MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes harshly rebuked his employers on Monday night over their refusal to air Ronan Farrow's report on Harvey Weinstein's long history of sexual assault and abuse. (Photo: Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images)
Oct 15, 2019
Issuing a harsh rebuke to his own employers for taking "the path of least resistance" by declining to report on allegations of sexual assault against movie producer Harvey Weinstein, MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes on Monday night was widely applauded for taking a different path.
In his closing monologue on his show "All In with Chris Hayes," Hayes compared NBC News executives with hundreds of Republican lawmakers and government officials who refuse to speak out publicly against President Donald Trump amid reports that they privately express grave concerns about his policies and decision-making.
"The insidious destructive force of the path of least resistance is everywhere you look," Hayes said. "Heck, I feel the tug of it myself as my own news organization is embroiled in a very public controversy over its conduct."
Hayes's former NBC colleague, journalist Ronan Farrow, spent months reporting on allegations against Weinstein in 2017--allegations which would help spark the worldwide #MeToo social justice movement.
But, Farrow suggests in his new book, Catch & Kill, the network refused to air the reporting out, correctly predicting that the Weinstein story would lead to scrutiny of one of its own longtime anchors--former "Today Show" host Matt Lauer.
"In Farrow's view, he was unable to break through what was effectively a conspiracy of silence from NBC News management," Hayes said.
Watch:
\u201cPlease watch this excellent closing statement by @chrislhayes\n\nTo stand up this way against his bosses at NBC News is remarkable \n\nI should note what makes this even more remarkable is Andy Lack (NBC News Chairman) isn't a big fan of Chris/his show\n\nChris is stepping out here\u201d— Yashar Ali \ud83d\udc18 \u06cc\u0627\u0634\u0627\u0631 (@Yashar Ali \ud83d\udc18 \u06cc\u0627\u0634\u0627\u0631) 1571105298
While NBC has claimed Farrow's reporting was not adequately sourced to air, the reporter went on to publish an explosive article in The New Yorker about the Weinstein allegations just two months later.
After leaving NBC News, Hayes said, Farrow was able to do "the kind of journalism that you want to do as a journalist, that everyone who works in this business should want to facilitate."
On social media, Hayes won applause for taking what many media critics called a brave stance against his powerful employer.
\u201cBrave stuff here by @chrislhayes. Ask yourself if you\u2019d do this in his position (you can answer privately, I\u2019m not judging).\u201d— Ryan Grim (@Ryan Grim) 1571140468
\u201cGood on ya @chrislhayes! The \u201cpath of least resistance\u201d is exactly why the powerful and connected often escape scrutiny.\u201d— Krystal Ball (@Krystal Ball) 1571140742
\u201cChris Hayes reminding us all why we need an unfettered free press\u201d— Will Bunch (@Will Bunch) 1571140210
\u201c.@chrislhayes is modeling exactly where our journalism should be in 2019. Too many outlets bend to the powerful when the very institutions they represent are supposed to operate as a check on that power. \n\nWhen I had dreams of being a journalist it was to uplift Truth like this:\u201d— Matt Deitsch (@Matt Deitsch) 1571151673
Journalism professor and media critic Jay Rosen wrote that Hayes's statement could mark the beginning of a reckoning at NBC--through a possible change in leadership or an independent investigation into Farrow's departure from the network.
After Hayes's monologue, Rosen wrote, "status quo won't hold."
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Issuing a harsh rebuke to his own employers for taking "the path of least resistance" by declining to report on allegations of sexual assault against movie producer Harvey Weinstein, MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes on Monday night was widely applauded for taking a different path.
In his closing monologue on his show "All In with Chris Hayes," Hayes compared NBC News executives with hundreds of Republican lawmakers and government officials who refuse to speak out publicly against President Donald Trump amid reports that they privately express grave concerns about his policies and decision-making.
"The insidious destructive force of the path of least resistance is everywhere you look," Hayes said. "Heck, I feel the tug of it myself as my own news organization is embroiled in a very public controversy over its conduct."
Hayes's former NBC colleague, journalist Ronan Farrow, spent months reporting on allegations against Weinstein in 2017--allegations which would help spark the worldwide #MeToo social justice movement.
But, Farrow suggests in his new book, Catch & Kill, the network refused to air the reporting out, correctly predicting that the Weinstein story would lead to scrutiny of one of its own longtime anchors--former "Today Show" host Matt Lauer.
"In Farrow's view, he was unable to break through what was effectively a conspiracy of silence from NBC News management," Hayes said.
Watch:
\u201cPlease watch this excellent closing statement by @chrislhayes\n\nTo stand up this way against his bosses at NBC News is remarkable \n\nI should note what makes this even more remarkable is Andy Lack (NBC News Chairman) isn't a big fan of Chris/his show\n\nChris is stepping out here\u201d— Yashar Ali \ud83d\udc18 \u06cc\u0627\u0634\u0627\u0631 (@Yashar Ali \ud83d\udc18 \u06cc\u0627\u0634\u0627\u0631) 1571105298
While NBC has claimed Farrow's reporting was not adequately sourced to air, the reporter went on to publish an explosive article in The New Yorker about the Weinstein allegations just two months later.
