SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison speaks during a press conference at Parliament House on January 05, 2020 in Canberra, Australia. (Photo by Rohan Thomson/Getty Images)
"Stop Making a Killing at the Planet's Expense": Climate Advocates Call for Fossil Fuel Companies to Foot Australia Fires Bill
"'Whatever it takes' needs to include serious and ambitious action to reduce Australia's and global emissions."
Jan 05, 2020
Climate advocates are calling on fossil fuel companies to pay for the damage caused by Australia's unprecedented bushfires rather than that country's taxpayers forking over an additional $2 billion for those affected by the crisis.
"Regular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free," the Australia Institute's deputy director Ebony Bennett said in a statement.
"It's disappointing that the Australian community will be left to pick up the tab for a climate-fueled disaster," she added.
\u201cMorrison Government\u2019s Fire Response Should be Funded by Levy on Fossil Fuel Producers\n\n\u201cRegular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free,\u201d says @ebony_bennett, Deputy Director of The Australia Institute.\n#bushfirecrisis\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578289285
Bennett, whose group is pushing for the Australian government to impose a "modest levy" on fossil fuel producing companies to cover the cost of bushfire recovery and first introduced the proposal in December, added that taxing those responsible for the climate crisis to provide the funds for disaster mitigation would "shift the economic burden of these disasters from regular Australians to the coal and gas companies that are fueling the climate crisis."
Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced Monday that the government would obtain the additional $2 billion from the country's projected $5 billion surplus for the year.
"The surplus is of no focus for me," said Morrison, whose response to the fires has been seen as, at best, insufficient by critics.
\u201cThe PM began by saying "Whatever it takes, whatever it costs, we will ensure the resilience and future of this country"\n\n'Whatever it takes' needs to include serious and ambitious action to reduce Australia's and global emissions.\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578281129
Monday's news of more aid from the government came as energy giant Chevron announced it would provide $1 million to the Australian Red Cross to aid in the group's recovery efforts.
A donation--a fraction of the company's annual revenue--is not what's needed from Chevron, tweeted TIME editor-at-large Anand Giridharadas.
"We need you to stop making a killing at the planet's expense," said Giridharadas.
In her comments, the Australia Institute's Bennett said that putting fossil fuel companies on the hook for the damage from the fires was the best way to ensure those behind the climate crisis pay for the damage.
"The government has now acknowledged the link between global warming and these disasters, so placing a modest climate disaster levy on the companies that are responsible is an important next step," said Bennett.
On January 20th, it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Climate advocates are calling on fossil fuel companies to pay for the damage caused by Australia's unprecedented bushfires rather than that country's taxpayers forking over an additional $2 billion for those affected by the crisis.
"Regular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free," the Australia Institute's deputy director Ebony Bennett said in a statement.
"It's disappointing that the Australian community will be left to pick up the tab for a climate-fueled disaster," she added.
\u201cMorrison Government\u2019s Fire Response Should be Funded by Levy on Fossil Fuel Producers\n\n\u201cRegular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free,\u201d says @ebony_bennett, Deputy Director of The Australia Institute.\n#bushfirecrisis\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578289285
Bennett, whose group is pushing for the Australian government to impose a "modest levy" on fossil fuel producing companies to cover the cost of bushfire recovery and first introduced the proposal in December, added that taxing those responsible for the climate crisis to provide the funds for disaster mitigation would "shift the economic burden of these disasters from regular Australians to the coal and gas companies that are fueling the climate crisis."
Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced Monday that the government would obtain the additional $2 billion from the country's projected $5 billion surplus for the year.
"The surplus is of no focus for me," said Morrison, whose response to the fires has been seen as, at best, insufficient by critics.
\u201cThe PM began by saying "Whatever it takes, whatever it costs, we will ensure the resilience and future of this country"\n\n'Whatever it takes' needs to include serious and ambitious action to reduce Australia's and global emissions.\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578281129
Monday's news of more aid from the government came as energy giant Chevron announced it would provide $1 million to the Australian Red Cross to aid in the group's recovery efforts.
A donation--a fraction of the company's annual revenue--is not what's needed from Chevron, tweeted TIME editor-at-large Anand Giridharadas.
"We need you to stop making a killing at the planet's expense," said Giridharadas.
In her comments, the Australia Institute's Bennett said that putting fossil fuel companies on the hook for the damage from the fires was the best way to ensure those behind the climate crisis pay for the damage.
"The government has now acknowledged the link between global warming and these disasters, so placing a modest climate disaster levy on the companies that are responsible is an important next step," said Bennett.
Climate advocates are calling on fossil fuel companies to pay for the damage caused by Australia's unprecedented bushfires rather than that country's taxpayers forking over an additional $2 billion for those affected by the crisis.
"Regular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free," the Australia Institute's deputy director Ebony Bennett said in a statement.
"It's disappointing that the Australian community will be left to pick up the tab for a climate-fueled disaster," she added.
\u201cMorrison Government\u2019s Fire Response Should be Funded by Levy on Fossil Fuel Producers\n\n\u201cRegular Australians should not be forced to pay while fossil fuel producers are being let off scot-free,\u201d says @ebony_bennett, Deputy Director of The Australia Institute.\n#bushfirecrisis\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578289285
Bennett, whose group is pushing for the Australian government to impose a "modest levy" on fossil fuel producing companies to cover the cost of bushfire recovery and first introduced the proposal in December, added that taxing those responsible for the climate crisis to provide the funds for disaster mitigation would "shift the economic burden of these disasters from regular Australians to the coal and gas companies that are fueling the climate crisis."
Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced Monday that the government would obtain the additional $2 billion from the country's projected $5 billion surplus for the year.
"The surplus is of no focus for me," said Morrison, whose response to the fires has been seen as, at best, insufficient by critics.
\u201cThe PM began by saying "Whatever it takes, whatever it costs, we will ensure the resilience and future of this country"\n\n'Whatever it takes' needs to include serious and ambitious action to reduce Australia's and global emissions.\u201d— Australia Institute (@Australia Institute) 1578281129
Monday's news of more aid from the government came as energy giant Chevron announced it would provide $1 million to the Australian Red Cross to aid in the group's recovery efforts.
A donation--a fraction of the company's annual revenue--is not what's needed from Chevron, tweeted TIME editor-at-large Anand Giridharadas.
"We need you to stop making a killing at the planet's expense," said Giridharadas.
In her comments, the Australia Institute's Bennett said that putting fossil fuel companies on the hook for the damage from the fires was the best way to ensure those behind the climate crisis pay for the damage.
"The government has now acknowledged the link between global warming and these disasters, so placing a modest climate disaster levy on the companies that are responsible is an important next step," said Bennett.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.