SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Civil rights groups on Friday filed a lawsuit against Alamance County and the city of Graham, North Carolina, after officials issued a new ordinance last week announcing the police department would not be issuing protest permits during the city's current state of emergency.
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the ACLU, and a local law firm filed the lawsuit and a temporary restraining order on behalf of Alamance County NAACP and eight individuals who were planning to protest at the Alamance County Courthouse in the center of Graham.
The courthouse is the site of a Confederate monument, and like similar statues it has drawn demonstrations in recent weeks amid the ongoing nationwide uprising against racial injustice and police brutality.
"It is appalling that Alamance County officials would trample on the First Amendment rights of their own constituents for the sake of a monument to white supremacy."
--Kristi Graunke, ACLU of North Carolina
"This ordinance is a sweeping bar to the rights of people to freely assemble and protest in Graham. People have a constitutional right to gather and voice their concerns in public areas without fear of arrest, harassment, or intimidation from law enforcement," said Kristi Graunke with the ACLU of North Carolina. "It is appalling that Alamance County officials would trample on the First Amendment rights of their own constituents for the sake of a monument to white supremacy."
The groups argued in the lawsuit that the new restriction violates protesters' constitutional rights.
"The Ordinance is an unconstitutional prior restraint on First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly, violates the First Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable and content-based time, place and manner restrictions of speech in traditional public forums and violates due process because it is void for vagueness," reads the suit.
The ordinance was issued on June 26, a day after Graham Mayor Jerry Peterman issued an executive order to shut down protests at the courthouse.
The Alamance County Sheriff's office then announced that the Graham Police Department would no longer be issuing permits for demonstrations of two or more people, a move with the Lawyers' Committee said "effectively bans any protest."
The sheriff's office posted a notice about the new ordinance on Facebook last week, garnering more than 1,000 comments within a day--including many that accused the sheriff of trampling residents' basic rights.
"Pretty sure the right to peaceful assembly is granted by the constitution.. not [Sheriff] Terry Johnson," one critic wrote.
"First Amendment rights have been taken away," tweeted a protester the day after the ordinance was issued. "Is this America?"
Days later, several people gathered in Graham despite the order, holding signs reading "Black Lives Matter" as passing drivers honked in support.
\u201cIf honking cars are any indication , BLM demonstrators have a lot of support in Alamance County. #Graham #NC #ConfederateMonuments\u201d— Tammy Grubb (@Tammy Grubb) 1593644691
"The Confederate monument in Graham's town square represents the racist past and present these protestors want to speak out against," said Elizabeth Haddix, managing attorney at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, in a statement Friday. "While the community is trying to reckon with its own racist history in the midst of police violence against Black citizens across the country and in Alamance County, the sheriff and police are restricting the people's basic rights to protest white supremacy."
Tenae Turner, a plaintiff who had planned to protest at the courthouse, said she had been denied the right to advocate "for equally representative government."
"I sought to gather with others to express support for Black lives," said Turner. "It sends a clear message that racist monuments are valued more highly than Black lives and our constitutional rights."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Civil rights groups on Friday filed a lawsuit against Alamance County and the city of Graham, North Carolina, after officials issued a new ordinance last week announcing the police department would not be issuing protest permits during the city's current state of emergency.
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the ACLU, and a local law firm filed the lawsuit and a temporary restraining order on behalf of Alamance County NAACP and eight individuals who were planning to protest at the Alamance County Courthouse in the center of Graham.
The courthouse is the site of a Confederate monument, and like similar statues it has drawn demonstrations in recent weeks amid the ongoing nationwide uprising against racial injustice and police brutality.
"It is appalling that Alamance County officials would trample on the First Amendment rights of their own constituents for the sake of a monument to white supremacy."
--Kristi Graunke, ACLU of North Carolina
"This ordinance is a sweeping bar to the rights of people to freely assemble and protest in Graham. People have a constitutional right to gather and voice their concerns in public areas without fear of arrest, harassment, or intimidation from law enforcement," said Kristi Graunke with the ACLU of North Carolina. "It is appalling that Alamance County officials would trample on the First Amendment rights of their own constituents for the sake of a monument to white supremacy."
The groups argued in the lawsuit that the new restriction violates protesters' constitutional rights.
"The Ordinance is an unconstitutional prior restraint on First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly, violates the First Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable and content-based time, place and manner restrictions of speech in traditional public forums and violates due process because it is void for vagueness," reads the suit.
The ordinance was issued on June 26, a day after Graham Mayor Jerry Peterman issued an executive order to shut down protests at the courthouse.
