Attorney General William Barr speaks at the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. on July 15, 2019. (Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)
Jul 30, 2019
In a decision immigrant rights advocates said could have horrific consequences for thousands of people fleeing violence in Central America, Attorney General William Barr ruled Monday that being an immediate member of a persecuted family is not sufficient grounds to seek asylum in the United States.
According to immigration experts, Barr's move rewrites years of law and represents the Trump administration's latest far-reaching assault on asylum protections.
"This is a continuation of an attack on Central American asylum seekers," Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Immigrants' Rights Project, said in a statement. "In Central America, gangs will attack one family member but threaten another family member."
As the New York Timesreported,
Migrants are eligible for asylum in the United States if they can prove they were persecuted because of their race, religion, nationality, or what immigration laws describe as "membership in a particular social group or political opinion." Mr. Barr's ruling concluded that the immigration appeals court 'erred' in finding that a migrant's family qualified as a persecuted social group.
Federal law allows the attorney general to overrule the decisions of the immigration appeals board, which is part of the Justice Department. But like many of the Trump administration's recent attempts to restrict migration to the United States' southwest border, Mr. Barr's ruling was expected to be challenged in the wider court system, immigration advocates and lawyers said.
"In this latest assault on asylum, the administration has taken the absurd position that families are not recognized within societies as distinct groups," Anna Gallagher, executive director of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network, said in a statement. "This is shameful."
Observers pointed out that Barr's decision appeared to leave an exception for members of wealthy or politically connected families.
\u201cMatter of L-E-A- doesn't entirely eliminate family-based asylum. If you're from a family which "carries greater societal import" (rich, famous, politically connected) or if you're from a clan-based society, you can get asylum based on family status.\n\nEveryone else? Seemingly not.\u201d— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@Aaron Reichlin-Melnick) 1564415443
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) slammed Barr's ruling in a tweet late Monday.
"AG Barr has announced that a gang's threat to torture or kill you or your family doesn't constitute a foundation for seeking asylum," said Merkley. "Trump's determination to slam the door on refugees with a credible threat on their lives violates our moral responsibility."
\u201cAG Barr has announced that a gang\u2019s threat to torture or kill you or your family doesn\u2019t constitute a foundation for seeking asylum.\n\nTrump\u2019s determination to slam the door on refugees w/ a credible threat on their lives violates our moral responsibility. https://t.co/eJlynByye5\u201d— Senator Jeff Merkley (@Senator Jeff Merkley) 1564449958
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) also decried Barr's decision, calling it "another cruel attempt to prevent vulnerable families from seeking asylum."
"Many of the families fleeing Central America have been victims of gang violence," tweeted the CHC, "and have seen their loved ones murdered, tortured, or raped."
Barr's move comes just days after President Donald Trump's "most extreme run at an asylum ban" was temporarily halted by a federal judge after rights groups sued.
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, some Trump administration officials are pushing to slash U.S. refugee admissions to zero in 2020.
"The president and some of his senior advisers simply don't want refugees to come to the United States, whether through the resettlement program or as asylum-seekers," Scott Roehm, director of the Center for Victims of Torture's Washington, D.C., office, said in a statement. "This is not about safety, or security, or economics; it's xenophobia-fueled politics."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a decision immigrant rights advocates said could have horrific consequences for thousands of people fleeing violence in Central America, Attorney General William Barr ruled Monday that being an immediate member of a persecuted family is not sufficient grounds to seek asylum in the United States.
According to immigration experts, Barr's move rewrites years of law and represents the Trump administration's latest far-reaching assault on asylum protections.
"This is a continuation of an attack on Central American asylum seekers," Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Immigrants' Rights Project, said in a statement. "In Central America, gangs will attack one family member but threaten another family member."
As the New York Timesreported,
Migrants are eligible for asylum in the United States if they can prove they were persecuted because of their race, religion, nationality, or what immigration laws describe as "membership in a particular social group or political opinion." Mr. Barr's ruling concluded that the immigration appeals court 'erred' in finding that a migrant's family qualified as a persecuted social group.
Federal law allows the attorney general to overrule the decisions of the immigration appeals board, which is part of the Justice Department. But like many of the Trump administration's recent attempts to restrict migration to the United States' southwest border, Mr. Barr's ruling was expected to be challenged in the wider court system, immigration advocates and lawyers said.
"In this latest assault on asylum, the administration has taken the absurd position that families are not recognized within societies as distinct groups," Anna Gallagher, executive director of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network, said in a statement. "This is shameful."
Observers pointed out that Barr's decision appeared to leave an exception for members of wealthy or politically connected families.
