SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Democratic presidential hopeful US Senator from Massachusetts Elizabeth Warren speaks during the first Democratic primary debate of the 2020 presidential campaign season hosted by NBC News at the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts in Miami, Florida, June 26, 2019. (Photo: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images)
In addition to demand for structural reforms to the American political and economic systems at the first 2020 Democratic primary debate Wednesday night, Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that with abortion and reproductive rights under relentless assault nationwide it is time to for Democrats to go on offense by codifying the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law.
"It's not enough for us to expect the courts to protect us," the Massachusetts Democrat said. "Forty-seven years ago, Roe v. Wade was decided, and we've all looked to the courts all that time, as state after state has undermined Roe, has put in exceptions, has come right up to the edge of taking away protections."
Instead of counting on the high court to protect the right to abortion care, the senator said, "We need to make that a federal law."
\u201cSen. Warren on Roe v. Wade: "47 years ago Roe v. Wade was decided and we've all looked to the courts...as state after state has undermined Roe, has put in exceptions...we now have an America where most people support Roe. v. Wade. We need to make that federal law." #DemDebate\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1561607956
Contrary to anti-choice rhetoric, a federal law protecting abortion rights, Warren added, would align with the views of most Americans.
"We now have an America where most people support Roe v. Wade," she said.
The senator won praise from women's rights groups for going beyond simply defending reproductive rights and instead going on the offensive to ensure pregnant patients have the right to obtain abortion care regardless of the political leanings of the Supreme Court.
\u201cWe agree with @SenWarren, Roe V. Wade should be a federal law. #reproductivejustice #democraticdebate\u201d— Mothering Justice (@Mothering Justice) 1561599300
\u201c.@ewarren with a strong stance on protecting abortion access: "I would make certain EVERY woman has access to the full range of reproductive health services and that includes birth control and abortion. It's not enough for us to expect the courts to protect us." #DemDebate\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1561599758
Warren's call for a federal law follows the passage of a number of state laws imposing extreme restrictions on abortion rights, including Alabama's law which bans almost all abortions in the state at any stage of pregnancy and laws in Ohio and Georgia which outlaw the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy.
Abortion must be treated as part of the standard healthcare which is available to women, Warren said.
"I would make certain that every woman has access to the full range of reproductive health care services," the senator said, "and that includes birth control, it includes abortion, it includes everything for a woman."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In addition to demand for structural reforms to the American political and economic systems at the first 2020 Democratic primary debate Wednesday night, Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that with abortion and reproductive rights under relentless assault nationwide it is time to for Democrats to go on offense by codifying the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law.
"It's not enough for us to expect the courts to protect us," the Massachusetts Democrat said. "Forty-seven years ago, Roe v. Wade was decided, and we've all looked to the courts all that time, as state after state has undermined Roe, has put in exceptions, has come right up to the edge of taking away protections."
Instead of counting on the high court to protect the right to abortion care, the senator said, "We need to make that a federal law."
\u201cSen. Warren on Roe v. Wade: "47 years ago Roe v. Wade was decided and we've all looked to the courts...as state after state has undermined Roe, has put in exceptions...we now have an America where most people support Roe. v. Wade. We need to make that federal law." #DemDebate\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1561607956
Contrary to anti-choice rhetoric, a federal law protecting abortion rights, Warren added, would align with the views of most Americans.
"We now have an America where most people support Roe v. Wade," she said.
The senator won praise from women's rights groups for going beyond simply defending reproductive rights and instead going on the offensive to ensure pregnant patients have the right to obtain abortion care regardless of the political leanings of the Supreme Court.
\u201cWe agree with @SenWarren, Roe V. Wade should be a federal law. #reproductivejustice #democraticdebate\u201d— Mothering Justice (@Mothering Justice) 1561599300
\u201c.@ewarren with a strong stance on protecting abortion access: "I would make certain EVERY woman has access to the full range of reproductive health services and that includes birth control and abortion. It's not enough for us to expect the courts to protect us." #DemDebate\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1561599758
Warren's call for a federal law follows the passage of a number of state laws imposing extreme restrictions on abortion rights, including Alabama's law which bans almost all abortions in the state at any stage of pregnancy and laws in Ohio and Georgia which outlaw the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy.
Abortion must be treated as part of the standard healthcare which is available to women, Warren said.
"I would make certain that every woman has access to the full range of reproductive health care services," the senator said, "and that includes birth control, it includes abortion, it includes everything for a woman."
In addition to demand for structural reforms to the American political and economic systems at the first 2020 Democratic primary debate Wednesday night, Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that with abortion and reproductive rights under relentless assault nationwide it is time to for Democrats to go on offense by codifying the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law.
"It's not enough for us to expect the courts to protect us," the Massachusetts Democrat said. "Forty-seven years ago, Roe v. Wade was decided, and we've all looked to the courts all that time, as state after state has undermined Roe, has put in exceptions, has come right up to the edge of taking away protections."
Instead of counting on the high court to protect the right to abortion care, the senator said, "We need to make that a federal law."
\u201cSen. Warren on Roe v. Wade: "47 years ago Roe v. Wade was decided and we've all looked to the courts...as state after state has undermined Roe, has put in exceptions...we now have an America where most people support Roe. v. Wade. We need to make that federal law." #DemDebate\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1561607956
Contrary to anti-choice rhetoric, a federal law protecting abortion rights, Warren added, would align with the views of most Americans.
"We now have an America where most people support Roe v. Wade," she said.
The senator won praise from women's rights groups for going beyond simply defending reproductive rights and instead going on the offensive to ensure pregnant patients have the right to obtain abortion care regardless of the political leanings of the Supreme Court.
\u201cWe agree with @SenWarren, Roe V. Wade should be a federal law. #reproductivejustice #democraticdebate\u201d— Mothering Justice (@Mothering Justice) 1561599300
\u201c.@ewarren with a strong stance on protecting abortion access: "I would make certain EVERY woman has access to the full range of reproductive health services and that includes birth control and abortion. It's not enough for us to expect the courts to protect us." #DemDebate\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1561599758
Warren's call for a federal law follows the passage of a number of state laws imposing extreme restrictions on abortion rights, including Alabama's law which bans almost all abortions in the state at any stage of pregnancy and laws in Ohio and Georgia which outlaw the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy.
Abortion must be treated as part of the standard healthcare which is available to women, Warren said.
"I would make certain that every woman has access to the full range of reproductive health care services," the senator said, "and that includes birth control, it includes abortion, it includes everything for a woman."