SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In a pair of letters Wednesday, more than 100 economists urged Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to increase relief for workers affected by the coronavirus pandemic by making "substantial improvements" to the federal short-time compensation program and passing Rep. Pramila Jayapal's Paycheck Guarantee Act.
"Congress has the power to protect ordinary workers during this public health and economic crisis."
--Thea Lee, EPI
Both letters point out that over 26 million people have filed for unemployment benefits since mid-March--a figure that undercounts the real number of recent job losses--and that while Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act from March provided some much needed help, "it does not meet the scale of the Covid-19 crisis."
The legislation proposed by Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), earlier this month would allow businesses nationwide to continue paying 100% of their employees' salaries of up to $100,000 annually, following the lead of various European countries. The bill was welcomed by labor unions and small business advocates.
Along with the CARES Act, the package passed by Congress on April 23 that provided more funding for the Paycheck Protection Program "fails to adequately address the fallout from the pandemic," says the letter about Jayapal's proposal. "The Paycheck Guarantee Act does much more to prevent mass layoffs, keep businesses intact, and facilitate a faster recovery."
\u201cAll these problems w/#PPP would be addressed in #PaycheckGuaranteeAct which is: \n\u2705Scaleable, ongoing: amount based on % of revenue loss & until econ indicators reached\n\u2705Grant not loan \n\u270525% rent, utilities, other exp\n\u2705Direct from Treasury/IRS. NO banks https://t.co/I5LgTLa6Py\u201d— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@Rep. Pramila Jayapal) 1588116187
"Congress has the power to protect ordinary workers during this public health and economic crisis," Economic Policy Institute (EPI) president Thea Lee said in a statement. "The Paycheck Guarantee Act will help businesses keep workers on payroll until the crisis is over--preserving economic security, benefits, and employment relationships."
Lee signed on to both letters, which were published on the EPI website and organized by the Congressional Progressive Caucus Center. Among the other signatories were Robert Pollin of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst; Jeffery Sachs of Columbia University; former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich of the University of California, Berkeley; and Eileen Appelbaum, Dean Baker, and Mark Weisbrot of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
Baker, in a statement, explained the benefits of a stronger federal short-time compensation--or work-sharing--program, which uses unemployment insurance to cover the costs of allowing employers to cut hours for all workers instead of laying them off entirely.
"Work-sharing has a well-established track record of keeping workers on the payroll through recession in Germany and other countries. It has enjoyed support across the political spectrum and from both business and labor," said Baker. "It is time that the United States modernize and ramp up its work-sharing system so that it is the standard method through which employers deal with downturns in demand."
\u201cMillions of working people have lost their jobs or businesses because of this pandemic.\n\nWe can do more to help them.\n\nHere's how. \u2b07\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0fhttps://t.co/vRwSqPwBo6\u201d— Rep. Mark Pocan (@Rep. Mark Pocan) 1585939649
Highlighting a proposal from Jayapal's CPC co-chair, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), the second letter calls for improving the federal work-sharing program by:
"A stronger federal work-sharing program could slow the rise in unemployment," says the letter. "Strengthening work-sharing along with other payroll subsidies could bring about a quicker and broader economic recovery. It is important that Congress act decisively and enact these measures without delay."
The letters came just a day after House leaders reversed plans to return to Washington, D.C. next week and ahead of an ad-hoc remote hearing on economic solutions to the pandemic hosted by the CPC, which will feature testimony from Eric Beinhocker of the Institute for New Economic Thinking at the University of Oxford, who signed both letters to Pelosi.
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
In a pair of letters Wednesday, more than 100 economists urged Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to increase relief for workers affected by the coronavirus pandemic by making "substantial improvements" to the federal short-time compensation program and passing Rep. Pramila Jayapal's Paycheck Guarantee Act.
"Congress has the power to protect ordinary workers during this public health and economic crisis."
--Thea Lee, EPI
Both letters point out that over 26 million people have filed for unemployment benefits since mid-March--a figure that undercounts the real number of recent job losses--and that while Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act from March provided some much needed help, "it does not meet the scale of the Covid-19 crisis."
The legislation proposed by Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), earlier this month would allow businesses nationwide to continue paying 100% of their employees' salaries of up to $100,000 annually, following the lead of various European countries. The bill was welcomed by labor unions and small business advocates.
Along with the CARES Act, the package passed by Congress on April 23 that provided more funding for the Paycheck Protection Program "fails to adequately address the fallout from the pandemic," says the letter about Jayapal's proposal. "The Paycheck Guarantee Act does much more to prevent mass layoffs, keep businesses intact, and facilitate a faster recovery."
\u201cAll these problems w/#PPP would be addressed in #PaycheckGuaranteeAct which is: \n\u2705Scaleable, ongoing: amount based on % of revenue loss & until econ indicators reached\n\u2705Grant not loan \n\u270525% rent, utilities, other exp\n\u2705Direct from Treasury/IRS. NO banks https://t.co/I5LgTLa6Py\u201d— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@Rep. Pramila Jayapal) 1588116187
"Congress has the power to protect ordinary workers during this public health and economic crisis," Economic Policy Institute (EPI) president Thea Lee said in a statement. "The Paycheck Guarantee Act will help businesses keep workers on payroll until the crisis is over--preserving economic security, benefits, and employment relationships."
