SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Agents walk to a vehicle outside the U.S. Border Patrol station in Clint, Texas, on June 26, 2019. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump's war on immigrants will reportedly enter a new phase Sunday as ICE agents across the country are then expected to begin several days of raids targeting families, an announcement that was decried as "terrorism" by critics.
"Let's call President Trump's attacks on our immigrant communities what they are: Bigoted. Anti-Immigrant. And a blatant attempt to terrorize immigrant families."
--Rep. Ben Ray Lujan
"This is not a 'rule of law' operation," Ali Noorani, the executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said in a tweet. "The goal is to terrorize immigrant communities so immigrants do not seek protection in the U.S."
The raids are expected to begin Sunday and continue for "several days," according toThe New York Times, which broke the story Thursday morning.
The operation is tailored to target families but, as the Times reported, anyone in the vicinity of the operation could also be taken into custody:
The raids, which will be conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement over multiple days, will include "collateral" deportations, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the preliminary stage of the operation. In those deportations, the authorities might detain immigrants who happened to be on the scene, even though they were not targets of the raids.
The threat of collateral deportations had advocates like Colorado Democratic candidate for Senate Trish Zornio up in arms.
"POTUS's proposed raids will include 'collateral' arrests if immigrants happen to be in the vicinity," tweeted Zornio. "This is beyond morally wrong and is in direct opposition of U.S. principles."
\u201cPOTUS\u2019s proposed raids will include \u201ccollateral\u201d arrests if immigrants happen to be in the vicinity. This is beyond morally wrong and is in direct opposition of US principles.\n\n\ud83d\udc49 FACT: ICE cannot forcibly enter your home. Do not answer the door.\n\nhttps://t.co/3cTkm0sEJO\u201d— Trish Zornio (@Trish Zornio) 1562854282
Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.) took to Twitter to attack the president, calling the predicted raids "bigoted" and "anti-immigrant."
"Let's call President Trump's attacks on our immigrant communities what they are," said Lujan. "Bigoted. Anti-Immigrant. And a blatant attempt to terrorize immigrant families."
It's not the first time Trump has threatened to send the government after immigrant families. On June 17, the president tweeted that his administration would begin conducting raids the "next week."
"They will be removed as fast as they come in," the president said at the time--before backing down five days later on June 22 with an ominous pledge to restart the process if Democrats in Congress did not fix the immigration issue, specifically the "asylum and loophole problems."
House Democrats passed a $4.6 billion bill for the border on June 27, legislation that exposed a growing rift between congressional leadership and the party's outspoken new members.
Author Cari Luna took to Twitter to blast Democrats for what she saw as the party's complicity in the raids.
"Last summer in Portland we occupied the ICE building and shut it down," said Luna. "This summer? Kids are still in cages, concentration camps are multiplying, and ICE is conducting nationwide raids."
"Time to occupy the offices of the Democratic leaders whose inaction makes them complicit," Luna added.
"Shame, shame, shame on this awful administration."
--Rep. Veronica Escobar
Even before Thursday's Times reporting, the effects of Trump's all-out assault on immigrants--from raids to conditions in detention centers--were having a deleterious effect on the country's migrant population.
"I'm scared to go outside. I'm scared to go to all places," a woman from Guatemala named Yennifer told CBS News on Tuesday. "My biggest fear is that if they take me, what's going to happen to my husband? And if they take my kids away from me, what's going to happen to them?"
CBS also talked to Make the Road NY immigrant defense coordinator Luba Cortes, who noted the effects of announcing raids, even if they don't happen, on the communities she works with.
"To say, 'We're going to have a raid today,' then, 'We're not going to have a raid today,' really plays with people's emotions," said Cortes.
On Thursday, immigrant rights advocates posted information for those who could be targeted by the ICE operations.
