SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Progressives expressed outrage on Monday over a CNN weekend segment on the so-called "leadership" of five centrist freshman congresswomen on the impeachment of President Donald Trump while ignoring the contributions of congresswomen of color who have been making the case for months.
The five white lawmakers backed impeachment proceedings following months of demands from ethics watchdogs and other critics, including the so-called "squad"--Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.)--and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.).
In the report, CNN anchor Dana Bash said the five representatives she dubbed the "anti-squad"--Reps. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.), Chrissy Houlahan (D-Penn.), and Elaine Luria (D-Va.)--engaged in "risky political business" a week ago by joining more than 100 other Democrats in calling for impeachment proceedings. Some of their Democratic colleagues had demanded impeachment more than two years ago.
Watch:
\u201cThese five freshman congresswomen changed history by becoming unlikely leaders on impeachment.\nhttps://t.co/vSMWkdn8UH\u201d— CNN Newsroom (@CNN Newsroom) 1569684462
The congresswomen represent more conservative districts than some of their progressive colleagues, but critics slammed CNN for portraying their decisions to back impeachment this month as courageous while ignoring the earlier calls of Tlaib, Omar, Ocasio-Cortez, Pressley, and that of Waters, who said Trump should be impeached shortly after he took office.
"The story gives these women credit for leading impeachment when in fact they were late in the game followers," Elie Mystal, executive editor of the blog Above the Law, tweeted. "If not for the work of women of color, there would have been no impeachment movement for them to glom onto, a fact this story seems to forget."
Others on social media joined Mystal in condemning the segment.
\u201c\u201cLeaders on impeachment?\u201d\n\nErm...\nMaxine?\nRashida?\nIlhan?\nAOC?\u201d— Mehdi Hasan (@Mehdi Hasan) 1569722603
\u201cWomen of color seem to never be enough. Somewhere along the line, white women will always be given credit for the work & sacrifice of women of color. I see you Maxine Waters, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar and AOC.\u201d— Linda Sarsour (@Linda Sarsour) 1569722958
\u201cThis is what @AOC @RashidaTlaib and @IlhanMN have been arguing for ages and being shot down. And now everyone else is taking the credit\u201d— Mairav Zonszein \u05de\u05e8\u05d1 \u05d6\u05d5\u05e0\u05e9\u05d9\u05d9\u05df (@Mairav Zonszein \u05de\u05e8\u05d1 \u05d6\u05d5\u05e0\u05e9\u05d9\u05d9\u05df) 1569733497
I thought this was a parody.
Ex military & CIA women- who are moderates- all white- are being given credit for impeachment of Trump when really, Tlaid, Omar, AOC & Ayanna led the effort.
This is gross..even for you CNN. https://t.co/9z88gRoIrC
-- Tania Singh (@TwinklingTania) September 29, 2019
Tlaib was attacked by colleagues earlier this year for using an expletive in her call to impeach Trump just after she was sworn in to Congress. The congresswoman sponsored a bill in March to examine whether the House should begin impeachment proceedings, and Omar, Ocasio-Cortez, and Pressley were among just 17 Democrats who signed on as co-sponsors the next month.
Along with Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), who first spoke on the House floor in favor of impeachment in May 2017, just four months after Trump took office, Waters was one of the first lawmakers to call on Congress to bring charges against the president.
In October 2017, Waters toldMSNBC that there was enough evidence of Trump's obstruction of justice in the Mueller probe for Congress to "be moving on impeachment."
In addition to criticizing CNN's "erasure" of the efforts of women in color in Congress, some slammed the segment for the mocking and dismissive tone it took towards first-term progressives in Congress like Ocasio-Cortez and Omar, who have embraced social media as a channel for sharing their bold and broadly popular proposals for reform and their work in Washington.
"None of us is ever going to get in a Twitter war with anyone else," said Slotkin. "We're not going to add unhelpful rhetoric to an already bad tone coming out of Washington."
Spanberger added that the five congresswomen don't "want to be the loudest voice in the room" after Bash suggested the progressive members are covered in the news more frequently.
"Not only are these women not at the forefront of impeachment, they actively shaded and condescended towards the black and brown women who have actually been fighting for the good of our nation," tweeted filmmaker Xavier Burgin.
\u201c@CNNnewsroom This clip is terrible. Not only are these women not at the forefront of impeachment, they actively shaded and condescended towards the black and brown women who have actually been fighting for the good of our nation. This is a truly terrible clip.\u201d— CNN Newsroom (@CNN Newsroom) 1569684462
\u201cIt\u2019s not a good story. The women of color who led the impeachment push are ignored. The correspondent treats \u2018the squad\u2019 in a mocking way\u2014I\u2019m not sure why\u2014it\u2019s utterly unnecessary. There are a million walking shots, so it\u2019s also boring.\u201d— Soledad O'Brien (@Soledad O'Brien) 1569849640
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Progressives expressed outrage on Monday over a CNN weekend segment on the so-called "leadership" of five centrist freshman congresswomen on the impeachment of President Donald Trump while ignoring the contributions of congresswomen of color who have been making the case for months.
