Aug 02, 2019
Individual donors to Democratic candidates for the party's 2020 presidential nomination overwhelmingly gave to Sen. Bernie Sanders, according to analyses released Friday.
The New York Times, in a map produced by the paper's reporters, found that Sanders, an Independent from Vermont, dominates most of the country as the primary or secondary recipient of nearly all donations from Americans in all states--though his support is strongest in New England, New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, the eastern Great Plains, and the West.
"The movement is so strong that NYT has to create a separate map that excludes @BernieSanders from it," tweeted Sanders campaign manager Faiz Shakir.
\u201cThe movement is so strong that NYT has to create a separate map that excludes @BernieSanders from it.\n\nhttps://t.co/59pjjZjSsl\u201d— Faiz (@Faiz) 1564757983
The L.A. Times went into further detail in a piece which allows readers to zero in on their zip codes for hard numbers. The Wall Street Journalshowed who had the most small dollar donations across the country (unsurprisingly, the majority of the country went to Sanders in that regard).
\u201cAnd this, from @latimes https://t.co/jDGKM29yIy\u201d— Carrie Levine (@Carrie Levine) 1564776935
And a study from The Center for Public Integrity and FiveThirtyEightdemonstrated that the senator is the recipient of donations from one out of every three Democrats donating to primary candidates, irrespective of how many other candidates they're donating to.
\u201cThe 2020 Democratic field is inspiring donors to spread the wealth - 1 in 5 have contributed to more than one candidate. \n\n1 in 3 have given to @BernieSanders\n\nhttps://t.co/u6PJN1I3oM\u201d— OpenSecrets.org (@OpenSecrets.org) 1564771980
The mappable data from the Times, said independent researcher Kristin Johnson, whose work on localized donations helped predict the upset win of Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) in her 2018 primary against then-incumbent Mike Capuano, "contradicts both the mainstream narrative and some national polling data that suggest that only a centrist Democrat could succeed in this political environment."
"Sanders clearly has an advantage from the supporter database and name recognition he amassed during his 2016 presidential campaign," added Johnson.
Progressives immediately pounced on the Times report as an indication of the strength of Sanders' support.
"Total number of donors would seem to me to be the most relevant (and least classist) way of gauging enthusiasm, rather than the cash totals CNN et al gush over every quarter," said journalist Adam Johnson.
Sanders' donor advantage was so overwhelming in the Times data that the paper "had to make two maps--one excluding Bernie Sanders--because Bernie had too many donors to show other candidates donation patterns," as Greenpeace International's Matt Browner Hamlin pointed out on Twitter.
\u201cLOL the Times had to make two maps - one excluding @BernieSanders - because Bernie had too many donors to show other candidates donation patterns. https://t.co/KKHwAoxA6d\u201d— Matt Browner Hamlin (@Matt Browner Hamlin) 1564762551
The breadth of Sanders' appeal, especially through the middle of the country, spurred the senator's Iowa communications director to challenge the conventional wisdom that "the Midwest doesn't want or support progressive policies."
\u201cCC'ing everyone saying that the midwest doesn't want or support progressive policies. #iacaucus #Bernie2020 \n\nhttps://t.co/VLqtLfqsV4\u201d— Roger Ouellette (@Roger Ouellette) 1564763720
The report also showed strength for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) across the country, though not as robust as that for Sanders.
Of other Democrats, South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a relative political unknown before this year's breakout presidential run, former Vice President Joe Biden, and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) all dominated the country's wealthier hotspots. Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke dominated Texas and Sen. Amy Klobuchar her native Minnesota.
Sanders' strength may be even greater than the maps show, however, as the Times admitted that "information about donors giving $200 or less directly to a campaign is not available."
The senator is raking it in from a plurality of Democrats contributing to campaigns, according to a study by The Center for Public Integrity and FiveThirtyEight:
Nearly one out of every three donors who have given to any presidential campaign have donated to Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont Democrat who has by far the largest number of donors of any of the Democratic candidates. (That doesn't mean they gave exclusively to Sanders -- many people have given money to multiple Democratic candidates.)
The study also found that "Democrats are far from wearing their donors out" and have more to give.
