SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
President Donald Trump listens to Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service, in the Roosevelt Room at the White House on March 22, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
'Blatant Lie': Seema Verma Claims Trump Not Cutting Medicaid as He Pushes Plan Doing Just That
"Make no mistake: the Trump administration has spent the past two years actively dismantling Medicaid by fiat—after failing to gut it legislatively."
Feb 06, 2020
Healthcare advocates are calling out Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Seema Verma for claiming Thursday that the Trump administration "is not cutting Medicaid" even as it moves forward with a block grant plan that critics warn would slash benefits for millions of vulnerable people across the nation.
"This is a blatant lie," Rebecca Vallas, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, tweeted in response to Verma's Washington Post op-ed accusing healthcare activists--including an emergency room doctor who confronted Vice President Mike Pence over the block grant plan last week--of "fearmongering" about Medicaid cuts.
"No," states the headline of Verma's op-ed, "the Trump administration is not cutting Medicaid."
\u201cYes, you are.\u201d— The Leadership Conference (@The Leadership Conference) 1581020212
First of all, Vallas tweeted at Verma, "You authorized and are encouraging states to cut off Medicaid for millions who can't meet rigid work reporting requirements." And second, she added, "you're pushing Medicaid block grants, which could strip 14-21 million people of health insurance if enacted nationwide."
\u201cMake no mistake: the Trump administration has spent the past two years actively dismantling Medicaid by fiat\u2014after failing to gut it legislatively as part of ACA repeal.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1581029870
\u201cAnd the fact that they have @SeemaCMS writing BS op-eds like this\u2014and are trying to rebrand Medicaid cuts with Orwellian phraseology like \u201cHealthy Adult Opportunity\u201d\u2014only shows that they know exactly how unpopular their cruel cuts are, especially in an election year.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1581029870
As Common Dreams reported last week, the Trump administration unveiled a proposal allowing states to convert federal Medicaid funding into fixed sums, a longstanding conservative goal that critics warn could constrain states' ability to hike spending on the program in response to an increase in public need.
Edwin Park, research professor at the Georgetown Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University's McCourt School, wrote on Twitter that Verma's op-ed includes "many misleading claims" and warned the administration's proposed Medicaid block grants would not keep up with inflation--effectively resulting in cuts in the future.
\u201cAmong many misleading claims op-ed says guidance wouldn't cut #Medicaid $ because it uses "reasonable" growth rate for block grant/cap. But rate = medical CPI/medical CPI + 0.5%. That's well below expected per-beneficiary cost growth, not even counting expected enrollment growth.\u201d— Edwin Park (@Edwin Park) 1581019835
The House of Representatives, with zero Republican votes, passed a non-binding resolution on Thursday officially condemning the Trump administration's Medicaid block grant plan as an "illegal" and "cruel attack on a program that provides for the health and well-being for some of our most vulnerable citizens."
"The Trump administration should uphold its responsibility to faithfully execute the law, including the Medicaid Act, and cease any and all efforts that threaten the care of the millions of Americans who rely on Medicaid," the resolution stated.
David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, said earlier this week that Democrats should force a vote on the resolution in the Senate to make sure all Republicans in Congress are on the record regarding Trump's attacks on the program:
\u201cI'm up @theprospect on how Democrats can force a vote on Trump's Medicaid block grant, so every vulnerable Republican in the Senate will have to take a position: for Trump's plan, or for saving millions from Medicaid cuts. https://t.co/zDR7onMCB6\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1580759708
Block-granting Medicaid has been Republican goal since at least the administration of former President Ronald Reagan. Bruce Bartlett, an architect of Reagan's right-wing economic agenda who has since broken with the GOP, tweeted last month that "block grants are just a Republican trick to slash spending without appearing to do so."
Rob Davidson, executive director of the Committee to Protect Medicare and the physician who confronted Pence at a restaurant in Iowa last month, applauded House Democrats for denouncing the Trump administration's block grant proposal and echoed their demand that the White House "reverse this dangerous action."
