SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A sign that reads "shut it down" is pictured at the Northwest Detention Center as during a protest at the Tacoma, Washington facility on Feb. 26, 2017. (Photo: Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)
A United Nations human rights expert on Monday urged the U.S. government to stop detaining migrants who are being "held for processing" of their immigration claims in "overcrowded and unsanitary administrative centers," citing concerns about the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.
"It is very difficult to keep the necessary physical distance in overcrowded detention facilities," Felipe Gonzalez Morales, the U.N. special rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, said in statement. "Significantly reducing the number of detained migrants by releasing them into alternative settings can easily solve this."
"None of those migrants are detained for criminal offenses, but are simply awaiting decisions on their immigration claims," he added. "The authorities should assess the capacity of readily available alternatives measures in the country and elaborate a set of criteria to identify those in administrative detention that could be immediately released to alternative placements."
Alternatives to detention facilities--poor conditions of which were often decried by detainees and immigration rights advocates long before the coronavirus outbreak--include providing community-based accommodations and care to migrants.
Alluding to the U.S. government's long track record--particularly under President Donald Trump--of ignoring the human rights of migrants, Gonzalez Morales said that "alternatives to widespread immigration detention in the U.S. would also ensure that migrants are not arbitrarily detained."
The Monday statement from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights noted that U.N. human rights experts have "received repeated reports of unsanitary conditions and lack of proper healthcare" at the Tacoma Northwest Processing Center in Washington state.
One local newspaper editorial warned earlier this month that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility--run by the private, for-profit company the GEO Group--could be "a ticking time bomb, a potential for a 'coronavirus catastrophe.'"
Gonzalez Morales said that rights experts were told "there is a lack of protective measures for detainees, that it is impossible to keep the recommended physical distance, and that new arrivals are not being put into isolation for medical observations," which "raises grave concerns that the coronavirus could spread in the center."
The special rapporteur has joined with five other U.N. experts in pressuring the U.S. government and the GEO Group to boost efforts to prevent the spread of the virus at the center, including by ensuring that all detainees have access to adequate healthcare and water and sanitation facilities.
Among the group was Nils Melzer, U.N. special rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, who highlighted Gonzalez Morales' comments on Twitter Monday:
\u201c\u00abIt is very difficult to keep the necessary physical distance in overcrowded detention facilities. Significantly reducing the number of detained #migrants by releasing them into alternative settings can easily solve this.\u00bb #COVID19 #HumanRights\u201d— Nils Melzer (@Nils Melzer) 1587990998
The new pressure from Gonzalez Morales and his colleagues add to the mounting criticism of the Trump administration's immigration policies as well as the failures of federal, state, and local governments to protect people--especially those at high risk of dying from a COVID-19 infection--in all types of detention facilities, including jails and prisons.
An early April report from Amnesty International declared that "detaining anyone solely for migration-related reasons during a global pandemic is cruel, reckless, and deadly."
The Trump administration has also come under fire for exploiting the pandemic to push through controversial immigration policies that the president and top officials have sought from the beginning.
\u201cThe president and Stephen Miller are exploiting a global pandemic to ban LEGAL immigration. \n\nThis xenophobic policy is their attempt to change the fabric of America and advance their anti-immigrant agenda.\n\nNot on our watch.\u201d— Rep. Ilhan Omar (@Rep. Ilhan Omar) 1588009736
As Voxreported Monday:
Amid the pandemic, the Trump administration has closed the U.S.-Mexico border, implemented an expulsion order to swiftly turn away migrants at the border, and postponed all immigration court hearings for migrants who are waiting in Mexico for a decision on their asylum applications in the U.S. Those measures, coupled with the restrictions on asylum-seekers that were already in place, have brought the asylum system to a virtual standstill.
"We're worried about the rapid, systematic expulsions of persons including asylum-seekers from the U.S.," Sibylla Brodzinsky, a spokesperson for the U.N. high commissioner for refugees (UNCHR), told Vox. "Obviously, a pandemic of this nature warrants extraordinary measures at borders, but the expulsion of asylum-seekers, which basically results in refoulement, shouldn't be among those measures."
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
A United Nations human rights expert on Monday urged the U.S. government to stop detaining migrants who are being "held for processing" of their immigration claims in "overcrowded and unsanitary administrative centers," citing concerns about the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.
