Members of the youth-led Sunrise Movement protested at the Democratic National Committee's summer meeting as the Resolutions Committee voted against holding a climate-specific 2020 debate. (Photo: Steve Rhodes)
Aug 23, 2019
2020 Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders "wants the DNC to have a climate debate and he thinks it's important to have that kind of conversation."
That is what Nina Turner, national co-chair for the Sanders campaign, told Common Dreams on Thursday about her candidate's position after learning that members of the Democratic National Committee--at a meeting of party delegates in California--had just voted down a resolution to sanction a climate-focused debate for the Democratic primary.
"To me it's just another example of going along to get along. What's the fear of having a forum that deals with the climate? It makes no sense to me." --Nina Turner, national co-chair Bernie Sanders campaign"I'm very disappointed that they voted that down within the DNC," Turner said. "It makes no sense. And to me it's just another example of going along to get along. What's the fear of having a forum that deals with the climate? It makes no sense to me."
While climate campaigners--including Sunrise Movement, 350.org, Friends of the Earth, and many others that have been demanding for months that the DNC reverse its opposition to a debate specifically aimed at addressing the climate emergency--expressed outrage over the vote, Turner suggested the best course of action for the campaigns at this point would be to join forces against the DNC.
"To me," she added, "all the presidential candidates should unite in that because if all the Democratic presidential candidates say to the DNC, 'Let's have a debate or a forum about climate change'--what are they gonna do, kick out every single one of them?"
Such an approach, said Turner, "is the one thing that all the candidates could unite on and show some real leadership to say: Let's have it. Let's have the conversation. Let's have the debate."
Turner wasn't the only high-profile Democrat voicing disappointment.
"The DNC decision to sabotage a #ClimateDebate is extremely disappointing," tweeted former vice president Al Gore following the vote. "Voters all over the U.S. are demanding we focus on the biggest threat to our nation and humanity's future and prioritize solving the climate crisis instead of continuing business as usual."
In June of this year, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, another top 2020 Democratic contender, and Washington Governor Jay Inslee, who ended his 2020 climate-forward campaign Wednesday night, both came out strongly in favor of the demand for the climate debate idea.
While many in the large primary field have embraced or endorsed the climate-debate demand over recent months, it remains unclear how many current candidates would embrace the confrontational approach with the DNC leadership that Turner is proposing.
\u201cA tale of two Democratic parties. \nOne: The establishment, inside conference rooms, debating away on the semantics. \nThe second, in the halls and the streets demanding robust #climate action. \n\nWhich side are you on, indeed. #ClimateDebate.\u201d— David Turnbull (@David Turnbull) 1566497786
On Thursday, Warren tweeted out her high hopes for participating in a climate forum being hosted next month by CNN, but this is not the kind of sanctioned debate that campaigners are demanding from the DNC.
\u201cClimate change is an existential crisis we all face\u2014and it\u2019s going to take big, structural change to solve it. I can\u2019t wait to talk about my plans to protect our planet and tackle climate change at the @CNN Climate Crisis Town Hall next month!\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1566503812
Meanwhile, as Turner called on the DNC to reverse its position, many online where expressing serious concern over the stance taken by DNC member Symone D. Sanders, a senior advisor to Joe Biden and his campaign, who argued during Thursday's meeting that having a climate-focused debate would put the party in "dangerous territory" as she warned that it would open the door to every "faction" of the party wanting their own issue-specific debate.