\u201c**ICE raids** KNOW YOUR RIGHTS / ENTERATE DE TUS DERECHOS @ImmDefense \n\nhttps://t.co/CfG6rlsQKF\u201d— Luis Sep\u00falveda (@Luis Sep\u00falveda) 1562852870
"No matter who you are or what your status is, this is the United States of America--where ALL people have rights," tweeted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). "Know yours."
\u201cNo matter who you are or what your status is, this is the United States of America - where ALL people have rights. Know yours.\n\nPrepare. Visit https://t.co/vneVYPCAY8 to learn how to handle this & other ICE encounters in multiple languages.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1562852310
Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) delivered a short, but cutting, reply to the news of the raids to NBC News reporter Alex Moe.
"Shame, shame, shame on this awful administration," said Escobar.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
President Donald Trump's war on immigrants will reportedly enter a new phase Sunday as ICE agents across the country are then expected to begin several days of raids targeting families, an announcement that was decried as "terrorism" by critics.
"Let's call President Trump's attacks on our immigrant communities what they are: Bigoted. Anti-Immigrant. And a blatant attempt to terrorize immigrant families."
--Rep. Ben Ray Lujan
"This is not a 'rule of law' operation," Ali Noorani, the executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said in a tweet. "The goal is to terrorize immigrant communities so immigrants do not seek protection in the U.S."
The raids are expected to begin Sunday and continue for "several days," according toThe New York Times, which broke the story Thursday morning.
The operation is tailored to target families but, as the Times reported, anyone in the vicinity of the operation could also be taken into custody:
The raids, which will be conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement over multiple days, will include "collateral" deportations, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the preliminary stage of the operation. In those deportations, the authorities might detain immigrants who happened to be on the scene, even though they were not targets of the raids.
The threat of collateral deportations had advocates like Colorado Democratic candidate for Senate Trish Zornio up in arms.
"POTUS's proposed raids will include 'collateral' arrests if immigrants happen to be in the vicinity," tweeted Zornio. "This is beyond morally wrong and is in direct opposition of U.S. principles."
\u201cPOTUS\u2019s proposed raids will include \u201ccollateral\u201d arrests if immigrants happen to be in the vicinity. This is beyond morally wrong and is in direct opposition of US principles.\n\n\ud83d\udc49 FACT: ICE cannot forcibly enter your home. Do not answer the door.\n\nhttps://t.co/3cTkm0sEJO\u201d— Trish Zornio (@Trish Zornio) 1562854282
Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.) took to Twitter to attack the president, calling the predicted raids "bigoted" and "anti-immigrant."
"Let's call President Trump's attacks on our immigrant communities what they are," said Lujan. "Bigoted. Anti-Immigrant. And a blatant attempt to terrorize immigrant families."
It's not the first time Trump has threatened to send the government after immigrant families. On June 17, the president tweeted that his administration would begin conducting raids the "next week."
"They will be removed as fast as they come in," the president said at the time--before backing down five days later on June 22 with an ominous pledge to restart the process if Democrats in Congress did not fix the immigration issue, specifically the "asylum and loophole problems."
House Democrats passed a $4.6 billion bill for the border on June 27, legislation that exposed a growing rift between congressional leadership and the party's outspoken new members.
Author Cari Luna took to Twitter to blast Democrats for what she saw as the party's complicity in the raids.
"Last summer in Portland we occupied the ICE building and shut it down," said Luna. "This summer? Kids are still in cages, concentration camps are multiplying, and ICE is conducting nationwide raids."
"Time to occupy the offices of the Democratic leaders whose inaction makes them complicit," Luna added.
"Shame, shame, shame on this awful administration."
--Rep. Veronica Escobar
Even before Thursday's Times reporting, the effects of Trump's all-out assault on immigrants--from raids to conditions in detention centers--were having a deleterious effect on the country's migrant population.
"I'm scared to go outside. I'm scared to go to all places," a woman from Guatemala named Yennifer told CBS News on Tuesday. "My biggest fear is that if they take me, what's going to happen to my husband? And if they take my kids away from me, what's going to happen to them?"