"At least 2.4 million people have together pumped about $209 million into the campaigns of major Democratic presidential contenders during the first half of 2019," the report said.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
bernie sandersbeto orourkedemocratic partyelection 2020elizabeth warrenjoe bidenkamala harrispete buttigieg
Individual donors to Democratic candidates for the party's 2020 presidential nomination overwhelmingly gave to Sen. Bernie Sanders, according to analyses released Friday.
The New York Times, in a map produced by the paper's reporters, found that Sanders, an Independent from Vermont, dominates most of the country as the primary or secondary recipient of nearly all donations from Americans in all states--though his support is strongest in New England, New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, the eastern Great Plains, and the West.
"The movement is so strong that NYT has to create a separate map that excludes @BernieSanders from it," tweeted Sanders campaign manager Faiz Shakir.
\u201cThe movement is so strong that NYT has to create a separate map that excludes @BernieSanders from it.\n\nhttps://t.co/59pjjZjSsl\u201d— Faiz (@Faiz) 1564757983
The L.A. Times went into further detail in a piece which allows readers to zero in on their zip codes for hard numbers. The Wall Street Journalshowed who had the most small dollar donations across the country (unsurprisingly, the majority of the country went to Sanders in that regard).
\u201cAnd this, from @latimes https://t.co/jDGKM29yIy\u201d— Carrie Levine (@Carrie Levine) 1564776935
And a study from The Center for Public Integrity and FiveThirtyEightdemonstrated that the senator is the recipient of donations from one out of every three Democrats donating to primary candidates, irrespective of how many other candidates they're donating to.
\u201cThe 2020 Democratic field is inspiring donors to spread the wealth - 1 in 5 have contributed to more than one candidate. \n\n1 in 3 have given to @BernieSanders\n\nhttps://t.co/u6PJN1I3oM\u201d— OpenSecrets.org (@OpenSecrets.org) 1564771980
The mappable data from the Times, said independent researcher Kristin Johnson, whose work on localized donations helped predict the upset win of Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) in her 2018 primary against then-incumbent Mike Capuano, "contradicts both the mainstream narrative and some national polling data that suggest that only a centrist Democrat could succeed in this political environment."
"Sanders clearly has an advantage from the supporter database and name recognition he amassed during his 2016 presidential campaign," added Johnson.
Progressives immediately pounced on the Times report as an indication of the strength of Sanders' support.
"Total number of donors would seem to me to be the most relevant (and least classist) way of gauging enthusiasm, rather than the cash totals CNN et al gush over every quarter," said journalist Adam Johnson.
Sanders' donor advantage was so overwhelming in the Times data that the paper "had to make two maps--one excluding Bernie Sanders--because Bernie had too many donors to show other candidates donation patterns," as Greenpeace International's Matt Browner Hamlin pointed out on Twitter.
\u201cLOL the Times had to make two maps - one excluding @BernieSanders - because Bernie had too many donors to show other candidates donation patterns. https://t.co/KKHwAoxA6d\u201d— Matt Browner Hamlin (@Matt Browner Hamlin) 1564762551
The breadth of Sanders' appeal, especially through the middle of the country, spurred the senator's Iowa communications director to challenge the conventional wisdom that "the Midwest doesn't want or support progressive policies."
\u201cCC'ing everyone saying that the midwest doesn't want or support progressive policies. #iacaucus #Bernie2020 \n\nhttps://t.co/VLqtLfqsV4\u201d— Roger Ouellette (@Roger Ouellette) 1564763720
The report also showed strength for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) across the country, though not as robust as that for Sanders.
Of other Democrats, South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a relative political unknown before this year's breakout presidential run, former Vice President Joe Biden, and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) all dominated the country's wealthier hotspots. Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke dominated Texas and Sen. Amy Klobuchar her native Minnesota.
Sanders' strength may be even greater than the maps show, however, as the Times admitted that "information about donors giving $200 or less directly to a campaign is not available."
The senator is raking it in from a plurality of Democrats contributing to campaigns, according to a study by The Center for Public Integrity and FiveThirtyEight:
Nearly one out of every three donors who have given to any presidential campaign have donated to Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont Democrat who has by far the largest number of donors of any of the Democratic candidates. (That doesn't mean they gave exclusively to Sanders -- many people have given money to multiple Democratic candidates.)
The study also found that "Democrats are far from wearing their donors out" and have more to give.
"At least 2.4 million people have together pumped about $209 million into the campaigns of major Democratic presidential contenders during the first half of 2019," the report said.