The five white lawmakers backed impeachment proceedings following months of demands from ethics watchdogs and other critics, including the so-called "squad"--Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.)--and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.).
In the report, CNN anchor Dana Bash said the five representatives she dubbed the "anti-squad"--Reps. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.), Chrissy Houlahan (D-Penn.), and Elaine Luria (D-Va.)--engaged in "risky political business" a week ago by joining more than 100 other Democrats in calling for impeachment proceedings. Some of their Democratic colleagues had demanded impeachment more than two years ago.
Watch:
\u201cThese five freshman congresswomen changed history by becoming unlikely leaders on impeachment.\nhttps://t.co/vSMWkdn8UH\u201d— CNN Newsroom (@CNN Newsroom) 1569684462
The congresswomen represent more conservative districts than some of their progressive colleagues, but critics slammed CNN for portraying their decisions to back impeachment this month as courageous while ignoring the earlier calls of Tlaib, Omar, Ocasio-Cortez, Pressley, and that of Waters, who said Trump should be impeached shortly after he took office.
"The story gives these women credit for leading impeachment when in fact they were late in the game followers," Elie Mystal, executive editor of the blog Above the Law, tweeted. "If not for the work of women of color, there would have been no impeachment movement for them to glom onto, a fact this story seems to forget."
Others on social media joined Mystal in condemning the segment.
\u201c\u201cLeaders on impeachment?\u201d\n\nErm...\nMaxine?\nRashida?\nIlhan?\nAOC?\u201d— Mehdi Hasan (@Mehdi Hasan) 1569722603
\u201cWomen of color seem to never be enough. Somewhere along the line, white women will always be given credit for the work & sacrifice of women of color. I see you Maxine Waters, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar and AOC.\u201d— Linda Sarsour (@Linda Sarsour) 1569722958
\u201cThis is what @AOC @RashidaTlaib and @IlhanMN have been arguing for ages and being shot down. And now everyone else is taking the credit\u201d— Mairav Zonszein \u05de\u05e8\u05d1 \u05d6\u05d5\u05e0\u05e9\u05d9\u05d9\u05df (@Mairav Zonszein \u05de\u05e8\u05d1 \u05d6\u05d5\u05e0\u05e9\u05d9\u05d9\u05df) 1569733497
I thought this was a parody.
Ex military & CIA women- who are moderates- all white- are being given credit for impeachment of Trump when really, Tlaid, Omar, AOC & Ayanna led the effort.
This is gross..even for you CNN. https://t.co/9z88gRoIrC
-- Tania Singh (@TwinklingTania) September 29, 2019
Tlaib was attacked by colleagues earlier this year for using an expletive in her call to impeach Trump just after she was sworn in to Congress. The congresswoman sponsored a bill in March to examine whether the House should begin impeachment proceedings, and Omar, Ocasio-Cortez, and Pressley were among just 17 Democrats who signed on as co-sponsors the next month.
Along with Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), who first spoke on the House floor in favor of impeachment in May 2017, just four months after Trump took office, Waters was one of the first lawmakers to call on Congress to bring charges against the president.
In October 2017, Waters toldMSNBC that there was enough evidence of Trump's obstruction of justice in the Mueller probe for Congress to "be moving on impeachment."
In addition to criticizing CNN's "erasure" of the efforts of women in color in Congress, some slammed the segment for the mocking and dismissive tone it took towards first-term progressives in Congress like Ocasio-Cortez and Omar, who have embraced social media as a channel for sharing their bold and broadly popular proposals for reform and their work in Washington.
"None of us is ever going to get in a Twitter war with anyone else," said Slotkin. "We're not going to add unhelpful rhetoric to an already bad tone coming out of Washington."
Spanberger added that the five congresswomen don't "want to be the loudest voice in the room" after Bash suggested the progressive members are covered in the news more frequently.
"Not only are these women not at the forefront of impeachment, they actively shaded and condescended towards the black and brown women who have actually been fighting for the good of our nation," tweeted filmmaker Xavier Burgin.
\u201c@CNNnewsroom This clip is terrible. Not only are these women not at the forefront of impeachment, they actively shaded and condescended towards the black and brown women who have actually been fighting for the good of our nation. This is a truly terrible clip.\u201d— CNN Newsroom (@CNN Newsroom) 1569684462
\u201cIt\u2019s not a good story. The women of color who led the impeachment push are ignored. The correspondent treats \u2018the squad\u2019 in a mocking way\u2014I\u2019m not sure why\u2014it\u2019s utterly unnecessary. There are a million walking shots, so it\u2019s also boring.\u201d— Soledad O'Brien (@Soledad O'Brien) 1569849640
Progressives expressed outrage on Monday over a CNN weekend segment on the so-called "leadership" of five centrist freshman congresswomen on the impeachment of President Donald Trump while ignoring the contributions of congresswomen of color who have been making the case for months.