CBS also talked to Make the Road NY immigrant defense coordinator Luba Cortes, who noted the effects of announcing raids, even if they don't happen, on the communities she works with.
"To say, 'We're going to have a raid today,' then, 'We're not going to have a raid today,' really plays with people's emotions," said Cortes.
On Thursday, immigrant rights advocates posted information for those who could be targeted by the ICE operations.
\u201c**ICE raids** KNOW YOUR RIGHTS / ENTERATE DE TUS DERECHOS @ImmDefense \n\nhttps://t.co/CfG6rlsQKF\u201d— Luis Sep\u00falveda (@Luis Sep\u00falveda) 1562852870
"No matter who you are or what your status is, this is the United States of America--where ALL people have rights," tweeted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). "Know yours."
\u201cNo matter who you are or what your status is, this is the United States of America - where ALL people have rights. Know yours.\n\nPrepare. Visit https://t.co/vneVYPCAY8 to learn how to handle this & other ICE encounters in multiple languages.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1562852310
Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) delivered a short, but cutting, reply to the news of the raids to NBC News reporter Alex Moe.
"Shame, shame, shame on this awful administration," said Escobar.
President Donald Trump's war on immigrants will reportedly enter a new phase Sunday as ICE agents across the country are then expected to begin several days of raids targeting families, an announcement that was decried as "terrorism" by critics.
"Let's call President Trump's attacks on our immigrant communities what they are: Bigoted. Anti-Immigrant. And a blatant attempt to terrorize immigrant families."
--Rep. Ben Ray Lujan
"This is not a 'rule of law' operation," Ali Noorani, the executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said in a tweet. "The goal is to terrorize immigrant communities so immigrants do not seek protection in the U.S."
The raids are expected to begin Sunday and continue for "several days," according toThe New York Times, which broke the story Thursday morning.
The operation is tailored to target families but, as the Times reported, anyone in the vicinity of the operation could also be taken into custody:
The raids, which will be conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement over multiple days, will include "collateral" deportations, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the preliminary stage of the operation. In those deportations, the authorities might detain immigrants who happened to be on the scene, even though they were not targets of the raids.
The threat of collateral deportations had advocates like Colorado Democratic candidate for Senate Trish Zornio up in arms.
"POTUS's proposed raids will include 'collateral' arrests if immigrants happen to be in the vicinity," tweeted Zornio. "This is beyond morally wrong and is in direct opposition of U.S. principles."
\u201cPOTUS\u2019s proposed raids will include \u201ccollateral\u201d arrests if immigrants happen to be in the vicinity. This is beyond morally wrong and is in direct opposition of US principles.\n\n\ud83d\udc49 FACT: ICE cannot forcibly enter your home. Do not answer the door.\n\nhttps://t.co/3cTkm0sEJO\u201d— Trish Zornio (@Trish Zornio) 1562854282
Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.) took to Twitter to attack the president, calling the predicted raids "bigoted" and "anti-immigrant."
"Let's call President Trump's attacks on our immigrant communities what they are," said Lujan. "Bigoted. Anti-Immigrant. And a blatant attempt to terrorize immigrant families."
It's not the first time Trump has threatened to send the government after immigrant families. On June 17, the president tweeted that his administration would begin conducting raids the "next week."
"They will be removed as fast as they come in," the president said at the time--before backing down five days later on June 22 with an ominous pledge to restart the process if Democrats in Congress did not fix the immigration issue, specifically the "asylum and loophole problems."
House Democrats passed a $4.6 billion bill for the border on June 27, legislation that exposed a growing rift between congressional leadership and the party's outspoken new members.
Author Cari Luna took to Twitter to blast Democrats for what she saw as the party's complicity in the raids.
"Last summer in Portland we occupied the ICE building and shut it down," said Luna. "This summer? Kids are still in cages, concentration camps are multiplying, and ICE is conducting nationwide raids."
