SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Visual artist Robin Bell projected the words "Crime Scene--Do Not Enter" onto President Donald Trump's Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. last year. The projection was a reference to Trump's violation of the emoluments clause. (Photo: @bellvisuals/Twitter)
After Repeated Violations of Constitution's Anti-Corruption Law, Trump Dismisses Emoluments Clause as 'Phony'
"It would be cool if the courts and/or opposition party proved that the emoluments clause is not, in fact, phony."
Oct 21, 2019
Two days after intense pressure forced President Donald Trump to back down from his plan to host the 2020 G7 summit at his resort in Doral, Florida, the president dismissed the Constitution's anti-corruption clause--which his plan would have violated--as "phony."
"You people, with this phony Emoluments Clause," Trump told reporters at a White House press conference on Monday, responding to allegations that hosting the meeting of foreign leaders at his own property would be a conflict of interest.
Trump claimed that President Barack Obama also violated the Emoluments Clause by signing a book deal and an agreement with Netflix while he was in office--two falsehoods that CNN promptly corrected--and compared himself to President George Washington, who Trump said was also a "businessman" while in office.
Watch:
\u201cTrump just claimed his G-7/Doral pick was OK because Obama got a Netflix & book deal. He claimed these were negotiated while in office.\n\nThere's no proof, and CNN fact-checked in real time.\n\nHe then went on to claim the Emoluments clause is "phony." CNN put it on the screen.\u201d— jordan (@jordan) 1571678905
Since Trump took office in 2017, ethics watchdogs have decried his refusal to divest from his real estate empire, the Trump Organization, which his two eldest sons are now running. The president maintains access to the company's financial data.
Meanwhile, a number of state and foreign officials have stayed at Trump's properties since he's been in office, which critics say is a clear violation of the Emoluments Clause. The clause bars any president from accepting payments from any state or foreign government.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), whose lawsuit against the president over the Emoluments Clause was reopened last month by a federal appeals court, was among the critics of Trump's dismissal of constitutional law.
"The emoluments clauses, which the president just called 'phony,' are of course the original anti-corruption provisions the framers put into the Constitution centuries ago," CREW executive director Noah Bookbinder tweeted.
\u201cThe emoluments clauses, which the President just called "phony," are of course the original anti-corruption provisions the framers put into the constitution centuries ago to prevent exactly the kinds of corruption we are seeing on a daily basis under this president.\u201d— Noah Bookbinder (@Noah Bookbinder) 1571677790
Trump has also been sued by 200 congressional Democrats and the attorneys general of Maryland and Washington, D.C. over alleged emoluments violations. Both cases are slowly moving through federal appeals courts, but no action has been taken by Democrats yet to stop the president from profiting off his position.
"It would be cool if the courts and/or opposition party proved that the Emoluments Clause is not, in fact, phony," tweeted journalist Talia Lavin on Monday.
On Saturday, after Trump canceled his plan to hold the G7 at Doral, CREW pointed out that his bow to pressure did not cancel out his many other ethical breaches.
"The president's reversal shows that pressure works, that those fighting to hold the line for an ethical government can still sometimes dial down his corruption," said Bookbinder. "The president deserves no plaudits for doing the right thing only after public outcry forced him not to do the wrong thing. This was one corrupt conflict of interest. He's racked up well over 2,000 of them. So we'll keep fighting."
On January 20th, it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Two days after intense pressure forced President Donald Trump to back down from his plan to host the 2020 G7 summit at his resort in Doral, Florida, the president dismissed the Constitution's anti-corruption clause--which his plan would have violated--as "phony."
"You people, with this phony Emoluments Clause," Trump told reporters at a White House press conference on Monday, responding to allegations that hosting the meeting of foreign leaders at his own property would be a conflict of interest.
Trump claimed that President Barack Obama also violated the Emoluments Clause by signing a book deal and an agreement with Netflix while he was in office--two falsehoods that CNN promptly corrected--and compared himself to President George Washington, who Trump said was also a "businessman" while in office.
Watch:
\u201cTrump just claimed his G-7/Doral pick was OK because Obama got a Netflix & book deal. He claimed these were negotiated while in office.\n\nThere's no proof, and CNN fact-checked in real time.\n\nHe then went on to claim the Emoluments clause is "phony." CNN put it on the screen.\u201d— jordan (@jordan) 1571678905
Since Trump took office in 2017, ethics watchdogs have decried his refusal to divest from his real estate empire, the Trump Organization, which his two eldest sons are now running. The president maintains access to the company's financial data.