Lee signed on to both letters, which were published on the EPI website and organized by the Congressional Progressive Caucus Center. Among the other signatories were Robert Pollin of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst; Jeffery Sachs of Columbia University; former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich of the University of California, Berkeley; and Eileen Appelbaum, Dean Baker, and Mark Weisbrot of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
Baker, in a statement, explained the benefits of a stronger federal short-time compensation--or work-sharing--program, which uses unemployment insurance to cover the costs of allowing employers to cut hours for all workers instead of laying them off entirely.
"Work-sharing has a well-established track record of keeping workers on the payroll through recession in Germany and other countries. It has enjoyed support across the political spectrum and from both business and labor," said Baker. "It is time that the United States modernize and ramp up its work-sharing system so that it is the standard method through which employers deal with downturns in demand."
\u201cMillions of working people have lost their jobs or businesses because of this pandemic.\n\nWe can do more to help them.\n\nHere's how. \u2b07\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0fhttps://t.co/vRwSqPwBo6\u201d— Rep. Mark Pocan (@Rep. Mark Pocan) 1585939649
Highlighting a proposal from Jayapal's CPC co-chair, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), the second letter calls for improving the federal work-sharing program by:
"A stronger federal work-sharing program could slow the rise in unemployment," says the letter. "Strengthening work-sharing along with other payroll subsidies could bring about a quicker and broader economic recovery. It is important that Congress act decisively and enact these measures without delay."
The letters came just a day after House leaders reversed plans to return to Washington, D.C. next week and ahead of an ad-hoc remote hearing on economic solutions to the pandemic hosted by the CPC, which will feature testimony from Eric Beinhocker of the Institute for New Economic Thinking at the University of Oxford, who signed both letters to Pelosi.
In a pair of letters Wednesday, more than 100 economists urged Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to increase relief for workers affected by the coronavirus pandemic by making "substantial improvements" to the federal short-time compensation program and passing Rep. Pramila Jayapal's Paycheck Guarantee Act.
"Congress has the power to protect ordinary workers during this public health and economic crisis."
--Thea Lee, EPI
Both letters point out that over 26 million people have filed for unemployment benefits since mid-March--a figure that undercounts the real number of recent job losses--and that while Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act from March provided some much needed help, "it does not meet the scale of the Covid-19 crisis."
The legislation proposed by Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), earlier this month would allow businesses nationwide to continue paying 100% of their employees' salaries of up to $100,000 annually, following the lead of various European countries. The bill was welcomed by labor unions and small business advocates.
Along with the CARES Act, the package passed by Congress on April 23 that provided more funding for the Paycheck Protection Program "fails to adequately address the fallout from the pandemic," says the letter about Jayapal's proposal. "The Paycheck Guarantee Act does much more to prevent mass layoffs, keep businesses intact, and facilitate a faster recovery."
\u201cAll these problems w/#PPP would be addressed in #PaycheckGuaranteeAct which is: \n\u2705Scaleable, ongoing: amount based on % of revenue loss & until econ indicators reached\n\u2705Grant not loan \n\u270525% rent, utilities, other exp\n\u2705Direct from Treasury/IRS. NO banks https://t.co/I5LgTLa6Py\u201d— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@Rep. Pramila Jayapal) 1588116187
"Congress has the power to protect ordinary workers during this public health and economic crisis," Economic Policy Institute (EPI) president Thea Lee said in a statement. "The Paycheck Guarantee Act will help businesses keep workers on payroll until the crisis is over--preserving economic security, benefits, and employment relationships."
Lee signed on to both letters, which were published on the EPI website and organized by the Congressional Progressive Caucus Center. Among the other signatories were Robert Pollin of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst; Jeffery Sachs of Columbia University; former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich of the University of California, Berkeley; and Eileen Appelbaum, Dean Baker, and Mark Weisbrot of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
Baker, in a statement, explained the benefits of a stronger federal short-time compensation--or work-sharing--program, which uses unemployment insurance to cover the costs of allowing employers to cut hours for all workers instead of laying them off entirely.
"Work-sharing has a well-established track record of keeping workers on the payroll through recession in Germany and other countries. It has enjoyed support across the political spectrum and from both business and labor," said Baker. "It is time that the United States modernize and ramp up its work-sharing system so that it is the standard method through which employers deal with downturns in demand."
\u201cMillions of working people have lost their jobs or businesses because of this pandemic.\n\nWe can do more to help them.\n\nHere's how. \u2b07\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0fhttps://t.co/vRwSqPwBo6\u201d— Rep. Mark Pocan (@Rep. Mark Pocan) 1585939649
Highlighting a proposal from Jayapal's CPC co-chair, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), the second letter calls for improving the federal work-sharing program by:
"A stronger federal work-sharing program could slow the rise in unemployment," says the letter. "Strengthening work-sharing along with other payroll subsidies could bring about a quicker and broader economic recovery. It is important that Congress act decisively and enact these measures without delay."
The letters came just a day after House leaders reversed plans to return to Washington, D.C. next week and ahead of an ad-hoc remote hearing on economic solutions to the pandemic hosted by the CPC, which will feature testimony from Eric Beinhocker of the Institute for New Economic Thinking at the University of Oxford, who signed both letters to Pelosi.