"Time to occupy the offices of the Democratic leaders whose inaction makes them complicit," Luna added.
"Shame, shame, shame on this awful administration."
--Rep. Veronica Escobar
Even before Thursday's Times reporting, the effects of Trump's all-out assault on immigrants--from raids to conditions in detention centers--were having a deleterious effect on the country's migrant population.
"I'm scared to go outside. I'm scared to go to all places," a woman from Guatemala named Yennifer told CBS News on Tuesday. "My biggest fear is that if they take me, what's going to happen to my husband? And if they take my kids away from me, what's going to happen to them?"
CBS also talked to Make the Road NY immigrant defense coordinator Luba Cortes, who noted the effects of announcing raids, even if they don't happen, on the communities she works with.
"To say, 'We're going to have a raid today,' then, 'We're not going to have a raid today,' really plays with people's emotions," said Cortes.
On Thursday, immigrant rights advocates posted information for those who could be targeted by the ICE operations.
\u201c**ICE raids** KNOW YOUR RIGHTS / ENTERATE DE TUS DERECHOS @ImmDefense \n\nhttps://t.co/CfG6rlsQKF\u201d— Luis Sep\u00falveda (@Luis Sep\u00falveda) 1562852870
"No matter who you are or what your status is, this is the United States of America--where ALL people have rights," tweeted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). "Know yours."
\u201cNo matter who you are or what your status is, this is the United States of America - where ALL people have rights. Know yours.\n\nPrepare. Visit https://t.co/vneVYPCAY8 to learn how to handle this & other ICE encounters in multiple languages.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1562852310
Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) delivered a short, but cutting, reply to the news of the raids to NBC News reporter Alex Moe.
"Shame, shame, shame on this awful administration," said Escobar.
"This is a massive win for justice and the rule of law," said one Democratic congresswoman. "Now Trump must comply."
This is a breaking news story... Please check back for possible updates...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday issued a ruling with no noted dissents affirming a federal judge's order compelling President Donald Trump's administration to enable the stateside return of Kilmar Abrego García, a Salvadoran man wrongfully deported to a notorious prison in his native country.
"The rule of law won today," said Andrew Rossman, one of Abrego García's lawyers. "Time to bring him home."
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in Thursday's unsigned order that the Trump administration must "facilitate and effectuate" Abrego García's release from custody "and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador."
"The intended scope of the term 'effectuate' in the district court's order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the district court's authority," Sotomayor added. "The district court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the executive branch in the conduct of foreign affairs."
Last week, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis gave the Trump administration until Monday April 7 to return Abrego García, who was deported last month to the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) super-maximum security prison in central El Salvador after the government claimed without credible evidence that he was a gang member.
"Defendants seized Abrego García without any lawful authority; held him in three separate domestic detention centers without legal basis; failed to present him to any immigration judge or officer; and forcibly transported him to El Salvador in direct contravention" of immigration law, she wrote.
A panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to stay Xinis' order, with one judge on the tribunal writing, "The United States government has no legal authority to snatch a person who is lawfully present in the United States off the street and remove him from the country without due process."
The panel refuted the Trump administration's assertion that it could not return Abrego García, calling the government's argument "that the federal courts are powerless to intervene... unconscionable."
However, on Monday, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily blocked Xinis' order just before the midnight deadline pending review by all nine justices.
Abrego García's legal team argued that their client was the victim of a "Kafkaesque mistake." Among the so-called evidence the government used to claim he is a member of the MS-13 criminal gang was a Chicago Bulls hat and hoodie he wore, and a snitch's tip. The Trump administration subsequently admitted in a March 31 court filing that Abrego García's deportation was an "administrative error" and an "oversight."
Before he was deported, Abrego García, 29, lived in Maryland with his wife, Jennifer Stefania Vasquez Sura, a U.S. citizen; their autistic, nonverbal 5-year-old child; and two children from Vasquez Sura's previous relationship. His lawyers said he left El Salvador to escape the then-endemic gang violence there.
