SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) attended an event with her sons in March of 2018. (Photo: Kirsten Gillibrand/Facebook)
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Wednesday introduced her "Family Bill of Rights," a five-point economic policy that aims to "lift many of the financial burdens on families and help level the playing field for children."
"The resources and care available at the start of a child's life have a crucial impact on their health, safety, development, and future success -- but not every child starts on equal footing," the senator from New York wrote on a Mediumpost detailing her plan.
"Families and kids face huge disparities in opportunity and resources depending on their income and zip code, and the gap is wider for families of color," she noted. "That isn't fair, and it isn't acceptable."
Gillibrand vowed Wednesday that, if she is elected president, she will implement her proposal, which "guarantees a set of fundamental rights to give every child the chance to succeed -- no matter what block they grow up on," during her first 100 days in office.
\u201cToday I'm announcing my Family Bill of Rights: a new economic policy platform that will lift many of the financial burdens on families and help level the playing field for children.\u201d— Kirsten Gillibrand (@Kirsten Gillibrand) 1558526400
Gillibrand's sweeping Family Bill of Rights addresses everything from maternal care and paid family leave to universal pre-K and healthcare for children. To cover the costs, she proposes a financial transaction tax, which would generate $777 billion over a decade, according to her campaign.
The five fundamental rights of her proposal are:
To improve maternal care--particulary for women of color, who are more than three times more likely to die of pregnancy-related causes than their white peers--Gillibrand calls for a plan modeled off of former Sen. Heidi Heitkamp's (D-N.D.) legislation to study data from rural communities, improve training, and make it easier to boost the number of OB-GYNs.
Gillibrand's proposal would "ensure that taxpayer-funded adoption and child welfare agencies can't discriminate against foster or adoptive families," and "provide a tax credit to ensure that a family's ability to adopt and provide a stable home for a child isn't dependent on their wealth." She would also require insurance companies to cover fertility treatment.
Borrowing a page from Finland's book, the senator calls for launching a nationwide program to provide new parents with "baby bundles" that contain necessary supplies "like diapers, swaddle blankets, and onesies, all in a box with a small mattress that can be repurposed as a nursery bed."
"Every child deserves the same opportunities to learn, grow, and reach their potential -- which is why I would enact universal pre-K and expand the Child and Dependent Care tax credit so that families can afford safe, high-quality childcare."
--Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
The presidential hopeful aims to ensure universal healthcare for kids by automatically enrolling every newborn in the existing Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and giving them access to Medicaid's Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit.
"Every child deserves the same opportunities to learn, grow, and reach their potential -- which is why I would enact universal pre-K and expand the Child and Dependent Care tax credit so that families can afford safe, high-quality childcare," Gillibrand wrote. "My plan would also professionalize at-home and day care, expand access to early education for children with disabilities, and support childcare workers."
Gillibrand, who has a track record of advocating for policies such as paid leave, has made children and families a key focus of her presidential campaign. When she announced her exploratory committee on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in January, the senator said she is running for president "because as a young mom, I'm going to fight for other people's kids as hard as I would fight for my own."
While Gillibrand's new policy is comprehensive, she isn't the only Democratic primary candidate to roll out family-focused proposals.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), in February, put forth a plan to tax the wealthy to help establish universal childcare. On Wednesday, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) reintroduced a bill from 2018 designed to combat racial bias in maternal care.
Earlier this month, on the heels of an "absolutely devastating" report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about the nation's rising maternal mortality, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) unveiled legislation crafted to promote community-based, holistic healthcare for pregnant people and new parents.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Wednesday introduced her "Family Bill of Rights," a five-point economic policy that aims to "lift many of the financial burdens on families and help level the playing field for children."
"The resources and care available at the start of a child's life have a crucial impact on their health, safety, development, and future success -- but not every child starts on equal footing," the senator from New York wrote on a Mediumpost detailing her plan.
"Families and kids face huge disparities in opportunity and resources depending on their income and zip code, and the gap is wider for families of color," she noted. "That isn't fair, and it isn't acceptable."