Individual donors to Democratic candidates for the party's 2020 presidential nomination overwhelmingly gave to Sen. Bernie Sanders, according to analyses released Friday.
The New York Times, in a map produced by the paper's reporters, found that Sanders, an Independent from Vermont, dominates most of the country as the primary or secondary recipient of nearly all donations from Americans in all states--though his support is strongest in New England, New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, the eastern Great Plains, and the West.
"The movement is so strong that NYT has to create a separate map that excludes @BernieSanders from it," tweeted Sanders campaign manager Faiz Shakir.
\u201cThe movement is so strong that NYT has to create a separate map that excludes @BernieSanders from it.\n\nhttps://t.co/59pjjZjSsl\u201d— Faiz (@Faiz) 1564757983
The L.A. Times went into further detail in a piece which allows readers to zero in on their zip codes for hard numbers. The Wall Street Journalshowed who had the most small dollar donations across the country (unsurprisingly, the majority of the country went to Sanders in that regard).
\u201cAnd this, from @latimes https://t.co/jDGKM29yIy\u201d— Carrie Levine (@Carrie Levine) 1564776935
And a study from The Center for Public Integrity and FiveThirtyEightdemonstrated that the senator is the recipient of donations from one out of every three Democrats donating to primary candidates, irrespective of how many other candidates they're donating to.
\u201cThe 2020 Democratic field is inspiring donors to spread the wealth - 1 in 5 have contributed to more than one candidate. \n\n1 in 3 have given to @BernieSanders\n\nhttps://t.co/u6PJN1I3oM\u201d— OpenSecrets.org (@OpenSecrets.org) 1564771980
The mappable data from the Times, said independent researcher Kristin Johnson, whose work on localized donations helped predict the upset win of Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) in her 2018 primary against then-incumbent Mike Capuano, "contradicts both the mainstream narrative and some national polling data that suggest that only a centrist Democrat could succeed in this political environment."
"Sanders clearly has an advantage from the supporter database and name recognition he amassed during his 2016 presidential campaign," added Johnson.
Progressives immediately pounced on the Times report as an indication of the strength of Sanders' support.
"Total number of donors would seem to me to be the most relevant (and least classist) way of gauging enthusiasm, rather than the cash totals CNN et al gush over every quarter," said journalist Adam Johnson.
Sanders' donor advantage was so overwhelming in the Times data that the paper "had to make two maps--one excluding Bernie Sanders--because Bernie had too many donors to show other candidates donation patterns," as Greenpeace International's Matt Browner Hamlin pointed out on Twitter.
\u201cLOL the Times had to make two maps - one excluding @BernieSanders - because Bernie had too many donors to show other candidates donation patterns. https://t.co/KKHwAoxA6d\u201d— Matt Browner Hamlin (@Matt Browner Hamlin) 1564762551
The breadth of Sanders' appeal, especially through the middle of the country, spurred the senator's Iowa communications director to challenge the conventional wisdom that "the Midwest doesn't want or support progressive policies."
\u201cCC'ing everyone saying that the midwest doesn't want or support progressive policies. #iacaucus #Bernie2020 \n\nhttps://t.co/VLqtLfqsV4\u201d— Roger Ouellette (@Roger Ouellette) 1564763720
The report also showed strength for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) across the country, though not as robust as that for Sanders.
Of other Democrats, South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a relative political unknown before this year's breakout presidential run, former Vice President Joe Biden, and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) all dominated the country's wealthier hotspots. Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke dominated Texas and Sen. Amy Klobuchar her native Minnesota.
Sanders' strength may be even greater than the maps show, however, as the Times admitted that "information about donors giving $200 or less directly to a campaign is not available."
The senator is raking it in from a plurality of Democrats contributing to campaigns, according to a study by The Center for Public Integrity and FiveThirtyEight:
Nearly one out of every three donors who have given to any presidential campaign have donated to Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont Democrat who has by far the largest number of donors of any of the Democratic candidates. (That doesn't mean they gave exclusively to Sanders -- many people have given money to multiple Democratic candidates.)
The study also found that "Democrats are far from wearing their donors out" and have more to give.
"At least 2.4 million people have together pumped about $209 million into the campaigns of major Democratic presidential contenders during the first half of 2019," the report said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.