\u201cBiden advisor @SymoneDSanders argues strongly against #ClimateDebate, says it "would fundamentally change the game" of what the campaigns had been told and be "dangerous territory in the middle of a Democratic primary process"\u201d— Casey Tolan (@Casey Tolan) 1566492383
The objections Ms. Sanders (no relation to Bernie) put forth raised serious questions--especially because Biden himself has openly endorsed the idea of a climate debate in the past--and did not go over well with progressive critics:
\u201cIt is concerning to see Joe Biden's senior advisor \n@SymoneDSanders lobbying to stop conversation on climate change.\n\nAmericans deserve to know how Democratic candidates like Joe Biden will protect future generations. #ClimateDebate\u201d— Friends of the Earth (Action) (@Friends of the Earth (Action)) 1566495688
\u201c.@SymoneDSanders is trying to shut down the movement for a #ClimateDebate right now at the @DNC meeting.\n\nBut her boss @JoeBiden has publicly supported it multiple times.\n\nSo\u2026what\u2019s going on?\nhttps://t.co/O3p8OtXd4o\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1566492392
In what campaigners saw as an incremental yet insufficient victory, a separate measure voted on Thursday did pass, one that lifts a ban on candidate participation in outside issue forums. As the Sunrise Movement tweeted, "We may have reversed the ban on candidate participation in outside climate discussions, but this is NO #ClimateDebate."
With an additional and larger floor vote expected on the specific climate debate question scheduled for a Saturday session at the DNC meeting, Varshini Prakash, co-founder and executive director of the Sunrise Movement, said there's still hope the party will reverse course and that her group plans to keep up the pressure:
"California was literally on fire last year--we know firsthand that climate breakdown is killing people and destroying livelihoods right now," said 26-year-old Alex Morrison, a volunteer with Sunrise, in a statement on Thursday.
"Time is running out to save our generation," Morrison added, "Young people need to know which candidates for president are treating the climate crisis like the emergency it is."
And expressing her dismay and frustration, journalist and commentator Kate Aronoff put it this way: "The DNC believes the climate crisis is a grave threat to the future of human civilization, just not a big enough threat to spend 2 hours talking about."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
2020 Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders "wants the DNC to have a climate debate and he thinks it's important to have that kind of conversation."
That is what Nina Turner, national co-chair for the Sanders campaign, told Common Dreams on Thursday about her candidate's position after learning that members of the Democratic National Committee--at a meeting of party delegates in California--had just voted down a resolution to sanction a climate-focused debate for the Democratic primary.
"To me it's just another example of going along to get along. What's the fear of having a forum that deals with the climate? It makes no sense to me." --Nina Turner, national co-chair Bernie Sanders campaign"I'm very disappointed that they voted that down within the DNC," Turner said. "It makes no sense. And to me it's just another example of going along to get along. What's the fear of having a forum that deals with the climate? It makes no sense to me."
While climate campaigners--including Sunrise Movement, 350.org, Friends of the Earth, and many others that have been demanding for months that the DNC reverse its opposition to a debate specifically aimed at addressing the climate emergency--expressed outrage over the vote, Turner suggested the best course of action for the campaigns at this point would be to join forces against the DNC.
"To me," she added, "all the presidential candidates should unite in that because if all the Democratic presidential candidates say to the DNC, 'Let's have a debate or a forum about climate change'--what are they gonna do, kick out every single one of them?"
Such an approach, said Turner, "is the one thing that all the candidates could unite on and show some real leadership to say: Let's have it. Let's have the conversation. Let's have the debate."
Turner wasn't the only high-profile Democrat voicing disappointment.
"The DNC decision to sabotage a #ClimateDebate is extremely disappointing," tweeted former vice president Al Gore following the vote. "Voters all over the U.S. are demanding we focus on the biggest threat to our nation and humanity's future and prioritize solving the climate crisis instead of continuing business as usual."
In June of this year, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, another top 2020 Democratic contender, and Washington Governor Jay Inslee, who ended his 2020 climate-forward campaign Wednesday night, both came out strongly in favor of the demand for the climate debate idea.
While many in the large primary field have embraced or endorsed the climate-debate demand over recent months, it remains unclear how many current candidates would embrace the confrontational approach with the DNC leadership that Turner is proposing.
\u201cA tale of two Democratic parties. \nOne: The establishment, inside conference rooms, debating away on the semantics. \nThe second, in the halls and the streets demanding robust #climate action. \n\nWhich side are you on, indeed. #ClimateDebate.\u201d— David Turnbull (@David Turnbull) 1566497786
On Thursday, Warren tweeted out her high hopes for participating in a climate forum being hosted next month by CNN, but this is not the kind of sanctioned debate that campaigners are demanding from the DNC.