Advocates for Abrego García welcomed the high court's order, with Congressman Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) writing on the social media site Bluesky that the justices "did the right thing."
"This is about the rule of law and due process," he added. "Kilmar Abrego García should be reunited with his family."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said: "This is a massive win for justice and the rule of law. Now Trump must comply."
"Controversial speech is not illegal, and political speech that criticizes the Israeli government or U.S. foreign policy is constitutionally protected," said the NYCLU's interim legal director.
An attorney for former Columbia University student organizer Mahmoud Khalil said Thursday that a memo submitted to an immigration judge shows that the U.S. government "is clearly going after Mahmoud and persecuting him for exercising his First Amendment rights."
"After a month of hiding the ball since Mahmoud's late-night unjust arrest in New York and taking him away to a remote detention center in Louisiana, immigration authorities have finally admitted that they have no case whatsoever against him," the lawyer, Marc Van Der Hout, said in a statement about a two-page memo from the U.S. Deparment of State that was published by The Associated Press.
Plainclothes federal agents accosted Khalil, a green-card holder who finished his graduate studies at Columbia last year, and his pregnant wife—Noor Abdalla, a U.S. citizen—at their building in New York City on March 8 and took him into custody. Abdalla has said that "this felt like a kidnapping because it was," and Khalil calls himself a "political prisoner."
As Van Der Hout explained Thursday: "The government has charged Mahmoud with a rarely used provision of the immigration laws targeting the deportation of even lawful permanent residents like Mahmoud—but Secretary of State Marco Rubio has provided no proof or evidence that these charges bear any viability against Mahmoud. Further, Secretary Rubio has shown that this is merely about targeting Mahmoud's free speech rights about Palestine."
"If anything, this document only underscores the startling escalation of Trump's war on dissent and efforts to remove people who disagree with him or U.S. policy."
The AP noted that "a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, did not respond to questions about whether it had additional evidence against Khalil, writing in an emailed statement, 'DHS did file evidence, but immigration court dockets are not available to the public.'"
Rubio's memo was submitted to Judge Jamee Comans ahead of an immigration court hearing scheduled for Friday in Jena, Louisiana—and after the judge said earlier this week that the federal government "either can provide sufficient evidence or not," and "if he's not removable, I'm going to terminate this case."
The memo suggests campus protests against the U.S.-backed Israeli assault on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip were inherently discriminatory against Jewish people, stating that Rubio determined the activities and presence of Khalil and another lawful permanent resident whose name is redacted "would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences and would compromise a compelling U.S. foreign policy interest."
"These determinations are based on information... regarding the participation and roles of [redacted] and Khalil in antisemitic protests and disruptive activities, which fosters a hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States," the memo continues. "The public actions and continued presence of [redacted] and Khalil in the United States undermine U.S. policy to combat antisemitism around the world and in the United States, in addition to efforts to protect Jewish students from harassment and violence in the United States."
Van Der Hout said that "an immigration judge would have to find that the secretary of state has 'reasonable ground' to believe that the immigrant's presence or activities in the U.S. 'would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences,' and that his presence—though he has only engaged in lawful conduct that is protected by the First Amendment—'compromise[s] a compelling United States foreign policy interest,' which purportedly justifies the government's ability to override the U.S. Constitution's free speech clause. But Rubio cites no real foreign policy issues or evidence whatsoever, and it is critically important to note that the U.S. government is always constrained by the Constitution, regardless of what its officials might think."
"The two-page memo, which was obtained by The Associated Press, does not allege any criminal conduct by Khalil" "Rather, Rubio wrote Khalil could be expelled for his beliefs." Free this man immediately. apnews.com/article/mahm...
