SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Acting Defense Secretary Mark Esper, pictured here in October 2019, on Thursday indicated the U.S. is willing to launch pre-emptive strikes on Iranian-backed militias in Iraq. (Photo: Staff Sgt. Nicole Meija/Joint Base Andrews/cc)
'War Hawks Must be Celebrating': Trump's Defense Secretary Claims US Ready to Strike Iranian-Backed Militias in Iraq
"We're back to preemptive wars now! Dick Cheney might as well be president."
Jan 01, 2020
Acting U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper on Thursday announced that "the game has changed" for how President Donald Trump's administration deals with Iran, indicating a willingness to use pre-emptive strikes against militias tied to the Persian Gulf state--comments that provoked immediate pushback from progressives and anti-war advocates.
"We're back to preemptive wars now!" tweeted Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft vice president Trita Parsi. "Dick Cheney might as well be president."
"The war hawks must be celebrating," Parsi added.
\u201cHa! We're back to preemptive wars now! Dick Cheney might as well be president. \nAnd Politico has gone from calling them pro-Iranian group to Iranian group??\nThe war hawks must be celebrating\n\nDefense secretary warns of preemptive strikes on Iranian group https://t.co/BWk7l26nCV\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1577990818
According to Politico, Esper made the comments as a warning against the militant group Kataib Hezbollah, which he accused of attacking the 104-acre U.S. embassy in Iraq on Tuesday.
"There are some indications out there that they may be planning additional attacks," Esper told Politico. "If we get word of attacks, we will take preemptive action as well to protect American forces, protect American lives. The game has changed."
Journalist Walker Bragman posited a different theory on the motivation for the attack, one based on the past two decades of U.S. involvement in the region.
"Protesters stormed the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, demanding a withdraw of forces after 17 YEARS of occupation during which time, the U.S.-backed government has failed to provide for the basic needs of its people," said Bragman. "But yeah, Iran's totally to blame for it..."
Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley added that the group would be heading into a "buzz saw" if it attacked the embassy, but warned of other potential threats to U.S. military personnel in Iraq:
Kataib Hezbollah had been escalating the frequency and size of its rocket attacks against U.S. bases since at least October, Esper and Milley said, culminating in last week's strike. "We know that the intent of this last attack was in fact to kill" Americans, Milley said, unlike a string of smaller rocket attacks throughout the year. He did not say how he knew that or whether Iran directly ordered the lethal attack.
Progressives pushed back on social media.
"Military strikes in Iraq and more troops to the Middle East is dangerous foreign policy and the OPPOSITE of what is needed," tweeted CodePink's Ariel Gold. "U.S. military should LEAVE Iraq, and Trump administration must make peace with Iran."
On January 20th, it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Acting U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper on Thursday announced that "the game has changed" for how President Donald Trump's administration deals with Iran, indicating a willingness to use pre-emptive strikes against militias tied to the Persian Gulf state--comments that provoked immediate pushback from progressives and anti-war advocates.
"We're back to preemptive wars now!" tweeted Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft vice president Trita Parsi. "Dick Cheney might as well be president."
"The war hawks must be celebrating," Parsi added.
\u201cHa! We're back to preemptive wars now! Dick Cheney might as well be president. \nAnd Politico has gone from calling them pro-Iranian group to Iranian group??\nThe war hawks must be celebrating\n\nDefense secretary warns of preemptive strikes on Iranian group https://t.co/BWk7l26nCV\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1577990818
According to Politico, Esper made the comments as a warning against the militant group Kataib Hezbollah, which he accused of attacking the 104-acre U.S. embassy in Iraq on Tuesday.
"There are some indications out there that they may be planning additional attacks," Esper told Politico. "If we get word of attacks, we will take preemptive action as well to protect American forces, protect American lives. The game has changed."
Journalist Walker Bragman posited a different theory on the motivation for the attack, one based on the past two decades of U.S. involvement in the region.
"Protesters stormed the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, demanding a withdraw of forces after 17 YEARS of occupation during which time, the U.S.-backed government has failed to provide for the basic needs of its people," said Bragman. "But yeah, Iran's totally to blame for it..."
Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley added that the group would be heading into a "buzz saw" if it attacked the embassy, but warned of other potential threats to U.S. military personnel in Iraq:
Kataib Hezbollah had been escalating the frequency and size of its rocket attacks against U.S. bases since at least October, Esper and Milley said, culminating in last week's strike. "We know that the intent of this last attack was in fact to kill" Americans, Milley said, unlike a string of smaller rocket attacks throughout the year. He did not say how he knew that or whether Iran directly ordered the lethal attack.
Progressives pushed back on social media.
"Military strikes in Iraq and more troops to the Middle East is dangerous foreign policy and the OPPOSITE of what is needed," tweeted CodePink's Ariel Gold. "U.S. military should LEAVE Iraq, and Trump administration must make peace with Iran."
Acting U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper on Thursday announced that "the game has changed" for how President Donald Trump's administration deals with Iran, indicating a willingness to use pre-emptive strikes against militias tied to the Persian Gulf state--comments that provoked immediate pushback from progressives and anti-war advocates.
"We're back to preemptive wars now!" tweeted Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft vice president Trita Parsi. "Dick Cheney might as well be president."
"The war hawks must be celebrating," Parsi added.
\u201cHa! We're back to preemptive wars now! Dick Cheney might as well be president. \nAnd Politico has gone from calling them pro-Iranian group to Iranian group??\nThe war hawks must be celebrating\n\nDefense secretary warns of preemptive strikes on Iranian group https://t.co/BWk7l26nCV\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1577990818
According to Politico, Esper made the comments as a warning against the militant group Kataib Hezbollah, which he accused of attacking the 104-acre U.S. embassy in Iraq on Tuesday.
"There are some indications out there that they may be planning additional attacks," Esper told Politico. "If we get word of attacks, we will take preemptive action as well to protect American forces, protect American lives. The game has changed."
Journalist Walker Bragman posited a different theory on the motivation for the attack, one based on the past two decades of U.S. involvement in the region.
"Protesters stormed the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, demanding a withdraw of forces after 17 YEARS of occupation during which time, the U.S.-backed government has failed to provide for the basic needs of its people," said Bragman. "But yeah, Iran's totally to blame for it..."
Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley added that the group would be heading into a "buzz saw" if it attacked the embassy, but warned of other potential threats to U.S. military personnel in Iraq:
Kataib Hezbollah had been escalating the frequency and size of its rocket attacks against U.S. bases since at least October, Esper and Milley said, culminating in last week's strike. "We know that the intent of this last attack was in fact to kill" Americans, Milley said, unlike a string of smaller rocket attacks throughout the year. He did not say how he knew that or whether Iran directly ordered the lethal attack.
Progressives pushed back on social media.
"Military strikes in Iraq and more troops to the Middle East is dangerous foreign policy and the OPPOSITE of what is needed," tweeted CodePink's Ariel Gold. "U.S. military should LEAVE Iraq, and Trump administration must make peace with Iran."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.