SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison speaks during a press conference at Parliament House on January 05, 2020 in Canberra, Australia. (Photo by Rohan Thomson/Getty Images)
Climate advocates are calling on fossil fuel companies to pay for the damage caused by Australia's unprecedented bushfires rather than that country's taxpayers forking over an additional $2 billion for those affected by the crisis.
"Regular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free," the Australia Institute's deputy director Ebony Bennett said in a statement.
"It's disappointing that the Australian community will be left to pick up the tab for a climate-fueled disaster," she added.
\u201cMorrison Government\u2019s Fire Response Should be Funded by Levy on Fossil Fuel Producers\n\n\u201cRegular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free,\u201d says @ebony_bennett, Deputy Director of The Australia Institute.\n#bushfirecrisis\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578289285
Bennett, whose group is pushing for the Australian government to impose a "modest levy" on fossil fuel producing companies to cover the cost of bushfire recovery and first introduced the proposal in December, added that taxing those responsible for the climate crisis to provide the funds for disaster mitigation would "shift the economic burden of these disasters from regular Australians to the coal and gas companies that are fueling the climate crisis."
Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced Monday that the government would obtain the additional $2 billion from the country's projected $5 billion surplus for the year.
"The surplus is of no focus for me," said Morrison, whose response to the fires has been seen as, at best, insufficient by critics.
\u201cThe PM began by saying "Whatever it takes, whatever it costs, we will ensure the resilience and future of this country"\n\n'Whatever it takes' needs to include serious and ambitious action to reduce Australia's and global emissions.\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578281129
Monday's news of more aid from the government came as energy giant Chevron announced it would provide $1 million to the Australian Red Cross to aid in the group's recovery efforts.
A donation--a fraction of the company's annual revenue--is not what's needed from Chevron, tweeted TIME editor-at-large Anand Giridharadas.
"We need you to stop making a killing at the planet's expense," said Giridharadas.
In her comments, the Australia Institute's Bennett said that putting fossil fuel companies on the hook for the damage from the fires was the best way to ensure those behind the climate crisis pay for the damage.
"The government has now acknowledged the link between global warming and these disasters, so placing a modest climate disaster levy on the companies that are responsible is an important next step," said Bennett.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Climate advocates are calling on fossil fuel companies to pay for the damage caused by Australia's unprecedented bushfires rather than that country's taxpayers forking over an additional $2 billion for those affected by the crisis.
"Regular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free," the Australia Institute's deputy director Ebony Bennett said in a statement.
"It's disappointing that the Australian community will be left to pick up the tab for a climate-fueled disaster," she added.
\u201cMorrison Government\u2019s Fire Response Should be Funded by Levy on Fossil Fuel Producers\n\n\u201cRegular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free,\u201d says @ebony_bennett, Deputy Director of The Australia Institute.\n#bushfirecrisis\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578289285
Bennett, whose group is pushing for the Australian government to impose a "modest levy" on fossil fuel producing companies to cover the cost of bushfire recovery and first introduced the proposal in December, added that taxing those responsible for the climate crisis to provide the funds for disaster mitigation would "shift the economic burden of these disasters from regular Australians to the coal and gas companies that are fueling the climate crisis."
Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced Monday that the government would obtain the additional $2 billion from the country's projected $5 billion surplus for the year.
"The surplus is of no focus for me," said Morrison, whose response to the fires has been seen as, at best, insufficient by critics.
\u201cThe PM began by saying "Whatever it takes, whatever it costs, we will ensure the resilience and future of this country"\n\n'Whatever it takes' needs to include serious and ambitious action to reduce Australia's and global emissions.\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578281129
Monday's news of more aid from the government came as energy giant Chevron announced it would provide $1 million to the Australian Red Cross to aid in the group's recovery efforts.
A donation--a fraction of the company's annual revenue--is not what's needed from Chevron, tweeted TIME editor-at-large Anand Giridharadas.
"We need you to stop making a killing at the planet's expense," said Giridharadas.
In her comments, the Australia Institute's Bennett said that putting fossil fuel companies on the hook for the damage from the fires was the best way to ensure those behind the climate crisis pay for the damage.
"The government has now acknowledged the link between global warming and these disasters, so placing a modest climate disaster levy on the companies that are responsible is an important next step," said Bennett.
Climate advocates are calling on fossil fuel companies to pay for the damage caused by Australia's unprecedented bushfires rather than that country's taxpayers forking over an additional $2 billion for those affected by the crisis.
"Regular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free," the Australia Institute's deputy director Ebony Bennett said in a statement.
"It's disappointing that the Australian community will be left to pick up the tab for a climate-fueled disaster," she added.
\u201cMorrison Government\u2019s Fire Response Should be Funded by Levy on Fossil Fuel Producers\n\n\u201cRegular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free,\u201d says @ebony_bennett, Deputy Director of The Australia Institute.\n#bushfirecrisis\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578289285
Bennett, whose group is pushing for the Australian government to impose a "modest levy" on fossil fuel producing companies to cover the cost of bushfire recovery and first introduced the proposal in December, added that taxing those responsible for the climate crisis to provide the funds for disaster mitigation would "shift the economic burden of these disasters from regular Australians to the coal and gas companies that are fueling the climate crisis."
Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced Monday that the government would obtain the additional $2 billion from the country's projected $5 billion surplus for the year.
"The surplus is of no focus for me," said Morrison, whose response to the fires has been seen as, at best, insufficient by critics.
\u201cThe PM began by saying "Whatever it takes, whatever it costs, we will ensure the resilience and future of this country"\n\n'Whatever it takes' needs to include serious and ambitious action to reduce Australia's and global emissions.\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578281129
Monday's news of more aid from the government came as energy giant Chevron announced it would provide $1 million to the Australian Red Cross to aid in the group's recovery efforts.
A donation--a fraction of the company's annual revenue--is not what's needed from Chevron, tweeted TIME editor-at-large Anand Giridharadas.
"We need you to stop making a killing at the planet's expense," said Giridharadas.
In her comments, the Australia Institute's Bennett said that putting fossil fuel companies on the hook for the damage from the fires was the best way to ensure those behind the climate crisis pay for the damage.
"The government has now acknowledged the link between global warming and these disasters, so placing a modest climate disaster levy on the companies that are responsible is an important next step," said Bennett.