Unemployed men marching along the Thames embankment in 1930, carrying a banner reading "Organise or Starve." (Photo by Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)
Fed Economists Warn US Unemployment Rate Could Soon Reach 32%--During Great Depression It Peaked at 25%
"These are very large numbers by historical standards, but this is a rather unique shock that is unlike any other experienced by the U.S. economy in the last 100 years."
Economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis are warning that if the current rate of U.S. job losses continues, the country's unemployment rate could reach a staggering 32.1% by the end of June as the coronavirus pandemic-induced downturn sparks mass layoffs across the nation.
Miguel Faria-e-Castro, an economist with the St. Louis Fed, wrote in an analysis last week that 47 million more workers could lose their jobs by the end of the second quarter of 2020, bringing the total number of unemployed people in the U.S. to 52.8 million. As CNBC noted, that number would be "more than three times worse than the peak of the Great Recession."
Faria-e-Castro's projection of 32.1% unemployment would put the U.S. jobless rate significantly higher than the Depression-era peak of 24.9%.
"The projections are even worse than St. Louis Fed President James Bullard's much-publicized estimate of 30% [unemployment]," CNBC reported. "They reflect the high nature of at-risk jobs that ultimately could be lost."
Faria-e-Castro stressed that "the expected duration of unemployment" could matter more "than the unemployment rate itself, especially if the recovery is quick (and so duration is short)."
"These are very large numbers by historical standards," Faria-e-Castro wrote, "but this is a rather unique shock that is unlike any other experienced by the U.S. economy in the last 100 years."
In response to the St. Louis Fed analysis, HuffPost senior reporter Zach Carter tweeted, "It remains simply incredible that Congress is not even in town during a crisis of this magnitude."
"An astonishing, bipartisan failure of government," Carter added.
As Common Dreams reported last Friday, 3.3 million people filed jobless claims two weeks ago, shattering the previous record of 695,000 set in 1982.
"I have been a labor economist for a very long time and I have never seen anything like this," Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute wrote in a blog post last week. "Furthermore, this is just the tip of the iceberg."
More than 40 economists surveyed by Bloomberg on Monday said they believe new Labor Department unemployment numbers set for release Thursday will be even higher.
Thomas Costerg, an economist at the investment firm Pictet Wealth Management, predicted that new jobless claims could be as high as 6.5 million while Goldman Sachs estimated 5.25 million.
New York magazine's Eric Levitz wrote Monday that while the "St. Louis Fed's projection is just a rough estimate... there's reason to think its catastrophic prediction is in the right ballpark."
"It's hard not to suspect that most every part of our economic life is going to get worse before it gets better," Levitz added.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis are warning that if the current rate of U.S. job losses continues, the country's unemployment rate could reach a staggering 32.1% by the end of June as the coronavirus pandemic-induced downturn sparks mass layoffs across the nation.
Miguel Faria-e-Castro, an economist with the St. Louis Fed, wrote in an analysis last week that 47 million more workers could lose their jobs by the end of the second quarter of 2020, bringing the total number of unemployed people in the U.S. to 52.8 million. As CNBC noted, that number would be "more than three times worse than the peak of the Great Recession."
Faria-e-Castro's projection of 32.1% unemployment would put the U.S. jobless rate significantly higher than the Depression-era peak of 24.9%.
"The projections are even worse than St. Louis Fed President James Bullard's much-publicized estimate of 30% [unemployment]," CNBC reported. "They reflect the high nature of at-risk jobs that ultimately could be lost."
Faria-e-Castro stressed that "the expected duration of unemployment" could matter more "than the unemployment rate itself, especially if the recovery is quick (and so duration is short)."
"These are very large numbers by historical standards," Faria-e-Castro wrote, "but this is a rather unique shock that is unlike any other experienced by the U.S. economy in the last 100 years."
In response to the St. Louis Fed analysis, HuffPost senior reporter Zach Carter tweeted, "It remains simply incredible that Congress is not even in town during a crisis of this magnitude."
"An astonishing, bipartisan failure of government," Carter added.
As Common Dreams reported last Friday, 3.3 million people filed jobless claims two weeks ago, shattering the previous record of 695,000 set in 1982.
"I have been a labor economist for a very long time and I have never seen anything like this," Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute wrote in a blog post last week. "Furthermore, this is just the tip of the iceberg."
More than 40 economists surveyed by Bloomberg on Monday said they believe new Labor Department unemployment numbers set for release Thursday will be even higher.
Thomas Costerg, an economist at the investment firm Pictet Wealth Management, predicted that new jobless claims could be as high as 6.5 million while Goldman Sachs estimated 5.25 million.
New York magazine's Eric Levitz wrote Monday that while the "St. Louis Fed's projection is just a rough estimate... there's reason to think its catastrophic prediction is in the right ballpark."
"It's hard not to suspect that most every part of our economic life is going to get worse before it gets better," Levitz added.
Economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis are warning that if the current rate of U.S. job losses continues, the country's unemployment rate could reach a staggering 32.1% by the end of June as the coronavirus pandemic-induced downturn sparks mass layoffs across the nation.
Miguel Faria-e-Castro, an economist with the St. Louis Fed, wrote in an analysis last week that 47 million more workers could lose their jobs by the end of the second quarter of 2020, bringing the total number of unemployed people in the U.S. to 52.8 million. As CNBC noted, that number would be "more than three times worse than the peak of the Great Recession."
Faria-e-Castro's projection of 32.1% unemployment would put the U.S. jobless rate significantly higher than the Depression-era peak of 24.9%.
"The projections are even worse than St. Louis Fed President James Bullard's much-publicized estimate of 30% [unemployment]," CNBC reported. "They reflect the high nature of at-risk jobs that ultimately could be lost."
Faria-e-Castro stressed that "the expected duration of unemployment" could matter more "than the unemployment rate itself, especially if the recovery is quick (and so duration is short)."
"These are very large numbers by historical standards," Faria-e-Castro wrote, "but this is a rather unique shock that is unlike any other experienced by the U.S. economy in the last 100 years."
In response to the St. Louis Fed analysis, HuffPost senior reporter Zach Carter tweeted, "It remains simply incredible that Congress is not even in town during a crisis of this magnitude."
"An astonishing, bipartisan failure of government," Carter added.
As Common Dreams reported last Friday, 3.3 million people filed jobless claims two weeks ago, shattering the previous record of 695,000 set in 1982.
"I have been a labor economist for a very long time and I have never seen anything like this," Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute wrote in a blog post last week. "Furthermore, this is just the tip of the iceberg."
More than 40 economists surveyed by Bloomberg on Monday said they believe new Labor Department unemployment numbers set for release Thursday will be even higher.
Thomas Costerg, an economist at the investment firm Pictet Wealth Management, predicted that new jobless claims could be as high as 6.5 million while Goldman Sachs estimated 5.25 million.
New York magazine's Eric Levitz wrote Monday that while the "St. Louis Fed's projection is just a rough estimate... there's reason to think its catastrophic prediction is in the right ballpark."
"It's hard not to suspect that most every part of our economic life is going to get worse before it gets better," Levitz added.