Voters line up outside the polling place at Fire Station Number 2 on Election Day November 06, 2018 in El Paso, Texas. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Apr 05, 2020
Despite warnings from public health experts and legal challenges by voting rights groups, the Democratic primary and state and local elections are set to go forward on Tuesday after Republican state legislators refused to take up a proposal to cancel most in-person voting in light of the coronavirus pandemic.
After Democratic Gov. Tony Evers ordered lawmakers to meet Saturday afternoon to consider allowing voters to mail in their ballots until May 26, following the lead of 15 other states, the GOP-led legislature assembled at the Capitol--but adjourned the session within seconds, refusing to take action.
\u201cRep. Tyler August convenes and adjourns the state Assembly in 17 seconds and declines to take any action on delaying Tuesday\u2019s election, as requested by Gov. Tony Evers because of COVID-19.\u201d— Patrick Marley (@Patrick Marley) 1586035532
According to Politico, Evers is not expected to take any further action to stop Wisconsin voters from having to either assemble at a dwindling number of polling places on Tuesday--risking contracting and spreading the coronavirus-- or waiving the right to vote in the primary and other key elections.
Republicans in the state did take one action on Saturday regarding the election, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block a lower court ruling by U.S. District Judge William Conley, who ordered election officials last week to extend the deadline for requesting an absentee ballot and to allow voters until April 14 to return the ballots.
\u201c.@wisgop is willing to go to the U.S SUPREME COURT to make sure people don\u2019t have enough time to return absentee ballots. \n\nMy mentions have been FULL of people who requested ballots weeks ago and have not yet received them. \n\nThis is the response to a life-threatening pandemic?\u201d— Dan Shafer (@Dan Shafer) 1586043069
Evers is reportedly concerned that taking further steps to halt in-person voting could backfire, according to Politico:
If the issue went before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which holds a Republican majority, Evers risks inadvertently creating precedent that could adversely affect his emergency powers... Beyond that, the governor's office doesn't want to expend all of its political capital in a fight over moving the election because it needs GOP legislative leaders to play ball on a broader coronavirus funding package.
The Wisconsin Democratic Party, mayors throughout the state, civil rights groups, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have all joined public health officials in urging the state to halt in-person voting to adhere to Evers' March 25 stay-at-home order, in light of the pandemic. More than 2,000 coronavirus cases have been reported in Wisconsin, and at least 56 people have died.
In addition to the Democratic presidential primary between Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden, Wisconsin voters on Tuesday will cast ballots in several local elections and the state Supreme Court race between conservative Justice Daniel Kelly and liberal Jill Karofsky. A victory for Kelly would secure the 5-2 conservative majority on the court. As President Donald Trump suggested last week, low turnout due to the pandemic could help secure Kelly's seat.
Biden has joined Republicans in urging the state to move ahead with the election as planned, saying last week it is a matter for "the Wisconsin courts and folks to decide"--a position journalist Jeremy Scahill called "reckless" on Sunday.
\u201cThe COVID-19 pandemic is being exploited for voter disenfranchisement by the GOP in Wisconsin & other states. It also impacts the Democratic presidential primary. Democrats should be opposing this and demanding postponement or mail-in voting only. Any other position is reckless.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1586089001
James Conway, an infectious diseases expert at the University of Wisconsin, called the state's plan to move ahead with in-person voting "really irresponsible" and one which would damage the credibility of public health guidance urging social distancing.
"It just seems really irresponsible to make this one giant exception," Conway told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. "From a public health stand it's both the wrong message and it's taking an enormous gamble."
Tuesday's elections are expecting to be mired in confusion and chaos, as the coronavirus has drastically reduced the number of poll workers available to run election sites. Milwaukee, the state's largest city with nearly 600,000 people, is expected to have just five polling locations open instead of its usual 180.
\u201cMilwaukee election officials just announced the city will have just five polling locations for Tuesday's election instead of the 180 they typically do amid a massive poll worker shortage.\n\nUp to 50,000 MKE voters are expected to vote, which means 10,000 could show up at each site\u201d— Molly Beck (@Molly Beck) 1585936282
\u201cMeanwhile, state health officials have asked people not to be in contact with more than five people total.\u201d— Molly Beck (@Molly Beck) 1585936282
Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler was among those on social media who warned the state Republicans' maneuver over the weekend is likely a preview of the GOP's tactics on a national scale during the general election.
\u201cThe whole country should tune in to what Republicans are doing now in Wisconsin. It\u2019s a preview of how they\u2019ll politically weaponize Coronavirus on a national scale.\u201d— Ben Wikler (@Ben Wikler) 1586022444
The Wisconsin GOP's actions over the weekend should convince congressional Democrats to "not surrender another iota of leverage until the election is secure and the economic recovery provisions are automatic," wrote Crooked Media editor Brian Beutler.
