SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
CNN host John King asked whether endorsements from Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib are "too urban" to help Sen. Bernie Sanders in the Democratic presidential primary. (Photo: CNN/Screengrab)
CNN Host Faces Backlash for Pondering Whether Ocasio-Cortez, Tlaib, and Omar Endorsements Are 'Too Urban' to Help Sanders
"Campaign just went from too white to too urban. That's U R B A N for those who couldn't hear the whistle from the back."
Oct 16, 2019
CNN anchor John King faced swift backlash Tuesday night for pondering on national television whether endorsements from progressive Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib are "too far-left," "too urban," and "too internet" to help Sen. Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary.
"They are more of the younger, fresher face. More aggressive, more liberal. Less compromising. Less talk about working with Republicans," King said of the congresswomen during a CNN panel discussion following Tuesday evening's presidential debate in Ohio.
\u201cCNN's John King just asked if @AOC, @Ilhan, and @RashidaTlaib's reported upcoming endorsement of Bernie is "too urban"\u201d— Andrew Lawrence (@Andrew Lawrence) 1571196514
Critics were quick to slam King's "too urban" line as a racist dog whistle and his "too internet" line as a sign of how out of touchCNN analysts are with the American public.
"Shame on you for this bigotry," tweeted Sanders backer Shaun King.
Others piled on, highlighting the dramatic shift from the common and false criticism of Sanders' support as "too white":
\u201c2016 pundits: Bernie can\u2019t get support from people of color \n\n2019 pundits: Bernie\u2019s support is skewed too people of color (urban) and too young (internet) \n\nThese fucking people\u201d— Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap \ud83e\udda1 (@Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap \ud83e\udda1) 1571198806
In response to King, Sanders campaign manager Faiz Shakir tweeted: "'Is this too far left? Is this too uncompromising? Is it too urban? Is it too internet? Does the Democratic Party need to find a broader audience?' No. No. Uh, No. No. And finally, No. Thanks for asking."
As Common Dreams reported Tuesday night, Ocasio-Cortez is expected to endorse Sanders for president and appear at a rally with the senator in New York City on Saturday. Tlaib is also expected to endorse Sanders, and Omar publicly endorsed the senator late Tuesday.
In a tweet Wednesday morning, Omar said she is "proud to endorse Sen. Sanders for president."
"Glad that AOC and Rashida Tlaib are on board too," said Omar. "It's time."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
CNN anchor John King faced swift backlash Tuesday night for pondering on national television whether endorsements from progressive Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib are "too far-left," "too urban," and "too internet" to help Sen. Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary.
"They are more of the younger, fresher face. More aggressive, more liberal. Less compromising. Less talk about working with Republicans," King said of the congresswomen during a CNN panel discussion following Tuesday evening's presidential debate in Ohio.
\u201cCNN's John King just asked if @AOC, @Ilhan, and @RashidaTlaib's reported upcoming endorsement of Bernie is "too urban"\u201d— Andrew Lawrence (@Andrew Lawrence) 1571196514
Critics were quick to slam King's "too urban" line as a racist dog whistle and his "too internet" line as a sign of how out of touchCNN analysts are with the American public.
"Shame on you for this bigotry," tweeted Sanders backer Shaun King.
Others piled on, highlighting the dramatic shift from the common and false criticism of Sanders' support as "too white":
\u201c2016 pundits: Bernie can\u2019t get support from people of color \n\n2019 pundits: Bernie\u2019s support is skewed too people of color (urban) and too young (internet) \n\nThese fucking people\u201d— Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap \ud83e\udda1 (@Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap \ud83e\udda1) 1571198806
In response to King, Sanders campaign manager Faiz Shakir tweeted: "'Is this too far left? Is this too uncompromising? Is it too urban? Is it too internet? Does the Democratic Party need to find a broader audience?' No. No. Uh, No. No. And finally, No. Thanks for asking."
As Common Dreams reported Tuesday night, Ocasio-Cortez is expected to endorse Sanders for president and appear at a rally with the senator in New York City on Saturday. Tlaib is also expected to endorse Sanders, and Omar publicly endorsed the senator late Tuesday.
In a tweet Wednesday morning, Omar said she is "proud to endorse Sen. Sanders for president."
"Glad that AOC and Rashida Tlaib are on board too," said Omar. "It's time."
CNN anchor John King faced swift backlash Tuesday night for pondering on national television whether endorsements from progressive Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib are "too far-left," "too urban," and "too internet" to help Sen. Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary.
"They are more of the younger, fresher face. More aggressive, more liberal. Less compromising. Less talk about working with Republicans," King said of the congresswomen during a CNN panel discussion following Tuesday evening's presidential debate in Ohio.
\u201cCNN's John King just asked if @AOC, @Ilhan, and @RashidaTlaib's reported upcoming endorsement of Bernie is "too urban"\u201d— Andrew Lawrence (@Andrew Lawrence) 1571196514
Critics were quick to slam King's "too urban" line as a racist dog whistle and his "too internet" line as a sign of how out of touchCNN analysts are with the American public.
"Shame on you for this bigotry," tweeted Sanders backer Shaun King.
Others piled on, highlighting the dramatic shift from the common and false criticism of Sanders' support as "too white":
\u201c2016 pundits: Bernie can\u2019t get support from people of color \n\n2019 pundits: Bernie\u2019s support is skewed too people of color (urban) and too young (internet) \n\nThese fucking people\u201d— Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap \ud83e\udda1 (@Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap \ud83e\udda1) 1571198806
In response to King, Sanders campaign manager Faiz Shakir tweeted: "'Is this too far left? Is this too uncompromising? Is it too urban? Is it too internet? Does the Democratic Party need to find a broader audience?' No. No. Uh, No. No. And finally, No. Thanks for asking."
As Common Dreams reported Tuesday night, Ocasio-Cortez is expected to endorse Sanders for president and appear at a rally with the senator in New York City on Saturday. Tlaib is also expected to endorse Sanders, and Omar publicly endorsed the senator late Tuesday.
In a tweet Wednesday morning, Omar said she is "proud to endorse Sen. Sanders for president."
"Glad that AOC and Rashida Tlaib are on board too," said Omar. "It's time."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.