Runoff from melting permafrost in Alaska flows toward the sea. (Photo: NOAA)
Apr 23, 2019
An alarming study released Tuesday found that melting Arctic permafrost could add nearly $70 trillion to the global cost of climate change unless immediate action is taken to slash carbon emissions.
"We have the technology and policy instruments to limit the warming but we are not moving fast enough."
--Dmitry Yumashev, Lancaster University
According to the new research, published in the journalNature Communications, melting permafrost caused by accelerating Arctic warming would add close to $70 trillion to the overall economic impact of climate change if the planet warms by 3degC by 2100.
Even if action is taken to limit warming to 1.5degC by the end of the century, the research found melting permafrost would still add $24.8 trillion to overall climate costs.
Dmitry Yumashev of Lancaster University, the lead author of the study, toldNational Geographic that melting permafrost and sea ice "are two known tipping elements in the climate system" that could trigger a cycle of unstoppable global warming.
In an interview with the Guardian, Yumashev called his study's results "disheartening," but said nations of the world have the technological capacity to confront the crisis.
What's needed, he said, is urgency and political will.
"Even at 1.5degC to 2degC [warming], there are impacts and costs due to thawing permafrost. But they are considerably lower for these scenarios compared to business as usual," said Yumashev. "We have the technology and policy instruments to limit the warming but we are not moving fast enough."
Kevin Schaefer of the National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Boulder, Colorado--a co-author of the study--echoed Yumashev's warning.
"With climate change we're conducting a high-risk experiment where we don't know what is coming," Schaefer told National Geographic. "The most important thing to remember about our study is the greater the warming, the stronger the feedbacks and the higher the costs to society."
As National Geographicreported, the "$25 to $70 trillion cost of Arctic warming adds four to six percent to the total cost of climate change--which is estimated to reach $1,390 trillion by the year 2300 if emissions cuts are not better than the Paris Agreement. However, the costs of the current business-as-usual path could be more than $2,000 trillion."
Yumashev expressed some relief that his research found the projected economic impact of melting permafrost was lower than the worst-case scenario predicted by previous estimates.
But, as Yumashev told the Guardian, "We still have a time bomb."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
An alarming study released Tuesday found that melting Arctic permafrost could add nearly $70 trillion to the global cost of climate change unless immediate action is taken to slash carbon emissions.
"We have the technology and policy instruments to limit the warming but we are not moving fast enough."
--Dmitry Yumashev, Lancaster University
According to the new research, published in the journalNature Communications, melting permafrost caused by accelerating Arctic warming would add close to $70 trillion to the overall economic impact of climate change if the planet warms by 3degC by 2100.
Even if action is taken to limit warming to 1.5degC by the end of the century, the research found melting permafrost would still add $24.8 trillion to overall climate costs.
Dmitry Yumashev of Lancaster University, the lead author of the study, toldNational Geographic that melting permafrost and sea ice "are two known tipping elements in the climate system" that could trigger a cycle of unstoppable global warming.
In an interview with the Guardian, Yumashev called his study's results "disheartening," but said nations of the world have the technological capacity to confront the crisis.
What's needed, he said, is urgency and political will.
"Even at 1.5degC to 2degC [warming], there are impacts and costs due to thawing permafrost. But they are considerably lower for these scenarios compared to business as usual," said Yumashev. "We have the technology and policy instruments to limit the warming but we are not moving fast enough."
Kevin Schaefer of the National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Boulder, Colorado--a co-author of the study--echoed Yumashev's warning.
"With climate change we're conducting a high-risk experiment where we don't know what is coming," Schaefer told National Geographic. "The most important thing to remember about our study is the greater the warming, the stronger the feedbacks and the higher the costs to society."
As National Geographicreported, the "$25 to $70 trillion cost of Arctic warming adds four to six percent to the total cost of climate change--which is estimated to reach $1,390 trillion by the year 2300 if emissions cuts are not better than the Paris Agreement. However, the costs of the current business-as-usual path could be more than $2,000 trillion."
Yumashev expressed some relief that his research found the projected economic impact of melting permafrost was lower than the worst-case scenario predicted by previous estimates.
But, as Yumashev told the Guardian, "We still have a time bomb."
From Your Site Articles
An alarming study released Tuesday found that melting Arctic permafrost could add nearly $70 trillion to the global cost of climate change unless immediate action is taken to slash carbon emissions.
"We have the technology and policy instruments to limit the warming but we are not moving fast enough."
--Dmitry Yumashev, Lancaster University
According to the new research, published in the journalNature Communications, melting permafrost caused by accelerating Arctic warming would add close to $70 trillion to the overall economic impact of climate change if the planet warms by 3degC by 2100.
Even if action is taken to limit warming to 1.5degC by the end of the century, the research found melting permafrost would still add $24.8 trillion to overall climate costs.
Dmitry Yumashev of Lancaster University, the lead author of the study, toldNational Geographic that melting permafrost and sea ice "are two known tipping elements in the climate system" that could trigger a cycle of unstoppable global warming.
In an interview with the Guardian, Yumashev called his study's results "disheartening," but said nations of the world have the technological capacity to confront the crisis.
What's needed, he said, is urgency and political will.
"Even at 1.5degC to 2degC [warming], there are impacts and costs due to thawing permafrost. But they are considerably lower for these scenarios compared to business as usual," said Yumashev. "We have the technology and policy instruments to limit the warming but we are not moving fast enough."
Kevin Schaefer of the National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Boulder, Colorado--a co-author of the study--echoed Yumashev's warning.
"With climate change we're conducting a high-risk experiment where we don't know what is coming," Schaefer told National Geographic. "The most important thing to remember about our study is the greater the warming, the stronger the feedbacks and the higher the costs to society."
As National Geographicreported, the "$25 to $70 trillion cost of Arctic warming adds four to six percent to the total cost of climate change--which is estimated to reach $1,390 trillion by the year 2300 if emissions cuts are not better than the Paris Agreement. However, the costs of the current business-as-usual path could be more than $2,000 trillion."
Yumashev expressed some relief that his research found the projected economic impact of melting permafrost was lower than the worst-case scenario predicted by previous estimates.
But, as Yumashev told the Guardian, "We still have a time bomb."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.