"Congressional Democrats need to pay attention to what's happening in Wisconsin right now," Beutler wrote.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Despite warnings from public health experts and legal challenges by voting rights groups, the Democratic primary and state and local elections are set to go forward on Tuesday after Republican state legislators refused to take up a proposal to cancel most in-person voting in light of the coronavirus pandemic.
After Democratic Gov. Tony Evers ordered lawmakers to meet Saturday afternoon to consider allowing voters to mail in their ballots until May 26, following the lead of 15 other states, the GOP-led legislature assembled at the Capitol--but adjourned the session within seconds, refusing to take action.
\u201cRep. Tyler August convenes and adjourns the state Assembly in 17 seconds and declines to take any action on delaying Tuesday\u2019s election, as requested by Gov. Tony Evers because of COVID-19.\u201d— Patrick Marley (@Patrick Marley) 1586035532
According to Politico, Evers is not expected to take any further action to stop Wisconsin voters from having to either assemble at a dwindling number of polling places on Tuesday--risking contracting and spreading the coronavirus-- or waiving the right to vote in the primary and other key elections.
Republicans in the state did take one action on Saturday regarding the election, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block a lower court ruling by U.S. District Judge William Conley, who ordered election officials last week to extend the deadline for requesting an absentee ballot and to allow voters until April 14 to return the ballots.
\u201c.@wisgop is willing to go to the U.S SUPREME COURT to make sure people don\u2019t have enough time to return absentee ballots. \n\nMy mentions have been FULL of people who requested ballots weeks ago and have not yet received them. \n\nThis is the response to a life-threatening pandemic?\u201d— Dan Shafer (@Dan Shafer) 1586043069
Evers is reportedly concerned that taking further steps to halt in-person voting could backfire, according to Politico:
If the issue went before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which holds a Republican majority, Evers risks inadvertently creating precedent that could adversely affect his emergency powers... Beyond that, the governor's office doesn't want to expend all of its political capital in a fight over moving the election because it needs GOP legislative leaders to play ball on a broader coronavirus funding package.
The Wisconsin Democratic Party, mayors throughout the state, civil rights groups, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have all joined public health officials in urging the state to halt in-person voting to adhere to Evers' March 25 stay-at-home order, in light of the pandemic. More than 2,000 coronavirus cases have been reported in Wisconsin, and at least 56 people have died.
In addition to the Democratic presidential primary between Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden, Wisconsin voters on Tuesday will cast ballots in several local elections and the state Supreme Court race between conservative Justice Daniel Kelly and liberal Jill Karofsky. A victory for Kelly would secure the 5-2 conservative majority on the court. As President Donald Trump suggested last week, low turnout due to the pandemic could help secure Kelly's seat.
Biden has joined Republicans in urging the state to move ahead with the election as planned, saying last week it is a matter for "the Wisconsin courts and folks to decide"--a position journalist Jeremy Scahill called "reckless" on Sunday.
\u201cThe COVID-19 pandemic is being exploited for voter disenfranchisement by the GOP in Wisconsin & other states. It also impacts the Democratic presidential primary. Democrats should be opposing this and demanding postponement or mail-in voting only. Any other position is reckless.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1586089001
James Conway, an infectious diseases expert at the University of Wisconsin, called the state's plan to move ahead with in-person voting "really irresponsible" and one which would damage the credibility of public health guidance urging social distancing.
"It just seems really irresponsible to make this one giant exception," Conway told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. "From a public health stand it's both the wrong message and it's taking an enormous gamble."
Tuesday's elections are expecting to be mired in confusion and chaos, as the coronavirus has drastically reduced the number of poll workers available to run election sites. Milwaukee, the state's largest city with nearly 600,000 people, is expected to have just five polling locations open instead of its usual 180.
\u201cMilwaukee election officials just announced the city will have just five polling locations for Tuesday's election instead of the 180 they typically do amid a massive poll worker shortage.\n\nUp to 50,000 MKE voters are expected to vote, which means 10,000 could show up at each site\u201d— Molly Beck (@Molly Beck) 1585936282
\u201cMeanwhile, state health officials have asked people not to be in contact with more than five people total.\u201d— Molly Beck (@Molly Beck) 1585936282
Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler was among those on social media who warned the state Republicans' maneuver over the weekend is likely a preview of the GOP's tactics on a national scale during the general election.
\u201cThe whole country should tune in to what Republicans are doing now in Wisconsin. It\u2019s a preview of how they\u2019ll politically weaponize Coronavirus on a national scale.\u201d— Ben Wikler (@Ben Wikler) 1586022444
The Wisconsin GOP's actions over the weekend should convince congressional Democrats to "not surrender another iota of leverage until the election is secure and the economic recovery provisions are automatic," wrote Crooked Media editor Brian Beutler.
"Congressional Democrats need to pay attention to what's happening in Wisconsin right now," Beutler wrote.
