To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
"Hearing Democrats like Joe Donnelly talk about Medicare for All being 'too extreme' for their constituents have clearly never lived a day in their life wondering if they'll have access to the medical care they need for themselves or their loved ones," wrote Alec Uebersohn, a PhD student at the University of California, Berkeley. (Photo: CNN/Screengrab)
Despite losing reelection in November after running on a fervently anti-Medicare for All platform, outgoing Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) confidently declared during a CNNinterview on Friday that the bold and increasingly popular solution to America's healthcare crisis does not inspire voters in states like Indiana.
"When you talk 'Medicare for All'... you start losing the people in my state," Donnelly said. "The talk on the coasts just doesn't get it done in the middle."
The notion that an ambitious left-wing platform only resonates "on the coasts" and is not electorally viable in more conservative states has become a common trope among "moderate" Democrats, but progressives were quick to push back on Donnelly's evidence-free claim, noting that Medicare for All has high levels of support in Indiana and throughout the Midwest.
"Given that Sen. Donnelly lost saying stuff like this, perhaps the lesson is the opposite--Indianans don't want a Democrat who, like Republicans, opposes good policy," argued Ben Spielberg, co-founder of 34justice, in a tweet on Saturday.
According to the progressive policy shop Data for Progress and the Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicare for All polls at 55 percent support in Indiana--and many were quick to point to this data in response to Donnelly's remarks.
\u201cJoe Donnelly, Democrat from Indiana: "When you talk Medicare for All...you start losing the people in my state."\n\nData: 55% of all voters in Indiana support #MedicareForAll, including large majorities of Democrats.\n\nNovember Senate election: @SenDonnelly lost.\n\n@DataProgress\u201d— Micah Johnson, MD (@Micah Johnson, MD) 1546111655
\u201c@CNN Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) co-sponsored Bernie Sanders #MedicareForAll bill & got re-elected in a midwestern state. Joe Donnelly (D-IN) didn\u2019t and lost re-election.\n\nBaldwin also voted against #BankLobbyistAct which Donnelly voted for. Every US Sen who lost re-election voted for it.\u201d— CNN (@CNN) 1546049704
As Warren Gunnels, policy director for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), pointed out, Donnelly ran a campaign ad attacking Medicare for All and the "radical left" while expressing support for President Donald Trump's proposed border wall--and he lost reelection.
By contrast, Gunnels noted, Sanders campaigned on Medicare for All in Indiana during the 2016 Democratic presidential primary and won, demonstrating that voters in the Midwest are open to single-payer healthcare and other bold progressive policies.
\u201cHe cut an ad:\n- Against #MedicareForAll \n- For Trump's wall\n- For more defense dollars\nLost IN\n\nWe were:\n- For #MedicareForAll\n- For most humane immigration plan\n- Against endless war\n- Given 90% chance to lose IN; >99% chance to lose MI \nWon both in '16 https://t.co/IjzHknro8E\u201d— Warren Gunnels (@Warren Gunnels) 1546110108
"Hearing Democrats like Joe Donnelly talk about Medicare for All being 'too extreme' for their constituents have clearly never lived a day in their life wondering if they'll have access to the medical care they need for themselves or their loved ones," wrote Alec Uebersohn, a PhD student at the University of California, Berkeley. "The true radicals are those who think the current status quo, or anything close to it, is acceptable. Or that we should settle for it. Or that change is 'unrealistic.'"
"Joe Donnelly and Claire McCaskill, two right-wing corporate Democrats who lost, are now hilariously lecturing the left about how to win without a hint of self awareness."
--Kyle Kulinski, Secular Talk
Donnelly's parting advice to Democrats came just days after another lawmaker who lost reelection, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), toldCNN in an "exit interview" that she is "confused" why bold progressive Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) has sparked such enthusiasm among the Democratic electorate.
"I'm a little confused why she's the thing. But it's a good example of what I'm talking about, a bright shiny new object, came out of nowhere and surprised people when she beat a very experienced congressman," McCaskill said. "And so she's now talked about a lot. I'm not sure what she's done yet to generate that kind of enthusiasm, but I wish her well. I hope she hangs the moon."
Critics were quick to characterize Donnelly and McCaskill's remarks as lectures to the growing progressive wing of the party, which is increasingly embracing policies like Medicare for All and a Green New Deal.
