SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar share a moment. (Photo: Niko House, Youtube)
Rep. Ilhan Omar is being targeted once again by both Republicans and Rupert Murdoch's right wing media machine, raising concerns among her supporters and colleagues about the level of hate being directed at her--and prompting a vigorous defense from some of her fellow House freshmen.
"Are Murdoch-owned media outlets--Fox News, the New York Post--trying to get Congresswoman [Omar] killed? Genuine question. I mean, this is just astonishing." --journalist Mehdi Hasan
Omar isn't the only newly elected Democrat to receive negative attention from right wing and politicians, but the vitriol directed at the Somali-born Democrat from Minnesota has resulted in a number of death threats.
The last few days have been more of the same for Omar after language she used last month in remarks to the Los Angeles chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) resurfaced in right wing media.
The Congresswoman mistakenly referred to CAIR's creation as a reaction to the 9/11 attacks in 2001 (the organization was founded in 1994) as part of a broader point about the curtailment of civil liberties in the 21st century in her remarks.
"CAIR was founded after 9/11, because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties," said Omar.
That phrasing--"some people did something"--set off a firestorm this week as right wing media and politicians interpreted the comment as downplaying the attacks, which left nearly 3,000 dead.
Much of the outrage has been driven by media properties owned by Rupert Murdoch: Fox News and The New York Post.
Murdoch "knows exactly what he's doing," said progressive PAC Justice Democrats in a tweet.
\u201cThe New York Post and Fox News are owned by a racist billionaire, Rupert Murdoch, who knows exactly what he's doing.\n\nMurdoch is part of a billionaire class that wants to divide and conquer America through hate and fear.\n\n@IlhanMN and all Americans deserve not to live in fear.\u201d— Justice Democrats (@Justice Democrats) 1554993659
On "Fox and Friends" Wednesday morning, host Brian Kilmeade took the opportunity of Omar's comments to suggest the congresswoman had dual loyalties.
"You have to wonder if she's an American first," said Kilmeade, who later clarified his comments.
Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), who was a moderator for an Islamophobic Facebook group from May 2018 to August 2018, said on Twitter that Omar's comment was "unbelievable" and implied that the congresswoman was downplaying the attacks.
"Crenshaw is twisting her words because she's black, Muslim, and the GOP and Fox [want] to paint her as foreign and un-American," said Pod Save America co-host Tommy Vietor. "Democrats should call out his bullshit. So should the media."
Rather than take a breather, however, Murdoch properties pushed even harder on Thursday. The Post published as its cover Thursday morning an image that superimposed Omar's phrasing of "something" over a picture of the World Trade Center burning during the 9/11 attacks.
"Here's your something," the Post thundered.
Splinter's Katherine Krueger noted the hypocrisy in the selectively edited clips and subsequent outrage machine epitomized by the Post's cover.
The irony is that this narrative around Omar's remarks is proving her exact point--bigots began widely equating terrorists with all Muslims after 9/11, but ask us not to do the same if the terrorist is white--so cutting off Omar's remarks to make it seem like she was minimizing the attacks fits an Islamophobic narrative already entrenched on the right.
Mehdi Hasan of The Intercept wondered if the paper--and Murdoch in general--was trying to get Omar killed.
"I mean, this is just astonishing," said Hasan.
\u201cAre Murdoch-owned media outlets - Fox News, the New York Post - trying to get Congresswoman @IlhanMN killed? Genuine question. I mean, this is just astonishing.\u201d— Mehdi Hasan (@Mehdi Hasan) 1554989060
Omar, for her part, pushed back against her critics Wednesday. Calling the remarks from Kilmeade and Crenshaw "dangerous incitement," Omar expressed hope that "leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it."
\u201cThis is dangerous incitement, given the death threats I face. I hope leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it.\n\nMy love and commitment to our country and that of my colleagues should never be in question. We are ALL Americans!\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1554913916
That didn't look likely by Thursday afternoon.