Despite warnings from public health experts and legal challenges by voting rights groups, the Democratic primary and state and local elections are set to go forward on Tuesday after Republican state legislators refused to take up a proposal to cancel most in-person voting in light of the coronavirus pandemic.
After Democratic Gov. Tony Evers ordered lawmakers to meet Saturday afternoon to consider allowing voters to mail in their ballots until May 26, following the lead of 15 other states, the GOP-led legislature assembled at the Capitol--but adjourned the session within seconds, refusing to take action.
\u201cRep. Tyler August convenes and adjourns the state Assembly in 17 seconds and declines to take any action on delaying Tuesday\u2019s election, as requested by Gov. Tony Evers because of COVID-19.\u201d— Patrick Marley (@Patrick Marley) 1586035532
According to Politico, Evers is not expected to take any further action to stop Wisconsin voters from having to either assemble at a dwindling number of polling places on Tuesday--risking contracting and spreading the coronavirus-- or waiving the right to vote in the primary and other key elections.
Republicans in the state did take one action on Saturday regarding the election, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block a lower court ruling by U.S. District Judge William Conley, who ordered election officials last week to extend the deadline for requesting an absentee ballot and to allow voters until April 14 to return the ballots.
\u201c.@wisgop is willing to go to the U.S SUPREME COURT to make sure people don\u2019t have enough time to return absentee ballots. \n\nMy mentions have been FULL of people who requested ballots weeks ago and have not yet received them. \n\nThis is the response to a life-threatening pandemic?\u201d— Dan Shafer (@Dan Shafer) 1586043069
Evers is reportedly concerned that taking further steps to halt in-person voting could backfire, according to Politico:
If the issue went before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which holds a Republican majority, Evers risks inadvertently creating precedent that could adversely affect his emergency powers... Beyond that, the governor's office doesn't want to expend all of its political capital in a fight over moving the election because it needs GOP legislative leaders to play ball on a broader coronavirus funding package.
The Wisconsin Democratic Party, mayors throughout the state, civil rights groups, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have all joined public health officials in urging the state to halt in-person voting to adhere to Evers' March 25 stay-at-home order, in light of the pandemic. More than 2,000 coronavirus cases have been reported in Wisconsin, and at least 56 people have died.
In addition to the Democratic presidential primary between Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden, Wisconsin voters on Tuesday will cast ballots in several local elections and the state Supreme Court race between conservative Justice Daniel Kelly and liberal Jill Karofsky. A victory for Kelly would secure the 5-2 conservative majority on the court. As President Donald Trump suggested last week, low turnout due to the pandemic could help secure Kelly's seat.
Biden has joined Republicans in urging the state to move ahead with the election as planned, saying last week it is a matter for "the Wisconsin courts and folks to decide"--a position journalist Jeremy Scahill called "reckless" on Sunday.
\u201cThe COVID-19 pandemic is being exploited for voter disenfranchisement by the GOP in Wisconsin & other states. It also impacts the Democratic presidential primary. Democrats should be opposing this and demanding postponement or mail-in voting only. Any other position is reckless.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1586089001
James Conway, an infectious diseases expert at the University of Wisconsin, called the state's plan to move ahead with in-person voting "really irresponsible" and one which would damage the credibility of public health guidance urging social distancing.
"It just seems really irresponsible to make this one giant exception," Conway told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. "From a public health stand it's both the wrong message and it's taking an enormous gamble."
Tuesday's elections are expecting to be mired in confusion and chaos, as the coronavirus has drastically reduced the number of poll workers available to run election sites. Milwaukee, the state's largest city with nearly 600,000 people, is expected to have just five polling locations open instead of its usual 180.
\u201cMilwaukee election officials just announced the city will have just five polling locations for Tuesday's election instead of the 180 they typically do amid a massive poll worker shortage.\n\nUp to 50,000 MKE voters are expected to vote, which means 10,000 could show up at each site\u201d— Molly Beck (@Molly Beck) 1585936282
\u201cMeanwhile, state health officials have asked people not to be in contact with more than five people total.\u201d— Molly Beck (@Molly Beck) 1585936282
Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler was among those on social media who warned the state Republicans' maneuver over the weekend is likely a preview of the GOP's tactics on a national scale during the general election.
\u201cThe whole country should tune in to what Republicans are doing now in Wisconsin. It\u2019s a preview of how they\u2019ll politically weaponize Coronavirus on a national scale.\u201d— Ben Wikler (@Ben Wikler) 1586022444
The Wisconsin GOP's actions over the weekend should convince congressional Democrats to "not surrender another iota of leverage until the election is secure and the economic recovery provisions are automatic," wrote Crooked Media editor Brian Beutler.
"Congressional Democrats need to pay attention to what's happening in Wisconsin right now," Beutler wrote.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.