\u201cJoe Donnelly and Claire McCaskill, two right-wing corporate democrats who lost, are now hilariously lecturing the left about how to win without a hint of self awareness.\u201d— Secular Talk\ud83c\udf99 (@Secular Talk\ud83c\udf99) 1546111237
In a series of tweets on Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez called McCaskill's remarks "pretty disappointing" and noted that the senator lost reelection after running on a conservative platform.
\u201cNot sure why fmr Sen. McCaskill keeps going on TV to call me a \u201cthing\u201d and \u201cshiny object,\u201d but it\u2019s pretty disappointing.\n\nMcCaskill promised she\u2019d \u201c100% back Trump up\u201d on his anti-immigrant rhetoric & lost. In MO, almost all progressive ballot issues won. https://t.co/53qKvnr8KG\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1546108524
\u201cIn fact, I actually went to Missouri after my primary. I met w Ferguson activists + progressive organizers.\n\nA conservative even came to embed at one of our rallies there. You can tell she was inspired + struggled w/ Fox News bc our message resonated:\nhttps://t.co/P0ywHxhC4V\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1546108524
Donnelly's attack on Medicare for All comes as single-payer proponents are gearing up for a prolonged battle against establishment forces--including many former Obama and Clinton campaign officials--that are committed to upholding America's for-profit healthcare status quo.
As Common Dreams reported, the Progressive Change Campaign Commitee (PCCC) launched a pressure campaign last week urging the incoming House Democratic majority to push for a vote on Medicare for All legislation as soon as possible to "see who stands with over 70 percent of Americans, and who stands with the lobbyists."
In February, National Nurses United is holding a Medicare for All week of action aimed at building on unprecedented grassroots momentum in support of single-payer healthcare.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Despite losing reelection in November after running on a fervently anti-Medicare for All platform, outgoing Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) confidently declared during a CNNinterview on Friday that the bold and increasingly popular solution to America's healthcare crisis does not inspire voters in states like Indiana.
"When you talk 'Medicare for All'... you start losing the people in my state," Donnelly said. "The talk on the coasts just doesn't get it done in the middle."
The notion that an ambitious left-wing platform only resonates "on the coasts" and is not electorally viable in more conservative states has become a common trope among "moderate" Democrats, but progressives were quick to push back on Donnelly's evidence-free claim, noting that Medicare for All has high levels of support in Indiana and throughout the Midwest.
"Given that Sen. Donnelly lost saying stuff like this, perhaps the lesson is the opposite--Indianans don't want a Democrat who, like Republicans, opposes good policy," argued Ben Spielberg, co-founder of 34justice, in a tweet on Saturday.
According to the progressive policy shop Data for Progress and the Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicare for All polls at 55 percent support in Indiana--and many were quick to point to this data in response to Donnelly's remarks.
\u201cJoe Donnelly, Democrat from Indiana: "When you talk Medicare for All...you start losing the people in my state."\n\nData: 55% of all voters in Indiana support #MedicareForAll, including large majorities of Democrats.\n\nNovember Senate election: @SenDonnelly lost.\n\n@DataProgress\u201d— Micah Johnson, MD (@Micah Johnson, MD) 1546111655
\u201c@CNN Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) co-sponsored Bernie Sanders #MedicareForAll bill & got re-elected in a midwestern state. Joe Donnelly (D-IN) didn\u2019t and lost re-election.\n\nBaldwin also voted against #BankLobbyistAct which Donnelly voted for. Every US Sen who lost re-election voted for it.\u201d— CNN (@CNN) 1546049704
As Warren Gunnels, policy director for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), pointed out, Donnelly ran a campaign ad attacking Medicare for All and the "radical left" while expressing support for President Donald Trump's proposed border wall--and he lost reelection.
By contrast, Gunnels noted, Sanders campaigned on Medicare for All in Indiana during the 2016 Democratic presidential primary and won, demonstrating that voters in the Midwest are open to single-payer healthcare and other bold progressive policies.
\u201cHe cut an ad:\n- Against #MedicareForAll \n- For Trump's wall\n- For more defense dollars\nLost IN\n\nWe were:\n- For #MedicareForAll\n- For most humane immigration plan\n- Against endless war\n- Given 90% chance to lose IN; >99% chance to lose MI \nWon both in '16 https://t.co/IjzHknro8E\u201d— Warren Gunnels (@Warren Gunnels) 1546110108
"Hearing Democrats like Joe Donnelly talk about Medicare for All being 'too extreme' for their constituents have clearly never lived a day in their life wondering if they'll have access to the medical care they need for themselves or their loved ones," wrote Alec Uebersohn, a PhD student at the University of California, Berkeley. "The true radicals are those who think the current status quo, or anything close to it, is acceptable. Or that we should settle for it. Or that change is 'unrealistic.'"