A number of GOP officials, including Republican National Committee chairperson Ronna McDaniel, co-chair Tommy Hicks, and the party's official Twitter account, seized upon the comments as indicative of Omar's hatred of America and called her remarks a "disgrace."
That the right is once again targeting Omar with vicious attacks did not escape Vox engagement editor Nisha Chittal, who, in a column Thursday, pointed out that the treatment of the Minnesota congresswoman is part of a pattern with how women of color are being treated in Congress.
[T]here's something distinctly racial (and gendered) about the aggression directed at Omar, who is black and one of the first Muslim women in Congress. She has been surrounded by controversy and personal attacks since she took office in January -- attacks that are explicitly about silencing outspoken women of color.
The congresswoman did have the backing of her fellow freshmen Reps. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.)--herself the target of a mailer Wednesday that described the New York representative as a "domestic terrorist."
All three congresswomen--all are women of color--came to Omar's defense Thursday.
Citing Omar's work for the 9/11 Victim's Compensation Fund, Ocasio-Cortez hit back at her critics on the right.
"She's done more for 9/11 families than the GOP," said Ocasio-Cortez in a tweet, "who won't even support healthcare for 1st responders--yet are happy to weaponize her faith."
\u201cI\u2019m not going to quote the NY Post\u2019s horrifying, hateful cover.\n\nHere\u2019s 1 fact: @IlhanMN is a cosponsor of the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund. She\u2018s done more for 9/11 families than the GOP who won\u2019t even support healthcare for 1st responders- yet are happy to weaponize her faith.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1555001755
Ocasio-Cortez also used the fund to target Crenshaw in particular and questioned the convenience of him only going after Omar in his supposed quest to end hate in America.
"In 2018, right-wing extremists were behind almost ALL US domestic terrorist killings," said Ocasio-Cortez. "Why don't you go do something about that?"
\u201cYou refuse to cosponsor the 9/11 Victim\u2019s Compensation Fund, yet have the audacity to drum resentment towards Ilhan w/completely out-of-context quotes.\n\nIn 2018, right-wing extremists were behind almost ALL US domestic terrorist killings. Why don\u2019t you go do something about that?\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1555002815
Pressley called for the right to consider context and not to intentionally misinterpret Omar's comments--and put blame for the hateful rhetoric squarely at Murdoch's feet.
"Manipulating her remarks is defaming and dangerous for her and her family," said Pressley. "Stop with this recklessness."
\u201c@Ilhan full comments clearly speak to post 9/11 #Islamophobia Manipulating her remarks is defaming & dangerous for her & her family. Stop with this recklessness. @rupertmurdoch this is on you - stoking hate, fear & division, putting REAL lives at risk. Shame on you.\u201d— Ayanna Pressley (@Ayanna Pressley) 1554994410
In a tweet posted online shortly before an appearance on MSNBC, Tlaib put blame for the controversy squarely on Murdoch and his media properties.
"The NY Post knows exactly what it's doing--taking quotes out of context and evoking painful imagery to spread hate and endangering the life of Rep. Omar," said Tlaib. "Shame on them, and shame on Rupert Murdoch."
In her interview with Hallie Jackson, Tlaib hammered that point home.
"I'm really outraged because, as a person who has gotten direct death threats myself, I know that her life is put in more danger," said Tlaib.
Watch the interview:
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Rep. Ilhan Omar is being targeted once again by both Republicans and Rupert Murdoch's right wing media machine, raising concerns among her supporters and colleagues about the level of hate being directed at her--and prompting a vigorous defense from some of her fellow House freshmen.
"Are Murdoch-owned media outlets--Fox News, the New York Post--trying to get Congresswoman [Omar] killed? Genuine question. I mean, this is just astonishing." --journalist Mehdi Hasan
Omar isn't the only newly elected Democrat to receive negative attention from right wing and politicians, but the vitriol directed at the Somali-born Democrat from Minnesota has resulted in a number of death threats.
The last few days have been more of the same for Omar after language she used last month in remarks to the Los Angeles chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) resurfaced in right wing media.
