SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A sign warns residents to take steps to contol the coronavirus outbreak at the entrance to the Manhattan Bridge in Brooklyn on March 19, 2020 in New York City. (Photo: Victor J. Blue/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump's Labor Department is asking states not to release hard unemployment numbers, the latest attempt by the White House to downplay the economic and real-world consequences of the coronavirus outbreak.
"The Trump administration would apparently rather you not hear those numbers," MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes told his audience Thursday night.
\u201cBREAKING: Trump admin. asking state officials to hold off releasing unemployment numbers: NYT.\u201d— All In with Chris Hayes (@All In with Chris Hayes) 1584666178
The New York Timesbroke the story Thursday night, citing an email sent to state officials from Office of Employment Insurance administrator Gay Gilbert asking states to only "provide information using generalities to describe claims levels (very high, large increase)" until the Labor Department releases its numbers on March 26.
"States should not provide numeric values to the public," said Gilbert.
Investment bank Goldman Sachs is predicting that claims increased by 2.25 million in the last week, a "historic and frankly apocalyptic surge" as Wall Street Journal reporter Micahel Derby described it, with no historical parallel in U.S. history.
\u201cGoldman Sachs warns data point to a historic and frankly apocalyptic surge in unemployment insurance claims, from current 281,000 to 2,250,000 in next week\u2019s report. Yes you read that right.\u201d— Michael S. Derby (@Michael S. Derby) 1584666159
The numbers are so unique, New School economist James Parrrott told Gothamist, because the damage being done by the virus has no precedent in modern history.
"In a recession, you'll see sort of episodic layoffs and business closings," said Parrott. "The numbers mount up over time. This was a completely different situation where for public health reasons... businesses were ordered to close en masse. So that is why we've never had anything like that before."
Observers were unimpressed by the latest White House attempt to clamp down on information which could reflect poorly on Trump's handling of the crisis.
"The Trump administration would like to extend to labor market data its highly successful approach to coronavirus data," New York Times opinion editor Binyamin Applebaum tweeted sarcastically. "I can only imagine how much markets would enjoy a little more uncertainty."
Predictions on Friday from analysts claimed that the economy could contract by as much as 14% in the second quarter--a level of economic decline not seen since World War II.
\u201cThese numbers are heart-stopping: \n\n-JPMorgan Chase estimates US economy could shrink by 14% b/t April & June, biggest contraction post-World War II\n- Goldman Sachs estimates 2.25 million filed for unemployment, nearly tenfold increase from week ago https://t.co/cyzpYs9mtc\u201d— Jim Sciutto (@Jim Sciutto) 1584712705
rinceton University historian Matt Karp said the data makes clear it's past time for a massive government intervention in the economy.
"How long can American society survive this kind of mass unemployment?" Karp tweeted. "Is even an epic $3T stimulus enough?"
"Seems like we need heroic WW2-style govt planning efforts to ramp up healthcare capacity, so the country can get back to work by May, even as hundreds of thousands get sick," Karp said.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
President Donald Trump's Labor Department is asking states not to release hard unemployment numbers, the latest attempt by the White House to downplay the economic and real-world consequences of the coronavirus outbreak.
"The Trump administration would apparently rather you not hear those numbers," MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes told his audience Thursday night.
\u201cBREAKING: Trump admin. asking state officials to hold off releasing unemployment numbers: NYT.\u201d— All In with Chris Hayes (@All In with Chris Hayes) 1584666178
The New York Timesbroke the story Thursday night, citing an email sent to state officials from Office of Employment Insurance administrator Gay Gilbert asking states to only "provide information using generalities to describe claims levels (very high, large increase)" until the Labor Department releases its numbers on March 26.
"States should not provide numeric values to the public," said Gilbert.
Investment bank Goldman Sachs is predicting that claims increased by 2.25 million in the last week, a "historic and frankly apocalyptic surge" as Wall Street Journal reporter Micahel Derby described it, with no historical parallel in U.S. history.
\u201cGoldman Sachs warns data point to a historic and frankly apocalyptic surge in unemployment insurance claims, from current 281,000 to 2,250,000 in next week\u2019s report. Yes you read that right.\u201d— Michael S. Derby (@Michael S. Derby) 1584666159
The numbers are so unique, New School economist James Parrrott told Gothamist, because the damage being done by the virus has no precedent in modern history.