"Joe Donnelly and Claire McCaskill, two right-wing corporate Democrats who lost, are now hilariously lecturing the left about how to win without a hint of self awareness."
--Kyle Kulinski, Secular Talk
Donnelly's parting advice to Democrats came just days after another lawmaker who lost reelection, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), toldCNN in an "exit interview" that she is "confused" why bold progressive Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) has sparked such enthusiasm among the Democratic electorate.
"I'm a little confused why she's the thing. But it's a good example of what I'm talking about, a bright shiny new object, came out of nowhere and surprised people when she beat a very experienced congressman," McCaskill said. "And so she's now talked about a lot. I'm not sure what she's done yet to generate that kind of enthusiasm, but I wish her well. I hope she hangs the moon."
Critics were quick to characterize Donnelly and McCaskill's remarks as lectures to the growing progressive wing of the party, which is increasingly embracing policies like Medicare for All and a Green New Deal.
\u201cJoe Donnelly and Claire McCaskill, two right-wing corporate democrats who lost, are now hilariously lecturing the left about how to win without a hint of self awareness.\u201d— Secular Talk\ud83c\udf99 (@Secular Talk\ud83c\udf99) 1546111237
In a series of tweets on Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez called McCaskill's remarks "pretty disappointing" and noted that the senator lost reelection after running on a conservative platform.
\u201cNot sure why fmr Sen. McCaskill keeps going on TV to call me a \u201cthing\u201d and \u201cshiny object,\u201d but it\u2019s pretty disappointing.\n\nMcCaskill promised she\u2019d \u201c100% back Trump up\u201d on his anti-immigrant rhetoric & lost. In MO, almost all progressive ballot issues won. https://t.co/53qKvnr8KG\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1546108524
\u201cIn fact, I actually went to Missouri after my primary. I met w Ferguson activists + progressive organizers.\n\nA conservative even came to embed at one of our rallies there. You can tell she was inspired + struggled w/ Fox News bc our message resonated:\nhttps://t.co/P0ywHxhC4V\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1546108524
Donnelly's attack on Medicare for All comes as single-payer proponents are gearing up for a prolonged battle against establishment forces--including many former Obama and Clinton campaign officials--that are committed to upholding America's for-profit healthcare status quo.
As Common Dreams reported, the Progressive Change Campaign Commitee (PCCC) launched a pressure campaign last week urging the incoming House Democratic majority to push for a vote on Medicare for All legislation as soon as possible to "see who stands with over 70 percent of Americans, and who stands with the lobbyists."
In February, National Nurses United is holding a Medicare for All week of action aimed at building on unprecedented grassroots momentum in support of single-payer healthcare.
Despite losing reelection in November after running on a fervently anti-Medicare for All platform, outgoing Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) confidently declared during a CNNinterview on Friday that the bold and increasingly popular solution to America's healthcare crisis does not inspire voters in states like Indiana.
"When you talk 'Medicare for All'... you start losing the people in my state," Donnelly said. "The talk on the coasts just doesn't get it done in the middle."
The notion that an ambitious left-wing platform only resonates "on the coasts" and is not electorally viable in more conservative states has become a common trope among "moderate" Democrats, but progressives were quick to push back on Donnelly's evidence-free claim, noting that Medicare for All has high levels of support in Indiana and throughout the Midwest.
"Given that Sen. Donnelly lost saying stuff like this, perhaps the lesson is the opposite--Indianans don't want a Democrat who, like Republicans, opposes good policy," argued Ben Spielberg, co-founder of 34justice, in a tweet on Saturday.
According to the progressive policy shop Data for Progress and the Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicare for All polls at 55 percent support in Indiana--and many were quick to point to this data in response to Donnelly's remarks.