The Congresswoman mistakenly referred to CAIR's creation as a reaction to the 9/11 attacks in 2001 (the organization was founded in 1994) as part of a broader point about the curtailment of civil liberties in the 21st century in her remarks.
"CAIR was founded after 9/11, because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties," said Omar.
That phrasing--"some people did something"--set off a firestorm this week as right wing media and politicians interpreted the comment as downplaying the attacks, which left nearly 3,000 dead.
Much of the outrage has been driven by media properties owned by Rupert Murdoch: Fox News and The New York Post.
Murdoch "knows exactly what he's doing," said progressive PAC Justice Democrats in a tweet.
\u201cThe New York Post and Fox News are owned by a racist billionaire, Rupert Murdoch, who knows exactly what he's doing.\n\nMurdoch is part of a billionaire class that wants to divide and conquer America through hate and fear.\n\n@IlhanMN and all Americans deserve not to live in fear.\u201d— Justice Democrats (@Justice Democrats) 1554993659
On "Fox and Friends" Wednesday morning, host Brian Kilmeade took the opportunity of Omar's comments to suggest the congresswoman had dual loyalties.
"You have to wonder if she's an American first," said Kilmeade, who later clarified his comments.
Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), who was a moderator for an Islamophobic Facebook group from May 2018 to August 2018, said on Twitter that Omar's comment was "unbelievable" and implied that the congresswoman was downplaying the attacks.
"Crenshaw is twisting her words because she's black, Muslim, and the GOP and Fox [want] to paint her as foreign and un-American," said Pod Save America co-host Tommy Vietor. "Democrats should call out his bullshit. So should the media."
Rather than take a breather, however, Murdoch properties pushed even harder on Thursday. The Post published as its cover Thursday morning an image that superimposed Omar's phrasing of "something" over a picture of the World Trade Center burning during the 9/11 attacks.
"Here's your something," the Post thundered.
Splinter's Katherine Krueger noted the hypocrisy in the selectively edited clips and subsequent outrage machine epitomized by the Post's cover.
The irony is that this narrative around Omar's remarks is proving her exact point--bigots began widely equating terrorists with all Muslims after 9/11, but ask us not to do the same if the terrorist is white--so cutting off Omar's remarks to make it seem like she was minimizing the attacks fits an Islamophobic narrative already entrenched on the right.
Mehdi Hasan of The Intercept wondered if the paper--and Murdoch in general--was trying to get Omar killed.
"I mean, this is just astonishing," said Hasan.
\u201cAre Murdoch-owned media outlets - Fox News, the New York Post - trying to get Congresswoman @IlhanMN killed? Genuine question. I mean, this is just astonishing.\u201d— Mehdi Hasan (@Mehdi Hasan) 1554989060
Omar, for her part, pushed back against her critics Wednesday. Calling the remarks from Kilmeade and Crenshaw "dangerous incitement," Omar expressed hope that "leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it."
\u201cThis is dangerous incitement, given the death threats I face. I hope leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it.\n\nMy love and commitment to our country and that of my colleagues should never be in question. We are ALL Americans!\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1554913916
That didn't look likely by Thursday afternoon.
A number of GOP officials, including Republican National Committee chairperson Ronna McDaniel, co-chair Tommy Hicks, and the party's official Twitter account, seized upon the comments as indicative of Omar's hatred of America and called her remarks a "disgrace."
That the right is once again targeting Omar with vicious attacks did not escape Vox engagement editor Nisha Chittal, who, in a column Thursday, pointed out that the treatment of the Minnesota congresswoman is part of a pattern with how women of color are being treated in Congress.
[T]here's something distinctly racial (and gendered) about the aggression directed at Omar, who is black and one of the first Muslim women in Congress. She has been surrounded by controversy and personal attacks since she took office in January -- attacks that are explicitly about silencing outspoken women of color.
The congresswoman did have the backing of her fellow freshmen Reps. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.)--herself the target of a mailer Wednesday that described the New York representative as a "domestic terrorist."
All three congresswomen--all are women of color--came to Omar's defense Thursday.