After leaving NBC News, Hayes said, Farrow was able to do "the kind of journalism that you want to do as a journalist, that everyone who works in this business should want to facilitate."
On social media, Hayes won applause for taking what many media critics called a brave stance against his powerful employer.
\u201cBrave stuff here by @chrislhayes. Ask yourself if you\u2019d do this in his position (you can answer privately, I\u2019m not judging).\u201d— Ryan Grim (@Ryan Grim) 1571140468
\u201cGood on ya @chrislhayes! The \u201cpath of least resistance\u201d is exactly why the powerful and connected often escape scrutiny.\u201d— Krystal Ball (@Krystal Ball) 1571140742
\u201cChris Hayes reminding us all why we need an unfettered free press\u201d— Will Bunch (@Will Bunch) 1571140210
\u201c.@chrislhayes is modeling exactly where our journalism should be in 2019. Too many outlets bend to the powerful when the very institutions they represent are supposed to operate as a check on that power. \n\nWhen I had dreams of being a journalist it was to uplift Truth like this:\u201d— Matt Deitsch (@Matt Deitsch) 1571151673
Journalism professor and media critic Jay Rosen wrote that Hayes's statement could mark the beginning of a reckoning at NBC--through a possible change in leadership or an independent investigation into Farrow's departure from the network.
After Hayes's monologue, Rosen wrote, "status quo won't hold."
Issuing a harsh rebuke to his own employers for taking "the path of least resistance" by declining to report on allegations of sexual assault against movie producer Harvey Weinstein, MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes on Monday night was widely applauded for taking a different path.
In his closing monologue on his show "All In with Chris Hayes," Hayes compared NBC News executives with hundreds of Republican lawmakers and government officials who refuse to speak out publicly against President Donald Trump amid reports that they privately express grave concerns about his policies and decision-making.
"The insidious destructive force of the path of least resistance is everywhere you look," Hayes said. "Heck, I feel the tug of it myself as my own news organization is embroiled in a very public controversy over its conduct."
Hayes's former NBC colleague, journalist Ronan Farrow, spent months reporting on allegations against Weinstein in 2017--allegations which would help spark the worldwide #MeToo social justice movement.
But, Farrow suggests in his new book, Catch & Kill, the network refused to air the reporting out, correctly predicting that the Weinstein story would lead to scrutiny of one of its own longtime anchors--former "Today Show" host Matt Lauer.
"In Farrow's view, he was unable to break through what was effectively a conspiracy of silence from NBC News management," Hayes said.
Watch:
\u201cPlease watch this excellent closing statement by @chrislhayes\n\nTo stand up this way against his bosses at NBC News is remarkable \n\nI should note what makes this even more remarkable is Andy Lack (NBC News Chairman) isn't a big fan of Chris/his show\n\nChris is stepping out here\u201d— Yashar Ali \ud83d\udc18 \u06cc\u0627\u0634\u0627\u0631 (@Yashar Ali \ud83d\udc18 \u06cc\u0627\u0634\u0627\u0631) 1571105298
While NBC has claimed Farrow's reporting was not adequately sourced to air, the reporter went on to publish an explosive article in The New Yorker about the Weinstein allegations just two months later.
After leaving NBC News, Hayes said, Farrow was able to do "the kind of journalism that you want to do as a journalist, that everyone who works in this business should want to facilitate."
On social media, Hayes won applause for taking what many media critics called a brave stance against his powerful employer.
\u201cBrave stuff here by @chrislhayes. Ask yourself if you\u2019d do this in his position (you can answer privately, I\u2019m not judging).\u201d— Ryan Grim (@Ryan Grim) 1571140468
\u201cGood on ya @chrislhayes! The \u201cpath of least resistance\u201d is exactly why the powerful and connected often escape scrutiny.\u201d— Krystal Ball (@Krystal Ball) 1571140742
\u201cChris Hayes reminding us all why we need an unfettered free press\u201d— Will Bunch (@Will Bunch) 1571140210
\u201c.@chrislhayes is modeling exactly where our journalism should be in 2019. Too many outlets bend to the powerful when the very institutions they represent are supposed to operate as a check on that power. \n\nWhen I had dreams of being a journalist it was to uplift Truth like this:\u201d— Matt Deitsch (@Matt Deitsch) 1571151673
Journalism professor and media critic Jay Rosen wrote that Hayes's statement could mark the beginning of a reckoning at NBC--through a possible change in leadership or an independent investigation into Farrow's departure from the network.
After Hayes's monologue, Rosen wrote, "status quo won't hold."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.