"It is very difficult to keep the necessary physical distance in overcrowded detention facilities," Felipe Gonzalez Morales, the U.N. special rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, said in statement. "Significantly reducing the number of detained migrants by releasing them into alternative settings can easily solve this."
"None of those migrants are detained for criminal offenses, but are simply awaiting decisions on their immigration claims," he added. "The authorities should assess the capacity of readily available alternatives measures in the country and elaborate a set of criteria to identify those in administrative detention that could be immediately released to alternative placements."
Alternatives to detention facilities--poor conditions of which were often decried by detainees and immigration rights advocates long before the coronavirus outbreak--include providing community-based accommodations and care to migrants.
Alluding to the U.S. government's long track record--particularly under President Donald Trump--of ignoring the human rights of migrants, Gonzalez Morales said that "alternatives to widespread immigration detention in the U.S. would also ensure that migrants are not arbitrarily detained."
The Monday statement from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights noted that U.N. human rights experts have "received repeated reports of unsanitary conditions and lack of proper healthcare" at the Tacoma Northwest Processing Center in Washington state.
One local newspaper editorial warned earlier this month that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility--run by the private, for-profit company the GEO Group--could be "a ticking time bomb, a potential for a 'coronavirus catastrophe.'"
Gonzalez Morales said that rights experts were told "there is a lack of protective measures for detainees, that it is impossible to keep the recommended physical distance, and that new arrivals are not being put into isolation for medical observations," which "raises grave concerns that the coronavirus could spread in the center."
The special rapporteur has joined with five other U.N. experts in pressuring the U.S. government and the GEO Group to boost efforts to prevent the spread of the virus at the center, including by ensuring that all detainees have access to adequate healthcare and water and sanitation facilities.
Among the group was Nils Melzer, U.N. special rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, who highlighted Gonzalez Morales' comments on Twitter Monday:
\u201c\u00abIt is very difficult to keep the necessary physical distance in overcrowded detention facilities. Significantly reducing the number of detained #migrants by releasing them into alternative settings can easily solve this.\u00bb #COVID19 #HumanRights\u201d— Nils Melzer (@Nils Melzer) 1587990998
The new pressure from Gonzalez Morales and his colleagues add to the mounting criticism of the Trump administration's immigration policies as well as the failures of federal, state, and local governments to protect people--especially those at high risk of dying from a COVID-19 infection--in all types of detention facilities, including jails and prisons.
An early April report from Amnesty International declared that "detaining anyone solely for migration-related reasons during a global pandemic is cruel, reckless, and deadly."
The Trump administration has also come under fire for exploiting the pandemic to push through controversial immigration policies that the president and top officials have sought from the beginning.
\u201cThe president and Stephen Miller are exploiting a global pandemic to ban LEGAL immigration. \n\nThis xenophobic policy is their attempt to change the fabric of America and advance their anti-immigrant agenda.\n\nNot on our watch.\u201d— Rep. Ilhan Omar (@Rep. Ilhan Omar) 1588009736
As Voxreported Monday:
Amid the pandemic, the Trump administration has closed the U.S.-Mexico border, implemented an expulsion order to swiftly turn away migrants at the border, and postponed all immigration court hearings for migrants who are waiting in Mexico for a decision on their asylum applications in the U.S. Those measures, coupled with the restrictions on asylum-seekers that were already in place, have brought the asylum system to a virtual standstill.
"We're worried about the rapid, systematic expulsions of persons including asylum-seekers from the U.S.," Sibylla Brodzinsky, a spokesperson for the U.N. high commissioner for refugees (UNCHR), told Vox. "Obviously, a pandemic of this nature warrants extraordinary measures at borders, but the expulsion of asylum-seekers, which basically results in refoulement, shouldn't be among those measures."
A United Nations human rights expert on Monday urged the U.S. government to stop detaining migrants who are being "held for processing" of their immigration claims in "overcrowded and unsanitary administrative centers," citing concerns about the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.
"It is very difficult to keep the necessary physical distance in overcrowded detention facilities," Felipe Gonzalez Morales, the U.N. special rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, said in statement. "Significantly reducing the number of detained migrants by releasing them into alternative settings can easily solve this."
"None of those migrants are detained for criminal offenses, but are simply awaiting decisions on their immigration claims," he added. "The authorities should assess the capacity of readily available alternatives measures in the country and elaborate a set of criteria to identify those in administrative detention that could be immediately released to alternative placements."