Citing Omar's work for the 9/11 Victim's Compensation Fund, Ocasio-Cortez hit back at her critics on the right.
"She's done more for 9/11 families than the GOP," said Ocasio-Cortez in a tweet, "who won't even support healthcare for 1st responders--yet are happy to weaponize her faith."
\u201cI\u2019m not going to quote the NY Post\u2019s horrifying, hateful cover.\n\nHere\u2019s 1 fact: @IlhanMN is a cosponsor of the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund. She\u2018s done more for 9/11 families than the GOP who won\u2019t even support healthcare for 1st responders- yet are happy to weaponize her faith.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1555001755
Ocasio-Cortez also used the fund to target Crenshaw in particular and questioned the convenience of him only going after Omar in his supposed quest to end hate in America.
"In 2018, right-wing extremists were behind almost ALL US domestic terrorist killings," said Ocasio-Cortez. "Why don't you go do something about that?"
\u201cYou refuse to cosponsor the 9/11 Victim\u2019s Compensation Fund, yet have the audacity to drum resentment towards Ilhan w/completely out-of-context quotes.\n\nIn 2018, right-wing extremists were behind almost ALL US domestic terrorist killings. Why don\u2019t you go do something about that?\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1555002815
Pressley called for the right to consider context and not to intentionally misinterpret Omar's comments--and put blame for the hateful rhetoric squarely at Murdoch's feet.
"Manipulating her remarks is defaming and dangerous for her and her family," said Pressley. "Stop with this recklessness."
\u201c@Ilhan full comments clearly speak to post 9/11 #Islamophobia Manipulating her remarks is defaming & dangerous for her & her family. Stop with this recklessness. @rupertmurdoch this is on you - stoking hate, fear & division, putting REAL lives at risk. Shame on you.\u201d— Ayanna Pressley (@Ayanna Pressley) 1554994410
In a tweet posted online shortly before an appearance on MSNBC, Tlaib put blame for the controversy squarely on Murdoch and his media properties.
"The NY Post knows exactly what it's doing--taking quotes out of context and evoking painful imagery to spread hate and endangering the life of Rep. Omar," said Tlaib. "Shame on them, and shame on Rupert Murdoch."
In her interview with Hallie Jackson, Tlaib hammered that point home.
"I'm really outraged because, as a person who has gotten direct death threats myself, I know that her life is put in more danger," said Tlaib.
Watch the interview:
Rep. Ilhan Omar is being targeted once again by both Republicans and Rupert Murdoch's right wing media machine, raising concerns among her supporters and colleagues about the level of hate being directed at her--and prompting a vigorous defense from some of her fellow House freshmen.
"Are Murdoch-owned media outlets--Fox News, the New York Post--trying to get Congresswoman [Omar] killed? Genuine question. I mean, this is just astonishing." --journalist Mehdi Hasan
Omar isn't the only newly elected Democrat to receive negative attention from right wing and politicians, but the vitriol directed at the Somali-born Democrat from Minnesota has resulted in a number of death threats.
The last few days have been more of the same for Omar after language she used last month in remarks to the Los Angeles chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) resurfaced in right wing media.
The Congresswoman mistakenly referred to CAIR's creation as a reaction to the 9/11 attacks in 2001 (the organization was founded in 1994) as part of a broader point about the curtailment of civil liberties in the 21st century in her remarks.
"CAIR was founded after 9/11, because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties," said Omar.
That phrasing--"some people did something"--set off a firestorm this week as right wing media and politicians interpreted the comment as downplaying the attacks, which left nearly 3,000 dead.
Much of the outrage has been driven by media properties owned by Rupert Murdoch: Fox News and The New York Post.
Murdoch "knows exactly what he's doing," said progressive PAC Justice Democrats in a tweet.
