Sen. Marco Rubio speaks with Navy Adm. Craig Faller, commander of U.S. Southern Command, about Venezuela. (Photo: Michael Dougherty, SOUTHCOM Public Affairs)
Mar 11, 2019
A U.S. Senator's claim about Venezuela Sunday made him the subject of ridicule, but the underlying message of destabilizing the Latin American country remains official American policy--even as the role of sanctions is ignored.
On Sunday morning, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) tweeted that a power failure and subsequent blackout in Venezuela was due to an accident at a location known as "German Dam."
"Today another transformer explosion at the German Dam in Bolivar State caused another massive blackout," Rubio wrote.
There was just one problem: German Dam is the name of a reporter covering the blackout story who tweeted about the transformer exploding, not the location of the accident. In fact, no such location exists in Venezuela.
Rubio's tweet led to endless rounds of mockery, not least from Dam himself.
\u201cSenator @marcorubio, an important transformer exploded in Bol\u00edvar and that, in part, again collapsed the Venezuelan Electric System; however it was not in a dam, much less german. \nMy name is Germ\u00e1n Dam, I am one of the journalists who published the information.\n\ud83d\ude0e\ud83e\udd18\ud83d\ude0a\u201d— Germ\u00e1n Dam (@Germ\u00e1n Dam) 1552170991
As amusing as Rubio's mistake was, it hints at another, more important issue: the American foreign policy establishment is using the blackout to take aim at Venezuela, no matter how they have to spin or obfuscate the facts around the power outage.
That was the message from foreign policy analyst Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, remarking on reporting about Venezuela from The New York Times over the weekend.
"This is amazing," tweeted Weisbrot, "buried deep in this NYT article is a sentence indicating the Trump economic sanctions are a major cause of the deadly blackout in Venezuela, contradicting the rest of the article."
\u201cThis is amazing: buried deep in this NYT article is a sentence indicating the Trump economic sanctions are a major cause of the deadly blackout in Venezuela, contradicting the rest of the article. No one has noticed; this should have been the main story: https://t.co/KGDZ4eI17g\u201d— Mark Weisbrot (@Mark Weisbrot) 1552246439
That's a meaningful thing to leave out, Weisbrot explained, because it is part of a continuing push from U.S. media to downplay the role of American sanctions in Venezuela's current instability--when they mention it at all.
\u201cSome people are questioning why this is important. In fact, it is part of a much larger omission by the media of the enormous destructive impact of US sanctions that have been in place before the Guaido trade embargo. See https://t.co/inC3YhhFxY\u201d— Mark Weisbrot (@Mark Weisbrot) 1552268930
U.S. officials, meanwhile, have targeted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro with rhetoric tying the blackout to government policies.
\u201cMaduro\u2019s policies bring nothing but darkness.\u201d— Secretary Pompeo (@Secretary Pompeo) 1552017897
The crisis in Venezuela was exacerbated by U.S. sanctions, as Weisbrot pointed out in a recent article for The Nation.
"Make no mistake about it," Weisbrot wrote, "U.S. sanctions on Venezuela are killing people, and have been killing people for some time."
Sanctions are only part of the battle. As part of a coordinated effort in January, the Trump administration unilaterally recognized opposition leader Juan Guaido as Venezuela's "interim president" on the very same day Guaido publicly declared the title for himself. And members of the U.S. government--including Rubio--have advocated for ramped up hostilities and covert actions against Maduro.
Still, it appears that those efforts have yet to be successful. Maduro is still entrenched in Caracas and Guaido, while freely roaming the country, is lacking the kind of support needed to overthrow the government. The situation, in the words ofWashington Post reporter Ishaan Tharoor, is starting to "look like a stalemate."
"As tenuous as his grip on power may seem, Maduro shows no sign of relinquishing command," wrote Tharoor.
The deepening reality that 2019's attempt to overthrow Venezuela's government may be as doomed as the attempt in 2002 was on display Sunday when National Security Advisor John Bolton gave a somewhat deflated interview to ABC "This Week" host Martha Raddatz.
