SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
More than 200 Republicans and two conservative Democrats filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday, asking the court to consider overturning Roe v. Wade. (Photo: Jordan Uhl/Flickr/cc)
Two Right-Wing Democrats Join Republicans in Asking Supreme Court to Consider Overturning Roe v. Wade
"It's happening, people. This is what's at stake in 2020."
Jan 01, 2020
Reproductive rights advocates on Thursday seized on an amicus brief signed by more than 200 members of Congress, including two conservative Democrats, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider overturning Roe vs. Wade as the latest example of the assault on women's freedom.
The brief was signed by 168 members of the House and 39 senators. Two House Democrats joined their Republican colleagues, led by House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) in the effort--Reps. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) and Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.).
Lipinski drew the ire of progressive Democrat Marie Newman, who is challenging him in the 2020 primary.
"His position in Congress jeopardizes the health of women in IL-03 and across the country," Newman tweeted. "My opponent does not trust women and is not fit to represent us."
The brief was filed ahead of the court's hearing on June Medical Services v. Gee, concerning a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital--one of numerous "TRAP" (Targeted Restrictions on Abortion Providers) laws passed in states in recent years.
Discrepancies over what constitutes an "undue burden" on patients seeking abortion care illustrate "the unworkability of the 'right to abortion' found in Roe v. Wade ... and the need for the Court to again take up the issue of whether Roe and [Planned Parenthood v. Casey] should be reconsidered and, if appropriate, overruled," the brief reads.
Alexis McGill Johnson, acting president of Planned Parenthood, said the Louisiana law and the amicus brief are both attempts to frame abortion care as unsafe.
"Asking the Supreme Court to reconsider overturning Roe is an assault on our basic rights, plain and simple," tweeted Johnson. "Abortion is safe and legal, and we're doing everything we can to keep it that way."
\u201cAnti-abortion politicians are using every trick in the book to ban abortion. Asking the Supreme Court to reconsider overturning Roe is an assault on our basic rights, plain and simple. \n\nAbortion is safe and legal, and we're doing everything we can to keep it that way.\u201d— Alexis McGill Johnson (@Alexis McGill Johnson) 1578000066
Pro-choice advocates condemned the brief, which some saw as the latest sign that President Donald Trump's remaking of the judicial branch poses a serious threat to Americans' right to abortion care.
\u201cBOOM. 200 Republicans ask the Supreme Court to go after Roe v. Wade. It's happening, people. This is what's at stake in 2020. https://t.co/YTwCS7z1tG\u201d— Steve Silberman (@Steve Silberman) 1577998948
A number of Democrats challenging some of the brief's signatories in 2020 pointed to the document as evidence that anti-choice candidates must be defeated in the coming elections.
\u201cShame on @RepDavid for joining in this effort to overturn Roe v. Wade.\n\nAs an emergency physician, I've been there when women had to make this heartbreaking decision, and it should remain between her & her physician. I'll fight to ensure women have autonomy over their own bodies.\u201d— Hiral Tipirneni, M.D. (@Hiral Tipirneni, M.D.) 1577997298
\u201cI can't believe it is 2020 and I have to say this but: ROE v. WADE IS NOT UP FOR DISCUSSION. Stop trying to regulate women's bodies. I mean, seriously. Stop. #OhioMike2020\u201d— Mike Larsen (@Mike Larsen) 1577998609
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
democratic partyelection 2020planned parenthoodreproductive rightsrepublican partyroe v. wadeus supreme courtwomen
Reproductive rights advocates on Thursday seized on an amicus brief signed by more than 200 members of Congress, including two conservative Democrats, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider overturning Roe vs. Wade as the latest example of the assault on women's freedom.
The brief was signed by 168 members of the House and 39 senators. Two House Democrats joined their Republican colleagues, led by House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) in the effort--Reps. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) and Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.).
Lipinski drew the ire of progressive Democrat Marie Newman, who is challenging him in the 2020 primary.
"His position in Congress jeopardizes the health of women in IL-03 and across the country," Newman tweeted. "My opponent does not trust women and is not fit to represent us."
The brief was filed ahead of the court's hearing on June Medical Services v. Gee, concerning a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital--one of numerous "TRAP" (Targeted Restrictions on Abortion Providers) laws passed in states in recent years.
Discrepancies over what constitutes an "undue burden" on patients seeking abortion care illustrate "the unworkability of the 'right to abortion' found in Roe v. Wade ... and the need for the Court to again take up the issue of whether Roe and [Planned Parenthood v. Casey] should be reconsidered and, if appropriate, overruled," the brief reads.
Alexis McGill Johnson, acting president of Planned Parenthood, said the Louisiana law and the amicus brief are both attempts to frame abortion care as unsafe.
