they [Southern Democrats] will block every bill I ask Congress to pass to keep America from collapsing. I just can't take that risk."\u201d— Waleed Shahid (@Waleed Shahid) 1545247063
In the 1960s, Sen. Richard Russell (D-Ga.)--after whom one of the Senate office buildings on Capitol Hill is named--successfully blocked numerous pieces of legislation making lynching a crime.
"For over a century members of Congress have attempted to pass some version of a bill that would recognize lynching for what it is, a bias, motivated act of terror. ... We do know the passage of this bill, even though it cannot reverse irrevocable harm that lynching was used as a terror of suppression, the passage of this bill is a recognition of that dark past," Booker said.
Rep.-elect Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) was among the progressive lawmakers who applauded the vote--and expressed dismay that the subject of lynching's illegality still needed to be brought up in the Senate in 2018.
"Making lynching a hate crime should be an obvious choice," she wrote. "There is no more clear symbol of the terror of racism and hate."
More than a century after legislation to recognize lynching as a crime was first introduced in Congress, a bill was unanimously passed in the Senate on Wednesday making the brutal method of public execution--which was common throughout the late 19th century and persisted through the civil rights era--as a "federal civil-rights crime."
Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Tim Scott (R-S.C.) introduced the latest bill to make lynching punishable as a hate crime. The legislation passed unanimously.
"This is an historic piece of legislation that would criminalize lynching, attempts to lynch, and conspiracy to lynch for the first time in American history," said Harris on the Senate floor ahead of the vote. "Lynching is part of the dark and despicable aspect of our country's history that followed slavery and many other outrages in our country...They were needless and horrendous acts of violence and they were motivated by racism. And we must acknowledge that fact lest we repeat it."
\u201cCongress has been attempting to pass a federal anti-lynching law since 1882. From 1882 to 1968, 200 bills were introduced in the House, and seven presidents asked for a federal law against lynching.\n\nFederal anti-lynching legislation never got past the Senate, until today.\u201d— Jane Coaston (@Jane Coaston) 1545254935
Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), who came under fire last month when she joked about attending a "public hanging" while facing black Democratic candidate Mike Espy in a run-off election--in the state with the most recorded lynchings in U.S. history--was presiding over the Senate during the debate.
According to the NAACP, 4,743 people were lynched between 1882 and 1968, and nearly three-quarters of the victims were black. White victims were generally targeted for their anti-racist and anti-lynching beliefs.
Over the past two decades, two murders of black men by white supremacists--those of James Byrd and Brandon McClelland--were classified as lynchings by some.
Despite the persistence of these public extrajudicial killings, lawmakers failed to pass legislation codifying the practice as a crime--although proposals were brought up in Congress about 200 times since the first attempt at the turn of the 20th century, according to Harris.
As Waleed Shahid of Justice Democrats wrote on Twitter, refusal to stand firmly against lynching by the Democratic Party for several decades, in the interest of uniting with conservatives, was to blame for much of the inaction.
\u201cThe anti-lynching legislation @KamalaHarris and @CoryBooker successfully pushed forward today has so much historical significance.\n\nFor years, Northern white liberals and Democrats ignored the issue of lynching because it was 'divisive.'\n\nThis is a major step toward justice.\u201d— Waleed Shahid (@Waleed Shahid) 1545247063
\u201cPresident Franklin Roosevelt told Walter White of the NAACP:\n\n"If I come out for the anti-lynching bill, they [Southern Democrats] will block every bill I ask Congress to pass to keep America from collapsing. I just can't take that risk."\u201d— Waleed Shahid (@Waleed Shahid) 1545247063
In the 1960s, Sen. Richard Russell (D-Ga.)--after whom one of the Senate office buildings on Capitol Hill is named--successfully blocked numerous pieces of legislation making lynching a crime.
"For over a century members of Congress have attempted to pass some version of a bill that would recognize lynching for what it is, a bias, motivated act of terror. ... We do know the passage of this bill, even though it cannot reverse irrevocable harm that lynching was used as a terror of suppression, the passage of this bill is a recognition of that dark past," Booker said.
Rep.-elect Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) was among the progressive lawmakers who applauded the vote--and expressed dismay that the subject of lynching's illegality still needed to be brought up in the Senate in 2018.
"Making lynching a hate crime should be an obvious choice," she wrote. "There is no more clear symbol of the terror of racism and hate."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.