Alternatives to detention facilities--poor conditions of which were often decried by detainees and immigration rights advocates long before the coronavirus outbreak--include providing community-based accommodations and care to migrants.
Alluding to the U.S. government's long track record--particularly under President Donald Trump--of ignoring the human rights of migrants, Gonzalez Morales said that "alternatives to widespread immigration detention in the U.S. would also ensure that migrants are not arbitrarily detained."
The Monday statement from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights noted that U.N. human rights experts have "received repeated reports of unsanitary conditions and lack of proper healthcare" at the Tacoma Northwest Processing Center in Washington state.
One local newspaper editorial warned earlier this month that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility--run by the private, for-profit company the GEO Group--could be "a ticking time bomb, a potential for a 'coronavirus catastrophe.'"
Gonzalez Morales said that rights experts were told "there is a lack of protective measures for detainees, that it is impossible to keep the recommended physical distance, and that new arrivals are not being put into isolation for medical observations," which "raises grave concerns that the coronavirus could spread in the center."
The special rapporteur has joined with five other U.N. experts in pressuring the U.S. government and the GEO Group to boost efforts to prevent the spread of the virus at the center, including by ensuring that all detainees have access to adequate healthcare and water and sanitation facilities.
Among the group was Nils Melzer, U.N. special rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, who highlighted Gonzalez Morales' comments on Twitter Monday:
\u201c\u00abIt is very difficult to keep the necessary physical distance in overcrowded detention facilities. Significantly reducing the number of detained #migrants by releasing them into alternative settings can easily solve this.\u00bb #COVID19 #HumanRights\u201d— Nils Melzer (@Nils Melzer) 1587990998
The new pressure from Gonzalez Morales and his colleagues add to the mounting criticism of the Trump administration's immigration policies as well as the failures of federal, state, and local governments to protect people--especially those at high risk of dying from a COVID-19 infection--in all types of detention facilities, including jails and prisons.
An early April report from Amnesty International declared that "detaining anyone solely for migration-related reasons during a global pandemic is cruel, reckless, and deadly."
The Trump administration has also come under fire for exploiting the pandemic to push through controversial immigration policies that the president and top officials have sought from the beginning.
\u201cThe president and Stephen Miller are exploiting a global pandemic to ban LEGAL immigration. \n\nThis xenophobic policy is their attempt to change the fabric of America and advance their anti-immigrant agenda.\n\nNot on our watch.\u201d— Rep. Ilhan Omar (@Rep. Ilhan Omar) 1588009736
As Voxreported Monday:
Amid the pandemic, the Trump administration has closed the U.S.-Mexico border, implemented an expulsion order to swiftly turn away migrants at the border, and postponed all immigration court hearings for migrants who are waiting in Mexico for a decision on their asylum applications in the U.S. Those measures, coupled with the restrictions on asylum-seekers that were already in place, have brought the asylum system to a virtual standstill.
"We're worried about the rapid, systematic expulsions of persons including asylum-seekers from the U.S.," Sibylla Brodzinsky, a spokesperson for the U.N. high commissioner for refugees (UNCHR), told Vox. "Obviously, a pandemic of this nature warrants extraordinary measures at borders, but the expulsion of asylum-seekers, which basically results in refoulement, shouldn't be among those measures."
"The only egg prices Donald Trump is lowering," quipped the DNC chair, "is our nest eggs."
For the third straight month, U.S retail egg prices have hit a record high, despite falling wholesale prices, no bird flu outbreaks, and President Donald Trump's campaign promises—and recent misleading claims.
On Thursday, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index (CPI) reported the average retail cost of a dozen eggs rose from $5.90 in February to $6.23 last month.
Egg prices continue to increase despite bird flu outbreak slowing finance.yahoo.com/news/egg-pri...
[image or embed]
— Yahoo Finance (@yahoofinance.com) April 10, 2025 at 6:22 AM
Earlier this week, Trump claimed that "eggs are down 79%" due to his administration's work, a possible reference to the wholesale price, which does not reflect retail cost due to the role that profit-hungry industrial producers and grocery cartels play in inflating prices.
Trump also said that egg prices "are going down more," a statement that contradicts not only recent trends but also his own administration's Food Price Outlook, which forecasts a 57.6% increase in egg prices for 2025, with a prediction interval of 31.1%-91.5%.
