To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

* indicates required
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Scientists Warn Summer 'Dead Zone' in Gulf of Mexico Could Span 'Roughly the Size of Massachusetts'

NASA captures clouds of sediment in the Gulf of Mexico on Nov. 10, 2009. (Photo: Jeff Schmaltz/NASA Earth Observatory MODIS Rapid Response Team)

Scientists Warn Summer 'Dead Zone' in Gulf of Mexico Could Span 'Roughly the Size of Massachusetts'

While the near-record forecast is partly due to the "abnormally high amount of spring rainfall" in the Midwest, experts also called for agricultural reforms to address the alarming long-term trend

U.S. scientists on Monday warned that because of runoff from human activities--such as urbanization and agriculture--this summer's "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico is forecast to be one of the worst on record.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) estimated the dead zone will span 7,829 square miles while Nancy Rabalais, a marine ecologist at Louisiana State University, predicted it will cover 8,717 square miles.

"These numbers are far above the five-year average of about 6,000 square miles," the Washington Postreported. The largest gulf dead zone ever recorded--8,776 square miles--occurred in 2017.

The gulf dead zone is primarily the result of nutrient pollution. The Mississippi River system carries nitrogen and phosphorus from cities and farms to the gulf, where the nutrients fuel an overgrowth of algae. The algae die, sink, decompose, and deplete the water of oxygen, which many marine creatures require for survival.

"When the oxygen is below two parts per million, any shrimp, crabs, and fish that can swim away, will swim away," Rabalais toldNational Geographic. "The animals in the sediment [that can't swim away] can be close to annihilated."

By posing a significant threat to regional marine life, the pollution that causes the gulf dead zone jeopardizes the tens of billions of dollars generated by commercial fishing in the area.

"It's just a major punch in the gut," Ryan Bradley, a fifth-generation commercial fisherman from Mississippi, told the Post. Bradley plans to travel to Washington, D.C. this month to ask federal lawmakers to declare a disaster in the region, which would open up relief funding for local fisheries.

Dead zones occur across the globe, though the annual one in the gulf is considered among the world's biggest. Experts partly credited the "abnormally high amount of spring rainfall" in the U.S. Midwest this year--which caused catastrophic flooding that could have a notable impact on both farmers and food prices in the long term--for the alarming new gulf dead zone forecasts.

"While this year's zone will be larger than usual because of the flooding, the long-term trend is still not changing," explained University of Michigan aquatic ecologist Don Scavia, who contributed to NOAA's analysis. "The bottom line is that we will never reach the dead zone reduction target of 1,900 square miles until more serious actions are taken to reduce the loss of Midwest fertilizers into the Mississippi River system."

Experts--including David Scheurer, a NOAA scientist who studies dead zones--are also worried that the human-caused climate crisis could exacerbate oxygen level issues in the gulf.

"That is a long-term concern," he told National Geographic. "If the climate does change in that region, there is a fair amount of evidence suggesting you would expect things to get worse."

The magazine reported:

Simply put, warm water is less capable of carrying oxygen, and a study published last year noted stretches of low-oxygen water thousands of miles across the ocean. Climate change is also expected to cause more intense precipitation and flooding in the Midwest, which will contribute to the amount of chemical fertilizer washed into the ocean.

Both Scheurer and Rabalais, however, say it's too early to say that the gulf's dead zone is already being made worse by climate change.

Considering the anticipated destruction, Rabalais recalled another human-caused disaster that devastated the gulf's ecosystem.

"You of course remember the BP oil spill?" she said. "This is a slow drip kind of change in the system that's been happening over decades, but it's just as consequential."

The photo caption has been updated with information from NASA's Earth Observatory.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
agricultureenvironmentnoaapollutionwater

U.S. scientists on Monday warned that because of runoff from human activities--such as urbanization and agriculture--this summer's "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico is forecast to be one of the worst on record.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) estimated the dead zone will span 7,829 square miles while Nancy Rabalais, a marine ecologist at Louisiana State University, predicted it will cover 8,717 square miles.

"These numbers are far above the five-year average of about 6,000 square miles," the Washington Postreported. The largest gulf dead zone ever recorded--8,776 square miles--occurred in 2017.

The gulf dead zone is primarily the result of nutrient pollution. The Mississippi River system carries nitrogen and phosphorus from cities and farms to the gulf, where the nutrients fuel an overgrowth of algae. The algae die, sink, decompose, and deplete the water of oxygen, which many marine creatures require for survival.

"When the oxygen is below two parts per million, any shrimp, crabs, and fish that can swim away, will swim away," Rabalais toldNational Geographic. "The animals in the sediment [that can't swim away] can be close to annihilated."

By posing a significant threat to regional marine life, the pollution that causes the gulf dead zone jeopardizes the tens of billions of dollars generated by commercial fishing in the area.

