SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
f the case of valve-turner Ken Ward (second from right) goes to trial once again he will be allowed to present the necessity defense, a court ruled on Monday. "Ward intended to protest the continued use of tar sands oil, which he contends significantly contributes to climate change, and the inaction by governments to meaningfully address the crisis of climate change," wrote the judge. (Photo: 350.org)
Judge Rules Valve Turner Ken Ward Must Be Allowed to Present 'Necessity Defense' for Climate Action
"I am very heartened that the Appeals Court recognized the validity of a necessity defense, in light of abundant evidence that the climate crisis is at a tipping point."
Apr 09, 2019
The Court of Appeals for the state of Washington on Monday overturned valve turner Ken Ward's burglary conviction because he was not allowed to present a climate "necessity defense" of his role in the multi-state action to shut down tar sands pipelines in 2016.
"Ward intended to protest the continued use of tar sands oil, which he contends significantly contributes to climate change, and the inaction by governments to meaningfully address the crisis of climate change."
--Judge David Mann
"Kenneth Ward appeals his conviction for burglary in the second degree after he broke into a Kinder Morgan pipeline facility and turned off a valve, which stopped the flow of Canadian tar sands oil to refineries in Skagit and Whatcom Counties," wrote Judge David Mann, who sent Ward's case back to a lower court for a third trial.
"Ward intended to protest the continued use of tar sands oil," Mann added, "which he contends significantly contributes to climate change, and the inaction by governments to meaningfully address the crisis of climate change."
If Ward's case goes to trial once again, he will be allowed to present the necessity defense, explained the Civil Liberties Defense Center, which represented Ward.
In a statement, Ward celebrated the judge's ruling and said he looks forward to "putting the true facts of my case before a jury."
"I am very heartened that the Appeals Court recognized the validity of a necessity defense, in light of abundant evidence that the climate crisis is at a tipping point, and that our government is utterly ineffectual," Ward said.
\u201cWA court found my Constitutional rights violated because I was not allowed a necessity defense in conviction for shut down of tar sands pipeline. https://t.co/MJViq11Y1g\u201d— ken ward (@ken ward) 1554768046
Environmentalist and 350.org founder Bill McKibben celebrated the judge's ruling on Twitter:
\u201cWow! WA appeals court overturns conviction of @wardken in pipeline case because he was not allowed to explain why climate change required him to act\nhttps://t.co/cr9akQfvPg\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1554772738
The case originated in 2016, when five climate activists temporarily disabled several pipelines carrying crude oil into the United States from Canada.
As Common Dreams reported at the time, a Minnesota state judge dismissed all charges against three valve turners last October. While celebrating the dropped charges, the activists expressed regret that they were not able to present a "necessity defense."
Emily Johnston, one of the valve turners whose charges were dropped, expressed hope that Ward will get the opportunity to use the climate necessity defense:
\u201cWAHOOOOO! #3rd time's a charm: @wardken was just UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED A JURY NECESSITY DEFENSE TRIAL on appeal.\n\nTHANK YOU @CLDC!\n\n1 hung jury, 1 conviction, 1 necessity defense trial, all for a single #ValveTurner action. Thanks, Ken, for being a stubborn bastard! \n\n#NotOverYet\u201d— Emily Johnston (@Emily Johnston) 1554758121
\u201cAnd, I hasten to add, many prayers that unlike ours, THIS ONE ACTUALLY HAPPENS.\u201d— Emily Johnston (@Emily Johnston) 1554758121
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Court of Appeals for the state of Washington on Monday overturned valve turner Ken Ward's burglary conviction because he was not allowed to present a climate "necessity defense" of his role in the multi-state action to shut down tar sands pipelines in 2016.
"Ward intended to protest the continued use of tar sands oil, which he contends significantly contributes to climate change, and the inaction by governments to meaningfully address the crisis of climate change."
--Judge David Mann
"Kenneth Ward appeals his conviction for burglary in the second degree after he broke into a Kinder Morgan pipeline facility and turned off a valve, which stopped the flow of Canadian tar sands oil to refineries in Skagit and Whatcom Counties," wrote Judge David Mann, who sent Ward's case back to a lower court for a third trial.
"Ward intended to protest the continued use of tar sands oil," Mann added, "which he contends significantly contributes to climate change, and the inaction by governments to meaningfully address the crisis of climate change."
If Ward's case goes to trial once again, he will be allowed to present the necessity defense, explained the Civil Liberties Defense Center, which represented Ward.
In a statement, Ward celebrated the judge's ruling and said he looks forward to "putting the true facts of my case before a jury."
