SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sara Nelson, international president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, called on Congress to pass an economic stimulus package for the airline industry that focuses on airline workers, not on tax breaks for corporations. (Photo: AFL-CIO)
As the Trump administration signaled that it would take measures to support the airline industry as the coronavirus pandemic led to international flight restrictions and a slowdown in bookings, the union representing flight attendants called on Congress to ensure airline workers--not executives and shareholder profits--are at the center of the effort to shore up the industry.
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, released a video on social media early Tuesday morning calling on lawmakers to prioritize the interests of working people in the industry as Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin prepared to meet with Senate Republicans to discuss an $850 billion economic stimulus package, which is set to include $50 billion for the airlines.
The industry stimulus was included following a request for $58 billion in aid from the trade group Airlines for America, but Nelson implored Congress to include direct support for flight attendants, pilots, and other workers in their plan to help keep airline companies afloat during the pandemic.
"We have told Congress that any stimulus funds for the aviation industry must come with strict rules that includes requiring employers across aviation to maintain pay and benefits for every worker," Nelson said in the video. "No taxpayer money for CEO bonuses, stock buybacks, or dividends; no breaking contracts through bankruptcy; and no federal funds for airlines that are fighting their workers' efforts to join a union."
\u201cWe have told Congress that any stimulus funds for the aviation industry must come with strict rules: continued paychecks for every worker and NO stock buy backs, dividends, executive bonuses, broken contracts, or interference with organizing. #coronavirus\nhttps://t.co/WoYhe0lnY4\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584418256
Nelson also shared her union's proposal for a bailout for workers rather than corporations in a Twitter thread. Mass layoffs for airline workers, she said, who need to go through a months-long security clearance process before being hired, would delay recoveries for many industries once the coronavirus pandemic is over.
\u201cWe need to avoid mass layoffs and maintain fleets so Americans can lift off again when COVID-19 subsides. How? Provide direct payroll subsidies to workers in the passenger airline industry. 4/11\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584388895
\u201cAbsent payroll subsidies mass layoffs and furloughs are inevitable. This will have long-term consequences because nearly all aviation-related workers have to pass background checks and security and safety training requirements. 6/11\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584388895
\u201cIf these lapse or people need to be rehired, it will slow aviation\u2019s return to service. If airlines are slow to recover--other industries will be too. Travel to business conferences, Disneyland, cruises, and casinos is dependent on a functioning aviation industry. 7/11\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584388895
The proposal submitted to the administration by Airlines for America mentions the country's 750,000 airline workers only in passing.
The trade group called on Congress to provide $30 billion in grants for passenger airlines and $25 billion in loans and temporary tax relief in the form of repeals and rebates on excise taxes.
President Donald Trump said Monday the administration would be "powerfully supporting" the airline industry with the stimulus package, which also includes a payroll tax cut--a measure which Democrats and other critics have denounced as doing nothing to help workers who have or will lose their jobs during the national crisis.
The administration's consideration of the industry's demands comes after Virgin Atlantic, which is reducing flights by about 80%, said Monday it would force staff to take eight weeks of unpaid leave.
On social media, workers' rights advocates applauded Nelson for her call to center airline workers in any effort to bail out the industry.
\u201cSounds a lot better to me than giving the corporate executives a bailout in the form of another tax cut. Thanks @FlyingWithSara\u201d— Jan Schakowsky (@Jan Schakowsky) 1584397446
\u201cThis is an excellent strategy to help *workers* in the airline industry, not the failing corporations. We've got to replicate this across multiple industries.\u201d— Yonah Freemark (@Yonah Freemark) 1584409885
Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) indicated he would back Nelson's demand for a stimulus package that offers direct support for airline workers.
"Any infusion of money to the airlines must have some major strings attached--including new rules to prohibit consumer abuses like unfair change and cancellation fees; protections for front-line workers like flight attendants, pilots, and airport workers; special consideration for our smaller, regional carriers not represented by the major trade associations; and the development of long-term strategies and targets to reduce the carbon footprint of the airline industry," Markey said in a statement. "As our next coronavirus stimulus package is developed, I will demand these conditions be met before supporting any airline bailout."
Nelson emphasized in her video that keeping airline workers employed and paid will enable them to serve the country during and after the crisis.
"Today we will save our industry and our jobs, tomorrow, our neighbors," Nelson said. "And in the weeks and months to come, our future."
