To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Former New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg (L) and Former Vice President Joe Biden (R) speak during a break in the ninth Democratic primary debate of the 2020 presidential campaign season co-hosted by NBC News, MSNBC, Noticias Telemundo and The Nevada Independent at the Paris Theater in Las Vegas, Nevada, on February 19, 2020. (Photo: Mark Ralston/AFP via Getty Images)
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was among the first critics to raise alarm Friday afternoon after The Interceptreported that a digital strategy firm owned by billionaire Mike Bloomberg "is in serious talks" to win a contract to take over work on Joe Biden's general election campaign against President Donald Trump.
"Along with Biden's campaign," journalist Ryan Grim, who broke the story, reported, the firm--called Hawkfish and which ran Bloomberg's primary campaign--is now "courting a wide swath of other progressive and Democratic organizations, opening up the possibility of Bloomberg gaining significant control over the party's technology and data infrastructure."
In a newsletter sent to readers to promote the story, Grim said the reporting "is a lot more important than it may seem at first, because it involves who or what controls the Democratic Party's data and tech infrastructure for the next generation." Grim in his newsletter also shared Ocasio-Cortez's initial reaction, which was one of alarm:
\u201cThis is a bad idea. A really bad one, on multiple levels - for starters, it threatens the integrity of Dem voter data & puts Nov prospects in hands of a shady firm w/ a failed track record.\n\nPlenty of orgs bid for contracts. I hope there is enough good sense to reject this one.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1586546069
According to Grim, while Hawkfish is unproven in the competitive and high-stakes world of political consulting and campaign management--though Bloomberg can claim success in spending (by far) the most money ever to win the least number of delegates ever in a presidential primary campaign--Biden signing with the Bloomberg outfit could come with other perks.
Democratic operatives who've been pitched by Hawkfish say that the firm is able to offer extraordinarily low prices by operating at a loss subsidized by Bloomberg, whose wealth dangles as an added benefit that could come with signing the firm. A Hawkfish insider, who spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to jeopardize employment, confirmed that the company is willing to operate at a loss in order to grab control of the party infrastructure, explaining that the firm hopes to offer a fee that would be small enough to entice the Biden campaign while passing muster with federal regulators.
While Grim reported that the Biden campaign was being pressured on both sides, "no final decision been made" on whether to accept Hawkfish's gestures. Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez was not alone among progressives in recognizing the troubling implications of this arrangement.
"This would be a mistake of colossal proportions," said Jess Morales Rocketto, a political activist and organizer, in response to Grim's reporting. "If you are a data driven electoral person, then the data on this is: they suck. Bloomberg spent $$$$$$$ and got nothing. He practiced such terrible digital tactics and they touted them like they were innovative."
Jen Perelman, a progressive Democrat running a primary campaign against Rep. Debbie Wasserman Shultz in Florida, denounced the idea.
\u201cThis is where progressives & independents MUST draw their line in the sand. \n\nIf Bloomberg takes over Biden\u2019s campaign funding, \u201cunity\u201d talk is over.\n\nThe DNC & Biden better think long & hard about this decision.\n\n#JEN2020 #StateOfEmergency \n\nhttps://t.co/ws3U4rDycU\u201d— Jen Perelman (@Jen Perelman) 1586548082
Even Howard Fineman, a political reporter and analyst for NBC News, recognized that this would be a disaster for Biden electorally.
"This would be a really terrible idea on a lot of levels," Fineman tweeted. "It would behoove Biden to scotch this ASAP."
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was among the first critics to raise alarm Friday afternoon after The Interceptreported that a digital strategy firm owned by billionaire Mike Bloomberg "is in serious talks" to win a contract to take over work on Joe Biden's general election campaign against President Donald Trump.
"Along with Biden's campaign," journalist Ryan Grim, who broke the story, reported, the firm--called Hawkfish and which ran Bloomberg's primary campaign--is now "courting a wide swath of other progressive and Democratic organizations, opening up the possibility of Bloomberg gaining significant control over the party's technology and data infrastructure."
In a newsletter sent to readers to promote the story, Grim said the reporting "is a lot more important than it may seem at first, because it involves who or what controls the Democratic Party's data and tech infrastructure for the next generation." Grim in his newsletter also shared Ocasio-Cortez's initial reaction, which was one of alarm:
\u201cThis is a bad idea. A really bad one, on multiple levels - for starters, it threatens the integrity of Dem voter data & puts Nov prospects in hands of a shady firm w/ a failed track record.\n\nPlenty of orgs bid for contracts. I hope there is enough good sense to reject this one.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1586546069
According to Grim, while Hawkfish is unproven in the competitive and high-stakes world of political consulting and campaign management--though Bloomberg can claim success in spending (by far) the most money ever to win the least number of delegates ever in a presidential primary campaign--Biden signing with the Bloomberg outfit could come with other perks.
