U.S. Border Patrol Agents at Border Field State Park in Imperial Beach watch over personnel that are reinforcing the border wall with concertina wire. (Photo: Mani Albrecht/U.S. Border Patrol/Flickr)
Sep 08, 2019
In a series of tweets Friday excoriating a recent Washington Post "Fact Checker" column downplaying the rate of President Donald Trump's border wall construction, Rep. Raul Grijalva laid out why the article and similar gotcha attempts are "dangerous."
Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat whose district borders Mexico, was responding to a piece by Post reporter Salvador Rizzo which gave the president three "Pinocchios" for claiming that the wall was under construction when, Rizzo said, the fact is that the administration is simply replacing older sections of existing wall with new fencing instead of building 1,000 miles of promised new barrier.
"Replacing a fence with a 30-foot structure covered in double razor wire and topped with floodlights qualifies as new construction no matter where it happens," tweeted Grijalva. "This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak."
\u201c3/11 Replacing a fence with a 30-foot structure covered in double razor wire and topped with floodlights qualifies as new construction no matter where it happens. This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak.\u201d— Raul M. Grijalva (@Raul M. Grijalva) 1567782460
Grijalva also pointed to a worrying tendency in the media to take short-term, technical victories over Trump while disregarding the reality of the administration's policies and its victims.
"The idea that this doesn't count as 'new wall,' and therefore there's nothing to see here, is dangerous and leads to complacency," said Grijalva. "Thumbing our noses at Trump is no substitute for on-the-ground reporting."
And, the lawmaker said, it's important to remember what the wall means.
"This is an intentional symbol of hate and fear, not a security measure," said Grijalva.
\u201c10/11 Here\u2019s Nogales, Arizona, and Nogales, Sonora, cut in half by the wall. I represent the U.S. side of this friendly but physically divided community. This is not what America should be about. This is an intentional symbol of hate and fear, not a security measure.\u201d— Raul M. Grijalva (@Raul M. Grijalva) 1567782460
Rizzo, for his part, replied that the Post fact-check relied on distinguishing between "the sturdier steel bollard fencing that is replacing dilapidated old fences from what Trump actually promised: a massive new concrete wall stretching 1,000 miles."
But Grijalva's point was well taken by fellow lawmakers and immigration advocates.
"Thank you Rep. Raul Grivalja for setting the record straight about what is actually happening with the construction of Trump's border wall," Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-Ill.) tweeted.
The Post reporting was "very inaccurate and irresponsible" said Wildlands Network's borderlands program director Myles Traphagen.
"Thirty foot wall is being [built] while I write this," Traphagen added.
\u201cThe press is falsely claiming that "No new border wall has been built." Very inaccurate and irresponsible reporting. See @RepRaulGrijalva tweet thread about this. 30' wall is being as I write this. #NoBorderWall\u201d— Myles Traphagen (@Myles Traphagen) 1567785302
Grijalva ended his thread by scolding the Post for missing the forest for the trees.
"The conversation about the wall has to be about stopping it and making sure Trump and his successors don't expand it," said Girjalva. "They want this to grow beyond public control. Treating the wall as just a chance to be clever at Trump's expense is irresponsible."
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a series of tweets Friday excoriating a recent Washington Post "Fact Checker" column downplaying the rate of President Donald Trump's border wall construction, Rep. Raul Grijalva laid out why the article and similar gotcha attempts are "dangerous."
Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat whose district borders Mexico, was responding to a piece by Post reporter Salvador Rizzo which gave the president three "Pinocchios" for claiming that the wall was under construction when, Rizzo said, the fact is that the administration is simply replacing older sections of existing wall with new fencing instead of building 1,000 miles of promised new barrier.
"Replacing a fence with a 30-foot structure covered in double razor wire and topped with floodlights qualifies as new construction no matter where it happens," tweeted Grijalva. "This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak."
\u201c3/11 Replacing a fence with a 30-foot structure covered in double razor wire and topped with floodlights qualifies as new construction no matter where it happens. This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak.\u201d— Raul M. Grijalva (@Raul M. Grijalva) 1567782460
Grijalva also pointed to a worrying tendency in the media to take short-term, technical victories over Trump while disregarding the reality of the administration's policies and its victims.
"The idea that this doesn't count as 'new wall,' and therefore there's nothing to see here, is dangerous and leads to complacency," said Grijalva. "Thumbing our noses at Trump is no substitute for on-the-ground reporting."
And, the lawmaker said, it's important to remember what the wall means.