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
As the Trump administration signaled that it would take measures to support the airline industry as the coronavirus pandemic led to international flight restrictions and a slowdown in bookings, the union representing flight attendants called on Congress to ensure airline workers--not executives and shareholder profits--are at the center of the effort to shore up the industry.
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, released a video on social media early Tuesday morning calling on lawmakers to prioritize the interests of working people in the industry as Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin prepared to meet with Senate Republicans to discuss an $850 billion economic stimulus package, which is set to include $50 billion for the airlines.
The industry stimulus was included following a request for $58 billion in aid from the trade group Airlines for America, but Nelson implored Congress to include direct support for flight attendants, pilots, and other workers in their plan to help keep airline companies afloat during the pandemic.
"We have told Congress that any stimulus funds for the aviation industry must come with strict rules that includes requiring employers across aviation to maintain pay and benefits for every worker," Nelson said in the video. "No taxpayer money for CEO bonuses, stock buybacks, or dividends; no breaking contracts through bankruptcy; and no federal funds for airlines that are fighting their workers' efforts to join a union."
\u201cWe have told Congress that any stimulus funds for the aviation industry must come with strict rules: continued paychecks for every worker and NO stock buy backs, dividends, executive bonuses, broken contracts, or interference with organizing. #coronavirus\nhttps://t.co/WoYhe0lnY4\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584418256
Nelson also shared her union's proposal for a bailout for workers rather than corporations in a Twitter thread. Mass layoffs for airline workers, she said, who need to go through a months-long security clearance process before being hired, would delay recoveries for many industries once the coronavirus pandemic is over.
\u201cWe need to avoid mass layoffs and maintain fleets so Americans can lift off again when COVID-19 subsides. How? Provide direct payroll subsidies to workers in the passenger airline industry. 4/11\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584388895
\u201cAbsent payroll subsidies mass layoffs and furloughs are inevitable. This will have long-term consequences because nearly all aviation-related workers have to pass background checks and security and safety training requirements. 6/11\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584388895
\u201cIf these lapse or people need to be rehired, it will slow aviation\u2019s return to service. If airlines are slow to recover--other industries will be too. Travel to business conferences, Disneyland, cruises, and casinos is dependent on a functioning aviation industry. 7/11\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584388895
The proposal submitted to the administration by Airlines for America mentions the country's 750,000 airline workers only in passing.
The trade group called on Congress to provide $30 billion in grants for passenger airlines and $25 billion in loans and temporary tax relief in the form of repeals and rebates on excise taxes.
President Donald Trump said Monday the administration would be "powerfully supporting" the airline industry with the stimulus package, which also includes a payroll tax cut--a measure which Democrats and other critics have denounced as doing nothing to help workers who have or will lose their jobs during the national crisis.
The administration's consideration of the industry's demands comes after Virgin Atlantic, which is reducing flights by about 80%, said Monday it would force staff to take eight weeks of unpaid leave.
On social media, workers' rights advocates applauded Nelson for her call to center airline workers in any effort to bail out the industry.
\u201cSounds a lot better to me than giving the corporate executives a bailout in the form of another tax cut. Thanks @FlyingWithSara\u201d— Jan Schakowsky (@Jan Schakowsky) 1584397446
\u201cThis is an excellent strategy to help *workers* in the airline industry, not the failing corporations. We've got to replicate this across multiple industries.\u201d— Yonah Freemark (@Yonah Freemark) 1584409885
Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) indicated he would back Nelson's demand for a stimulus package that offers direct support for airline workers.
"Any infusion of money to the airlines must have some major strings attached--including new rules to prohibit consumer abuses like unfair change and cancellation fees; protections for front-line workers like flight attendants, pilots, and airport workers; special consideration for our smaller, regional carriers not represented by the major trade associations; and the development of long-term strategies and targets to reduce the carbon footprint of the airline industry," Markey said in a statement. "As our next coronavirus stimulus package is developed, I will demand these conditions be met before supporting any airline bailout."
Nelson emphasized in her video that keeping airline workers employed and paid will enable them to serve the country during and after the crisis.
"Today we will save our industry and our jobs, tomorrow, our neighbors," Nelson said. "And in the weeks and months to come, our future."
