SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Delegates stand in front of a TV screen during the vote of a watered down resolution condemning structural racism and police brutality in the wake of the death of George Floyd at the United Nations Human Rights Council on June 19, 2020 in Geneva. (Photo: Fabrice Coffrini/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)
'Absurd': After US Bullying, Every Mention of United States Stripped From UN Resolution Spurred by George Floyd Killing
"The United Nations needs to do its job—not get bullied out of doing it," said the ACLU in response.
Jun 19, 2020
The United Nations Human Rights Council on Friday unanimously adopted a resolution condemning police abuses and ordering an inquiry into law enforcement actions that "resulted in the death of George Floyd and other Africans and people of African descent."
But rights groups immediately slammed the resolution as overly broad and "absurd" because it was weakened to remove all references to one particularly relevant country: the United States.
"The final resolution passed by the United Nations strips mention of the United States, where police kill people, particularly Black people, at alarmingly higher rates compared to other developed countries," Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU's Human Rights Program, said in a statement.
"The United States is yet again turning its back on victims of police violence and Black people."
--Jamil Dakwar, ACLU
An earlier draft of the resolution--which was introduced by African nations this week in the wake of Floyd's killing on May 25--explicitly called for a U.N. investigation into police violence against black people in the United States, but all references to the world's most powerful country were scrubbed from the text in closed-door negotiations.
Ahead of the vote on the final version of the resolution, Dakwar accused the U.S. of "bullying other countries to water down what would have been an historic resolution and exempting itself from international investigation."
"The United States is yet again turning its back on victims of police violence and Black people," said Dakwar.
Human Rights Watch, an advocacy organization based in the U.S., warned as the resolution was being finalized Thursday that stripping any mention of the United States from a resolution sparked by U.S. police violence "would transform it into an 'all lives matter' text, and risk making it so vague as to be meaningless."
AFP reported Friday that "Washington complained of being singled out in the draft text, and a number of its allies, including Australia and Israel, spoke out against the U.S. focus during the debate." The Trump administration withdrew the U.S. from the Human Rights Council in 2018.
One earlier version of the resolution called for an inquiry into "violations of international human rights law and abuses against Africans and people of African descent in the United States of America and other parts of the world recently affected by law enforcement agencies."
\u201cHere's what happens when the US & allies strong-arm @UN_HRC members, arguing "racism is everywhere," "we shouldn't single out one country," "US has strong democratic institutions so we shouldn't subject it to international scrutiny." Resolution as passed today, without a vote:\u201d— (((Amy Bergquist))) (@(((Amy Bergquist)))) 1592582179
The adopted resolution orders U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet to prepare a report on systemic racism and law enforcement abuses against people of African descent.
As Reutersreported, the resolution also mandates that Bachelet "examine government responses to peaceful protests, including accusations of the excessive use of force, and deliver findings in a year's time."
Dakwar of the ACLU said in a statement Friday that "the United Nations needs to do its job--not get bullied out of doing it--and hold the United States accountable."
"The country must face independent global scrutiny for its oppression of Black people," said Dakwar.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The United Nations Human Rights Council on Friday unanimously adopted a resolution condemning police abuses and ordering an inquiry into law enforcement actions that "resulted in the death of George Floyd and other Africans and people of African descent."
But rights groups immediately slammed the resolution as overly broad and "absurd" because it was weakened to remove all references to one particularly relevant country: the United States.
"The final resolution passed by the United Nations strips mention of the United States, where police kill people, particularly Black people, at alarmingly higher rates compared to other developed countries," Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU's Human Rights Program, said in a statement.
"The United States is yet again turning its back on victims of police violence and Black people."
--Jamil Dakwar, ACLU
An earlier draft of the resolution--which was introduced by African nations this week in the wake of Floyd's killing on May 25--explicitly called for a U.N. investigation into police violence against black people in the United States, but all references to the world's most powerful country were scrubbed from the text in closed-door negotiations.
Ahead of the vote on the final version of the resolution, Dakwar accused the U.S. of "bullying other countries to water down what would have been an historic resolution and exempting itself from international investigation."