Recent record egg prices have largely been driven by an avian flu epidemic that has forced farmers to cull over 166 million birds, most of them egg-laying hens. However, no farms are currently reporting any bird flu outbreaks.
On Tuesday, Cal-Maine Foods, the nation's largest egg producer, announced quarterly profits of $509 million, more than triple its gains from a year ago. The Mississippi-based company, which produces around 20% of U.S. eggs, also enjoyed a more than 600% increase in gross profits between fiscal years 2021-23, according to the consumer advocacy group Food & Water Watch (FWW).
Yet even as its profits soared, Cal-Maine still took $42 million in federal compensation for losses due to bird flu.
The top five egg producers own roughly half of all U.S. laying hens. The biggest of those corporations is Cal-Maine, which just announced quarterly profits of $509 million — more than 3x what it made a year ago. Corporate concentration + bird flu = a price-hiking free for all.
— Robert Reich (@rbreich.bsky.social) April 9, 2025 at 10:31 AM
Last month, the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust division launched an investigation of alleged price-fixing by the nation's largest egg producers, including Cal-Maine, which isn't even the largest recipient of avian flu-related government assistance. Versova, which operates farms in Iowa and Ohio, has been allotted more than $107 million in federal bird flu relief, The Washington Post reported Wednesday. Hillandale Farms, a Pennsylvania-based company sold last month to Global Eggs, received $53 million in avian flu-related subsidies.
"For those companies to be bailed out and then turn around and set exploitative prices, it just adds insult to injury for consumers," Thomas Gremillion, director of food policy at the Consumer Federation of America, told the Post. "Absolutely, it's unfair."
FWW research director Amanda Starbuck took aim at the corporate food system, saying Thursday that "the industry is proving itself effective at extracting enormous profits out of American consumers."
"We are all paying for it—at the store, with food shortages, and with the growing threat of the next pandemic," she continued.
"Restoring sanity to the grocery aisle will require immediate action to transform our food system," Starbuck added. "To lower egg prices, the Trump administration must take on the food monopolies, hasten and prioritize its investigation into corporate price fixing, and stop the spread of factory farms."
The fresh CPI figures weren't all bad news, as the index saw its first decline in five years, falling 0.1% mainly on the strength of lower oil prices. The 12-month increase in consumer prices also slowed from 2.8% to 2.4%.
However, the mildly positive CPI news was overshadowed by the economic uncertainty caused by Trump's mercurial global trade war, including a ramped-up 145% tariff on imports from China, one of the top U.S. trading partners, and ongoing stock market chaos.
"The only egg prices Donald Trump is lowering," Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin quipped earlier this week, "is our nest eggs."
"In his short time in government, Elon Musk has done enormous harm to working Americans."
Dozens of House Democrats wrote to U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday "to make clear that you must remove Elon Musk from his government position by May 30th and to demand that you stop ignoring federal law and ethics rules to empower an unelected billionaire."
Musk, the richest person on Earth, is leading Trump's effort to gut the federal bureaucracy as the de facto chief of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency—but the billionaire is not the formal head of DOGE. Instead, Musk is a "special government employee," which lets him keep his financial disclosure form confidential.
The new letter to Trump, signed by 77 House Democrats, highlights that special government employees can only serve in their positions for 130 days in a year and demands "an immediate public statement from your administration making clear that Musk will resign and surrender all decision-making authority, as required by law."
"In his short time in government, Elon Musk has done enormous harm to working Americans," noted the coalition, led by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar (D-Texas). "Musk's reckless destruction of government agencies has led to everything from seniors having challenges accessing Social Security to veterans losing access to care."
The billionaire's business ties include SpaceX and its subsidiary Starlink, the electric vehicle maker Tesla, and the social media site X, which is aiming to add a digital wallet feature. His companies have received tens of billions of dollars in government funding, including through contracts.
"While millions of Americans are suffering, Musk is continuing to enrich himself and break ethics laws," the lawmakers wrote. "Musk continues to cut funds from programs that support working people, while his own companies continue to rake in more than $8 million per day in contracts and subsidies from the federal government. Recently, your administration changed the rules of a broadband program to give even more money to one of Musk's companies. Musk held a car show on the lawn of the White House, where he illegally promoted his company's vehicles."