As the Trump administration signaled that it would take measures to support the airline industry as the coronavirus pandemic led to international flight restrictions and a slowdown in bookings, the union representing flight attendants called on Congress to ensure airline workers--not executives and shareholder profits--are at the center of the effort to shore up the industry.
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, released a video on social media early Tuesday morning calling on lawmakers to prioritize the interests of working people in the industry as Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin prepared to meet with Senate Republicans to discuss an $850 billion economic stimulus package, which is set to include $50 billion for the airlines.
The industry stimulus was included following a request for $58 billion in aid from the trade group Airlines for America, but Nelson implored Congress to include direct support for flight attendants, pilots, and other workers in their plan to help keep airline companies afloat during the pandemic.
"We have told Congress that any stimulus funds for the aviation industry must come with strict rules that includes requiring employers across aviation to maintain pay and benefits for every worker," Nelson said in the video. "No taxpayer money for CEO bonuses, stock buybacks, or dividends; no breaking contracts through bankruptcy; and no federal funds for airlines that are fighting their workers' efforts to join a union."
\u201cWe have told Congress that any stimulus funds for the aviation industry must come with strict rules: continued paychecks for every worker and NO stock buy backs, dividends, executive bonuses, broken contracts, or interference with organizing. #coronavirus\nhttps://t.co/WoYhe0lnY4\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584418256
Nelson also shared her union's proposal for a bailout for workers rather than corporations in a Twitter thread. Mass layoffs for airline workers, she said, who need to go through a months-long security clearance process before being hired, would delay recoveries for many industries once the coronavirus pandemic is over.
\u201cWe need to avoid mass layoffs and maintain fleets so Americans can lift off again when COVID-19 subsides. How? Provide direct payroll subsidies to workers in the passenger airline industry. 4/11\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584388895
\u201cAbsent payroll subsidies mass layoffs and furloughs are inevitable. This will have long-term consequences because nearly all aviation-related workers have to pass background checks and security and safety training requirements. 6/11\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584388895
\u201cIf these lapse or people need to be rehired, it will slow aviation\u2019s return to service. If airlines are slow to recover--other industries will be too. Travel to business conferences, Disneyland, cruises, and casinos is dependent on a functioning aviation industry. 7/11\u201d— Sara Nelson (@Sara Nelson) 1584388895
The proposal submitted to the administration by Airlines for America mentions the country's 750,000 airline workers only in passing.
The trade group called on Congress to provide $30 billion in grants for passenger airlines and $25 billion in loans and temporary tax relief in the form of repeals and rebates on excise taxes.
President Donald Trump said Monday the administration would be "powerfully supporting" the airline industry with the stimulus package, which also includes a payroll tax cut--a measure which Democrats and other critics have denounced as doing nothing to help workers who have or will lose their jobs during the national crisis.
The administration's consideration of the industry's demands comes after Virgin Atlantic, which is reducing flights by about 80%, said Monday it would force staff to take eight weeks of unpaid leave.
On social media, workers' rights advocates applauded Nelson for her call to center airline workers in any effort to bail out the industry.
\u201cSounds a lot better to me than giving the corporate executives a bailout in the form of another tax cut. Thanks @FlyingWithSara\u201d— Jan Schakowsky (@Jan Schakowsky) 1584397446
\u201cThis is an excellent strategy to help *workers* in the airline industry, not the failing corporations. We've got to replicate this across multiple industries.\u201d— Yonah Freemark (@Yonah Freemark) 1584409885
Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) indicated he would back Nelson's demand for a stimulus package that offers direct support for airline workers.
"Any infusion of money to the airlines must have some major strings attached--including new rules to prohibit consumer abuses like unfair change and cancellation fees; protections for front-line workers like flight attendants, pilots, and airport workers; special consideration for our smaller, regional carriers not represented by the major trade associations; and the development of long-term strategies and targets to reduce the carbon footprint of the airline industry," Markey said in a statement. "As our next coronavirus stimulus package is developed, I will demand these conditions be met before supporting any airline bailout."
Nelson emphasized in her video that keeping airline workers employed and paid will enable them to serve the country during and after the crisis.
"Today we will save our industry and our jobs, tomorrow, our neighbors," Nelson said. "And in the weeks and months to come, our future."
"The North Carolina Republican Party is one step closer to stealing an election in broad daylight," said one state Democrat.