\u201cThe New York Post and Fox News are owned by a racist billionaire, Rupert Murdoch, who knows exactly what he's doing.\n\nMurdoch is part of a billionaire class that wants to divide and conquer America through hate and fear.\n\n@IlhanMN and all Americans deserve not to live in fear.\u201d— Justice Democrats (@Justice Democrats) 1554993659
On "Fox and Friends" Wednesday morning, host Brian Kilmeade took the opportunity of Omar's comments to suggest the congresswoman had dual loyalties.
"You have to wonder if she's an American first," said Kilmeade, who later clarified his comments.
Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), who was a moderator for an Islamophobic Facebook group from May 2018 to August 2018, said on Twitter that Omar's comment was "unbelievable" and implied that the congresswoman was downplaying the attacks.
"Crenshaw is twisting her words because she's black, Muslim, and the GOP and Fox [want] to paint her as foreign and un-American," said Pod Save America co-host Tommy Vietor. "Democrats should call out his bullshit. So should the media."
Rather than take a breather, however, Murdoch properties pushed even harder on Thursday. The Post published as its cover Thursday morning an image that superimposed Omar's phrasing of "something" over a picture of the World Trade Center burning during the 9/11 attacks.
"Here's your something," the Post thundered.
Splinter's Katherine Krueger noted the hypocrisy in the selectively edited clips and subsequent outrage machine epitomized by the Post's cover.
The irony is that this narrative around Omar's remarks is proving her exact point--bigots began widely equating terrorists with all Muslims after 9/11, but ask us not to do the same if the terrorist is white--so cutting off Omar's remarks to make it seem like she was minimizing the attacks fits an Islamophobic narrative already entrenched on the right.
Mehdi Hasan of The Intercept wondered if the paper--and Murdoch in general--was trying to get Omar killed.
"I mean, this is just astonishing," said Hasan.
\u201cAre Murdoch-owned media outlets - Fox News, the New York Post - trying to get Congresswoman @IlhanMN killed? Genuine question. I mean, this is just astonishing.\u201d— Mehdi Hasan (@Mehdi Hasan) 1554989060
Omar, for her part, pushed back against her critics Wednesday. Calling the remarks from Kilmeade and Crenshaw "dangerous incitement," Omar expressed hope that "leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it."
\u201cThis is dangerous incitement, given the death threats I face. I hope leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it.\n\nMy love and commitment to our country and that of my colleagues should never be in question. We are ALL Americans!\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1554913916
That didn't look likely by Thursday afternoon.
A number of GOP officials, including Republican National Committee chairperson Ronna McDaniel, co-chair Tommy Hicks, and the party's official Twitter account, seized upon the comments as indicative of Omar's hatred of America and called her remarks a "disgrace."
That the right is once again targeting Omar with vicious attacks did not escape Vox engagement editor Nisha Chittal, who, in a column Thursday, pointed out that the treatment of the Minnesota congresswoman is part of a pattern with how women of color are being treated in Congress.
[T]here's something distinctly racial (and gendered) about the aggression directed at Omar, who is black and one of the first Muslim women in Congress. She has been surrounded by controversy and personal attacks since she took office in January -- attacks that are explicitly about silencing outspoken women of color.
The congresswoman did have the backing of her fellow freshmen Reps. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.)--herself the target of a mailer Wednesday that described the New York representative as a "domestic terrorist."
All three congresswomen--all are women of color--came to Omar's defense Thursday.
Citing Omar's work for the 9/11 Victim's Compensation Fund, Ocasio-Cortez hit back at her critics on the right.
"She's done more for 9/11 families than the GOP," said Ocasio-Cortez in a tweet, "who won't even support healthcare for 1st responders--yet are happy to weaponize her faith."
\u201cI\u2019m not going to quote the NY Post\u2019s horrifying, hateful cover.\n\nHere\u2019s 1 fact: @IlhanMN is a cosponsor of the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund. She\u2018s done more for 9/11 families than the GOP who won\u2019t even support healthcare for 1st responders- yet are happy to weaponize her faith.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1555001755
Ocasio-Cortez also used the fund to target Crenshaw in particular and questioned the convenience of him only going after Omar in his supposed quest to end hate in America.