"I'm not certain of anything, but I do think momentum is on the side of Guaido," said Bolton. "We'll see what happens."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
center for economic and policy researchjohn boltonjuan guaidomarco rubiomark weisbrotmike pompeoneoconnicolas madurosocialismvenezuela
A U.S. Senator's claim about Venezuela Sunday made him the subject of ridicule, but the underlying message of destabilizing the Latin American country remains official American policy--even as the role of sanctions is ignored.
On Sunday morning, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) tweeted that a power failure and subsequent blackout in Venezuela was due to an accident at a location known as "German Dam."
"Today another transformer explosion at the German Dam in Bolivar State caused another massive blackout," Rubio wrote.
There was just one problem: German Dam is the name of a reporter covering the blackout story who tweeted about the transformer exploding, not the location of the accident. In fact, no such location exists in Venezuela.
Rubio's tweet led to endless rounds of mockery, not least from Dam himself.
\u201cSenator @marcorubio, an important transformer exploded in Bol\u00edvar and that, in part, again collapsed the Venezuelan Electric System; however it was not in a dam, much less german. \nMy name is Germ\u00e1n Dam, I am one of the journalists who published the information.\n\ud83d\ude0e\ud83e\udd18\ud83d\ude0a\u201d— Germ\u00e1n Dam (@Germ\u00e1n Dam) 1552170991
As amusing as Rubio's mistake was, it hints at another, more important issue: the American foreign policy establishment is using the blackout to take aim at Venezuela, no matter how they have to spin or obfuscate the facts around the power outage.
That was the message from foreign policy analyst Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, remarking on reporting about Venezuela from The New York Times over the weekend.
"This is amazing," tweeted Weisbrot, "buried deep in this NYT article is a sentence indicating the Trump economic sanctions are a major cause of the deadly blackout in Venezuela, contradicting the rest of the article."
\u201cThis is amazing: buried deep in this NYT article is a sentence indicating the Trump economic sanctions are a major cause of the deadly blackout in Venezuela, contradicting the rest of the article. No one has noticed; this should have been the main story: https://t.co/KGDZ4eI17g\u201d— Mark Weisbrot (@Mark Weisbrot) 1552246439
That's a meaningful thing to leave out, Weisbrot explained, because it is part of a continuing push from U.S. media to downplay the role of American sanctions in Venezuela's current instability--when they mention it at all.
\u201cSome people are questioning why this is important. In fact, it is part of a much larger omission by the media of the enormous destructive impact of US sanctions that have been in place before the Guaido trade embargo. See https://t.co/inC3YhhFxY\u201d— Mark Weisbrot (@Mark Weisbrot) 1552268930
U.S. officials, meanwhile, have targeted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro with rhetoric tying the blackout to government policies.
\u201cMaduro\u2019s policies bring nothing but darkness.\u201d— Secretary Pompeo (@Secretary Pompeo) 1552017897
The crisis in Venezuela was exacerbated by U.S. sanctions, as Weisbrot pointed out in a recent article for The Nation.
"Make no mistake about it," Weisbrot wrote, "U.S. sanctions on Venezuela are killing people, and have been killing people for some time."
Sanctions are only part of the battle. As part of a coordinated effort in January, the Trump administration unilaterally recognized opposition leader Juan Guaido as Venezuela's "interim president" on the very same day Guaido publicly declared the title for himself. And members of the U.S. government--including Rubio--have advocated for ramped up hostilities and covert actions against Maduro.
Still, it appears that those efforts have yet to be successful. Maduro is still entrenched in Caracas and Guaido, while freely roaming the country, is lacking the kind of support needed to overthrow the government. The situation, in the words ofWashington Post reporter Ishaan Tharoor, is starting to "look like a stalemate."
"As tenuous as his grip on power may seem, Maduro shows no sign of relinquishing command," wrote Tharoor.
The deepening reality that 2019's attempt to overthrow Venezuela's government may be as doomed as the attempt in 2002 was on display Sunday when National Security Advisor John Bolton gave a somewhat deflated interview to ABC "This Week" host Martha Raddatz.