\u201cClimate change is an existential crisis we all face\u2014and it\u2019s going to take big, structural change to solve it. I can\u2019t wait to talk about my plans to protect our planet and tackle climate change at the @CNN Climate Crisis Town Hall next month!\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1566503812
Meanwhile, as Turner called on the DNC to reverse its position, many online where expressing serious concern over the stance taken by DNC member Symone D. Sanders, a senior advisor to Joe Biden and his campaign, who argued during Thursday's meeting that having a climate-focused debate would put the party in "dangerous territory" as she warned that it would open the door to every "faction" of the party wanting their own issue-specific debate.
\u201cBiden advisor @SymoneDSanders argues strongly against #ClimateDebate, says it "would fundamentally change the game" of what the campaigns had been told and be "dangerous territory in the middle of a Democratic primary process"\u201d— Casey Tolan (@Casey Tolan) 1566492383
The objections Ms. Sanders (no relation to Bernie) put forth raised serious questions--especially because Biden himself has openly endorsed the idea of a climate debate in the past--and did not go over well with progressive critics:
\u201cIt is concerning to see Joe Biden's senior advisor \n@SymoneDSanders lobbying to stop conversation on climate change.\n\nAmericans deserve to know how Democratic candidates like Joe Biden will protect future generations. #ClimateDebate\u201d— Friends of the Earth (Action) (@Friends of the Earth (Action)) 1566495688
\u201c.@SymoneDSanders is trying to shut down the movement for a #ClimateDebate right now at the @DNC meeting.\n\nBut her boss @JoeBiden has publicly supported it multiple times.\n\nSo\u2026what\u2019s going on?\nhttps://t.co/O3p8OtXd4o\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1566492392
In what campaigners saw as an incremental yet insufficient victory, a separate measure voted on Thursday did pass, one that lifts a ban on candidate participation in outside issue forums. As the Sunrise Movement tweeted, "We may have reversed the ban on candidate participation in outside climate discussions, but this is NO #ClimateDebate."
With an additional and larger floor vote expected on the specific climate debate question scheduled for a Saturday session at the DNC meeting, Varshini Prakash, co-founder and executive director of the Sunrise Movement, said there's still hope the party will reverse course and that her group plans to keep up the pressure:
"California was literally on fire last year--we know firsthand that climate breakdown is killing people and destroying livelihoods right now," said 26-year-old Alex Morrison, a volunteer with Sunrise, in a statement on Thursday.
"Time is running out to save our generation," Morrison added, "Young people need to know which candidates for president are treating the climate crisis like the emergency it is."
And expressing her dismay and frustration, journalist and commentator Kate Aronoff put it this way: "The DNC believes the climate crisis is a grave threat to the future of human civilization, just not a big enough threat to spend 2 hours talking about."
2020 Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders "wants the DNC to have a climate debate and he thinks it's important to have that kind of conversation."
That is what Nina Turner, national co-chair for the Sanders campaign, told Common Dreams on Thursday about her candidate's position after learning that members of the Democratic National Committee--at a meeting of party delegates in California--had just voted down a resolution to sanction a climate-focused debate for the Democratic primary.
"To me it's just another example of going along to get along. What's the fear of having a forum that deals with the climate? It makes no sense to me." --Nina Turner, national co-chair Bernie Sanders campaign"I'm very disappointed that they voted that down within the DNC," Turner said. "It makes no sense. And to me it's just another example of going along to get along. What's the fear of having a forum that deals with the climate? It makes no sense to me."
While climate campaigners--including Sunrise Movement, 350.org, Friends of the Earth, and many others that have been demanding for months that the DNC reverse its opposition to a debate specifically aimed at addressing the climate emergency--expressed outrage over the vote, Turner suggested the best course of action for the campaigns at this point would be to join forces against the DNC.
"To me," she added, "all the presidential candidates should unite in that because if all the Democratic presidential candidates say to the DNC, 'Let's have a debate or a forum about climate change'--what are they gonna do, kick out every single one of them?"