[image or embed]
— Adil Haque (@adhaque.bsky.social) April 10, 2025 at 2:13 PM
In addition to Van Der Hout's firm, Khalil is represented by Dratel & Lewis, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), the Creating Law Enforcement Accountability & Responsibility (CLEAR) project, New York University Immigrants' Rights Clinic, and the national, New Jersey, and New York arms of the ACLU.
Molly Biklen, interim legal director at the NYCLU, said that Rubio's memo "underscores that the government has ripped Mahmoud Khalil from his home and nine-months pregnant wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, solely because it disagrees with his speech. Controversial speech is not illegal, and political speech that criticizes the Israeli government or U.S. foreign policy is constitutionally protected."
The New York Times reported earlier this week that under President Donald Trump, nearly 300 students have had visas revoked and could face deportation. Biklen said that "if anything, this document only underscores the startling escalation of Trump's war on dissent and efforts to remove people who disagree with him or U.S. policy. It's nothing more than a naked attack on all of our free speech rights."
Khalil's immigration case is occurring alongside a federal court battle in New Jersey, where his lawyers are arguing that he has been unlawfully detained. Referencing the latter proceedings, CCR staff attorney Samah Sisay said that the Rubio memo "shows that the secretary of state's determination that Mr. Khalil is deportable is based solely on his free speech activities as he has alleged in his habeas litigation."
"The government has not stated any legitimate foreign policy interest that is negatively impacted by Mr. Khalil but instead erroneously attributes prejudiced views to him for participating in the student encampment at Columbia University and speaking out against the United States' support of Israel's genocide in Gaza," Sisay added. "The government has not met its burden, and Mr. Khalil should be released."
"The Milei government has picked a fight with workers and pensioners, and now they will feel the full force of organized labor," said one union leader.
Increasingly fed up with economic policies under which poverty and inflation have soared while vital social services, wages, and the peso have taken huge hits, disaffected Argentinians took to the streets of cities across the South American nation Wednesday for the third general strike of right-wing President Javier Milei's tumultuous 16-month presidency.
Led by the General Confederation of Labor (CGT)—an umbrella group of Argentinian unions—the "paro general," or general stoppage, drew workers, the unemployed, pensioners, educators, students, and others affected by Milei's severe austerity measures and his administration's plans for more deep cuts. Demonstrations continued throughout Thursday.
"In the face of intolerable social inequality and a government that ignores calls for better wages and a dignified standard of living for all, the workers are going on strike," CGT explained ahead of the action.
Airlines canceled hundreds of flights as air traffic controllers and other airport workers joined the strike; many schools, banks, and other offices shut down; and ports, some public transport, and other services ground to a halt.
"The only thing the administration has brought is a wave of layoffs across state agencies, higher poverty rates, and international debts, which are the biggest scam in Argentina's history," the Association of Airline Pilots (APA) said.
Rodolfo Aguiar, secretary general of the Association of State Workers (ATE), said Wednesday that "after this strike, they have to turn off the chainsaw; there's no room for more cuts," a reference to both Milei's ubiquitous campaign prop and his gutting of public programs upon which millions of Argentinians rely.
"Right now, the crisis Argentina is facing is worsening," Aguiar added, warning about government talks with the International Monetary Fund. "The rise in the dollar will quickly translate into food prices, and the new deal with the IMF is nothing more than more debt and more austerity measures."
Milei's government is nearing agreement on a $20 million IMF bailout, a deeply unpopular proposition in a country left reeling by the U.S.-dominated institution's missteps and intentional policies that benefit foreign investors while causing acute suffering for millions of everyday Argentinians. Argentina already owes $44 billion to the IMF.
"We already have experience as Argentinians that no agreement has been beneficial for the people," retiree and striker Rezo Mossetti told Agence France-Press in Buenos Aires Thursday, lamenting that his country keeps getting into "worse and worse" debt.