\u201cMatter of L-E-A- doesn't entirely eliminate family-based asylum. If you're from a family which "carries greater societal import" (rich, famous, politically connected) or if you're from a clan-based society, you can get asylum based on family status.\n\nEveryone else? Seemingly not.\u201d— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@Aaron Reichlin-Melnick) 1564415443
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) slammed Barr's ruling in a tweet late Monday.
"AG Barr has announced that a gang's threat to torture or kill you or your family doesn't constitute a foundation for seeking asylum," said Merkley. "Trump's determination to slam the door on refugees with a credible threat on their lives violates our moral responsibility."
\u201cAG Barr has announced that a gang\u2019s threat to torture or kill you or your family doesn\u2019t constitute a foundation for seeking asylum.\n\nTrump\u2019s determination to slam the door on refugees w/ a credible threat on their lives violates our moral responsibility. https://t.co/eJlynByye5\u201d— Senator Jeff Merkley (@Senator Jeff Merkley) 1564449958
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) also decried Barr's decision, calling it "another cruel attempt to prevent vulnerable families from seeking asylum."
"Many of the families fleeing Central America have been victims of gang violence," tweeted the CHC, "and have seen their loved ones murdered, tortured, or raped."
Barr's move comes just days after President Donald Trump's "most extreme run at an asylum ban" was temporarily halted by a federal judge after rights groups sued.
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, some Trump administration officials are pushing to slash U.S. refugee admissions to zero in 2020.
"The president and some of his senior advisers simply don't want refugees to come to the United States, whether through the resettlement program or as asylum-seekers," Scott Roehm, director of the Center for Victims of Torture's Washington, D.C., office, said in a statement. "This is not about safety, or security, or economics; it's xenophobia-fueled politics."
In a decision immigrant rights advocates said could have horrific consequences for thousands of people fleeing violence in Central America, Attorney General William Barr ruled Monday that being an immediate member of a persecuted family is not sufficient grounds to seek asylum in the United States.
According to immigration experts, Barr's move rewrites years of law and represents the Trump administration's latest far-reaching assault on asylum protections.
"This is a continuation of an attack on Central American asylum seekers," Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Immigrants' Rights Project, said in a statement. "In Central America, gangs will attack one family member but threaten another family member."
As the New York Timesreported,
Migrants are eligible for asylum in the United States if they can prove they were persecuted because of their race, religion, nationality, or what immigration laws describe as "membership in a particular social group or political opinion." Mr. Barr's ruling concluded that the immigration appeals court 'erred' in finding that a migrant's family qualified as a persecuted social group.
Federal law allows the attorney general to overrule the decisions of the immigration appeals board, which is part of the Justice Department. But like many of the Trump administration's recent attempts to restrict migration to the United States' southwest border, Mr. Barr's ruling was expected to be challenged in the wider court system, immigration advocates and lawyers said.
"In this latest assault on asylum, the administration has taken the absurd position that families are not recognized within societies as distinct groups," Anna Gallagher, executive director of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network, said in a statement. "This is shameful."
Observers pointed out that Barr's decision appeared to leave an exception for members of wealthy or politically connected families.
\u201cMatter of L-E-A- doesn't entirely eliminate family-based asylum. If you're from a family which "carries greater societal import" (rich, famous, politically connected) or if you're from a clan-based society, you can get asylum based on family status.\n\nEveryone else? Seemingly not.\u201d— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@Aaron Reichlin-Melnick) 1564415443
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) slammed Barr's ruling in a tweet late Monday.
"AG Barr has announced that a gang's threat to torture or kill you or your family doesn't constitute a foundation for seeking asylum," said Merkley. "Trump's determination to slam the door on refugees with a credible threat on their lives violates our moral responsibility."
\u201cAG Barr has announced that a gang\u2019s threat to torture or kill you or your family doesn\u2019t constitute a foundation for seeking asylum.\n\nTrump\u2019s determination to slam the door on refugees w/ a credible threat on their lives violates our moral responsibility. https://t.co/eJlynByye5\u201d— Senator Jeff Merkley (@Senator Jeff Merkley) 1564449958
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) also decried Barr's decision, calling it "another cruel attempt to prevent vulnerable families from seeking asylum."
"Many of the families fleeing Central America have been victims of gang violence," tweeted the CHC, "and have seen their loved ones murdered, tortured, or raped."
Barr's move comes just days after President Donald Trump's "most extreme run at an asylum ban" was temporarily halted by a federal judge after rights groups sued.
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, some Trump administration officials are pushing to slash U.S. refugee admissions to zero in 2020.
"The president and some of his senior advisers simply don't want refugees to come to the United States, whether through the resettlement program or as asylum-seekers," Scott Roehm, director of the Center for Victims of Torture's Washington, D.C., office, said in a statement. "This is not about safety, or security, or economics; it's xenophobia-fueled politics."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.