The five white lawmakers backed impeachment proceedings following months of demands from ethics watchdogs and other critics, including the so-called "squad"--Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.)--and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.).
In the report, CNN anchor Dana Bash said the five representatives she dubbed the "anti-squad"--Reps. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.), Chrissy Houlahan (D-Penn.), and Elaine Luria (D-Va.)--engaged in "risky political business" a week ago by joining more than 100 other Democrats in calling for impeachment proceedings. Some of their Democratic colleagues had demanded impeachment more than two years ago.
Watch:
\u201cThese five freshman congresswomen changed history by becoming unlikely leaders on impeachment.\nhttps://t.co/vSMWkdn8UH\u201d— CNN Newsroom (@CNN Newsroom) 1569684462
The congresswomen represent more conservative districts than some of their progressive colleagues, but critics slammed CNN for portraying their decisions to back impeachment this month as courageous while ignoring the earlier calls of Tlaib, Omar, Ocasio-Cortez, Pressley, and that of Waters, who said Trump should be impeached shortly after he took office.
"The story gives these women credit for leading impeachment when in fact they were late in the game followers," Elie Mystal, executive editor of the blog Above the Law, tweeted. "If not for the work of women of color, there would have been no impeachment movement for them to glom onto, a fact this story seems to forget."
Others on social media joined Mystal in condemning the segment.
\u201c\u201cLeaders on impeachment?\u201d\n\nErm...\nMaxine?\nRashida?\nIlhan?\nAOC?\u201d— Mehdi Hasan (@Mehdi Hasan) 1569722603
\u201cWomen of color seem to never be enough. Somewhere along the line, white women will always be given credit for the work & sacrifice of women of color. I see you Maxine Waters, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar and AOC.\u201d— Linda Sarsour (@Linda Sarsour) 1569722958
\u201cThis is what @AOC @RashidaTlaib and @IlhanMN have been arguing for ages and being shot down. And now everyone else is taking the credit\u201d— Mairav Zonszein \u05de\u05e8\u05d1 \u05d6\u05d5\u05e0\u05e9\u05d9\u05d9\u05df (@Mairav Zonszein \u05de\u05e8\u05d1 \u05d6\u05d5\u05e0\u05e9\u05d9\u05d9\u05df) 1569733497
I thought this was a parody.
Ex military & CIA women- who are moderates- all white- are being given credit for impeachment of Trump when really, Tlaid, Omar, AOC & Ayanna led the effort.
This is gross..even for you CNN. https://t.co/9z88gRoIrC
-- Tania Singh (@TwinklingTania) September 29, 2019
Tlaib was attacked by colleagues earlier this year for using an expletive in her call to impeach Trump just after she was sworn in to Congress. The congresswoman sponsored a bill in March to examine whether the House should begin impeachment proceedings, and Omar, Ocasio-Cortez, and Pressley were among just 17 Democrats who signed on as co-sponsors the next month.
Along with Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), who first spoke on the House floor in favor of impeachment in May 2017, just four months after Trump took office, Waters was one of the first lawmakers to call on Congress to bring charges against the president.
In October 2017, Waters toldMSNBC that there was enough evidence of Trump's obstruction of justice in the Mueller probe for Congress to "be moving on impeachment."
In addition to criticizing CNN's "erasure" of the efforts of women in color in Congress, some slammed the segment for the mocking and dismissive tone it took towards first-term progressives in Congress like Ocasio-Cortez and Omar, who have embraced social media as a channel for sharing their bold and broadly popular proposals for reform and their work in Washington.
"None of us is ever going to get in a Twitter war with anyone else," said Slotkin. "We're not going to add unhelpful rhetoric to an already bad tone coming out of Washington."
Spanberger added that the five congresswomen don't "want to be the loudest voice in the room" after Bash suggested the progressive members are covered in the news more frequently.
"Not only are these women not at the forefront of impeachment, they actively shaded and condescended towards the black and brown women who have actually been fighting for the good of our nation," tweeted filmmaker Xavier Burgin.
\u201c@CNNnewsroom This clip is terrible. Not only are these women not at the forefront of impeachment, they actively shaded and condescended towards the black and brown women who have actually been fighting for the good of our nation. This is a truly terrible clip.\u201d— CNN Newsroom (@CNN Newsroom) 1569684462
\u201cIt\u2019s not a good story. The women of color who led the impeachment push are ignored. The correspondent treats \u2018the squad\u2019 in a mocking way\u2014I\u2019m not sure why\u2014it\u2019s utterly unnecessary. There are a million walking shots, so it\u2019s also boring.\u201d— Soledad O'Brien (@Soledad O'Brien) 1569849640