The Alamance County Sheriff's office then announced that the Graham Police Department would no longer be issuing permits for demonstrations of two or more people, a move with the Lawyers' Committee said "effectively bans any protest."
The sheriff's office posted a notice about the new ordinance on Facebook last week, garnering more than 1,000 comments within a day--including many that accused the sheriff of trampling residents' basic rights.
"Pretty sure the right to peaceful assembly is granted by the constitution.. not [Sheriff] Terry Johnson," one critic wrote.
"First Amendment rights have been taken away," tweeted a protester the day after the ordinance was issued. "Is this America?"
Days later, several people gathered in Graham despite the order, holding signs reading "Black Lives Matter" as passing drivers honked in support.
\u201cIf honking cars are any indication , BLM demonstrators have a lot of support in Alamance County. #Graham #NC #ConfederateMonuments\u201d— Tammy Grubb (@Tammy Grubb) 1593644691
"The Confederate monument in Graham's town square represents the racist past and present these protestors want to speak out against," said Elizabeth Haddix, managing attorney at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, in a statement Friday. "While the community is trying to reckon with its own racist history in the midst of police violence against Black citizens across the country and in Alamance County, the sheriff and police are restricting the people's basic rights to protest white supremacy."
Tenae Turner, a plaintiff who had planned to protest at the courthouse, said she had been denied the right to advocate "for equally representative government."
"I sought to gather with others to express support for Black lives," said Turner. "It sends a clear message that racist monuments are valued more highly than Black lives and our constitutional rights."
Civil rights groups on Friday filed a lawsuit against Alamance County and the city of Graham, North Carolina, after officials issued a new ordinance last week announcing the police department would not be issuing protest permits during the city's current state of emergency.
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the ACLU, and a local law firm filed the lawsuit and a temporary restraining order on behalf of Alamance County NAACP and eight individuals who were planning to protest at the Alamance County Courthouse in the center of Graham.
The courthouse is the site of a Confederate monument, and like similar statues it has drawn demonstrations in recent weeks amid the ongoing nationwide uprising against racial injustice and police brutality.
"It is appalling that Alamance County officials would trample on the First Amendment rights of their own constituents for the sake of a monument to white supremacy."
--Kristi Graunke, ACLU of North Carolina
"This ordinance is a sweeping bar to the rights of people to freely assemble and protest in Graham. People have a constitutional right to gather and voice their concerns in public areas without fear of arrest, harassment, or intimidation from law enforcement," said Kristi Graunke with the ACLU of North Carolina. "It is appalling that Alamance County officials would trample on the First Amendment rights of their own constituents for the sake of a monument to white supremacy."
The groups argued in the lawsuit that the new restriction violates protesters' constitutional rights.
"The Ordinance is an unconstitutional prior restraint on First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly, violates the First Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable and content-based time, place and manner restrictions of speech in traditional public forums and violates due process because it is void for vagueness," reads the suit.
The ordinance was issued on June 26, a day after Graham Mayor Jerry Peterman issued an executive order to shut down protests at the courthouse.
The Alamance County Sheriff's office then announced that the Graham Police Department would no longer be issuing permits for demonstrations of two or more people, a move with the Lawyers' Committee said "effectively bans any protest."
The sheriff's office posted a notice about the new ordinance on Facebook last week, garnering more than 1,000 comments within a day--including many that accused the sheriff of trampling residents' basic rights.
"Pretty sure the right to peaceful assembly is granted by the constitution.. not [Sheriff] Terry Johnson," one critic wrote.
"First Amendment rights have been taken away," tweeted a protester the day after the ordinance was issued. "Is this America?"
Days later, several people gathered in Graham despite the order, holding signs reading "Black Lives Matter" as passing drivers honked in support.
\u201cIf honking cars are any indication , BLM demonstrators have a lot of support in Alamance County. #Graham #NC #ConfederateMonuments\u201d— Tammy Grubb (@Tammy Grubb) 1593644691
"The Confederate monument in Graham's town square represents the racist past and present these protestors want to speak out against," said Elizabeth Haddix, managing attorney at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, in a statement Friday. "While the community is trying to reckon with its own racist history in the midst of police violence against Black citizens across the country and in Alamance County, the sheriff and police are restricting the people's basic rights to protest white supremacy."
Tenae Turner, a plaintiff who had planned to protest at the courthouse, said she had been denied the right to advocate "for equally representative government."
"I sought to gather with others to express support for Black lives," said Turner. "It sends a clear message that racist monuments are valued more highly than Black lives and our constitutional rights."