"President Trump's latest healthcare cuts will endanger the health, security, and lives of millions of American families," Davidson said in a statement. "Instead of cutting healthcare as President Trump continues to do, we should expand it, protect patients with preexisting conditions, and reduce the astronomical costs of prescription drugs."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Healthcare advocates are calling out Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Seema Verma for claiming Thursday that the Trump administration "is not cutting Medicaid" even as it moves forward with a block grant plan that critics warn would slash benefits for millions of vulnerable people across the nation.
"This is a blatant lie," Rebecca Vallas, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, tweeted in response to Verma's Washington Post op-ed accusing healthcare activists--including an emergency room doctor who confronted Vice President Mike Pence over the block grant plan last week--of "fearmongering" about Medicaid cuts.
"No," states the headline of Verma's op-ed, "the Trump administration is not cutting Medicaid."
\u201cYes, you are.\u201d— The Leadership Conference (@The Leadership Conference) 1581020212
First of all, Vallas tweeted at Verma, "You authorized and are encouraging states to cut off Medicaid for millions who can't meet rigid work reporting requirements." And second, she added, "you're pushing Medicaid block grants, which could strip 14-21 million people of health insurance if enacted nationwide."
\u201cMake no mistake: the Trump administration has spent the past two years actively dismantling Medicaid by fiat\u2014after failing to gut it legislatively as part of ACA repeal.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1581029870
\u201cAnd the fact that they have @SeemaCMS writing BS op-eds like this\u2014and are trying to rebrand Medicaid cuts with Orwellian phraseology like \u201cHealthy Adult Opportunity\u201d\u2014only shows that they know exactly how unpopular their cruel cuts are, especially in an election year.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1581029870
As Common Dreams reported last week, the Trump administration unveiled a proposal allowing states to convert federal Medicaid funding into fixed sums, a longstanding conservative goal that critics warn could constrain states' ability to hike spending on the program in response to an increase in public need.
Edwin Park, research professor at the Georgetown Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University's McCourt School, wrote on Twitter that Verma's op-ed includes "many misleading claims" and warned the administration's proposed Medicaid block grants would not keep up with inflation--effectively resulting in cuts in the future.
\u201cAmong many misleading claims op-ed says guidance wouldn't cut #Medicaid $ because it uses "reasonable" growth rate for block grant/cap. But rate = medical CPI/medical CPI + 0.5%. That's well below expected per-beneficiary cost growth, not even counting expected enrollment growth.\u201d— Edwin Park (@Edwin Park) 1581019835
The House of Representatives, with zero Republican votes, passed a non-binding resolution on Thursday officially condemning the Trump administration's Medicaid block grant plan as an "illegal" and "cruel attack on a program that provides for the health and well-being for some of our most vulnerable citizens."
"The Trump administration should uphold its responsibility to faithfully execute the law, including the Medicaid Act, and cease any and all efforts that threaten the care of the millions of Americans who rely on Medicaid," the resolution stated.
David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, said earlier this week that Democrats should force a vote on the resolution in the Senate to make sure all Republicans in Congress are on the record regarding Trump's attacks on the program:
\u201cI'm up @theprospect on how Democrats can force a vote on Trump's Medicaid block grant, so every vulnerable Republican in the Senate will have to take a position: for Trump's plan, or for saving millions from Medicaid cuts. https://t.co/zDR7onMCB6\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1580759708
Block-granting Medicaid has been Republican goal since at least the administration of former President Ronald Reagan. Bruce Bartlett, an architect of Reagan's right-wing economic agenda who has since broken with the GOP, tweeted last month that "block grants are just a Republican trick to slash spending without appearing to do so."
Rob Davidson, executive director of the Committee to Protect Medicare and the physician who confronted Pence at a restaurant in Iowa last month, applauded House Democrats for denouncing the Trump administration's block grant proposal and echoed their demand that the White House "reverse this dangerous action."
"President Trump's latest healthcare cuts will endanger the health, security, and lives of millions of American families," Davidson said in a statement. "Instead of cutting healthcare as President Trump continues to do, we should expand it, protect patients with preexisting conditions, and reduce the astronomical costs of prescription drugs."
