SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Joe Biden speaking at a campaign event for Hillary Clinton at a September 27, 2016 rally at Drexel University, in Philadelphia. (Photo: Bastiaan Slabbers/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Biden, Warren Raise Objections After Iowa Democrats Say Only Half of Caucus Results Will Be Released First
"I think that's a bit disingenuous," said Sanders campaign advisor Jeff Weaver.
Feb 03, 2020
The Iowa Democratic Party said Tuesday that approximately half of the results from the state's caucuses should be available by 5:00pm ET--an announcement made during an afternoon conference call that reportedly resulted in "objections" from representatives of the Joe Biden campaign.
"We want to get some results out there," said Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) chair Troy Price in the call.
As New York Times reporter Shane Goldmacher pointed out on Twitter, there were "objections."
\u201cIowa party officials are holding a call with the campaigns.\n\nTroy Price tells them he'll put out about *50%* of results at 4 p.m. today.\n\nThere are objections.\n\nHe won't say when the rest are coming.\u201d— Shane Goldmacher (@Shane Goldmacher) 1580837176
The objections, according to the Associated Press, came primarily from Dana Remus, a lawyer for the Biden campaign.
"You need to have enough transparency that other people feel comfortable about it now and we're just not there right now," said Remus.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), on the campaign trail in New Hampshire, told reporters that she found the IDP releasing only half of the results to be an insufficient response to calls for transparency.
"I just don't understand what that means, at least half of the data," said Warren. "I think they ought to get it together and release all the data."
Jeff Weaver, an advisor to the Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) presidential campaign, urged other campaigns on Tuesday's call to support the IDP's decision and expressed skepticism at the motivations of the campaigns objecting to the release of the results.
"Folks who are just trying to delay the return of this because of their relative positioning in the results last night, I think that's a bit disingenuous," said Weaver.
The Sanders campaign, using its own independent count of results, has already released counts from 60% of the caucuses.
...and here's Jeff Weaver, absent any word form IDP, releasing more internal numbers. Bernie won, guys.
With 60% reporting:
29.4% - Bernie Sanders
24.87% - Pete Buttigieg
20.65% - Elizabeth Warren
12.92% - Joe Biden
11.18% - Amy KlobucharTold you so.pic.twitter.com/t5zwNcBAcT
-- Samuel D. Finkelstein II (@CANCEL_SAM) February 4, 2020
Biden, who appeared headed to a disastrous showing in Iowa despite being the national frontrunner, has seized on the confusion around the results to deflect from what is expected to be a fourth place finish. On Tuesday the former vice president told reporters he was "feeling good" about the race.
The candidates now head to New Hampshire, where they will barnstorm the New England state in advance of voting on Feb. 11.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Iowa Democratic Party said Tuesday that approximately half of the results from the state's caucuses should be available by 5:00pm ET--an announcement made during an afternoon conference call that reportedly resulted in "objections" from representatives of the Joe Biden campaign.
"We want to get some results out there," said Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) chair Troy Price in the call.
As New York Times reporter Shane Goldmacher pointed out on Twitter, there were "objections."
\u201cIowa party officials are holding a call with the campaigns.\n\nTroy Price tells them he'll put out about *50%* of results at 4 p.m. today.\n\nThere are objections.\n\nHe won't say when the rest are coming.\u201d— Shane Goldmacher (@Shane Goldmacher) 1580837176
The objections, according to the Associated Press, came primarily from Dana Remus, a lawyer for the Biden campaign.
"You need to have enough transparency that other people feel comfortable about it now and we're just not there right now," said Remus.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), on the campaign trail in New Hampshire, told reporters that she found the IDP releasing only half of the results to be an insufficient response to calls for transparency.
"I just don't understand what that means, at least half of the data," said Warren. "I think they ought to get it together and release all the data."
Jeff Weaver, an advisor to the Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) presidential campaign, urged other campaigns on Tuesday's call to support the IDP's decision and expressed skepticism at the motivations of the campaigns objecting to the release of the results.
"Folks who are just trying to delay the return of this because of their relative positioning in the results last night, I think that's a bit disingenuous," said Weaver.
The Sanders campaign, using its own independent count of results, has already released counts from 60% of the caucuses.
...and here's Jeff Weaver, absent any word form IDP, releasing more internal numbers. Bernie won, guys.
With 60% reporting:
29.4% - Bernie Sanders
24.87% - Pete Buttigieg
20.65% - Elizabeth Warren
12.92% - Joe Biden
11.18% - Amy KlobucharTold you so.pic.twitter.com/t5zwNcBAcT
-- Samuel D. Finkelstein II (@CANCEL_SAM) February 4, 2020
Biden, who appeared headed to a disastrous showing in Iowa despite being the national frontrunner, has seized on the confusion around the results to deflect from what is expected to be a fourth place finish. On Tuesday the former vice president told reporters he was "feeling good" about the race.
The candidates now head to New Hampshire, where they will barnstorm the New England state in advance of voting on Feb. 11.
The Iowa Democratic Party said Tuesday that approximately half of the results from the state's caucuses should be available by 5:00pm ET--an announcement made during an afternoon conference call that reportedly resulted in "objections" from representatives of the Joe Biden campaign.
"We want to get some results out there," said Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) chair Troy Price in the call.
As New York Times reporter Shane Goldmacher pointed out on Twitter, there were "objections."
\u201cIowa party officials are holding a call with the campaigns.\n\nTroy Price tells them he'll put out about *50%* of results at 4 p.m. today.\n\nThere are objections.\n\nHe won't say when the rest are coming.\u201d— Shane Goldmacher (@Shane Goldmacher) 1580837176
The objections, according to the Associated Press, came primarily from Dana Remus, a lawyer for the Biden campaign.
"You need to have enough transparency that other people feel comfortable about it now and we're just not there right now," said Remus.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), on the campaign trail in New Hampshire, told reporters that she found the IDP releasing only half of the results to be an insufficient response to calls for transparency.
"I just don't understand what that means, at least half of the data," said Warren. "I think they ought to get it together and release all the data."
Jeff Weaver, an advisor to the Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) presidential campaign, urged other campaigns on Tuesday's call to support the IDP's decision and expressed skepticism at the motivations of the campaigns objecting to the release of the results.
"Folks who are just trying to delay the return of this because of their relative positioning in the results last night, I think that's a bit disingenuous," said Weaver.
The Sanders campaign, using its own independent count of results, has already released counts from 60% of the caucuses.
...and here's Jeff Weaver, absent any word form IDP, releasing more internal numbers. Bernie won, guys.
With 60% reporting:
29.4% - Bernie Sanders
24.87% - Pete Buttigieg
20.65% - Elizabeth Warren
12.92% - Joe Biden
11.18% - Amy KlobucharTold you so.pic.twitter.com/t5zwNcBAcT
-- Samuel D. Finkelstein II (@CANCEL_SAM) February 4, 2020
Biden, who appeared headed to a disastrous showing in Iowa despite being the national frontrunner, has seized on the confusion around the results to deflect from what is expected to be a fourth place finish. On Tuesday the former vice president told reporters he was "feeling good" about the race.
The candidates now head to New Hampshire, where they will barnstorm the New England state in advance of voting on Feb. 11.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.