"In 2018, right-wing extremists were behind almost ALL US domestic terrorist killings," said Ocasio-Cortez. "Why don't you go do something about that?"
\u201cYou refuse to cosponsor the 9/11 Victim\u2019s Compensation Fund, yet have the audacity to drum resentment towards Ilhan w/completely out-of-context quotes.\n\nIn 2018, right-wing extremists were behind almost ALL US domestic terrorist killings. Why don\u2019t you go do something about that?\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1555002815
Pressley called for the right to consider context and not to intentionally misinterpret Omar's comments--and put blame for the hateful rhetoric squarely at Murdoch's feet.
"Manipulating her remarks is defaming and dangerous for her and her family," said Pressley. "Stop with this recklessness."
\u201c@Ilhan full comments clearly speak to post 9/11 #Islamophobia Manipulating her remarks is defaming & dangerous for her & her family. Stop with this recklessness. @rupertmurdoch this is on you - stoking hate, fear & division, putting REAL lives at risk. Shame on you.\u201d— Ayanna Pressley (@Ayanna Pressley) 1554994410
In a tweet posted online shortly before an appearance on MSNBC, Tlaib put blame for the controversy squarely on Murdoch and his media properties.
"The NY Post knows exactly what it's doing--taking quotes out of context and evoking painful imagery to spread hate and endangering the life of Rep. Omar," said Tlaib. "Shame on them, and shame on Rupert Murdoch."
In her interview with Hallie Jackson, Tlaib hammered that point home.
"I'm really outraged because, as a person who has gotten direct death threats myself, I know that her life is put in more danger," said Tlaib.
Watch the interview:
Judge James Boasberg accused White House officials of "willful disregard" of his order to turn deportation flights headed to El Salvador.
Chief Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. said Wednesday that he has given the Trump administration "ample opportunity to rectify or explain" why it violated his order last month to stop planes flying hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador, where they are being held in a notorious prison—and warned that he could soon hold officials in contempt of court.
"The court ultimately determines that the government's actions on that day demonstrate a willful disregard for its order, sufficient for the court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the government in criminal contempt," Boasberg wrote in the 46-page ruling.
The ruling pertained to the clear instructions Boasberg gave administration lawyers last month when he issued a nationwide restraining order in response to President Donald Trump's invoking of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 and deployment of two deportation flights.
Boasberg noted that his ruling stands even though his order last month was vacated by the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled that the case regarding the deportation flights should have been filed in Texas, where the Venezuelan migrants were flown from, instead of Washington, D.C.
"That court's later determination that the [temporary restraining order] suffered from a legal defect, however, does not excuse the
government's violation," said Boasberg. "If a party chooses to disobey the order—rather than wait for it to be reversed through the judicial process—such disobedience is punishable as contempt."
The case regarding Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act—which he invoked to fast-track the expulsion of 238 migrants accused of being in the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua despite a lack of criminal history or convictions for many of them—has unfolded alongside another case in the Washington D.C. court, in which Judge Paula Xinis has demanded the administration work to free one migrant mistakenly sent to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT).
Xinis said Tuesday she was opening an inquiry into the Department of Justice's refusal to comply with a unanimous Supreme Court ruling that ordered the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident who has denied allegations that he is a member of the gang MS-13 and who had court-ordered protection from being deported to El Salvador.
In Boasberg's ruling, the judge warned that the Trump administration can "purge its contempt" by affording due process to the Venezuelan migrants it sent to El Salvador.
"And if they don't, then we're heading towards a special prosecutor for criminal contempt prosecutions," said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council.
Being found in criminal contempt could result in fines or prison time for Trump administration officials.
"The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders—especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it," wrote Boasberg.
He cited the 1795 ruling in United States v. Peters, adding "To permit such officials to freely 'annul the judgments of the courts of the United States' would not just 'destroy the rights acquired under those judgments'; it would make 'a solemn mockery' of 'the Constitution itself.'... So fatal a result must be deprecated by all."
The event that will cap a five-day sprint across western states that have drawn record crowds, including in deep-red regions won by President Donald Trump.
Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York continued their 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour on Wednesday with a final stop in Missoula, Montana—an event that will cap a five-day sprint across western states that have drawn record crowds and invigorated those sickened by President Donald Trump's authoritarian assault on democracy, human rights, civil liberties, and the nation's working people.
Wednesday's event is set to kick off at 3:00 pm eastern (1:00 pm local time) on the campus of the University of Montana in Missoula.
Jacob Owens, a reporter with the local NBC News affiliate, said hundreds of people were already lined up for the event as of mid-morning, with some arriving as early as 5:00 am to make sure they were able to get into the event. As of this writing, over 6,000 people were already in attendance.
Watch it live:
FIGHT THE OLIGARCHY WITH BERNIE AND AOC: MONTANA www.youtube.com
"We are up against an ideology that has given up not only on the premise and promise of liberal democracy but on the livability of our shared world—on its beauty, on its people, on our children, on other species."
In a "must-read" piece published Sunday by The Guardian, Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor laid out in over 5,000 words the "powerful possibilities for resistance" against the global rise of what they term "end times fascism."
Klein and Taylor began with "the extreme notion that wealthy, tax-averse people should up and start their own high-tech fiefdoms, whether new countries on artificial islands in international waters ('seasteading') or pro-business 'freedom cities' such as Próspera, a glorified gated community combined with a wild west med spa on a Honduran island."
"The first sign that fortunes were shifting came in 2023, when a campaigning Donald Trump, seemingly out of nowhere, promised to hold a contest that would lead to the creation of 10 'freedom cities' on federal lands," they noted. After winning the U.S. presidential contest last November, Trump returned to the Oval Office in January.
As Klein and Taylor detailed:
One might assume that it is contradictory for Trump, elected on a flag-waving "America first" platform, to lend credence to this vision of sovereign territories ruled over by billionaire god-kings. And much has been made of the colorful flame wars between the MAGA mouth-piece Steve Bannon, a proud nationalist and populist, and the Trump-allied billionaires he has attacked as "technofeudalists" who "don't give a flying fuck about the human being"—let alone the nation state. And conflicts inside Trump's awkward, jerry-rigged coalition certainly exist, most recently reaching a boiling point over tariffs. Still, the underlying visions might not be as incompatible as they first appear.
The startup country contingent is clearly foreseeing a future marked by shocks, scarcity, and collapse. Their high-tech private domains are essentially fortressed escape pods, designed for the select few to take advantage of every possible luxury and opportunity for human optimization, giving them and their children an edge in an increasingly barbarous future. To put it bluntly, the most powerful people in the world are preparing for the end of the world, an end they themselves are frenetically accelerating.
That is not so far away from the more mass-market vision of fortressed nations that has gripped the hard right globally, from Italy to Israel, Australia to the United States: In a time of ceaseless peril, openly supremacist movements in these countries are positioning their relatively wealthy states as armed bunkers.
One of Trump's primary campaign promises was "mass deportations," which he has begun delivering on by having plainclothes immigration agents yank foreign students critical of U.S. policy off the streets and sending hundreds of immigrants—many of them seemingly innocent of any crimes—to a mega-prison in El Salvador. The president has pursued this agenda despite expert warnings about the human and economic impacts, and it's not just his anti-migrant effort expected to cause harm on both fronts.
This is an era of climate breakdown, rising risk of nuclear war, skyrocketing inequality, and unregulated artificial intelligence, and "Trump 2.0's economic project is a Frankenstein's monster of the industries driving all of these threats—fossil fuels, weapons, and resource-ravenous cryptocurrency and AI," Klein and Taylor stressed. "Everyone involved in these sectors knows that there is no way to build the artificial mirror world that AI promises to construct without sacrificing this world—these technologies consume too much energy, too many critical minerals, and too much water for the two to coexist in any kind of equilibrium."
While reclaiming the most powerful post in the world, Trump has surrounded himself with billionaires, putting tech leaders willing to give big donations in prominent seats at his inauguration and installing ultrarich individuals—including Elon Musk, the wealthiest person on Earth and the leader of companies including SpaceX—in key positions within his second administration.
