SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
According to the Guardian--which first reported on U.S. opposition to the measure on Monday--Trump officials are objecting to the resolution's "language on victims' support from family planning clinics." (Photo: Shawn Baldwin/AP)
'Morally Despicable': Trump Administration Threatens to Veto UN Resolution Combating Rape as Weapon of War
The U.S. is reportedly opposing the resolution over language on reproductive health for victims of rape
Apr 23, 2019
In what critics denounced as the Trump administration's latest attack on women's rights across the globe, U.S. officials are reportedly threatening to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution seeking to end the use of rape as a weapon of war over its language on reproductive health.
"In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
--Heather Barr, Human Rights Watch
According to the Guardian--which first reported on U.S. opposition to the measure late Monday--Trump officials are objecting to the resolution's "language on victims' support from family planning clinics."
"In recent months, the Trump administration has taken a hard line, refusing to agree to any U.N. documents that refer to sexual or reproductive health, on grounds that such language implies support for abortions," the Guardian reported. "It has also opposed the use of the word 'gender,' seeing it as a cover for liberal promotion of transgender rights."
The Trump administration's opposition to the measure, proposed by Germany, quickly sparked international outrage.
"If we let the Americans do this and take out this language, it will be watered down for a long time," an anonymous European diplomat told the Guardian. "It is, at its heart, an attack on the progressive normative framework established over the past 25 years."
Heather Barr, acting co-director of the women's rights division at Human Rights Watch, tweeted: "In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
Others also took to Twitter to condemn the Trump administration's efforts:
\u201cThe Trump administration is so obsessed with ensuring women remain walking incubators that it is willing to destroy an anti-rape resolution.\n\nUS threatens to veto UN resolution on rape as weapon of war, officials say https://t.co/Gk8vQ5m39h\u201d— Mona Eltahawy (@Mona Eltahawy) 1555974523
\u201cA reminder of how morally despicable the US is on the global stage https://t.co/irJQpVKWSa\u201d— Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn (@Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn) 1555975100
Pramila Patten, U.N. special representative on sexual violence in conflict, told the Guardian that the resolution's passage is now in serious doubt due to U.S. opposition.
"We are not even sure whether we are having the resolution [Tuesday], because of the threats of a veto from the U.S.," Patten said.
The resolution seeks to improve monitoring of sexual violence in conflict, punish perpetrators, and increase support for victims.
Patten said the language on reproductive health "is being maintained for the time being and we'll see over the next 24 hours how the situation evolves."
"It will be a huge contradiction that you are talking about a survivor-centered approach and you do not have language on sexual and reproductive healthcare services, which is for me the most critical," said Patten.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In what critics denounced as the Trump administration's latest attack on women's rights across the globe, U.S. officials are reportedly threatening to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution seeking to end the use of rape as a weapon of war over its language on reproductive health.
"In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
--Heather Barr, Human Rights Watch
According to the Guardian--which first reported on U.S. opposition to the measure late Monday--Trump officials are objecting to the resolution's "language on victims' support from family planning clinics."
"In recent months, the Trump administration has taken a hard line, refusing to agree to any U.N. documents that refer to sexual or reproductive health, on grounds that such language implies support for abortions," the Guardian reported. "It has also opposed the use of the word 'gender,' seeing it as a cover for liberal promotion of transgender rights."
The Trump administration's opposition to the measure, proposed by Germany, quickly sparked international outrage.
"If we let the Americans do this and take out this language, it will be watered down for a long time," an anonymous European diplomat told the Guardian. "It is, at its heart, an attack on the progressive normative framework established over the past 25 years."
Heather Barr, acting co-director of the women's rights division at Human Rights Watch, tweeted: "In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
Others also took to Twitter to condemn the Trump administration's efforts:
\u201cThe Trump administration is so obsessed with ensuring women remain walking incubators that it is willing to destroy an anti-rape resolution.\n\nUS threatens to veto UN resolution on rape as weapon of war, officials say https://t.co/Gk8vQ5m39h\u201d— Mona Eltahawy (@Mona Eltahawy) 1555974523
\u201cA reminder of how morally despicable the US is on the global stage https://t.co/irJQpVKWSa\u201d— Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn (@Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn) 1555975100
Pramila Patten, U.N. special representative on sexual violence in conflict, told the Guardian that the resolution's passage is now in serious doubt due to U.S. opposition.
"We are not even sure whether we are having the resolution [Tuesday], because of the threats of a veto from the U.S.," Patten said.
The resolution seeks to improve monitoring of sexual violence in conflict, punish perpetrators, and increase support for victims.
Patten said the language on reproductive health "is being maintained for the time being and we'll see over the next 24 hours how the situation evolves."
"It will be a huge contradiction that you are talking about a survivor-centered approach and you do not have language on sexual and reproductive healthcare services, which is for me the most critical," said Patten.
In what critics denounced as the Trump administration's latest attack on women's rights across the globe, U.S. officials are reportedly threatening to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution seeking to end the use of rape as a weapon of war over its language on reproductive health.
"In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
--Heather Barr, Human Rights Watch
According to the Guardian--which first reported on U.S. opposition to the measure late Monday--Trump officials are objecting to the resolution's "language on victims' support from family planning clinics."
"In recent months, the Trump administration has taken a hard line, refusing to agree to any U.N. documents that refer to sexual or reproductive health, on grounds that such language implies support for abortions," the Guardian reported. "It has also opposed the use of the word 'gender,' seeing it as a cover for liberal promotion of transgender rights."
The Trump administration's opposition to the measure, proposed by Germany, quickly sparked international outrage.
"If we let the Americans do this and take out this language, it will be watered down for a long time," an anonymous European diplomat told the Guardian. "It is, at its heart, an attack on the progressive normative framework established over the past 25 years."
Heather Barr, acting co-director of the women's rights division at Human Rights Watch, tweeted: "In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
Others also took to Twitter to condemn the Trump administration's efforts:
\u201cThe Trump administration is so obsessed with ensuring women remain walking incubators that it is willing to destroy an anti-rape resolution.\n\nUS threatens to veto UN resolution on rape as weapon of war, officials say https://t.co/Gk8vQ5m39h\u201d— Mona Eltahawy (@Mona Eltahawy) 1555974523
\u201cA reminder of how morally despicable the US is on the global stage https://t.co/irJQpVKWSa\u201d— Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn (@Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn) 1555975100
Pramila Patten, U.N. special representative on sexual violence in conflict, told the Guardian that the resolution's passage is now in serious doubt due to U.S. opposition.
"We are not even sure whether we are having the resolution [Tuesday], because of the threats of a veto from the U.S.," Patten said.
The resolution seeks to improve monitoring of sexual violence in conflict, punish perpetrators, and increase support for victims.
Patten said the language on reproductive health "is being maintained for the time being and we'll see over the next 24 hours how the situation evolves."
"It will be a huge contradiction that you are talking about a survivor-centered approach and you do not have language on sexual and reproductive healthcare services, which is for me the most critical," said Patten.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.