SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Rep. Maxine Waters won praise Friday from critics of the cash-for-access U.S. political system amid reports that some Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee are frustrated at her refusal to do raise money from the industry she regulates.
Politicoreported that Democrats on the committee have been disappointed with Waters's decision to focus on consumer protection legislation and Wall Street oversight--the stated purpose of the panel--rather than raising money at fundraisers and through direct contributions from wealthy banks and then doling out that cash to her fellow lawmakers.
At least one critic on social media wondered why the news outlet highlighted the Democrats' displeasure instead of questioning why "Members of Congress [expect] to raise money from those they're there to regulate."
"D.C. is sick," added Jack Mirkinson, deputy editor of Splinter News.
\u201cMaxine Waters is apparently prioritizing consumer protection over raking in Wall Street cash\u2026so of course Democrats on her committee are complaining. DC is sick https://t.co/ieBX77fUWz\u201d— Jack Mirkinson (@Jack Mirkinson) 1565355907
While the top Republican on the panel, Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), has raised nearly $160,000 for his members, Waters has distributed just $10,000 to Democrats.
But the 15-term California Democrat told the outlet that the lack of funds being distributed throughout the committee's ranks is deliberate.
"This committee is no longer simply a 'juice committee,'" Waters told Politico.
Other House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) chairs have spent significant time and energy on raising money for upcoming elections to give their members a better chance of retaining their seats.
Although Waters still accepts corporate PAC money, she argued that working in the interest of voters is primarily what will help representatives to win their elections in 2020--not amassing funds from Wall Street interests who are used to contributing to lawmakers and being treated favorably in Washington in return.
"Waters said her primary focus during the first months of this year has been on organizing the panel and building a record of legislative accomplishments, including those that members can bring home to their districts," Zachary Warmbrodt reported in Politico.
Under Waters's leadership, the HFSC has held hearings on the persistent housing crisis in Michigan, state efforts to oversee student loan service companies, and the abuses of the payday loan industry.
The committee has also recently passed bills to make the federal Bank Secrecy/Anti-Money Laundering framework more transparent and efficient and to provide insurance discounts for first-time home buyers.
"We must never lose sight of why we were elected to office," Waters told Politico. "We were all elected to office to address the public policy needs of our constituents."
One social media user expressed hope that other committee leaders in Washington would take the same approach to their powerful positions.
\u201c@politico Sounds like @RepMaxineWaters is doing a great job. She works for the people, not the special interests. The members in the hard fought districts should use Maxine as an example of how the @HouseDemocrats are working for you, unlike the Republicans.\u201d— POLITICO (@POLITICO) 1565344803
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Rep. Maxine Waters won praise Friday from critics of the cash-for-access U.S. political system amid reports that some Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee are frustrated at her refusal to do raise money from the industry she regulates.
Politicoreported that Democrats on the committee have been disappointed with Waters's decision to focus on consumer protection legislation and Wall Street oversight--the stated purpose of the panel--rather than raising money at fundraisers and through direct contributions from wealthy banks and then doling out that cash to her fellow lawmakers.
At least one critic on social media wondered why the news outlet highlighted the Democrats' displeasure instead of questioning why "Members of Congress [expect] to raise money from those they're there to regulate."
"D.C. is sick," added Jack Mirkinson, deputy editor of Splinter News.
\u201cMaxine Waters is apparently prioritizing consumer protection over raking in Wall Street cash\u2026so of course Democrats on her committee are complaining. DC is sick https://t.co/ieBX77fUWz\u201d— Jack Mirkinson (@Jack Mirkinson) 1565355907
While the top Republican on the panel, Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), has raised nearly $160,000 for his members, Waters has distributed just $10,000 to Democrats.
But the 15-term California Democrat told the outlet that the lack of funds being distributed throughout the committee's ranks is deliberate.
"This committee is no longer simply a 'juice committee,'" Waters told Politico.