The letter continues: "Musk paid Wisconsin voters to support his preferred candidate in the state supreme court race. Any typical government employee would be held accountable for these actions, but Musk, who donated $277 million to your presidential campaign, has been allowed to keep his position of power in your White House."
"Once Elon Musk is removed from his post, he may not legally return to the federal government this year without divesting from his companies, including Tesla and SpaceX," the letter concludes. "For the good of the country, Elon Musk should be removed from his position immediately. Under the law, Mr. Musk cannot remain in his position beyond May 30th."
Politico reported last week that "Trump has told his inner circle, including members of his Cabinet, that Elon Musk will be stepping back in the coming weeks from his current role as governing partner."
The Hill pointed out Thursday that "the Tesla CEO has signaled he plans to wrap up his work in the allotted 130-day period. He told Fox News' Bret Baier last month that he expects to have accomplished most of his DOGE work in that time frame."
Still, the letter's signatories want to ensure that Musk actually leaves the government. Casar told Axios—which scooped the letter—that "we're making it very clear that the public pressure is only going to ramp up on Republicans between here and May 30."
Democrats "have legal tools at our disposal, political tools at our disposal," he said, as well as the "full force of public pressure."
"We have been told they are looking for anti-Trump or anti-Musk language," an anonymous source said of potential surveillance at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Staff with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency fear that billionaire and presidential adviser Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency is spying on them using artificial intelligence, according to reporting from Reuters, The Guardian, and Crooked Media's newsletter What a Day.
According to Reuters reporting published Tuesday, Trump administration officials told some managers at the EPA that DOGE is rolling out AI to monitor for communications that may be perceived as hostile to U.S. President Donald Trump or Musk, citing two unnamed sources with knowledge of the situation.
According to those two sources, who relayed comments made by Trump-appointed officials in posts at the EPA, DOGE was using AI to monitor communication apps such as Microsoft Teams. "Be careful what you say, what you type, and what you do," an EPA manager said, according to one of the sources.
"We have been told they are looking for anti-Trump or anti-Musk language," a third source told Reuters.
The outlet, however, could not independently confirm whether AI was being implemented.
After the story was published, the EPA told Reuters in a statement that it was "looking at AI to better optimize agency functions and administrative efficiencies." However, the agency said it was not using AI "as it makes personnel decisions in concert with DOGE." The EPA also did not directly address whether it was using AI to snoop on employees.
In response to Reuters' reporting, the government accountability group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington wrote on X, "Let's be clear: the career civil servants who work in the government serve the American people, not Donald Trump."
According to Thursday reporting from The Guardian and Reuters, EPA managers told employees during a Wednesday morning meeting that DOGE is "using AI to scan through agency communications to find any anti-Musk, anti-Doge, or anti-Trump statements," according to an employee who was quoted anonymously.
Since returning to power, Trump has launched an all-out assault on environmental protection, including through cuts to programs and personnel at the EPA. According to The New York Times, the EPA has already undergone a 3% staff reduction so far, but the agency also plans to eliminate its scientific research arm, which would mean dismissing as many as 1,155 scientists, according to reporting from last month. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has also said he would like to cut 65% of the agency's budget.
The Guardian and What a Day also reviewed an email from a manager at the Association of Clean Water Administrators, a group of state and interstate bodies that works with the EPA on water quality and management, which warned workers that meetings with EPA employees might be monitored by AI.
"We recently learned that all EPA phones (landline/mobile), all Teams/Zoom virtual meetings, and calendar entries are being transcribed/monitored," the email states. The recorded information is then fed into an "AI tool" which analyzes and scrutinizes what has been recorded. "I do not know if DOGE is doing the analysis or … the agency itself," according to the author of the email, per The Guardian and What a Day.
The EPA denied that it's recording meetings, but it did not address the question of an AI tool, according to the outlets.
According to The Guardian and What a Day, employees at other agencies also fear they are being surveilled. For example, a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs official warned employees that virtual meetings are being recorded in secret, according to an email reviewed by the two outlets. In February, managers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration warned some workers to be careful about what they say on calls, per an employee there.
"It's like being in a horror film where you know something out there [wants] to kill you but you never know when or how or who it is," one anonymously quoted employee from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development told The Guardian and What a Day, evoking the climate of fear that is rife among government workers.