The Flint water crisis began in 2014 after the city switched the Flint River as its drinking water source to save money. (Photo: George Thomas/Flickr/cc)
Apr 19, 2019
As Flint, Michigan, marks five years since the city's deadly water crisis began, a federal judge ruled in favor of residents who want to sue the federal government for not acting promptly to ensure the city had clean drinking water.
Residents filed suit against the EPA in 2017, demanding $722 million in damages and arguing that the agency was able to inform the city that its drinking water was contaminated months before it finally issued an emergency order.
"These lies went on for months while the people of Flint continued to be poisoned," Judge Linda Parker, an Obama appointee, wrote in her ruling Friday.
\u201cToday we celebrate the court\u2019s ruling permitting the lawsuit against the EPA to move forward. Lawsuit alleges EPA failed to take steps necessary to protect the people of Flint from being poisoned by their water. Go Get \u2018Em Flint Team.@PittMcGe@michaelpitt8\u201d— Pitt McGehee Palmer Bonanni & Rivers PC (@Pitt McGehee Palmer Bonanni & Rivers PC) 1555631757
\u201cFlint residents will get their day in court with the U.S. government. https://t.co/kpawKAiF9h\u201d— \ud835\ude81\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8b\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8a \ud835\ude71\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude92\ud835\ude9d\ud835\ude9c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude91 (@\ud835\ude81\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8b\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8a \ud835\ude71\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude92\ud835\ude9d\ud835\ude9c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude91) 1555692870
The EPA was notified that Flint was using a contaminated drinking water source--the Flint River--in mid-2015, when a whistleblower wrote in a memo that the water contained lead. But the agency didn't issue an emergency order to protect residents for another seven months.
By that time, residents of the majority-black city had been drinking the tainted water for a year and a half.
City officials began drawing drinking water from the river in April 2014, switching from Detroit's system to save money. Residents began complaining of rashes, hair loss, and other health concerns almost immediately, and reporting that the water was brown and had an unpleasant taste and odor--but the city insisted the water was safe.
"This ruling will shake up the EPA, which has refused to accept responsibility in causing the catastrophe." --Michael Pitt, attorney
State regulators continued telling residents that the water was safe for drinking even after a group of doctors reported in September 2015 that they had detected high levels of lead in children's bloodstreams. The EPA issued its emergency order in January 2016 and claims that it lacked the authority to take action sooner because of the state's decision-making.
As residents are arguing in their lawsuit, the agency's inspector general reported later that year that under the Safe Drinking Water Act, in the event of state inaction "the EPA can and should proceed with an [emergency] order" to protect the public "in a timely manner."
"The lead-contaminated public water supply system will affect the residents for years and likely generations to come," Parker wrote. "The acts leading to the creation of the Flint Water Crisis, alleged to be rooted in lies, recklessness and profound disrespect have and will continue to produce a heinous impact for the people of Flint."
Michael Pitt, a lawyer for the 1,700 residents who filed the suit in 2017 praised Parker's decision.
"This ruling will shake up the EPA, which has refused to accept responsibility in causing the catastrophe," said Pitt. "The EPA is mandated by Congress to be a watchdog over state environmental operations and is required by law to take over drinking water systems when a significant public health risk becomes apparent."
The ruling is the latest victory for victims of the crisis, which was linked to at least 12 deaths from Legionnaires disease and put residents, especially children, at risk for long-term neurological and cognitive disorders. Earlier this month a class-action lawsuit against former Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder was allowed to proceed, and an appellate court ruled in January that city and state officials can be sued as well.
Join Us: Everything is on the Line
The future of all that we cherish is on the line and we have to fight like hell to protect democracy, human decency, and a liveable planet. The last line of defense is people who understand what’s at stake—activists, writers, thinkers, doers, and everyday people who see what is happening, know in their hearts that a better world is possible, and are willing to fight for it. You are one of the good people Common Dreams was built for. We provide independent news, progressive opinion, and crucial analysis on the day’s most important issues. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. But to keep publishing and remain strong in these dangerous times, we need your support. So we’re asking you today: Will you donate to our Fall Campaign and keep the progressive, nonprofit journalism of Common Dreams alive? |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As Flint, Michigan, marks five years since the city's deadly water crisis began, a federal judge ruled in favor of residents who want to sue the federal government for not acting promptly to ensure the city had clean drinking water.
Residents filed suit against the EPA in 2017, demanding $722 million in damages and arguing that the agency was able to inform the city that its drinking water was contaminated months before it finally issued an emergency order.
"These lies went on for months while the people of Flint continued to be poisoned," Judge Linda Parker, an Obama appointee, wrote in her ruling Friday.
\u201cToday we celebrate the court\u2019s ruling permitting the lawsuit against the EPA to move forward. Lawsuit alleges EPA failed to take steps necessary to protect the people of Flint from being poisoned by their water. Go Get \u2018Em Flint Team.@PittMcGe@michaelpitt8\u201d— Pitt McGehee Palmer Bonanni & Rivers PC (@Pitt McGehee Palmer Bonanni & Rivers PC) 1555631757
\u201cFlint residents will get their day in court with the U.S. government. https://t.co/kpawKAiF9h\u201d— \ud835\ude81\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8b\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8a \ud835\ude71\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude92\ud835\ude9d\ud835\ude9c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude91 (@\ud835\ude81\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8b\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8a \ud835\ude71\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude92\ud835\ude9d\ud835\ude9c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude91) 1555692870
The EPA was notified that Flint was using a contaminated drinking water source--the Flint River--in mid-2015, when a whistleblower wrote in a memo that the water contained lead. But the agency didn't issue an emergency order to protect residents for another seven months.