Gillibrand vowed Wednesday that, if she is elected president, she will implement her proposal, which "guarantees a set of fundamental rights to give every child the chance to succeed -- no matter what block they grow up on," during her first 100 days in office.
\u201cToday I'm announcing my Family Bill of Rights: a new economic policy platform that will lift many of the financial burdens on families and help level the playing field for children.\u201d— Kirsten Gillibrand (@Kirsten Gillibrand) 1558526400
Gillibrand's sweeping Family Bill of Rights addresses everything from maternal care and paid family leave to universal pre-K and healthcare for children. To cover the costs, she proposes a financial transaction tax, which would generate $777 billion over a decade, according to her campaign.
The five fundamental rights of her proposal are:
To improve maternal care--particulary for women of color, who are more than three times more likely to die of pregnancy-related causes than their white peers--Gillibrand calls for a plan modeled off of former Sen. Heidi Heitkamp's (D-N.D.) legislation to study data from rural communities, improve training, and make it easier to boost the number of OB-GYNs.
Gillibrand's proposal would "ensure that taxpayer-funded adoption and child welfare agencies can't discriminate against foster or adoptive families," and "provide a tax credit to ensure that a family's ability to adopt and provide a stable home for a child isn't dependent on their wealth." She would also require insurance companies to cover fertility treatment.
Borrowing a page from Finland's book, the senator calls for launching a nationwide program to provide new parents with "baby bundles" that contain necessary supplies "like diapers, swaddle blankets, and onesies, all in a box with a small mattress that can be repurposed as a nursery bed."
"Every child deserves the same opportunities to learn, grow, and reach their potential -- which is why I would enact universal pre-K and expand the Child and Dependent Care tax credit so that families can afford safe, high-quality childcare."
--Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
The presidential hopeful aims to ensure universal healthcare for kids by automatically enrolling every newborn in the existing Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and giving them access to Medicaid's Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit.
"Every child deserves the same opportunities to learn, grow, and reach their potential -- which is why I would enact universal pre-K and expand the Child and Dependent Care tax credit so that families can afford safe, high-quality childcare," Gillibrand wrote. "My plan would also professionalize at-home and day care, expand access to early education for children with disabilities, and support childcare workers."
Gillibrand, who has a track record of advocating for policies such as paid leave, has made children and families a key focus of her presidential campaign. When she announced her exploratory committee on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in January, the senator said she is running for president "because as a young mom, I'm going to fight for other people's kids as hard as I would fight for my own."
While Gillibrand's new policy is comprehensive, she isn't the only Democratic primary candidate to roll out family-focused proposals.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), in February, put forth a plan to tax the wealthy to help establish universal childcare. On Wednesday, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) reintroduced a bill from 2018 designed to combat racial bias in maternal care.
Earlier this month, on the heels of an "absolutely devastating" report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about the nation's rising maternal mortality, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) unveiled legislation crafted to promote community-based, holistic healthcare for pregnant people and new parents.
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Wednesday introduced her "Family Bill of Rights," a five-point economic policy that aims to "lift many of the financial burdens on families and help level the playing field for children."
"The resources and care available at the start of a child's life have a crucial impact on their health, safety, development, and future success -- but not every child starts on equal footing," the senator from New York wrote on a Mediumpost detailing her plan.
"Families and kids face huge disparities in opportunity and resources depending on their income and zip code, and the gap is wider for families of color," she noted. "That isn't fair, and it isn't acceptable."
Gillibrand vowed Wednesday that, if she is elected president, she will implement her proposal, which "guarantees a set of fundamental rights to give every child the chance to succeed -- no matter what block they grow up on," during her first 100 days in office.
\u201cToday I'm announcing my Family Bill of Rights: a new economic policy platform that will lift many of the financial burdens on families and help level the playing field for children.\u201d— Kirsten Gillibrand (@Kirsten Gillibrand) 1558526400
Gillibrand's sweeping Family Bill of Rights addresses everything from maternal care and paid family leave to universal pre-K and healthcare for children. To cover the costs, she proposes a financial transaction tax, which would generate $777 billion over a decade, according to her campaign.