Healthcare advocates are calling out Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Seema Verma for claiming Thursday that the Trump administration "is not cutting Medicaid" even as it moves forward with a block grant plan that critics warn would slash benefits for millions of vulnerable people across the nation.
"This is a blatant lie," Rebecca Vallas, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, tweeted in response to Verma's Washington Post op-ed accusing healthcare activists--including an emergency room doctor who confronted Vice President Mike Pence over the block grant plan last week--of "fearmongering" about Medicaid cuts.
"No," states the headline of Verma's op-ed, "the Trump administration is not cutting Medicaid."
\u201cYes, you are.\u201d— The Leadership Conference (@The Leadership Conference) 1581020212
First of all, Vallas tweeted at Verma, "You authorized and are encouraging states to cut off Medicaid for millions who can't meet rigid work reporting requirements." And second, she added, "you're pushing Medicaid block grants, which could strip 14-21 million people of health insurance if enacted nationwide."
\u201cMake no mistake: the Trump administration has spent the past two years actively dismantling Medicaid by fiat\u2014after failing to gut it legislatively as part of ACA repeal.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1581029870
\u201cAnd the fact that they have @SeemaCMS writing BS op-eds like this\u2014and are trying to rebrand Medicaid cuts with Orwellian phraseology like \u201cHealthy Adult Opportunity\u201d\u2014only shows that they know exactly how unpopular their cruel cuts are, especially in an election year.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1581029870
As Common Dreams reported last week, the Trump administration unveiled a proposal allowing states to convert federal Medicaid funding into fixed sums, a longstanding conservative goal that critics warn could constrain states' ability to hike spending on the program in response to an increase in public need.
Edwin Park, research professor at the Georgetown Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University's McCourt School, wrote on Twitter that Verma's op-ed includes "many misleading claims" and warned the administration's proposed Medicaid block grants would not keep up with inflation--effectively resulting in cuts in the future.
\u201cAmong many misleading claims op-ed says guidance wouldn't cut #Medicaid $ because it uses "reasonable" growth rate for block grant/cap. But rate = medical CPI/medical CPI + 0.5%. That's well below expected per-beneficiary cost growth, not even counting expected enrollment growth.\u201d— Edwin Park (@Edwin Park) 1581019835
The House of Representatives, with zero Republican votes, passed a non-binding resolution on Thursday officially condemning the Trump administration's Medicaid block grant plan as an "illegal" and "cruel attack on a program that provides for the health and well-being for some of our most vulnerable citizens."
"The Trump administration should uphold its responsibility to faithfully execute the law, including the Medicaid Act, and cease any and all efforts that threaten the care of the millions of Americans who rely on Medicaid," the resolution stated.
David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, said earlier this week that Democrats should force a vote on the resolution in the Senate to make sure all Republicans in Congress are on the record regarding Trump's attacks on the program:
\u201cI'm up @theprospect on how Democrats can force a vote on Trump's Medicaid block grant, so every vulnerable Republican in the Senate will have to take a position: for Trump's plan, or for saving millions from Medicaid cuts. https://t.co/zDR7onMCB6\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1580759708
Block-granting Medicaid has been Republican goal since at least the administration of former President Ronald Reagan. Bruce Bartlett, an architect of Reagan's right-wing economic agenda who has since broken with the GOP, tweeted last month that "block grants are just a Republican trick to slash spending without appearing to do so."
Rob Davidson, executive director of the Committee to Protect Medicare and the physician who confronted Pence at a restaurant in Iowa last month, applauded House Democrats for denouncing the Trump administration's block grant proposal and echoed their demand that the White House "reverse this dangerous action."
"President Trump's latest healthcare cuts will endanger the health, security, and lives of millions of American families," Davidson said in a statement. "Instead of cutting healthcare as President Trump continues to do, we should expand it, protect patients with preexisting conditions, and reduce the astronomical costs of prescription drugs."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.