"The United States is yet again turning its back on victims of police violence and Black people," said Dakwar.
Human Rights Watch, an advocacy organization based in the U.S., warned as the resolution was being finalized Thursday that stripping any mention of the United States from a resolution sparked by U.S. police violence "would transform it into an 'all lives matter' text, and risk making it so vague as to be meaningless."
AFP reported Friday that "Washington complained of being singled out in the draft text, and a number of its allies, including Australia and Israel, spoke out against the U.S. focus during the debate." The Trump administration withdrew the U.S. from the Human Rights Council in 2018.
One earlier version of the resolution called for an inquiry into "violations of international human rights law and abuses against Africans and people of African descent in the United States of America and other parts of the world recently affected by law enforcement agencies."
\u201cHere's what happens when the US & allies strong-arm @UN_HRC members, arguing "racism is everywhere," "we shouldn't single out one country," "US has strong democratic institutions so we shouldn't subject it to international scrutiny." Resolution as passed today, without a vote:\u201d— (((Amy Bergquist))) (@(((Amy Bergquist)))) 1592582179
The adopted resolution orders U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet to prepare a report on systemic racism and law enforcement abuses against people of African descent.
As Reutersreported, the resolution also mandates that Bachelet "examine government responses to peaceful protests, including accusations of the excessive use of force, and deliver findings in a year's time."
Dakwar of the ACLU said in a statement Friday that "the United Nations needs to do its job--not get bullied out of doing it--and hold the United States accountable."
"The country must face independent global scrutiny for its oppression of Black people," said Dakwar.
The United Nations Human Rights Council on Friday unanimously adopted a resolution condemning police abuses and ordering an inquiry into law enforcement actions that "resulted in the death of George Floyd and other Africans and people of African descent."
But rights groups immediately slammed the resolution as overly broad and "absurd" because it was weakened to remove all references to one particularly relevant country: the United States.
"The final resolution passed by the United Nations strips mention of the United States, where police kill people, particularly Black people, at alarmingly higher rates compared to other developed countries," Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU's Human Rights Program, said in a statement.
"The United States is yet again turning its back on victims of police violence and Black people."
--Jamil Dakwar, ACLU
An earlier draft of the resolution--which was introduced by African nations this week in the wake of Floyd's killing on May 25--explicitly called for a U.N. investigation into police violence against black people in the United States, but all references to the world's most powerful country were scrubbed from the text in closed-door negotiations.
Ahead of the vote on the final version of the resolution, Dakwar accused the U.S. of "bullying other countries to water down what would have been an historic resolution and exempting itself from international investigation."
"The United States is yet again turning its back on victims of police violence and Black people," said Dakwar.
Human Rights Watch, an advocacy organization based in the U.S., warned as the resolution was being finalized Thursday that stripping any mention of the United States from a resolution sparked by U.S. police violence "would transform it into an 'all lives matter' text, and risk making it so vague as to be meaningless."
AFP reported Friday that "Washington complained of being singled out in the draft text, and a number of its allies, including Australia and Israel, spoke out against the U.S. focus during the debate." The Trump administration withdrew the U.S. from the Human Rights Council in 2018.
One earlier version of the resolution called for an inquiry into "violations of international human rights law and abuses against Africans and people of African descent in the United States of America and other parts of the world recently affected by law enforcement agencies."
\u201cHere's what happens when the US & allies strong-arm @UN_HRC members, arguing "racism is everywhere," "we shouldn't single out one country," "US has strong democratic institutions so we shouldn't subject it to international scrutiny." Resolution as passed today, without a vote:\u201d— (((Amy Bergquist))) (@(((Amy Bergquist)))) 1592582179
The adopted resolution orders U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet to prepare a report on systemic racism and law enforcement abuses against people of African descent.
As Reutersreported, the resolution also mandates that Bachelet "examine government responses to peaceful protests, including accusations of the excessive use of force, and deliver findings in a year's time."
Dakwar of the ACLU said in a statement Friday that "the United Nations needs to do its job--not get bullied out of doing it--and hold the United States accountable."
"The country must face independent global scrutiny for its oppression of Black people," said Dakwar.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.