"For Musk, Mars has become a secular ark, which he claims is key to the survival of human civilization, perhaps via uploaded consciousnesses to an artificial general intelligence," Klein and Taylor wrote. "Much like religious end-timers who long to escape the corporeal realm, Musk's drive for humanity to become 'multiplanetary' is made possible by his inability to appreciate the multispecies splendor of our only home."
This is the most powerful thing The Guardian has published in years. “In order to make earthly planetary survival possible, some versions of this world need to end.”
[image or embed]
— Vivian Blaxell ( @vivianblaxell.bsky.social) April 13, 2025 at 9:44 AM
That rejection of protecting Earth and its myriad species is key. As Klein and Taylor argued, "The governing ideology of the far right in our age of escalating disasters has become a monstrous, supremacist survivalism."
"To bet against the future on this scale—to bank on your bunker—is to betray, on the most basic level, our duties to one another, to the children we love, and to every other life form with whom we share a planetary home," the pair wrote. "This is a belief system that is genocidal at its core and treasonous to the wonder and beauty of this world. We are convinced that the more people understand the extent to which the right has succumbed to the Armageddon complex, the more they will be willing to fight back, realizing that absolutely everything is now on the line."
"Our opponents know full well that we are entering an age of emergency, but have responded by embracing lethal yet self-serving delusions," they continued. "Having bought into various apartheid fantasies of bunkered safety, they are choosing to let the Earth burn. Our task is to build a wide and deep movement, as spiritual as it is political, strong enough to stop these unhinged traitors. A movement rooted in a steadfast commitment to one another, across our many differences and divides, and to this miraculous, singular planet."
Klein and Taylor also offered a solution for how to "break this apocalyptic fever." According to them:
First, we help each other face the depth of the depravity that has gripped the hard right in all of our countries. To move forward with focus, we must first understand this simple fact: We are up against an ideology that has given up not only on the premise and promise of liberal democracy but on the livability of our shared world—on its beauty, on its people, on our children, on other species. The forces we are up against have made peace with mass death. They are treasonous to this world and its human and non-human inhabitants.
Second, we counter their apocalyptic narratives with a far better story about how to survive the hard times ahead without leaving anyone behind. A story capable of draining end times fascism of its gothic power and galvanizing a movement ready to put it all on the line for our collective survival. A story not of end times, but of better times; not of separation and supremacy, but of interdependence and belonging; not of escaping, but staying put and staying faithful to the troubled earthly reality in which we are enmeshed and bound.
"To have a hope of combating the end times fascists, with their ever-constricting and asphyxiating concentric circles of 'ordered love,'" the pair asserted, "we will need to build an unruly open-hearted movement of the Earth-loving faithful: faithful to this planet, its people, its creatures, and to the possibility of a livable future for us all."
The essay has been met with high praise from academics, activists, advocacy groups, journalists, and more, many of whom described it as "essential reading" and "terrifying but ultimately hopeful."
Climate campaigner and writer Bill McKibben called it "the darkest—and in some ways most light-filled—take on our dire moment."
Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor offer hope through understanding, allowing us to counter their narratives with a far better story. @naomiaklein.bsky.social @astra.bsky.social
[image or embed]
— The Sanders Institute (@sandersinstitute.bsky.social) April 15, 2025 at 3:25 PM
J. Mijin Cha, an assistant professor of environmental studies at the University of California, Santa Cruz, said: "This piece by Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor is so sharp in its diagnosis of what we are facing and the way we fight back. We don't fight fascism with fascism-lite."
"What I mean by fascism-lite is the way the Dems have seen migrants, trans people, people of color, and other marginalized people as disposable in this call for 'moderation,'" she added. "You don't get ahead by leaving people behind. We need to have a positive vision. Not just—we aren't as bad as the other side."
Professor Deborah Lupton, leader of the Vitalities Lab at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, wrote on social media, "Read, weep, and then take action."