"I'm not certain of anything, but I do think momentum is on the side of Guaido," said Bolton. "We'll see what happens."
A U.S. Senator's claim about Venezuela Sunday made him the subject of ridicule, but the underlying message of destabilizing the Latin American country remains official American policy--even as the role of sanctions is ignored.
On Sunday morning, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) tweeted that a power failure and subsequent blackout in Venezuela was due to an accident at a location known as "German Dam."
"Today another transformer explosion at the German Dam in Bolivar State caused another massive blackout," Rubio wrote.
There was just one problem: German Dam is the name of a reporter covering the blackout story who tweeted about the transformer exploding, not the location of the accident. In fact, no such location exists in Venezuela.
Rubio's tweet led to endless rounds of mockery, not least from Dam himself.
\u201cSenator @marcorubio, an important transformer exploded in Bol\u00edvar and that, in part, again collapsed the Venezuelan Electric System; however it was not in a dam, much less german. \nMy name is Germ\u00e1n Dam, I am one of the journalists who published the information.\n\ud83d\ude0e\ud83e\udd18\ud83d\ude0a\u201d— Germ\u00e1n Dam (@Germ\u00e1n Dam) 1552170991
As amusing as Rubio's mistake was, it hints at another, more important issue: the American foreign policy establishment is using the blackout to take aim at Venezuela, no matter how they have to spin or obfuscate the facts around the power outage.
That was the message from foreign policy analyst Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, remarking on reporting about Venezuela from The New York Times over the weekend.
"This is amazing," tweeted Weisbrot, "buried deep in this NYT article is a sentence indicating the Trump economic sanctions are a major cause of the deadly blackout in Venezuela, contradicting the rest of the article."
\u201cThis is amazing: buried deep in this NYT article is a sentence indicating the Trump economic sanctions are a major cause of the deadly blackout in Venezuela, contradicting the rest of the article. No one has noticed; this should have been the main story: https://t.co/KGDZ4eI17g\u201d— Mark Weisbrot (@Mark Weisbrot) 1552246439
That's a meaningful thing to leave out, Weisbrot explained, because it is part of a continuing push from U.S. media to downplay the role of American sanctions in Venezuela's current instability--when they mention it at all.
\u201cSome people are questioning why this is important. In fact, it is part of a much larger omission by the media of the enormous destructive impact of US sanctions that have been in place before the Guaido trade embargo. See https://t.co/inC3YhhFxY\u201d— Mark Weisbrot (@Mark Weisbrot) 1552268930
U.S. officials, meanwhile, have targeted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro with rhetoric tying the blackout to government policies.
\u201cMaduro\u2019s policies bring nothing but darkness.\u201d— Secretary Pompeo (@Secretary Pompeo) 1552017897
The crisis in Venezuela was exacerbated by U.S. sanctions, as Weisbrot pointed out in a recent article for The Nation.
"Make no mistake about it," Weisbrot wrote, "U.S. sanctions on Venezuela are killing people, and have been killing people for some time."
Sanctions are only part of the battle. As part of a coordinated effort in January, the Trump administration unilaterally recognized opposition leader Juan Guaido as Venezuela's "interim president" on the very same day Guaido publicly declared the title for himself. And members of the U.S. government--including Rubio--have advocated for ramped up hostilities and covert actions against Maduro.
Still, it appears that those efforts have yet to be successful. Maduro is still entrenched in Caracas and Guaido, while freely roaming the country, is lacking the kind of support needed to overthrow the government. The situation, in the words ofWashington Post reporter Ishaan Tharoor, is starting to "look like a stalemate."
"As tenuous as his grip on power may seem, Maduro shows no sign of relinquishing command," wrote Tharoor.
The deepening reality that 2019's attempt to overthrow Venezuela's government may be as doomed as the attempt in 2002 was on display Sunday when National Security Advisor John Bolton gave a somewhat deflated interview to ABC "This Week" host Martha Raddatz.
"I'm not certain of anything, but I do think momentum is on the side of Guaido," said Bolton. "We'll see what happens."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.