"In a recession, you'll see sort of episodic layoffs and business closings," said Parrott. "The numbers mount up over time. This was a completely different situation where for public health reasons... businesses were ordered to close en masse. So that is why we've never had anything like that before."
Observers were unimpressed by the latest White House attempt to clamp down on information which could reflect poorly on Trump's handling of the crisis.
"The Trump administration would like to extend to labor market data its highly successful approach to coronavirus data," New York Times opinion editor Binyamin Applebaum tweeted sarcastically. "I can only imagine how much markets would enjoy a little more uncertainty."
Predictions on Friday from analysts claimed that the economy could contract by as much as 14% in the second quarter--a level of economic decline not seen since World War II.
\u201cThese numbers are heart-stopping: \n\n-JPMorgan Chase estimates US economy could shrink by 14% b/t April & June, biggest contraction post-World War II\n- Goldman Sachs estimates 2.25 million filed for unemployment, nearly tenfold increase from week ago https://t.co/cyzpYs9mtc\u201d— Jim Sciutto (@Jim Sciutto) 1584712705
rinceton University historian Matt Karp said the data makes clear it's past time for a massive government intervention in the economy.
"How long can American society survive this kind of mass unemployment?" Karp tweeted. "Is even an epic $3T stimulus enough?"
"Seems like we need heroic WW2-style govt planning efforts to ramp up healthcare capacity, so the country can get back to work by May, even as hundreds of thousands get sick," Karp said.
President Donald Trump's Labor Department is asking states not to release hard unemployment numbers, the latest attempt by the White House to downplay the economic and real-world consequences of the coronavirus outbreak.
"The Trump administration would apparently rather you not hear those numbers," MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes told his audience Thursday night.
\u201cBREAKING: Trump admin. asking state officials to hold off releasing unemployment numbers: NYT.\u201d— All In with Chris Hayes (@All In with Chris Hayes) 1584666178
The New York Timesbroke the story Thursday night, citing an email sent to state officials from Office of Employment Insurance administrator Gay Gilbert asking states to only "provide information using generalities to describe claims levels (very high, large increase)" until the Labor Department releases its numbers on March 26.
"States should not provide numeric values to the public," said Gilbert.
Investment bank Goldman Sachs is predicting that claims increased by 2.25 million in the last week, a "historic and frankly apocalyptic surge" as Wall Street Journal reporter Micahel Derby described it, with no historical parallel in U.S. history.
\u201cGoldman Sachs warns data point to a historic and frankly apocalyptic surge in unemployment insurance claims, from current 281,000 to 2,250,000 in next week\u2019s report. Yes you read that right.\u201d— Michael S. Derby (@Michael S. Derby) 1584666159
The numbers are so unique, New School economist James Parrrott told Gothamist, because the damage being done by the virus has no precedent in modern history.
"In a recession, you'll see sort of episodic layoffs and business closings," said Parrott. "The numbers mount up over time. This was a completely different situation where for public health reasons... businesses were ordered to close en masse. So that is why we've never had anything like that before."
Observers were unimpressed by the latest White House attempt to clamp down on information which could reflect poorly on Trump's handling of the crisis.
"The Trump administration would like to extend to labor market data its highly successful approach to coronavirus data," New York Times opinion editor Binyamin Applebaum tweeted sarcastically. "I can only imagine how much markets would enjoy a little more uncertainty."
Predictions on Friday from analysts claimed that the economy could contract by as much as 14% in the second quarter--a level of economic decline not seen since World War II.
\u201cThese numbers are heart-stopping: \n\n-JPMorgan Chase estimates US economy could shrink by 14% b/t April & June, biggest contraction post-World War II\n- Goldman Sachs estimates 2.25 million filed for unemployment, nearly tenfold increase from week ago https://t.co/cyzpYs9mtc\u201d— Jim Sciutto (@Jim Sciutto) 1584712705
rinceton University historian Matt Karp said the data makes clear it's past time for a massive government intervention in the economy.
"How long can American society survive this kind of mass unemployment?" Karp tweeted. "Is even an epic $3T stimulus enough?"
"Seems like we need heroic WW2-style govt planning efforts to ramp up healthcare capacity, so the country can get back to work by May, even as hundreds of thousands get sick," Karp said.