The five fundamental rights of her proposal are:
To improve maternal care--particulary for women of color, who are more than three times more likely to die of pregnancy-related causes than their white peers--Gillibrand calls for a plan modeled off of former Sen. Heidi Heitkamp's (D-N.D.) legislation to study data from rural communities, improve training, and make it easier to boost the number of OB-GYNs.
Gillibrand's proposal would "ensure that taxpayer-funded adoption and child welfare agencies can't discriminate against foster or adoptive families," and "provide a tax credit to ensure that a family's ability to adopt and provide a stable home for a child isn't dependent on their wealth." She would also require insurance companies to cover fertility treatment.
Borrowing a page from Finland's book, the senator calls for launching a nationwide program to provide new parents with "baby bundles" that contain necessary supplies "like diapers, swaddle blankets, and onesies, all in a box with a small mattress that can be repurposed as a nursery bed."
"Every child deserves the same opportunities to learn, grow, and reach their potential -- which is why I would enact universal pre-K and expand the Child and Dependent Care tax credit so that families can afford safe, high-quality childcare."
--Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
The presidential hopeful aims to ensure universal healthcare for kids by automatically enrolling every newborn in the existing Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and giving them access to Medicaid's Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit.
"Every child deserves the same opportunities to learn, grow, and reach their potential -- which is why I would enact universal pre-K and expand the Child and Dependent Care tax credit so that families can afford safe, high-quality childcare," Gillibrand wrote. "My plan would also professionalize at-home and day care, expand access to early education for children with disabilities, and support childcare workers."
Gillibrand, who has a track record of advocating for policies such as paid leave, has made children and families a key focus of her presidential campaign. When she announced her exploratory committee on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in January, the senator said she is running for president "because as a young mom, I'm going to fight for other people's kids as hard as I would fight for my own."
While Gillibrand's new policy is comprehensive, she isn't the only Democratic primary candidate to roll out family-focused proposals.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), in February, put forth a plan to tax the wealthy to help establish universal childcare. On Wednesday, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) reintroduced a bill from 2018 designed to combat racial bias in maternal care.
Earlier this month, on the heels of an "absolutely devastating" report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about the nation's rising maternal mortality, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) unveiled legislation crafted to promote community-based, holistic healthcare for pregnant people and new parents.
"Republicans want to give away trillions of dollars to the richest people in our country," said Rep. Rashida Tlaib, "and they want to pay for it by taking food away from hungry children and letting people die from a lack of healthcare coverage."
In a party-line vote, House Republicans on Thursday approved a budget blueprint that sets the stage for the GOP to pass another round of tax cuts for the rich, paid for in part by slashing Medicaid, federal nutrition assistance, and other critical programs.
The final vote was 216 to 214, with two Republicans—Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Victoria Spartz of Indiana—and every Democrat opposing the measure, which now must be converted into legislation.
The budget reconciliation process that Republicans are using for their sweeping bill means it can pass with a simple majority in both chambers of Congress.
"Republicans are ramming through a budget that includes $880 billion in cuts to Medicaid and at least $230 billion in cuts to food assistance to pay for tax breaks for billionaires," Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) said in a statement Thursday. "These are the largest Medicaid and food assistance cuts in American history."
“Make no mistake: Republicans want to give away trillions of dollars to the richest people in our country like Elon Musk, and they want to pay for it by taking food away from hungry children and letting people die from a lack of healthcare coverage," Tlaib continued. "We must raise our voices and defeat this dangerous Republican budget."
"In unifying behind this budget resolution, congressional Republicans are telling us they are serious about their agenda to rob everyday Americans in order to deliver a big payout to the ultra-wealthy in tax cuts."
Passage of the blueprint came hours after Republican congressional leaders and President Donald Trump managed to win the support of GOP holdouts concerned that the forthcoming legislative package won't reduce spending enough to offset the massive cost of fresh tax cuts, which would largely benefit the rich.
During a press conference Thursday following the vote, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) signaled that they are unified behind the goal of cutting at least $1.5 trillion in federal spending over the next decade—an objective that Trump has endorsed.