CGT decided to launch the general strike during a March 20 meeting that followed a pensioner-led March 12 protest outside the National Congress in Buenos Aires. After fringe elements including rowdy soccer fans known as "barrabravas" joined the protests and committed acts of violence and vandalism, police responded by attacking demonstrators with "less-lethal" weapons including water cannons and tear gas. A gas canister struck freelance photojournalist Pablo Grillo in the head, causing a severe brain injury that required urgent surgery.
This, after Argentinian Security Minister Patricia Bullrich invoked controversial measure empowering more aggressive use of force against protesters and rescinding a ban on police use of tear gas canisters. The Security Ministry also filed a criminal complaint dubiously accusing organizers of the March 12 protest of sedition.
Milei and his supporters have portrayed the general strike as a treasonous assault on the fragile Argentinian economy and those taking part in the day of action as lazy and jobless.
When Clarín, the country's largest newspaper, cited a study by the Argentine University of Enterprise claiming that the general strike would cost the national economy around $185 million per day, University of Buenos Aires professor Sergio Wischñevsky retorted: "Very revealing. It means that's the magnitude of the wealth workers produce every day. It's the best argument to stop ignoring workers."
As he has done with past protests against his rule, Milei has also framed the general strike as "an attack against the republic" and repeated his threat that police would "crack down" on demonstrators.
Orwellian use of state infrastructure by Milei's "anarcho-capitalist" gvmnt. in Argentina. As the 36 hr. general strike begins, signs & loudspeakers at train stations across Buenos Aires read: "Attack against the republic! The syndicalist caste punishes millions of Argentines who want to work."
[image or embed]
— Batallon Bakunin ( @batallonbakunin.bsky.social) April 10, 2025 at 4:11 AM
General strikers largely shrugged off the threats of police violence and state repression.
"The right to strike is a worker right and I think there has to be more strikes because the situation with this government is unsustainable," Hugo Velazuez, a 62-year-old worker striking in Buenos Aires, told Reuters.
While the Argentinian mainstream media's coverage of the general strike was largely muted, images posted by independent progressive media showed parts of central Buenos Aires appearing practically empty.
Workers around the world showed solidarity with striking Argentinians.
"The Milei government has picked a fight with workers and pensioners, and now they will feel the full force of organized labor," said Paddy Crumlin, president of the London-based International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF), which boasts nearly 20 million members in 677 unions in 149 nations. "The international trade union movement stands ready to fight back with our Argentine comrades. We will not rest until these attacks on workers' rights are defeated."
ITF noted that various sectors of Argentina's transportation sector "are under direct threat of privatization," including the national commercial airline, Aerolíneas Argentinas, the National Highway Board, and the Argentinian Merchant Marine.
Milei—a self-described anarcho-capitalist who was elected in November 2023 on a wave of populist revulsion at the status quo—campaigned on a platform of repairing the moribund economy, tackling inflation, reducing poverty, and dismantling the state. He made wild promises including dollarizing Argentina's economy and abolishing the central bank.
However, the realities of leading South America's second-largest economy have forced Milei's administration to abandon or significantly curtail key agenda items, leading to accusations of neoliberalism and betrayal from the right and hypocrisy and rank incompetence from the left. According to most polling, Milei's approval rating has fallen from net positive to negative in just a few months.
Particularly galling to many left-of-center Argentinians is Milei's cozying up to far-right figures around the world, especially U.S. President Donald Trump.
Andrew Kennis, a Rutgers University media studies professor specializing in Latin America, noted similarities between the protests in Argentina and anti-Trump demonstrations in the United States.
"It's no coincidence that 5.2 million people were in the streets in all 50 states just this past Saturday and that the U.S. is now catching up with the mass resistance that's long been going on in Argentina," Kennis told Common Dreams Thursday.
Kennis—who this week published a deep dive on Milei's "destructive chainsaw theory" in Common Dreams—added that in the cases of both Milei and Trump, "there was no real honeymoon period, as there almost always is" for most new presidencies.
"In both countries, people were in the streets pretty damned fast and furiously," he added.