Allison Riggs, a Democratic associate justice on the North Carolina Supreme Court, vowed to continue a legal battle over her narrow November victory after a state appeals panel on Friday took a major step toward invalidating more than 60,000 votes.
Riggs' GOP challenger, Judge Jefferson Griffin, lost by 734 votes—but rather than conceding, he has sought to have select ballots thrown out. In Friday's 2-1 decision, Republican Judges Fred Gore and John Tyson gave the targeted citizens 15 days to provide documentation to election workers confirming their eligibility to vote. If they don't do so, their votes could be discarded.
"We will be promptly appealing this deeply misinformed decision that threatens to disenfranchise more than 65,000 lawful voters and sets a dangerous precedent, allowing disappointed politicians to thwart the will of the people," Riggs said in a statement.
"North Carolinians elected me to keep my seat, and I swore an oath to the Constitution and the rule of law—so I will continue to stand up for the rights of voters in this state and stand in the way of those who would take power from the people," she added.
Since Riggs has recused herself from the case, only six of the North Carolina Supreme Court's justices will hear her appeal, "raising the possibility of a 3-3 deadlock," The News & Observer reported Friday.
As the Raleigh newspaper detailed:
If that were to happen, the most recent ruling of a lower court prevails, which means Friday's decision from the Court of Appeals could stand.
Riggs has said that if she loses at the state court level, she intends to return the case to federal court.
Republicans already hold a 5 to 2 majority on the state Supreme Court. If Griffin ultimately wins his case and replaces Riggs, that majority will grow to 6 to 1, further complicating Democrats' hopes to retake control of the court in coming elections.
Although the court fight is far from over, Griffin spokesperson Paul Shumaker and North Carolina GOP Chair Jason Simmons cheered Friday's decision, from which Democratic Judge Toby Hampson dissented.
Hampson's dissent begins by pointing out that Griffin "has yet to identify a single voter—among the tens of thousands petitioner challenges in this appeal—who was, in fact, ineligible to vote in the 2024 general election under the statutes, rules, and regulations in place in November 2024 governing that election."
"Changing the rules by which these lawful voters took part in our electoral process after the election to discard their otherwise valid votes in an attempt to alter the outcome of only one race among many on the ballot is directly counter to law, equity, and the Constitution," Hampson argued.
Democratic leaders in North Carolina and beyond also blasted the majority's decision. State Democratic Party Chair Anderson Clayton said that "Judge Tyson and Gore put party affiliation above the rights of North Carolina voters" when they "legitimized Jefferson Griffin's unconstitutional challenge" to tens of thousands of legally cast votes.
Reminder: From my legal and partisan sources, this ultimately gets decided based on how fed courts address military and overseas voters who didn't provide photo ID (and were expressly advised before election that they didn't need to). Why it matters: andersonalerts.substack.com/p/nc-supreme...
[image or embed]
— Bryan Anderson (@bryanranderson.bsky.social) April 4, 2025 at 2:23 PM
North Carolina House of Representatives Minority Leader Robert Reives (D-54) declared: "We cannot mince words at this point: The North Carolina Republican Party is one step closer to stealing an election in broad daylight. Justice Allison Riggs won her election—full stop. Our democracy continues to be tested, but we cannot allow it to break."
Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin warned that "this partisan decision has no legal basis and is an all-out assault on our democracy and the basic premise that voters decide who wins their elections, not the courts. If upheld, this could allow politicians across the country to overturn the will of the people."
"North Carolinians chose Allison Riggs to be their North Carolina Supreme Court justice," Martin stressed. "They won't stand for Republicans trying to take their votes away or those of active duty North Carolina military. It's six months past time for Jefferson Griffin to concede this race that he lost."
Bob Phillips, executive director of the nonpartisan voting rights organization Common Cause North Carolina, was similarly engaged, saying: "Today's ruling is a disgrace. This poorly conceived decision is an extreme overreach and sides with a sore loser candidate over the citizens of our state. If allowed to stand, the ruling would inject chaos into North Carolina's elections in ways that could disenfranchise tens of thousands of lawful voters and invite similar challenges nationwide."
Phillips continued:
Let's be clear: these North Carolina voters did absolutely nothing wrong. They followed the rules and cast ballots that should count. To say otherwise now is an affront to the rule of law and our Constitution.