"We have a lot of United States senators who believe that is a minimum," Thune said of the $1.5 trillion figure.
Sharon Parrott, president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said in a statement that "in this budget framework, there is no way to cut $1.5 trillion in spending while protecting health coverage through Medicaid and food assistance through [the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]."
"This budget architecture was terrible a couple of months ago," Parrott added. "It is a far worse plan at a moment when the president's tariffs, chaotically crafted and applied, have caused business uncertainty to soar and raised the risk of a recession, higher unemployment, and surging prices."
In a post on his social media site, Trump congratulated House Republicans for approving the measure and claimed it would deliver "the Largest Tax and Regulation Cuts ever even contemplated."
An analysis released last week by the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that renewing soon-to-expire provisions of the 2017 Trump-GOP tax law would cost $5.5 trillion over the next decade. Republican lawmakers have also called for an additional $1.5 trillion in tax cuts, which would push the overall cost of the tax package to $7 trillion.
David Kass, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness, said in a statement Thursday that "the country is rapidly undergoing an intensifying economic crisis created by Trump and congressional Republicans, and the only legislative solution they've put forward is to double down on tax cuts for billionaires while eliminating healthcare access and food assistance for millions of Americans."
Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, echoed that message, saying that "in unifying behind this budget resolution, congressional Republicans are telling us they are serious about their agenda to rob everyday Americans in order to deliver a big payout to the ultra-wealthy in tax cuts."
"As they now work to actually write the bill that they intend to push through via the reconciliation process, which will deplete funding for healthcare, nutrition, and other critical human needs in order to line the pockets of CEOs and billionaires, they should know we are also serious in our efforts to fight back," Gilbert added.
"The only egg prices Donald Trump is lowering," quipped the DNC chair, "is our nest eggs."
For the third straight month, U.S retail egg prices have hit a record high, despite falling wholesale prices, no bird flu outbreaks, and President Donald Trump's campaign promises—and recent misleading claims.
On Thursday, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index (CPI) reported the average retail cost of a dozen eggs rose from $5.90 in February to $6.23 last month.
Egg prices continue to increase despite bird flu outbreak slowing finance.yahoo.com/news/egg-pri...
[image or embed]
— Yahoo Finance (@yahoofinance.com) April 10, 2025 at 6:22 AM
Earlier this week, Trump claimed that "eggs are down 79%" due to his administration's work, a possible reference to the wholesale price, which does not reflect retail cost due to the role that profit-hungry industrial producers and grocery cartels play in inflating prices.
Trump also said that egg prices "are going down more," a statement that contradicts not only recent trends but also his own administration's Food Price Outlook, which forecasts a 57.6% increase in egg prices for 2025, with a prediction interval of 31.1%-91.5%.
Recent record egg prices have largely been driven by an avian flu epidemic that has forced farmers to cull over 166 million birds, most of them egg-laying hens. However, no farms are currently reporting any bird flu outbreaks.
On Tuesday, Cal-Maine Foods, the nation's largest egg producer, announced quarterly profits of $509 million, more than triple its gains from a year ago. The Mississippi-based company, which produces around 20% of U.S. eggs, also enjoyed a more than 600% increase in gross profits between fiscal years 2021-23, according to the consumer advocacy group Food & Water Watch (FWW).
Yet even as its profits soared, Cal-Maine still took $42 million in federal compensation for losses due to bird flu.
The top five egg producers own roughly half of all U.S. laying hens. The biggest of those corporations is Cal-Maine, which just announced quarterly profits of $509 million — more than 3x what it made a year ago. Corporate concentration + bird flu = a price-hiking free for all.
— Robert Reich (@rbreich.bsky.social) April 9, 2025 at 10:31 AM
Last month, the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust division launched an investigation of alleged price-fixing by the nation's largest egg producers, including Cal-Maine, which isn't even the largest recipient of avian flu-related government assistance. Versova, which operates farms in Iowa and Ohio, has been allotted more than $107 million in federal bird flu relief, The Washington Post reported Wednesday. Hillandale Farms, a Pennsylvania-based company sold last month to Global Eggs, received $53 million in avian flu-related subsidies.
