SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai leaves a meeting Dec. 14, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
The telecom industry and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai justified the Republican repeal of net neutrality protections in December of 2017 with promises that a "light-touch framework" would spur investment, giving broadband providers "stronger incentives to build networks, especially in unserved areas, and to upgrade networks."
"The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
-- Gigi Sohn, former FCC lawyer
However, according to recent reports, in the year after the repeal--which officially took effect last June--cable companies' investments actually fell, just as net neutrality supporters had warned they would.
Those fighting the rollback pointed to the declines in spending as just one piece of evidence that the deregulation push by Pai--a former Verizon lawyer appointed by President Donald Trump--was always designed to benefit industry at the public's expense.
"The repeal of net neutrality is nothing but a massive government handout to some of the most unscrupulous, and least popular, corporations in the United States," Fight for the Future's Evan Greer toldMotherboard. "It's not helping workers at these companies. It's not helping people in rural communities. It's not closing the digital divide."
\u201c*Sigh.* Repealing #NetNeutrality did NOT increase network investment. \n\nIt DID give telecom giants like @Comcast the power to block, throttle, and charge Internet users new fees.\n\n\u270a\u00a0We will fight this. We will get net neutrality back. https://t.co/8A7ScjeqgT\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1548280322
"Sorry, [Ajit Pai]: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did," tweeted Tim Karr, Free Press's senior director of strategy and communications.
\u201cSorry, @AjitPaiFCC: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did: https://t.co/qVTiRyboy2 via @jbrodkin\u201d— Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social) (@Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social)) 1548283503
Comcast's overall expenditures increased in 2018, according to an earnings announcement released Wednesday, but "Cable Communications' capital expenditures decreased 3.0 percent to $7.7 billion, reflecting decreased spending on customer premise equipment and support capital, partially offset by higher investment in scalable infrastructure and line extensions."
While Comcast is one of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs), as Ars Technica, noted: "Comcast isn't the only ISP that lowered network investment last year. Charter and Verizon both said in 2018 that they were reducing capital expenditures." And that trend is expected to continue in 2019--at least, for Comcast and Charter--according to MoffettNathanson estimates cited in a Light Reading article this week.
In addition, as Ars Technica reported, "The net neutrality repeal hasn't closed broadband gaps in rural areas, where industry trade groups say they won't expand service unless the government gives them more direct funding," arguing that without such assistance, the return on investment wouldn't be worth it.
As Gigi Sohn, a former FCC lawyer who helped craft the repealed net neutrality rules, concluded in an email to Motherboard, "The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
The telecom industry and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai justified the Republican repeal of net neutrality protections in December of 2017 with promises that a "light-touch framework" would spur investment, giving broadband providers "stronger incentives to build networks, especially in unserved areas, and to upgrade networks."
"The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
-- Gigi Sohn, former FCC lawyer
However, according to recent reports, in the year after the repeal--which officially took effect last June--cable companies' investments actually fell, just as net neutrality supporters had warned they would.
Those fighting the rollback pointed to the declines in spending as just one piece of evidence that the deregulation push by Pai--a former Verizon lawyer appointed by President Donald Trump--was always designed to benefit industry at the public's expense.
"The repeal of net neutrality is nothing but a massive government handout to some of the most unscrupulous, and least popular, corporations in the United States," Fight for the Future's Evan Greer toldMotherboard. "It's not helping workers at these companies. It's not helping people in rural communities. It's not closing the digital divide."
\u201c*Sigh.* Repealing #NetNeutrality did NOT increase network investment. \n\nIt DID give telecom giants like @Comcast the power to block, throttle, and charge Internet users new fees.\n\n\u270a\u00a0We will fight this. We will get net neutrality back. https://t.co/8A7ScjeqgT\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1548280322
"Sorry, [Ajit Pai]: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did," tweeted Tim Karr, Free Press's senior director of strategy and communications.
\u201cSorry, @AjitPaiFCC: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did: https://t.co/qVTiRyboy2 via @jbrodkin\u201d— Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social) (@Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social)) 1548283503
Comcast's overall expenditures increased in 2018, according to an earnings announcement released Wednesday, but "Cable Communications' capital expenditures decreased 3.0 percent to $7.7 billion, reflecting decreased spending on customer premise equipment and support capital, partially offset by higher investment in scalable infrastructure and line extensions."
While Comcast is one of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs), as Ars Technica, noted: "Comcast isn't the only ISP that lowered network investment last year. Charter and Verizon both said in 2018 that they were reducing capital expenditures." And that trend is expected to continue in 2019--at least, for Comcast and Charter--according to MoffettNathanson estimates cited in a Light Reading article this week.
In addition, as Ars Technica reported, "The net neutrality repeal hasn't closed broadband gaps in rural areas, where industry trade groups say they won't expand service unless the government gives them more direct funding," arguing that without such assistance, the return on investment wouldn't be worth it.
As Gigi Sohn, a former FCC lawyer who helped craft the repealed net neutrality rules, concluded in an email to Motherboard, "The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
The telecom industry and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai justified the Republican repeal of net neutrality protections in December of 2017 with promises that a "light-touch framework" would spur investment, giving broadband providers "stronger incentives to build networks, especially in unserved areas, and to upgrade networks."
"The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
-- Gigi Sohn, former FCC lawyer
However, according to recent reports, in the year after the repeal--which officially took effect last June--cable companies' investments actually fell, just as net neutrality supporters had warned they would.
Those fighting the rollback pointed to the declines in spending as just one piece of evidence that the deregulation push by Pai--a former Verizon lawyer appointed by President Donald Trump--was always designed to benefit industry at the public's expense.
"The repeal of net neutrality is nothing but a massive government handout to some of the most unscrupulous, and least popular, corporations in the United States," Fight for the Future's Evan Greer toldMotherboard. "It's not helping workers at these companies. It's not helping people in rural communities. It's not closing the digital divide."
\u201c*Sigh.* Repealing #NetNeutrality did NOT increase network investment. \n\nIt DID give telecom giants like @Comcast the power to block, throttle, and charge Internet users new fees.\n\n\u270a\u00a0We will fight this. We will get net neutrality back. https://t.co/8A7ScjeqgT\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1548280322
"Sorry, [Ajit Pai]: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did," tweeted Tim Karr, Free Press's senior director of strategy and communications.
\u201cSorry, @AjitPaiFCC: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did: https://t.co/qVTiRyboy2 via @jbrodkin\u201d— Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social) (@Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social)) 1548283503
Comcast's overall expenditures increased in 2018, according to an earnings announcement released Wednesday, but "Cable Communications' capital expenditures decreased 3.0 percent to $7.7 billion, reflecting decreased spending on customer premise equipment and support capital, partially offset by higher investment in scalable infrastructure and line extensions."
While Comcast is one of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs), as Ars Technica, noted: "Comcast isn't the only ISP that lowered network investment last year. Charter and Verizon both said in 2018 that they were reducing capital expenditures." And that trend is expected to continue in 2019--at least, for Comcast and Charter--according to MoffettNathanson estimates cited in a Light Reading article this week.
In addition, as Ars Technica reported, "The net neutrality repeal hasn't closed broadband gaps in rural areas, where industry trade groups say they won't expand service unless the government gives them more direct funding," arguing that without such assistance, the return on investment wouldn't be worth it.
As Gigi Sohn, a former FCC lawyer who helped craft the repealed net neutrality rules, concluded in an email to Motherboard, "The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."