SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
With Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell expected as early as Wednesday to use the so-called "nuclear option" to speed up the confirmation process for President Donald Trump's right wing judicial nominees, progressives raised alarm and urged Americans to pressure their senators to stop the "reckless court packing" by the Republican Party.
"McConnell has signaled he is ready to use the so-called 'nuclear option' to further pack the courts with Trump's lifetime judicial appointments," tweeted the progressive advocacy group 5 Calls. "Tell the Senate to block McConnell and stop further erosion of our democratic norms!"
\u201c\ud83d\udea8\ud83d\udea8 McConnell is moving forward w/ the nuclear option to limit floor debate on district judge nominations & speed roll extremists onto the federal bench.\u00a0\n\nIf you haven't called your Senators yet to stop this reckless court packing, DO IT NOW. \ud83d\udd25\u260e\ufe0f\ud83d\udd25: https://t.co/hPznoG9OXk\u201d— 5 Calls \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@5 Calls \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1554235058
On Tuesday, Republicans failed to reach the 60 votes necessary to advance S. Res 50, which would change Senate rules to cut debate time on district court nominees and other lower-level judges from 30 hours to just two hours.
The vote, which was expected to fail, set the stage for McConnell to use the "nuclear option," which would allow the resolution to pass with just a simple majority of 51 votes.
McConnell is expected to begin the process on Wednesday, HuffPostreported.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, denounced McConnell for attempting to carry out "a short-sighted, partisan power grab."
"And it is motivated by the far-right's desire to flood the federal judiciary with young, ideological nominees, many of whom--as we have seen time and again in the Judiciary Committee--are simply unqualified to serve on our nation's courts," Leahy said. "Post-cloture time is a critical tool for senators, especially those who do not sit on the Judiciary Committee, to vet nominees for lifetime judgeships."
Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, tweeted, "Presidencies aren't forever. But federal court nominations last a lifetime."
"McConnell has been leading an effort to rig the rules and rubber-stamp hostile nominees who lack capacity to be fair and impartial," Clarke added. "We must condemn this."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
With Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell expected as early as Wednesday to use the so-called "nuclear option" to speed up the confirmation process for President Donald Trump's right wing judicial nominees, progressives raised alarm and urged Americans to pressure their senators to stop the "reckless court packing" by the Republican Party.
"McConnell has signaled he is ready to use the so-called 'nuclear option' to further pack the courts with Trump's lifetime judicial appointments," tweeted the progressive advocacy group 5 Calls. "Tell the Senate to block McConnell and stop further erosion of our democratic norms!"
\u201c\ud83d\udea8\ud83d\udea8 McConnell is moving forward w/ the nuclear option to limit floor debate on district judge nominations & speed roll extremists onto the federal bench.\u00a0\n\nIf you haven't called your Senators yet to stop this reckless court packing, DO IT NOW. \ud83d\udd25\u260e\ufe0f\ud83d\udd25: https://t.co/hPznoG9OXk\u201d— 5 Calls \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@5 Calls \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1554235058
On Tuesday, Republicans failed to reach the 60 votes necessary to advance S. Res 50, which would change Senate rules to cut debate time on district court nominees and other lower-level judges from 30 hours to just two hours.
The vote, which was expected to fail, set the stage for McConnell to use the "nuclear option," which would allow the resolution to pass with just a simple majority of 51 votes.
McConnell is expected to begin the process on Wednesday, HuffPostreported.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, denounced McConnell for attempting to carry out "a short-sighted, partisan power grab."
"And it is motivated by the far-right's desire to flood the federal judiciary with young, ideological nominees, many of whom--as we have seen time and again in the Judiciary Committee--are simply unqualified to serve on our nation's courts," Leahy said. "Post-cloture time is a critical tool for senators, especially those who do not sit on the Judiciary Committee, to vet nominees for lifetime judgeships."
Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, tweeted, "Presidencies aren't forever. But federal court nominations last a lifetime."
"McConnell has been leading an effort to rig the rules and rubber-stamp hostile nominees who lack capacity to be fair and impartial," Clarke added. "We must condemn this."
With Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell expected as early as Wednesday to use the so-called "nuclear option" to speed up the confirmation process for President Donald Trump's right wing judicial nominees, progressives raised alarm and urged Americans to pressure their senators to stop the "reckless court packing" by the Republican Party.
"McConnell has signaled he is ready to use the so-called 'nuclear option' to further pack the courts with Trump's lifetime judicial appointments," tweeted the progressive advocacy group 5 Calls. "Tell the Senate to block McConnell and stop further erosion of our democratic norms!"
\u201c\ud83d\udea8\ud83d\udea8 McConnell is moving forward w/ the nuclear option to limit floor debate on district judge nominations & speed roll extremists onto the federal bench.\u00a0\n\nIf you haven't called your Senators yet to stop this reckless court packing, DO IT NOW. \ud83d\udd25\u260e\ufe0f\ud83d\udd25: https://t.co/hPznoG9OXk\u201d— 5 Calls \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@5 Calls \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1554235058
On Tuesday, Republicans failed to reach the 60 votes necessary to advance S. Res 50, which would change Senate rules to cut debate time on district court nominees and other lower-level judges from 30 hours to just two hours.
The vote, which was expected to fail, set the stage for McConnell to use the "nuclear option," which would allow the resolution to pass with just a simple majority of 51 votes.
McConnell is expected to begin the process on Wednesday, HuffPostreported.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, denounced McConnell for attempting to carry out "a short-sighted, partisan power grab."
"And it is motivated by the far-right's desire to flood the federal judiciary with young, ideological nominees, many of whom--as we have seen time and again in the Judiciary Committee--are simply unqualified to serve on our nation's courts," Leahy said. "Post-cloture time is a critical tool for senators, especially those who do not sit on the Judiciary Committee, to vet nominees for lifetime judgeships."
Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, tweeted, "Presidencies aren't forever. But federal court nominations last a lifetime."
"McConnell has been leading an effort to rig the rules and rubber-stamp hostile nominees who lack capacity to be fair and impartial," Clarke added. "We must condemn this."