Democratic operatives who've been pitched by Hawkfish say that the firm is able to offer extraordinarily low prices by operating at a loss subsidized by Bloomberg, whose wealth dangles as an added benefit that could come with signing the firm. A Hawkfish insider, who spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to jeopardize employment, confirmed that the company is willing to operate at a loss in order to grab control of the party infrastructure, explaining that the firm hopes to offer a fee that would be small enough to entice the Biden campaign while passing muster with federal regulators.
While Grim reported that the Biden campaign was being pressured on both sides, "no final decision been made" on whether to accept Hawkfish's gestures. Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez was not alone among progressives in recognizing the troubling implications of this arrangement.
"This would be a mistake of colossal proportions," said Jess Morales Rocketto, a political activist and organizer, in response to Grim's reporting. "If you are a data driven electoral person, then the data on this is: they suck. Bloomberg spent $$$$$$$ and got nothing. He practiced such terrible digital tactics and they touted them like they were innovative."
Jen Perelman, a progressive Democrat running a primary campaign against Rep. Debbie Wasserman Shultz in Florida, denounced the idea.
\u201cThis is where progressives & independents MUST draw their line in the sand. \n\nIf Bloomberg takes over Biden\u2019s campaign funding, \u201cunity\u201d talk is over.\n\nThe DNC & Biden better think long & hard about this decision.\n\n#JEN2020 #StateOfEmergency \n\nhttps://t.co/ws3U4rDycU\u201d— Jen Perelman (@Jen Perelman) 1586548082
Even Howard Fineman, a political reporter and analyst for NBC News, recognized that this would be a disaster for Biden electorally.
"This would be a really terrible idea on a lot of levels," Fineman tweeted. "It would behoove Biden to scotch this ASAP."
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was among the first critics to raise alarm Friday afternoon after The Interceptreported that a digital strategy firm owned by billionaire Mike Bloomberg "is in serious talks" to win a contract to take over work on Joe Biden's general election campaign against President Donald Trump.
"Along with Biden's campaign," journalist Ryan Grim, who broke the story, reported, the firm--called Hawkfish and which ran Bloomberg's primary campaign--is now "courting a wide swath of other progressive and Democratic organizations, opening up the possibility of Bloomberg gaining significant control over the party's technology and data infrastructure."
In a newsletter sent to readers to promote the story, Grim said the reporting "is a lot more important than it may seem at first, because it involves who or what controls the Democratic Party's data and tech infrastructure for the next generation." Grim in his newsletter also shared Ocasio-Cortez's initial reaction, which was one of alarm:
\u201cThis is a bad idea. A really bad one, on multiple levels - for starters, it threatens the integrity of Dem voter data & puts Nov prospects in hands of a shady firm w/ a failed track record.\n\nPlenty of orgs bid for contracts. I hope there is enough good sense to reject this one.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1586546069
According to Grim, while Hawkfish is unproven in the competitive and high-stakes world of political consulting and campaign management--though Bloomberg can claim success in spending (by far) the most money ever to win the least number of delegates ever in a presidential primary campaign--Biden signing with the Bloomberg outfit could come with other perks.
Democratic operatives who've been pitched by Hawkfish say that the firm is able to offer extraordinarily low prices by operating at a loss subsidized by Bloomberg, whose wealth dangles as an added benefit that could come with signing the firm. A Hawkfish insider, who spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to jeopardize employment, confirmed that the company is willing to operate at a loss in order to grab control of the party infrastructure, explaining that the firm hopes to offer a fee that would be small enough to entice the Biden campaign while passing muster with federal regulators.
While Grim reported that the Biden campaign was being pressured on both sides, "no final decision been made" on whether to accept Hawkfish's gestures. Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez was not alone among progressives in recognizing the troubling implications of this arrangement.
"This would be a mistake of colossal proportions," said Jess Morales Rocketto, a political activist and organizer, in response to Grim's reporting. "If you are a data driven electoral person, then the data on this is: they suck. Bloomberg spent $$$$$$$ and got nothing. He practiced such terrible digital tactics and they touted them like they were innovative."
Jen Perelman, a progressive Democrat running a primary campaign against Rep. Debbie Wasserman Shultz in Florida, denounced the idea.
\u201cThis is where progressives & independents MUST draw their line in the sand. \n\nIf Bloomberg takes over Biden\u2019s campaign funding, \u201cunity\u201d talk is over.\n\nThe DNC & Biden better think long & hard about this decision.\n\n#JEN2020 #StateOfEmergency \n\nhttps://t.co/ws3U4rDycU\u201d— Jen Perelman (@Jen Perelman) 1586548082
Even Howard Fineman, a political reporter and analyst for NBC News, recognized that this would be a disaster for Biden electorally.
"This would be a really terrible idea on a lot of levels," Fineman tweeted. "It would behoove Biden to scotch this ASAP."