\u201cJoe Donnelly, Democrat from Indiana: "When you talk Medicare for All...you start losing the people in my state."\n\nData: 55% of all voters in Indiana support #MedicareForAll, including large majorities of Democrats.\n\nNovember Senate election: @SenDonnelly lost.\n\n@DataProgress\u201d— Micah Johnson, MD (@Micah Johnson, MD) 1546111655
\u201c@CNN Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) co-sponsored Bernie Sanders #MedicareForAll bill & got re-elected in a midwestern state. Joe Donnelly (D-IN) didn\u2019t and lost re-election.\n\nBaldwin also voted against #BankLobbyistAct which Donnelly voted for. Every US Sen who lost re-election voted for it.\u201d— CNN (@CNN) 1546049704
As Warren Gunnels, policy director for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), pointed out, Donnelly ran a campaign ad attacking Medicare for All and the "radical left" while expressing support for President Donald Trump's proposed border wall--and he lost reelection.
By contrast, Gunnels noted, Sanders campaigned on Medicare for All in Indiana during the 2016 Democratic presidential primary and won, demonstrating that voters in the Midwest are open to single-payer healthcare and other bold progressive policies.
\u201cHe cut an ad:\n- Against #MedicareForAll \n- For Trump's wall\n- For more defense dollars\nLost IN\n\nWe were:\n- For #MedicareForAll\n- For most humane immigration plan\n- Against endless war\n- Given 90% chance to lose IN; >99% chance to lose MI \nWon both in '16 https://t.co/IjzHknro8E\u201d— Warren Gunnels (@Warren Gunnels) 1546110108
"Hearing Democrats like Joe Donnelly talk about Medicare for All being 'too extreme' for their constituents have clearly never lived a day in their life wondering if they'll have access to the medical care they need for themselves or their loved ones," wrote Alec Uebersohn, a PhD student at the University of California, Berkeley. "The true radicals are those who think the current status quo, or anything close to it, is acceptable. Or that we should settle for it. Or that change is 'unrealistic.'"
"Joe Donnelly and Claire McCaskill, two right-wing corporate Democrats who lost, are now hilariously lecturing the left about how to win without a hint of self awareness."
--Kyle Kulinski, Secular Talk
Donnelly's parting advice to Democrats came just days after another lawmaker who lost reelection, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), toldCNN in an "exit interview" that she is "confused" why bold progressive Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) has sparked such enthusiasm among the Democratic electorate.
"I'm a little confused why she's the thing. But it's a good example of what I'm talking about, a bright shiny new object, came out of nowhere and surprised people when she beat a very experienced congressman," McCaskill said. "And so she's now talked about a lot. I'm not sure what she's done yet to generate that kind of enthusiasm, but I wish her well. I hope she hangs the moon."
Critics were quick to characterize Donnelly and McCaskill's remarks as lectures to the growing progressive wing of the party, which is increasingly embracing policies like Medicare for All and a Green New Deal.
\u201cJoe Donnelly and Claire McCaskill, two right-wing corporate democrats who lost, are now hilariously lecturing the left about how to win without a hint of self awareness.\u201d— Secular Talk\ud83c\udf99 (@Secular Talk\ud83c\udf99) 1546111237
In a series of tweets on Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez called McCaskill's remarks "pretty disappointing" and noted that the senator lost reelection after running on a conservative platform.
\u201cNot sure why fmr Sen. McCaskill keeps going on TV to call me a \u201cthing\u201d and \u201cshiny object,\u201d but it\u2019s pretty disappointing.\n\nMcCaskill promised she\u2019d \u201c100% back Trump up\u201d on his anti-immigrant rhetoric & lost. In MO, almost all progressive ballot issues won. https://t.co/53qKvnr8KG\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1546108524
\u201cIn fact, I actually went to Missouri after my primary. I met w Ferguson activists + progressive organizers.\n\nA conservative even came to embed at one of our rallies there. You can tell she was inspired + struggled w/ Fox News bc our message resonated:\nhttps://t.co/P0ywHxhC4V\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1546108524
Donnelly's attack on Medicare for All comes as single-payer proponents are gearing up for a prolonged battle against establishment forces--including many former Obama and Clinton campaign officials--that are committed to upholding America's for-profit healthcare status quo.
As Common Dreams reported, the Progressive Change Campaign Commitee (PCCC) launched a pressure campaign last week urging the incoming House Democratic majority to push for a vote on Medicare for All legislation as soon as possible to "see who stands with over 70 percent of Americans, and who stands with the lobbyists."
In February, National Nurses United is holding a Medicare for All week of action aimed at building on unprecedented grassroots momentum in support of single-payer healthcare.