"Asking the Supreme Court to reconsider overturning Roe is an assault on our basic rights, plain and simple," tweeted Johnson. "Abortion is safe and legal, and we're doing everything we can to keep it that way."
\u201cAnti-abortion politicians are using every trick in the book to ban abortion. Asking the Supreme Court to reconsider overturning Roe is an assault on our basic rights, plain and simple. \n\nAbortion is safe and legal, and we're doing everything we can to keep it that way.\u201d— Alexis McGill Johnson (@Alexis McGill Johnson) 1578000066
Pro-choice advocates condemned the brief, which some saw as the latest sign that President Donald Trump's remaking of the judicial branch poses a serious threat to Americans' right to abortion care.
\u201cBOOM. 200 Republicans ask the Supreme Court to go after Roe v. Wade. It's happening, people. This is what's at stake in 2020. https://t.co/YTwCS7z1tG\u201d— Steve Silberman (@Steve Silberman) 1577998948
A number of Democrats challenging some of the brief's signatories in 2020 pointed to the document as evidence that anti-choice candidates must be defeated in the coming elections.
\u201cShame on @RepDavid for joining in this effort to overturn Roe v. Wade.\n\nAs an emergency physician, I've been there when women had to make this heartbreaking decision, and it should remain between her & her physician. I'll fight to ensure women have autonomy over their own bodies.\u201d— Hiral Tipirneni, M.D. (@Hiral Tipirneni, M.D.) 1577997298
\u201cI can't believe it is 2020 and I have to say this but: ROE v. WADE IS NOT UP FOR DISCUSSION. Stop trying to regulate women's bodies. I mean, seriously. Stop. #OhioMike2020\u201d— Mike Larsen (@Mike Larsen) 1577998609
Reproductive rights advocates on Thursday seized on an amicus brief signed by more than 200 members of Congress, including two conservative Democrats, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider overturning Roe vs. Wade as the latest example of the assault on women's freedom.
The brief was signed by 168 members of the House and 39 senators. Two House Democrats joined their Republican colleagues, led by House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) in the effort--Reps. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) and Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.).
Lipinski drew the ire of progressive Democrat Marie Newman, who is challenging him in the 2020 primary.
"His position in Congress jeopardizes the health of women in IL-03 and across the country," Newman tweeted. "My opponent does not trust women and is not fit to represent us."
The brief was filed ahead of the court's hearing on June Medical Services v. Gee, concerning a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital--one of numerous "TRAP" (Targeted Restrictions on Abortion Providers) laws passed in states in recent years.
Discrepancies over what constitutes an "undue burden" on patients seeking abortion care illustrate "the unworkability of the 'right to abortion' found in Roe v. Wade ... and the need for the Court to again take up the issue of whether Roe and [Planned Parenthood v. Casey] should be reconsidered and, if appropriate, overruled," the brief reads.
Alexis McGill Johnson, acting president of Planned Parenthood, said the Louisiana law and the amicus brief are both attempts to frame abortion care as unsafe.
"Asking the Supreme Court to reconsider overturning Roe is an assault on our basic rights, plain and simple," tweeted Johnson. "Abortion is safe and legal, and we're doing everything we can to keep it that way."
\u201cAnti-abortion politicians are using every trick in the book to ban abortion. Asking the Supreme Court to reconsider overturning Roe is an assault on our basic rights, plain and simple. \n\nAbortion is safe and legal, and we're doing everything we can to keep it that way.\u201d— Alexis McGill Johnson (@Alexis McGill Johnson) 1578000066
Pro-choice advocates condemned the brief, which some saw as the latest sign that President Donald Trump's remaking of the judicial branch poses a serious threat to Americans' right to abortion care.
\u201cBOOM. 200 Republicans ask the Supreme Court to go after Roe v. Wade. It's happening, people. This is what's at stake in 2020. https://t.co/YTwCS7z1tG\u201d— Steve Silberman (@Steve Silberman) 1577998948
A number of Democrats challenging some of the brief's signatories in 2020 pointed to the document as evidence that anti-choice candidates must be defeated in the coming elections.
\u201cShame on @RepDavid for joining in this effort to overturn Roe v. Wade.\n\nAs an emergency physician, I've been there when women had to make this heartbreaking decision, and it should remain between her & her physician. I'll fight to ensure women have autonomy over their own bodies.\u201d— Hiral Tipirneni, M.D. (@Hiral Tipirneni, M.D.) 1577997298
\u201cI can't believe it is 2020 and I have to say this but: ROE v. WADE IS NOT UP FOR DISCUSSION. Stop trying to regulate women's bodies. I mean, seriously. Stop. #OhioMike2020\u201d— Mike Larsen (@Mike Larsen) 1577998609
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.