Other House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) chairs have spent significant time and energy on raising money for upcoming elections to give their members a better chance of retaining their seats.
Although Waters still accepts corporate PAC money, she argued that working in the interest of voters is primarily what will help representatives to win their elections in 2020--not amassing funds from Wall Street interests who are used to contributing to lawmakers and being treated favorably in Washington in return.
"Waters said her primary focus during the first months of this year has been on organizing the panel and building a record of legislative accomplishments, including those that members can bring home to their districts," Zachary Warmbrodt reported in Politico.
Under Waters's leadership, the HFSC has held hearings on the persistent housing crisis in Michigan, state efforts to oversee student loan service companies, and the abuses of the payday loan industry.
The committee has also recently passed bills to make the federal Bank Secrecy/Anti-Money Laundering framework more transparent and efficient and to provide insurance discounts for first-time home buyers.
"We must never lose sight of why we were elected to office," Waters told Politico. "We were all elected to office to address the public policy needs of our constituents."
One social media user expressed hope that other committee leaders in Washington would take the same approach to their powerful positions.
\u201c@politico Sounds like @RepMaxineWaters is doing a great job. She works for the people, not the special interests. The members in the hard fought districts should use Maxine as an example of how the @HouseDemocrats are working for you, unlike the Republicans.\u201d— POLITICO (@POLITICO) 1565344803
Rep. Maxine Waters won praise Friday from critics of the cash-for-access U.S. political system amid reports that some Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee are frustrated at her refusal to do raise money from the industry she regulates.
Politicoreported that Democrats on the committee have been disappointed with Waters's decision to focus on consumer protection legislation and Wall Street oversight--the stated purpose of the panel--rather than raising money at fundraisers and through direct contributions from wealthy banks and then doling out that cash to her fellow lawmakers.
At least one critic on social media wondered why the news outlet highlighted the Democrats' displeasure instead of questioning why "Members of Congress [expect] to raise money from those they're there to regulate."
"D.C. is sick," added Jack Mirkinson, deputy editor of Splinter News.
\u201cMaxine Waters is apparently prioritizing consumer protection over raking in Wall Street cash\u2026so of course Democrats on her committee are complaining. DC is sick https://t.co/ieBX77fUWz\u201d— Jack Mirkinson (@Jack Mirkinson) 1565355907
While the top Republican on the panel, Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), has raised nearly $160,000 for his members, Waters has distributed just $10,000 to Democrats.
But the 15-term California Democrat told the outlet that the lack of funds being distributed throughout the committee's ranks is deliberate.
"This committee is no longer simply a 'juice committee,'" Waters told Politico.
Other House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) chairs have spent significant time and energy on raising money for upcoming elections to give their members a better chance of retaining their seats.
Although Waters still accepts corporate PAC money, she argued that working in the interest of voters is primarily what will help representatives to win their elections in 2020--not amassing funds from Wall Street interests who are used to contributing to lawmakers and being treated favorably in Washington in return.
"Waters said her primary focus during the first months of this year has been on organizing the panel and building a record of legislative accomplishments, including those that members can bring home to their districts," Zachary Warmbrodt reported in Politico.
Under Waters's leadership, the HFSC has held hearings on the persistent housing crisis in Michigan, state efforts to oversee student loan service companies, and the abuses of the payday loan industry.
The committee has also recently passed bills to make the federal Bank Secrecy/Anti-Money Laundering framework more transparent and efficient and to provide insurance discounts for first-time home buyers.
"We must never lose sight of why we were elected to office," Waters told Politico. "We were all elected to office to address the public policy needs of our constituents."
One social media user expressed hope that other committee leaders in Washington would take the same approach to their powerful positions.
\u201c@politico Sounds like @RepMaxineWaters is doing a great job. She works for the people, not the special interests. The members in the hard fought districts should use Maxine as an example of how the @HouseDemocrats are working for you, unlike the Republicans.\u201d— POLITICO (@POLITICO) 1565344803