"It's just a major punch in the gut," Ryan Bradley, a fifth-generation commercial fisherman from Mississippi, told the Post. Bradley plans to travel to Washington, D.C. this month to ask federal lawmakers to declare a disaster in the region, which would open up relief funding for local fisheries.

Dead zones occur across the globe, though the annual one in the gulf is considered among the world's biggest. Experts partly credited the "abnormally high amount of spring rainfall" in the U.S. Midwest this year--which caused catastrophic flooding that could have a notable impact on both farmers and food prices in the long term--for the alarming new gulf dead zone forecasts.

"While this year's zone will be larger than usual because of the flooding, the long-term trend is still not changing," explained University of Michigan aquatic ecologist Don Scavia, who contributed to NOAA's analysis. "The bottom line is that we will never reach the dead zone reduction target of 1,900 square miles until more serious actions are taken to reduce the loss of Midwest fertilizers into the Mississippi River system."

Experts--including David Scheurer, a NOAA scientist who studies dead zones--are also worried that the human-caused climate crisis could exacerbate oxygen level issues in the gulf.

"That is a long-term concern," he told National Geographic. "If the climate does change in that region, there is a fair amount of evidence suggesting you would expect things to get worse."

The magazine reported:

Simply put, warm water is less capable of carrying oxygen, and a study published last year noted stretches of low-oxygen water thousands of miles across the ocean. Climate change is also expected to cause more intense precipitation and flooding in the Midwest, which will contribute to the amount of chemical fertilizer washed into the ocean.

Both Scheurer and Rabalais, however, say it's too early to say that the gulf's dead zone is already being made worse by climate change.

Considering the anticipated destruction, Rabalais recalled another human-caused disaster that devastated the gulf's ecosystem.

"You of course remember the BP oil spill?" she said. "This is a slow drip kind of change in the system that's been happening over decades, but it's just as consequential."

The photo caption has been updated with information from NASA's Earth Observatory.

U.S. scientists on Monday warned that because of runoff from human activities--such as urbanization and agriculture--this summer's "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico is forecast to be one of the worst on record.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) estimated the dead zone will span 7,829 square miles while Nancy Rabalais, a marine ecologist at Louisiana State University, predicted it will cover 8,717 square miles.

"These numbers are far above the five-year average of about 6,000 square miles," the Washington Postreported. The largest gulf dead zone ever recorded--8,776 square miles--occurred in 2017.

The gulf dead zone is primarily the result of nutrient pollution. The Mississippi River system carries nitrogen and phosphorus from cities and farms to the gulf, where the nutrients fuel an overgrowth of algae. The algae die, sink, decompose, and deplete the water of oxygen, which many marine creatures require for survival.

"When the oxygen is below two parts per million, any shrimp, crabs, and fish that can swim away, will swim away," Rabalais toldNational Geographic. "The animals in the sediment [that can't swim away] can be close to annihilated."

By posing a significant threat to regional marine life, the pollution that causes the gulf dead zone jeopardizes the tens of billions of dollars generated by commercial fishing in the area.

"It's just a major punch in the gut," Ryan Bradley, a fifth-generation commercial fisherman from Mississippi, told the Post. Bradley plans to travel to Washington, D.C. this month to ask federal lawmakers to declare a disaster in the region, which would open up relief funding for local fisheries.

Dead zones occur across the globe, though the annual one in the gulf is considered among the world's biggest. Experts partly credited the "abnormally high amount of spring rainfall" in the U.S. Midwest this year--which caused catastrophic flooding that could have a notable impact on both farmers and food prices in the long term--for the alarming new gulf dead zone forecasts.

"While this year's zone will be larger than usual because of the flooding, the long-term trend is still not changing," explained University of Michigan aquatic ecologist Don Scavia, who contributed to NOAA's analysis. "The bottom line is that we will never reach the dead zone reduction target of 1,900 square miles until more serious actions are taken to reduce the loss of Midwest fertilizers into the Mississippi River system."

Experts--including David Scheurer, a NOAA scientist who studies dead zones--are also worried that the human-caused climate crisis could exacerbate oxygen level issues in the gulf.

"That is a long-term concern," he told National Geographic. "If the climate does change in that region, there is a fair amount of evidence suggesting you would expect things to get worse."

The magazine reported:

Simply put, warm water is less capable of carrying oxygen, and a study published last year noted stretches of low-oxygen water thousands of miles across the ocean. Climate change is also expected to cause more intense precipitation and flooding in the Midwest, which will contribute to the amount of chemical fertilizer washed into the ocean.

Both Scheurer and Rabalais, however, say it's too early to say that the gulf's dead zone is already being made worse by climate change.

Considering the anticipated destruction, Rabalais recalled another human-caused disaster that devastated the gulf's ecosystem.

"You of course remember the BP oil spill?" she said. "This is a slow drip kind of change in the system that's been happening over decades, but it's just as consequential."

The photo caption has been updated with information from NASA's Earth Observatory.

agricultureenvironmentnoaapollutionwater
Join the Conversation