"This is an intentional symbol of hate and fear, not a security measure," said Grijalva.
\u201c10/11 Here\u2019s Nogales, Arizona, and Nogales, Sonora, cut in half by the wall. I represent the U.S. side of this friendly but physically divided community. This is not what America should be about. This is an intentional symbol of hate and fear, not a security measure.\u201d— Raul M. Grijalva (@Raul M. Grijalva) 1567782460
Rizzo, for his part, replied that the Post fact-check relied on distinguishing between "the sturdier steel bollard fencing that is replacing dilapidated old fences from what Trump actually promised: a massive new concrete wall stretching 1,000 miles."
But Grijalva's point was well taken by fellow lawmakers and immigration advocates.
"Thank you Rep. Raul Grivalja for setting the record straight about what is actually happening with the construction of Trump's border wall," Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-Ill.) tweeted.
The Post reporting was "very inaccurate and irresponsible" said Wildlands Network's borderlands program director Myles Traphagen.
"Thirty foot wall is being [built] while I write this," Traphagen added.
\u201cThe press is falsely claiming that "No new border wall has been built." Very inaccurate and irresponsible reporting. See @RepRaulGrijalva tweet thread about this. 30' wall is being as I write this. #NoBorderWall\u201d— Myles Traphagen (@Myles Traphagen) 1567785302
Grijalva ended his thread by scolding the Post for missing the forest for the trees.
"The conversation about the wall has to be about stopping it and making sure Trump and his successors don't expand it," said Girjalva. "They want this to grow beyond public control. Treating the wall as just a chance to be clever at Trump's expense is irresponsible."
In a series of tweets Friday excoriating a recent Washington Post "Fact Checker" column downplaying the rate of President Donald Trump's border wall construction, Rep. Raul Grijalva laid out why the article and similar gotcha attempts are "dangerous."
Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat whose district borders Mexico, was responding to a piece by Post reporter Salvador Rizzo which gave the president three "Pinocchios" for claiming that the wall was under construction when, Rizzo said, the fact is that the administration is simply replacing older sections of existing wall with new fencing instead of building 1,000 miles of promised new barrier.
"Replacing a fence with a 30-foot structure covered in double razor wire and topped with floodlights qualifies as new construction no matter where it happens," tweeted Grijalva. "This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak."
\u201c3/11 Replacing a fence with a 30-foot structure covered in double razor wire and topped with floodlights qualifies as new construction no matter where it happens. This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak.\u201d— Raul M. Grijalva (@Raul M. Grijalva) 1567782460
Grijalva also pointed to a worrying tendency in the media to take short-term, technical victories over Trump while disregarding the reality of the administration's policies and its victims.
"The idea that this doesn't count as 'new wall,' and therefore there's nothing to see here, is dangerous and leads to complacency," said Grijalva. "Thumbing our noses at Trump is no substitute for on-the-ground reporting."
And, the lawmaker said, it's important to remember what the wall means.
"This is an intentional symbol of hate and fear, not a security measure," said Grijalva.
\u201c10/11 Here\u2019s Nogales, Arizona, and Nogales, Sonora, cut in half by the wall. I represent the U.S. side of this friendly but physically divided community. This is not what America should be about. This is an intentional symbol of hate and fear, not a security measure.\u201d— Raul M. Grijalva (@Raul M. Grijalva) 1567782460
Rizzo, for his part, replied that the Post fact-check relied on distinguishing between "the sturdier steel bollard fencing that is replacing dilapidated old fences from what Trump actually promised: a massive new concrete wall stretching 1,000 miles."
But Grijalva's point was well taken by fellow lawmakers and immigration advocates.
"Thank you Rep. Raul Grivalja for setting the record straight about what is actually happening with the construction of Trump's border wall," Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-Ill.) tweeted.
The Post reporting was "very inaccurate and irresponsible" said Wildlands Network's borderlands program director Myles Traphagen.
"Thirty foot wall is being [built] while I write this," Traphagen added.
\u201cThe press is falsely claiming that "No new border wall has been built." Very inaccurate and irresponsible reporting. See @RepRaulGrijalva tweet thread about this. 30' wall is being as I write this. #NoBorderWall\u201d— Myles Traphagen (@Myles Traphagen) 1567785302
Grijalva ended his thread by scolding the Post for missing the forest for the trees.
"The conversation about the wall has to be about stopping it and making sure Trump and his successors don't expand it," said Girjalva. "They want this to grow beyond public control. Treating the wall as just a chance to be clever at Trump's expense is irresponsible."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.