"I am very heartened that the Appeals Court recognized the validity of a necessity defense, in light of abundant evidence that the climate crisis is at a tipping point, and that our government is utterly ineffectual," Ward said.
\u201cWA court found my Constitutional rights violated because I was not allowed a necessity defense in conviction for shut down of tar sands pipeline. https://t.co/MJViq11Y1g\u201d— ken ward (@ken ward) 1554768046
Environmentalist and 350.org founder Bill McKibben celebrated the judge's ruling on Twitter:
\u201cWow! WA appeals court overturns conviction of @wardken in pipeline case because he was not allowed to explain why climate change required him to act\nhttps://t.co/cr9akQfvPg\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1554772738
The case originated in 2016, when five climate activists temporarily disabled several pipelines carrying crude oil into the United States from Canada.
As Common Dreams reported at the time, a Minnesota state judge dismissed all charges against three valve turners last October. While celebrating the dropped charges, the activists expressed regret that they were not able to present a "necessity defense."
Emily Johnston, one of the valve turners whose charges were dropped, expressed hope that Ward will get the opportunity to use the climate necessity defense:
\u201cWAHOOOOO! #3rd time's a charm: @wardken was just UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED A JURY NECESSITY DEFENSE TRIAL on appeal.\n\nTHANK YOU @CLDC!\n\n1 hung jury, 1 conviction, 1 necessity defense trial, all for a single #ValveTurner action. Thanks, Ken, for being a stubborn bastard! \n\n#NotOverYet\u201d— Emily Johnston (@Emily Johnston) 1554758121
\u201cAnd, I hasten to add, many prayers that unlike ours, THIS ONE ACTUALLY HAPPENS.\u201d— Emily Johnston (@Emily Johnston) 1554758121
The Court of Appeals for the state of Washington on Monday overturned valve turner Ken Ward's burglary conviction because he was not allowed to present a climate "necessity defense" of his role in the multi-state action to shut down tar sands pipelines in 2016.
"Ward intended to protest the continued use of tar sands oil, which he contends significantly contributes to climate change, and the inaction by governments to meaningfully address the crisis of climate change."
--Judge David Mann
"Kenneth Ward appeals his conviction for burglary in the second degree after he broke into a Kinder Morgan pipeline facility and turned off a valve, which stopped the flow of Canadian tar sands oil to refineries in Skagit and Whatcom Counties," wrote Judge David Mann, who sent Ward's case back to a lower court for a third trial.
"Ward intended to protest the continued use of tar sands oil," Mann added, "which he contends significantly contributes to climate change, and the inaction by governments to meaningfully address the crisis of climate change."
If Ward's case goes to trial once again, he will be allowed to present the necessity defense, explained the Civil Liberties Defense Center, which represented Ward.
In a statement, Ward celebrated the judge's ruling and said he looks forward to "putting the true facts of my case before a jury."
"I am very heartened that the Appeals Court recognized the validity of a necessity defense, in light of abundant evidence that the climate crisis is at a tipping point, and that our government is utterly ineffectual," Ward said.
\u201cWA court found my Constitutional rights violated because I was not allowed a necessity defense in conviction for shut down of tar sands pipeline. https://t.co/MJViq11Y1g\u201d— ken ward (@ken ward) 1554768046
Environmentalist and 350.org founder Bill McKibben celebrated the judge's ruling on Twitter:
\u201cWow! WA appeals court overturns conviction of @wardken in pipeline case because he was not allowed to explain why climate change required him to act\nhttps://t.co/cr9akQfvPg\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1554772738
The case originated in 2016, when five climate activists temporarily disabled several pipelines carrying crude oil into the United States from Canada.
As Common Dreams reported at the time, a Minnesota state judge dismissed all charges against three valve turners last October. While celebrating the dropped charges, the activists expressed regret that they were not able to present a "necessity defense."
Emily Johnston, one of the valve turners whose charges were dropped, expressed hope that Ward will get the opportunity to use the climate necessity defense:
\u201cWAHOOOOO! #3rd time's a charm: @wardken was just UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED A JURY NECESSITY DEFENSE TRIAL on appeal.\n\nTHANK YOU @CLDC!\n\n1 hung jury, 1 conviction, 1 necessity defense trial, all for a single #ValveTurner action. Thanks, Ken, for being a stubborn bastard! \n\n#NotOverYet\u201d— Emily Johnston (@Emily Johnston) 1554758121
\u201cAnd, I hasten to add, many prayers that unlike ours, THIS ONE ACTUALLY HAPPENS.\u201d— Emily Johnston (@Emily Johnston) 1554758121
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.