By that time, residents of the majority-black city had been drinking the tainted water for a year and a half.
City officials began drawing drinking water from the river in April 2014, switching from Detroit's system to save money. Residents began complaining of rashes, hair loss, and other health concerns almost immediately, and reporting that the water was brown and had an unpleasant taste and odor--but the city insisted the water was safe.
"This ruling will shake up the EPA, which has refused to accept responsibility in causing the catastrophe." --Michael Pitt, attorney
State regulators continued telling residents that the water was safe for drinking even after a group of doctors reported in September 2015 that they had detected high levels of lead in children's bloodstreams. The EPA issued its emergency order in January 2016 and claims that it lacked the authority to take action sooner because of the state's decision-making.
As residents are arguing in their lawsuit, the agency's inspector general reported later that year that under the Safe Drinking Water Act, in the event of state inaction "the EPA can and should proceed with an [emergency] order" to protect the public "in a timely manner."
"The lead-contaminated public water supply system will affect the residents for years and likely generations to come," Parker wrote. "The acts leading to the creation of the Flint Water Crisis, alleged to be rooted in lies, recklessness and profound disrespect have and will continue to produce a heinous impact for the people of Flint."
Michael Pitt, a lawyer for the 1,700 residents who filed the suit in 2017 praised Parker's decision.
"This ruling will shake up the EPA, which has refused to accept responsibility in causing the catastrophe," said Pitt. "The EPA is mandated by Congress to be a watchdog over state environmental operations and is required by law to take over drinking water systems when a significant public health risk becomes apparent."
The ruling is the latest victory for victims of the crisis, which was linked to at least 12 deaths from Legionnaires disease and put residents, especially children, at risk for long-term neurological and cognitive disorders. Earlier this month a class-action lawsuit against former Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder was allowed to proceed, and an appellate court ruled in January that city and state officials can be sued as well.
As Flint, Michigan, marks five years since the city's deadly water crisis began, a federal judge ruled in favor of residents who want to sue the federal government for not acting promptly to ensure the city had clean drinking water.
Residents filed suit against the EPA in 2017, demanding $722 million in damages and arguing that the agency was able to inform the city that its drinking water was contaminated months before it finally issued an emergency order.
"These lies went on for months while the people of Flint continued to be poisoned," Judge Linda Parker, an Obama appointee, wrote in her ruling Friday.
\u201cToday we celebrate the court\u2019s ruling permitting the lawsuit against the EPA to move forward. Lawsuit alleges EPA failed to take steps necessary to protect the people of Flint from being poisoned by their water. Go Get \u2018Em Flint Team.@PittMcGe@michaelpitt8\u201d— Pitt McGehee Palmer Bonanni & Rivers PC (@Pitt McGehee Palmer Bonanni & Rivers PC) 1555631757
\u201cFlint residents will get their day in court with the U.S. government. https://t.co/kpawKAiF9h\u201d— \ud835\ude81\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8b\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8a \ud835\ude71\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude92\ud835\ude9d\ud835\ude9c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude91 (@\ud835\ude81\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8b\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude8a \ud835\ude71\ud835\ude8e\ud835\ude92\ud835\ude9d\ud835\ude9c\ud835\ude8c\ud835\ude91) 1555692870
The EPA was notified that Flint was using a contaminated drinking water source--the Flint River--in mid-2015, when a whistleblower wrote in a memo that the water contained lead. But the agency didn't issue an emergency order to protect residents for another seven months.
By that time, residents of the majority-black city had been drinking the tainted water for a year and a half.
City officials began drawing drinking water from the river in April 2014, switching from Detroit's system to save money. Residents began complaining of rashes, hair loss, and other health concerns almost immediately, and reporting that the water was brown and had an unpleasant taste and odor--but the city insisted the water was safe.
"This ruling will shake up the EPA, which has refused to accept responsibility in causing the catastrophe." --Michael Pitt, attorney
State regulators continued telling residents that the water was safe for drinking even after a group of doctors reported in September 2015 that they had detected high levels of lead in children's bloodstreams. The EPA issued its emergency order in January 2016 and claims that it lacked the authority to take action sooner because of the state's decision-making.
As residents are arguing in their lawsuit, the agency's inspector general reported later that year that under the Safe Drinking Water Act, in the event of state inaction "the EPA can and should proceed with an [emergency] order" to protect the public "in a timely manner."
"The lead-contaminated public water supply system will affect the residents for years and likely generations to come," Parker wrote. "The acts leading to the creation of the Flint Water Crisis, alleged to be rooted in lies, recklessness and profound disrespect have and will continue to produce a heinous impact for the people of Flint."
Michael Pitt, a lawyer for the 1,700 residents who filed the suit in 2017 praised Parker's decision.
"This ruling will shake up the EPA, which has refused to accept responsibility in causing the catastrophe," said Pitt. "The EPA is mandated by Congress to be a watchdog over state environmental operations and is required by law to take over drinking water systems when a significant public health risk becomes apparent."
The ruling is the latest victory for victims of the crisis, which was linked to at least 12 deaths from Legionnaires disease and put residents, especially children, at risk for long-term neurological and cognitive disorders. Earlier this month a class-action lawsuit against former Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder was allowed to proceed, and an appellate court ruled in January that city and state officials can be sued as well.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.