If Griffin gets his way, never again will the people of North Carolina be able to have confidence in the outcome of our elections. Instead, Griffin's reckless lawsuit will open the door to an endless stream of other sore loser candidates who will attempt to throw out enough votes until they can cheat their way into office.
This fight is not over. We are confident that the courts will ultimately see Griffin's ploy for what it is: an unconstitutional attack on our freedom to vote.
"The people of North Carolina will continue to protest against Griffin's outrageous attack on our rights," he added, "as we continue our work to protect our family members, friends, and neighbors who are targeted by Griffin's disgraceful scheme."
"How the government reacts will tell us so much about how far down the road to autocracy we are," said one lawyer.
A U.S. judge on Friday ordered the return of a Maryland resident who the Trump administration mistakenly deported to a prison in El Salvador last month, according to The Associated Press.
Prior to issuing the ruling, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis called the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia "an illegal act."
The judge, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, gave the Trump administration end of the day of the day on Monday to bring him back to the United States.
Supporters outside the courtroom cheered as the judge handed down her order, according to The Washington Post.
Responding to the ruling on social media, U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said: "This is a big win. Now Trump must comply with the judge's order."
Immigration lawyer Ava Benach wrote: "The right decision. How the government reacts will tell us so much about how far down the road to autocracy we are."
The right decision. How the government reacts will tell us so much about how far down the road to autocracy we are.
[image or embed]
— avabenach.bsky.social (@avabenach.bsky.social) April 4, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Abrego Garcia was among hundreds of people the administration expelled in mid-March to a notorious megaprison in El Salvador after targeting them for alleged gang ties.
In a court papers filed earlier this week in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) acting field office director admitted that the removal of Abrego Garcia on March 15 "was an error."
Abrego Garcia was deported despite the fact that in 2019, a U.S. immigration judge ruled that he could not be deported to his native El Salvador because he would likely face gang persecution there.
"Corporations get let off the hook, Musk gets insider information, and the American people get hosed."
The latest U.S. agency in the crosshairs of billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency is reportedly the Federal Trade Commission, an already-understaffed department tasked with preventing monopolistic practices and shielding consumers from corporate abuses.
Axios reported Friday that at least two DOGE staffers "now have offices at" the FTC. According to The Verge, two DOGE members "were spotted" at the agency's building this week and "are now listed in the FTC's internal directory."
The Verge noted that the FTC is "a fairly lean agency with fewer than 1,200 employees," a number that the Trump administration has already cut into with the firing of some of the department's consumer protection and antitrust staff.
At least two of Musk's companies, Tesla and X, have faced scrutiny in recent years from the FTC, which is now under the leadership of Trump appointee Andrew Ferguson, who previously pledged to roll back former chair Lina Khan's anti-monopoly legacy.
Emily Peterson-Cassin, corporate power director at the Demand Progress Education Fund, which referred to the operatives as Musk's "minions," said Friday that "DOGE is yet again raiding a federal watchdog tasked with protecting working Americans from Wall Street and Big Tech."
"The FTC has worked to stop monopolistic mergers that would have led to higher grocery prices and is now gearing up to go to court against Meta's social media monopoly," said Peterson-Cassin. "It's no surprise that at this moment, while the economy is in freefall and fraud is on the rise, DOGE is choosing to raid the federal watchdog that protects everyday Americans and threatens corporate monopolies and grifters."
News of DOGE staffers' infiltration of the FTC came as Trump's sweeping new tariffs continued to cause global economic turmoil and heightened concerns that companies in the U.S. will use the tariffs as a new excuse to jack up prices and pad their bottom lines.
Ferguson pledged in a social media post Thursday that under his leadership, the FTC "will be watching closely" to ensure companies don't view Trump's tariffs "as a green light for price fixing or any other unlawful behavior."
But Trump has hobbled the agency—and prompted yet another legal fight—by firing its two Democratic commissioners, a move that sparked fury and has already impacted the FTC's ability to pursue cases against large corporations.
Peterson-Cassin said Friday that "the only winners" of DOGE's targeting of the FTC "are Trump's billionaire besties like [Meta CEO] Mark Zuckerberg and especially Musk, who now stands to gain access to confidential financial information about every company ever investigated by the FTC, including the auto manufacturers, aerospace firms, internet providers, tech companies, and banks that directly compete with his own companies."
"Corporations get let off the hook, Musk gets insider information, and the American people get hosed," Peterson-Cassin added.