Such an approach, said Turner, "is the one thing that all the candidates could unite on and show some real leadership to say: Let's have it. Let's have the conversation. Let's have the debate."
Turner wasn't the only high-profile Democrat voicing disappointment.
"The DNC decision to sabotage a #ClimateDebate is extremely disappointing," tweeted former vice president Al Gore following the vote. "Voters all over the U.S. are demanding we focus on the biggest threat to our nation and humanity's future and prioritize solving the climate crisis instead of continuing business as usual."
In June of this year, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, another top 2020 Democratic contender, and Washington Governor Jay Inslee, who ended his 2020 climate-forward campaign Wednesday night, both came out strongly in favor of the demand for the climate debate idea.
While many in the large primary field have embraced or endorsed the climate-debate demand over recent months, it remains unclear how many current candidates would embrace the confrontational approach with the DNC leadership that Turner is proposing.
\u201cA tale of two Democratic parties. \nOne: The establishment, inside conference rooms, debating away on the semantics. \nThe second, in the halls and the streets demanding robust #climate action. \n\nWhich side are you on, indeed. #ClimateDebate.\u201d— David Turnbull (@David Turnbull) 1566497786
On Thursday, Warren tweeted out her high hopes for participating in a climate forum being hosted next month by CNN, but this is not the kind of sanctioned debate that campaigners are demanding from the DNC.
\u201cClimate change is an existential crisis we all face\u2014and it\u2019s going to take big, structural change to solve it. I can\u2019t wait to talk about my plans to protect our planet and tackle climate change at the @CNN Climate Crisis Town Hall next month!\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1566503812
Meanwhile, as Turner called on the DNC to reverse its position, many online where expressing serious concern over the stance taken by DNC member Symone D. Sanders, a senior advisor to Joe Biden and his campaign, who argued during Thursday's meeting that having a climate-focused debate would put the party in "dangerous territory" as she warned that it would open the door to every "faction" of the party wanting their own issue-specific debate.
\u201cBiden advisor @SymoneDSanders argues strongly against #ClimateDebate, says it "would fundamentally change the game" of what the campaigns had been told and be "dangerous territory in the middle of a Democratic primary process"\u201d— Casey Tolan (@Casey Tolan) 1566492383
The objections Ms. Sanders (no relation to Bernie) put forth raised serious questions--especially because Biden himself has openly endorsed the idea of a climate debate in the past--and did not go over well with progressive critics:
\u201cIt is concerning to see Joe Biden's senior advisor \n@SymoneDSanders lobbying to stop conversation on climate change.\n\nAmericans deserve to know how Democratic candidates like Joe Biden will protect future generations. #ClimateDebate\u201d— Friends of the Earth (Action) (@Friends of the Earth (Action)) 1566495688
\u201c.@SymoneDSanders is trying to shut down the movement for a #ClimateDebate right now at the @DNC meeting.\n\nBut her boss @JoeBiden has publicly supported it multiple times.\n\nSo\u2026what\u2019s going on?\nhttps://t.co/O3p8OtXd4o\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1566492392
In what campaigners saw as an incremental yet insufficient victory, a separate measure voted on Thursday did pass, one that lifts a ban on candidate participation in outside issue forums. As the Sunrise Movement tweeted, "We may have reversed the ban on candidate participation in outside climate discussions, but this is NO #ClimateDebate."
With an additional and larger floor vote expected on the specific climate debate question scheduled for a Saturday session at the DNC meeting, Varshini Prakash, co-founder and executive director of the Sunrise Movement, said there's still hope the party will reverse course and that her group plans to keep up the pressure:
"California was literally on fire last year--we know firsthand that climate breakdown is killing people and destroying livelihoods right now," said 26-year-old Alex Morrison, a volunteer with Sunrise, in a statement on Thursday.
"Time is running out to save our generation," Morrison added, "Young people need to know which candidates for president are treating the climate crisis like the emergency it is."
And expressing her dismay and frustration, journalist and commentator Kate Aronoff put it this way: "The DNC believes the climate crisis is a grave threat to the future of human civilization, just not a big enough threat to spend 2 hours talking about."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.