SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Democratic presidential hopeful Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders speaks during the sixth Democratic primary debate of the 2020 presidential campaign season co-hosted by PBS NewsHour & Politico at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, California on December 19, 2019. (Photo: Frederic J. Brown / AFP)
After Telling Moderator Climate Question 'Misses the Mark,' Sanders Says Real Issue Is Will We 'Save the Planet for Our Children and Grandchildren'
"Instead of spending $1.8 trillion a year globally on weapons of destruction," said Sanders, "maybe we pool our resources and fight our common enemy which is climate change."
Dec 19, 2019
Sen. Bernie Sanders received widespread applause during Thursday night's Democratic Party presidential debate when he challenged what he considered a flimsy question on the issue of the climate crisis and then offered a far-reaching critique about a global system in which trillions are spent on war and destruction but similar investments are not made to address the emergency of global heating.
"The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough." --Sen. Bernie SandersAfter Tim Alberta, Politico's chief political correspondent and one of the debate moderators, asked candidates if they would support federal funding to relocate communities threatened by rising sea levels and flooding rivers, Sanders took issue with the premise of the question.
"With all due respect, Tim, your question misses the mark," Sanders said.
"It is not an issue of relocating people from towns," Sanders continued. "The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren. The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough."
Sanders continued by saying the nation must "declare a national emergency" and touted legislation he has proposed to do exactly that.
"The United States has got to lead the world, and maybe--just maybe--instead of spending $1.8 trillion a year, globally, on weapons of destruction," he continued, "maybe an American president (ie. Bernie Sanders) can lead the world. Instead of spending money to kill eachother, maybe we pool our resources and fight our common enemy which is climate change."
Watch:
\u201cRejoining the Paris Agreement ain't enough.\n\nThe issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren.\n\nWe need a Green New Deal. #DemDebate\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1576806256
Climate campaigners applauded the answer as the top moment of the debate up to that point.
\u201c.@BernieSanders redirects the #DemDebate questions on the climate crisis with some perspective:\n\n"The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren."\n\nBiggest applause so far of the night.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576805964
\u201chttps://t.co/Hc31esFaqd\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576808291
"Thank you BernieSanders," tweeted Friends of the Earth, "for continuing to call for the bold solutions that match the scale of crisis we are facing."
And so it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sen. Bernie Sanders received widespread applause during Thursday night's Democratic Party presidential debate when he challenged what he considered a flimsy question on the issue of the climate crisis and then offered a far-reaching critique about a global system in which trillions are spent on war and destruction but similar investments are not made to address the emergency of global heating.
"The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough." --Sen. Bernie SandersAfter Tim Alberta, Politico's chief political correspondent and one of the debate moderators, asked candidates if they would support federal funding to relocate communities threatened by rising sea levels and flooding rivers, Sanders took issue with the premise of the question.
"With all due respect, Tim, your question misses the mark," Sanders said.
"It is not an issue of relocating people from towns," Sanders continued. "The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren. The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough."
Sanders continued by saying the nation must "declare a national emergency" and touted legislation he has proposed to do exactly that.
"The United States has got to lead the world, and maybe--just maybe--instead of spending $1.8 trillion a year, globally, on weapons of destruction," he continued, "maybe an American president (ie. Bernie Sanders) can lead the world. Instead of spending money to kill eachother, maybe we pool our resources and fight our common enemy which is climate change."
Watch:
\u201cRejoining the Paris Agreement ain't enough.\n\nThe issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren.\n\nWe need a Green New Deal. #DemDebate\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1576806256
Climate campaigners applauded the answer as the top moment of the debate up to that point.
\u201c.@BernieSanders redirects the #DemDebate questions on the climate crisis with some perspective:\n\n"The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren."\n\nBiggest applause so far of the night.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576805964
\u201chttps://t.co/Hc31esFaqd\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576808291
"Thank you BernieSanders," tweeted Friends of the Earth, "for continuing to call for the bold solutions that match the scale of crisis we are facing."
Sen. Bernie Sanders received widespread applause during Thursday night's Democratic Party presidential debate when he challenged what he considered a flimsy question on the issue of the climate crisis and then offered a far-reaching critique about a global system in which trillions are spent on war and destruction but similar investments are not made to address the emergency of global heating.
"The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough." --Sen. Bernie SandersAfter Tim Alberta, Politico's chief political correspondent and one of the debate moderators, asked candidates if they would support federal funding to relocate communities threatened by rising sea levels and flooding rivers, Sanders took issue with the premise of the question.
"With all due respect, Tim, your question misses the mark," Sanders said.
"It is not an issue of relocating people from towns," Sanders continued. "The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren. The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough."
Sanders continued by saying the nation must "declare a national emergency" and touted legislation he has proposed to do exactly that.
"The United States has got to lead the world, and maybe--just maybe--instead of spending $1.8 trillion a year, globally, on weapons of destruction," he continued, "maybe an American president (ie. Bernie Sanders) can lead the world. Instead of spending money to kill eachother, maybe we pool our resources and fight our common enemy which is climate change."
Watch:
\u201cRejoining the Paris Agreement ain't enough.\n\nThe issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren.\n\nWe need a Green New Deal. #DemDebate\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1576806256
Climate campaigners applauded the answer as the top moment of the debate up to that point.
\u201c.@BernieSanders redirects the #DemDebate questions on the climate crisis with some perspective:\n\n"The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren."\n\nBiggest applause so far of the night.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576805964
\u201chttps://t.co/Hc31esFaqd\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576808291
"Thank you BernieSanders," tweeted Friends of the Earth, "for continuing to call for the bold solutions that match the scale of crisis we are facing."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.