"For those companies to be bailed out and then turn around and set exploitative prices, it just adds insult to injury for consumers," Thomas Gremillion, director of food policy at the Consumer Federation of America, told the Post. "Absolutely, it's unfair."
FWW research director Amanda Starbuck took aim at the corporate food system, saying Thursday that "the industry is proving itself effective at extracting enormous profits out of American consumers."
"We are all paying for it—at the store, with food shortages, and with the growing threat of the next pandemic," she continued.
"Restoring sanity to the grocery aisle will require immediate action to transform our food system," Starbuck added. "To lower egg prices, the Trump administration must take on the food monopolies, hasten and prioritize its investigation into corporate price fixing, and stop the spread of factory farms."
The fresh CPI figures weren't all bad news, as the index saw its first decline in five years, falling 0.1% mainly on the strength of lower oil prices. The 12-month increase in consumer prices also slowed from 2.8% to 2.4%.
However, the mildly positive CPI news was overshadowed by the economic uncertainty caused by Trump's mercurial global trade war, including a ramped-up 145% tariff on imports from China, one of the top U.S. trading partners, and ongoing stock market chaos.
"The only egg prices Donald Trump is lowering," Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin quipped earlier this week, "is our nest eggs."
"In his short time in government, Elon Musk has done enormous harm to working Americans."
Dozens of House Democrats wrote to U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday "to make clear that you must remove Elon Musk from his government position by May 30th and to demand that you stop ignoring federal law and ethics rules to empower an unelected billionaire."
Musk, the richest person on Earth, is leading Trump's effort to gut the federal bureaucracy as the de facto chief of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency—but the billionaire is not the formal head of DOGE. Instead, Musk is a "special government employee," which lets him keep his financial disclosure form confidential.
The new letter to Trump, signed by 77 House Democrats, highlights that special government employees can only serve in their positions for 130 days in a year and demands "an immediate public statement from your administration making clear that Musk will resign and surrender all decision-making authority, as required by law."
"In his short time in government, Elon Musk has done enormous harm to working Americans," noted the coalition, led by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar (D-Texas). "Musk's reckless destruction of government agencies has led to everything from seniors having challenges accessing Social Security to veterans losing access to care."
The billionaire's business ties include SpaceX and its subsidiary Starlink, the electric vehicle maker Tesla, and the social media site X, which is aiming to add a digital wallet feature. His companies have received tens of billions of dollars in government funding, including through contracts.
"While millions of Americans are suffering, Musk is continuing to enrich himself and break ethics laws," the lawmakers wrote. "Musk continues to cut funds from programs that support working people, while his own companies continue to rake in more than $8 million per day in contracts and subsidies from the federal government. Recently, your administration changed the rules of a broadband program to give even more money to one of Musk's companies. Musk held a car show on the lawn of the White House, where he illegally promoted his company's vehicles."
The letter continues: "Musk paid Wisconsin voters to support his preferred candidate in the state supreme court race. Any typical government employee would be held accountable for these actions, but Musk, who donated $277 million to your presidential campaign, has been allowed to keep his position of power in your White House."
"Once Elon Musk is removed from his post, he may not legally return to the federal government this year without divesting from his companies, including Tesla and SpaceX," the letter concludes. "For the good of the country, Elon Musk should be removed from his position immediately. Under the law, Mr. Musk cannot remain in his position beyond May 30th."
Politico reported last week that "Trump has told his inner circle, including members of his Cabinet, that Elon Musk will be stepping back in the coming weeks from his current role as governing partner."
The Hill pointed out Thursday that "the Tesla CEO has signaled he plans to wrap up his work in the allotted 130-day period. He told Fox News' Bret Baier last month that he expects to have accomplished most of his DOGE work in that time frame."
Still, the letter's signatories want to ensure that Musk actually leaves the government. Casar told Axios—which scooped the letter—that "we're making it very clear that the public pressure is only going to ramp up on Republicans between here and May 30."
Democrats "have legal tools at our disposal, political tools at our disposal," he said, as well as the "full force of public pressure."