Meanwhile, a number of state and foreign officials have stayed at Trump's properties since he's been in office, which critics say is a clear violation of the Emoluments Clause. The clause bars any president from accepting payments from any state or foreign government.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), whose lawsuit against the president over the Emoluments Clause was reopened last month by a federal appeals court, was among the critics of Trump's dismissal of constitutional law.
"The emoluments clauses, which the president just called 'phony,' are of course the original anti-corruption provisions the framers put into the Constitution centuries ago," CREW executive director Noah Bookbinder tweeted.
\u201cThe emoluments clauses, which the President just called "phony," are of course the original anti-corruption provisions the framers put into the constitution centuries ago to prevent exactly the kinds of corruption we are seeing on a daily basis under this president.\u201d— Noah Bookbinder (@Noah Bookbinder) 1571677790
Trump has also been sued by 200 congressional Democrats and the attorneys general of Maryland and Washington, D.C. over alleged emoluments violations. Both cases are slowly moving through federal appeals courts, but no action has been taken by Democrats yet to stop the president from profiting off his position.
"It would be cool if the courts and/or opposition party proved that the Emoluments Clause is not, in fact, phony," tweeted journalist Talia Lavin on Monday.
On Saturday, after Trump canceled his plan to hold the G7 at Doral, CREW pointed out that his bow to pressure did not cancel out his many other ethical breaches.
"The president's reversal shows that pressure works, that those fighting to hold the line for an ethical government can still sometimes dial down his corruption," said Bookbinder. "The president deserves no plaudits for doing the right thing only after public outcry forced him not to do the wrong thing. This was one corrupt conflict of interest. He's racked up well over 2,000 of them. So we'll keep fighting."
Two days after intense pressure forced President Donald Trump to back down from his plan to host the 2020 G7 summit at his resort in Doral, Florida, the president dismissed the Constitution's anti-corruption clause--which his plan would have violated--as "phony."
"You people, with this phony Emoluments Clause," Trump told reporters at a White House press conference on Monday, responding to allegations that hosting the meeting of foreign leaders at his own property would be a conflict of interest.
Trump claimed that President Barack Obama also violated the Emoluments Clause by signing a book deal and an agreement with Netflix while he was in office--two falsehoods that CNN promptly corrected--and compared himself to President George Washington, who Trump said was also a "businessman" while in office.
Watch:
\u201cTrump just claimed his G-7/Doral pick was OK because Obama got a Netflix & book deal. He claimed these were negotiated while in office.\n\nThere's no proof, and CNN fact-checked in real time.\n\nHe then went on to claim the Emoluments clause is "phony." CNN put it on the screen.\u201d— jordan (@jordan) 1571678905
Since Trump took office in 2017, ethics watchdogs have decried his refusal to divest from his real estate empire, the Trump Organization, which his two eldest sons are now running. The president maintains access to the company's financial data.
Meanwhile, a number of state and foreign officials have stayed at Trump's properties since he's been in office, which critics say is a clear violation of the Emoluments Clause. The clause bars any president from accepting payments from any state or foreign government.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), whose lawsuit against the president over the Emoluments Clause was reopened last month by a federal appeals court, was among the critics of Trump's dismissal of constitutional law.
"The emoluments clauses, which the president just called 'phony,' are of course the original anti-corruption provisions the framers put into the Constitution centuries ago," CREW executive director Noah Bookbinder tweeted.
\u201cThe emoluments clauses, which the President just called "phony," are of course the original anti-corruption provisions the framers put into the constitution centuries ago to prevent exactly the kinds of corruption we are seeing on a daily basis under this president.\u201d— Noah Bookbinder (@Noah Bookbinder) 1571677790
Trump has also been sued by 200 congressional Democrats and the attorneys general of Maryland and Washington, D.C. over alleged emoluments violations. Both cases are slowly moving through federal appeals courts, but no action has been taken by Democrats yet to stop the president from profiting off his position.
"It would be cool if the courts and/or opposition party proved that the Emoluments Clause is not, in fact, phony," tweeted journalist Talia Lavin on Monday.
On Saturday, after Trump canceled his plan to hold the G7 at Doral, CREW pointed out that his bow to pressure did not cancel out his many other ethical breaches.
"The president's reversal shows that pressure works, that those fighting to hold the line for an ethical government can still sometimes dial down his corruption," said Bookbinder. "The president deserves no plaudits for doing the right thing only after public outcry forced him not to do the wrong thing. This was one corrupt conflict of interest. He's racked up well over 2,000 of them. So we'll keep fighting."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.