SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

* indicates required
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Julian Assange's Life Is at Risk, Says United Nations Expert, Condemning Detention After Exposing War Crimes

Demonstrators protest outside Westminster Magistrates Court in London on October 21, 2019. (Photo: Isabel Infantes/AFP via Getty Images)

Julian Assange's Life Is at Risk, Says United Nations Expert, Condemning Detention After Exposing War Crimes

"He continues to be detained under oppressive conditions of isolation and surveillance, not justified by his detention status," special rapporteur Nils Melzer said of Assange.

The United Nations special rapporteur on torture reiterated Friday a warning that Julian Assange's life is at risk and said the WikiLeaks founder must not be extradited to the United States as a consequence of "exposing serious governmental misconduct."

"While the U.S. government prosecutes Mr. Assange for publishing information about serious human rights violations, including torture and murder, the officials responsible for these crimes continue to enjoy impunity," said special rapporteur Nils Melzer in a new statement.

Free press advocates see Assange as victim of an unprecedented assault on journalism because the WikiLeaks publisher faces 18 charges in the U.S. under the Espionage Act--making Assange the first publisher to face charges under that law. Currently in London's Belmarsh prison for skipping bail seven years ago when he first took refuge at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, Assange last month lost a bid to postpone his U.S. extradition hearing in February.

Melzer's new comments come five months after he visited Assange in prison and said Assange exhibited "all symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to psychological torture." But warnings about Assange's treatment, the U.N. expert said, went unheeded.

The U.K. government has shown "outright contempt for Mr. Assange's rights and integrity," said Melzer, and failed to take "any measures of investigation, prevention, and redress required under international law."

Assange has also not been given his right to prepare his defense, Melzer said, because his "access to legal counsel and documents has been severely obstructed."

"In a cursory response sent nearly five months after my visit, the U.K. government flatly rejected my findings, without indicating any willingness to consider my recommendations, let alone to implement them, or even provide the additional information requested," said Melzer.

"He continues to be detained under oppressive conditions of isolation and surveillance, not justified by his detention status," Melzer said of Assange.

The driving force behind the harsh treatment and potential life behind bars appears evident to Melzer.

"In my view, this case has never been about Mr. Assange's guilt or innocence, but about making him pay the price for exposing serious governmental misconduct, including alleged war crimes and corruption," Melzer said. "Unless the U.K. urgently changes course and alleviates his inhumane situation, Mr. Assange's continued exposure to arbitrariness and abuse may soon end up costing his life."

Assange's case, argue WikiLeaks and whistleblowing researchers Felicity Ruby and Naomi Colvin, deserves the world's attention.

"The indictments for which Assange is now imprisoned have nothing to do with Sweden, Russia, Trump, or his cat," Ruby and Colvin wrote at New Internationalist. "They are a straightforward attempt to prosecute a publisher for committing acts of journalism: specifically the releases of 2010-11 on Guantanamo Bay, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and Cablegate. These are the most significant series of public-interest disclosures of our times."

"For this journalism, he is held, alone for more than 20 hours a day in a cell on the health ward of Belmarsh, only just able to receive documents from his lawyers. Years of unsympathetic and hostile treatment from his peers have left him almost as alone in the public realm as he is now in Belmarsh," wrote Ruby and Colvin. "And yet it is on this man, resilient but much weakened after a decade of unrelenting pressure that the future of the freedom to report, and to read, rests."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.