SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) questions President Donald Trump's nominee to be representative to the United Nations on June 19, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Stefani Reynolds/Getty Images)
'Outrageous': Lindsey Graham Breaks Senate Rules to Advance Sweeping Anti-Asylum Bill
"Lindsey Graham is so desperate to attack asylum seekers that he just broke the rules of his own committee to advance his bill."
Aug 01, 2019
Senate Democrats and progressive advocacy groups accused Sen. Lindsey Graham of breaking Judiciary Committee rules Thursday after the South Carolina Republican forced a vote to advance his "dangerous and immoral" anti-asylum legislation.
The bill, titled the Secure and Protect Act of 2019 (S.1494), is condemned by human rights organizations as a sweeping attack on asylum seekers and an effort to expand President Donald Trump's xenophobic deportation force.
Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, waived the panel's rules to force a vote on S.1494 before Democrats were permitted to speak on the legislation.
"The clerk will call the roll," Graham said as Democrats protested.
The South Carolina Republican ignored Democrats' objections and the legislation advanced out of the Judiciary Committee along party lines.
"Lindsey Graham is so desperate to attack asylum seekers that he just broke the rules of his own committee to advance his bill," tweeted progressive advocacy group Credo Action.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, called Graham's move "outrageous."
Watch:
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) denounced Graham's violation of the Senate rules and blasted the contents of his bill.
Leahy said the bill gives Trump everything he wants in his "political war on immigration."
"It allows for the indefinite detention of immigrant children. It ratchets up the cruelty against refugees seeking asylum," Leahy said. "It's as partisan and shortsighted as it gets. This is supposed to be the Senate Judiciary committee--not the Donald Trump committee."
In a statement on Thursday, progressive advocacy group Human Rights First echoed Leahy's assessment.
"The bill is an extremist attack on U.S. laws protecting children and refugees," said Eleanor Acer, director of Human Rights First's refugee protection program. "The Trump administration has thus far decimated the U.S. resettlement and asylum systems through executive fiat, but this bill would essentially enact its cruel policies into law. Senator Graham has taken Stephen Miller's anti-asylum wish list and drafted a bill around it."
"If enacted," said Acer, "the provisions in this bill would deport children to trafficking and abuse, return refugees to persecution, strand them in highly dangerous countries, rush those who do seek asylum through rigged hearings, and prevent their release from immigration jails."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Senate Democrats and progressive advocacy groups accused Sen. Lindsey Graham of breaking Judiciary Committee rules Thursday after the South Carolina Republican forced a vote to advance his "dangerous and immoral" anti-asylum legislation.
The bill, titled the Secure and Protect Act of 2019 (S.1494), is condemned by human rights organizations as a sweeping attack on asylum seekers and an effort to expand President Donald Trump's xenophobic deportation force.
Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, waived the panel's rules to force a vote on S.1494 before Democrats were permitted to speak on the legislation.
"The clerk will call the roll," Graham said as Democrats protested.
The South Carolina Republican ignored Democrats' objections and the legislation advanced out of the Judiciary Committee along party lines.
"Lindsey Graham is so desperate to attack asylum seekers that he just broke the rules of his own committee to advance his bill," tweeted progressive advocacy group Credo Action.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, called Graham's move "outrageous."
Watch:
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) denounced Graham's violation of the Senate rules and blasted the contents of his bill.
Leahy said the bill gives Trump everything he wants in his "political war on immigration."
"It allows for the indefinite detention of immigrant children. It ratchets up the cruelty against refugees seeking asylum," Leahy said. "It's as partisan and shortsighted as it gets. This is supposed to be the Senate Judiciary committee--not the Donald Trump committee."
In a statement on Thursday, progressive advocacy group Human Rights First echoed Leahy's assessment.
"The bill is an extremist attack on U.S. laws protecting children and refugees," said Eleanor Acer, director of Human Rights First's refugee protection program. "The Trump administration has thus far decimated the U.S. resettlement and asylum systems through executive fiat, but this bill would essentially enact its cruel policies into law. Senator Graham has taken Stephen Miller's anti-asylum wish list and drafted a bill around it."
"If enacted," said Acer, "the provisions in this bill would deport children to trafficking and abuse, return refugees to persecution, strand them in highly dangerous countries, rush those who do seek asylum through rigged hearings, and prevent their release from immigration jails."
From Your Site Articles
Senate Democrats and progressive advocacy groups accused Sen. Lindsey Graham of breaking Judiciary Committee rules Thursday after the South Carolina Republican forced a vote to advance his "dangerous and immoral" anti-asylum legislation.
The bill, titled the Secure and Protect Act of 2019 (S.1494), is condemned by human rights organizations as a sweeping attack on asylum seekers and an effort to expand President Donald Trump's xenophobic deportation force.
Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, waived the panel's rules to force a vote on S.1494 before Democrats were permitted to speak on the legislation.
"The clerk will call the roll," Graham said as Democrats protested.
The South Carolina Republican ignored Democrats' objections and the legislation advanced out of the Judiciary Committee along party lines.
"Lindsey Graham is so desperate to attack asylum seekers that he just broke the rules of his own committee to advance his bill," tweeted progressive advocacy group Credo Action.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, called Graham's move "outrageous."
Watch:
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) denounced Graham's violation of the Senate rules and blasted the contents of his bill.
Leahy said the bill gives Trump everything he wants in his "political war on immigration."
"It allows for the indefinite detention of immigrant children. It ratchets up the cruelty against refugees seeking asylum," Leahy said. "It's as partisan and shortsighted as it gets. This is supposed to be the Senate Judiciary committee--not the Donald Trump committee."
In a statement on Thursday, progressive advocacy group Human Rights First echoed Leahy's assessment.
"The bill is an extremist attack on U.S. laws protecting children and refugees," said Eleanor Acer, director of Human Rights First's refugee protection program. "The Trump administration has thus far decimated the U.S. resettlement and asylum systems through executive fiat, but this bill would essentially enact its cruel policies into law. Senator Graham has taken Stephen Miller's anti-asylum wish list and drafted a bill around it."
"If enacted," said Acer, "the provisions in this bill would deport children to trafficking and abuse, return refugees to persecution, strand them in highly dangerous countries, rush those who do seek asylum through rigged hearings, and prevent their release from immigration jails."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.